68
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

An appraisal of ultrasound fetal biometry in the first trimester

, &
Pages 11-15 | Published online: 26 Aug 2010

References

  • Gardosi J. Dating of pregnancy: time to forget the last menstrual period. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9(6):367–368.
  • McLennan AC, Schluter PJ. Construction of modern Australian first trimester ultrasound dating and growth charts. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52(5):471–479.
  • Bottomley C, Bourne T. Dating and growth in the first trimester. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;23(4):439–452.
  • Degani S. Fetal biometry: clinical, pathological, and technical considerations. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001;56(3):159–167.
  • Robinson HP. Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy. BMJ. 1973;4(5883):28–31.
  • Robinson HP, Fleming JE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;82(9):702–710.
  • Hadlock FP, Shah YP, Kanon DJ, Lindsey JV Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5–18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology. 1992;182(2):501–505.
  • Drumm JE, Clinch J, MacKenzie G. The ultrasonic measurement of fetal crown-rump length as a method of assessing gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;83(6):417–421.
  • Lohr PA, Reeves MF, Creinin MD. A comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for determination of gestational age and clinical outcomes in women undergoing early medical abortion. Contraception. 2010;81(3):240–244.
  • Grisolia G, Milano K, Pilu G, et al. Biometry of early pregnancy with transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1993;3(6):403–411.
  • Bottomley C, Daemen A, Mukri F, et al. Assessing first trimester growth: the influence of ethnic background and maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):284–290.
  • Sahota DS, Leung TY, Leung TN, Chan OK, Lau TK. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(2):157–160.
  • Britten S, Soenksen DM, Bustillo M, Coulam CB. Very early (24–56 days from last menstrual period) embryonic heart rate in normal pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(12):2424–2426.
  • Hellman LM, Kobayashi M, Fillisti L, Lavenhar M, Cromb E. Growth and development of the human fetus prior to the twentieth week of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;103(6):789–800.
  • Goldstein SR. Embryonic ultrasonographic measurements: crown-rump length revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(3):497–501.
  • Sladkevicius P, Saltvedt S, Almstrom H, Kublickas M, Grunewald C, Valentin L. Ultrasound dating at 12–14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(5):504–511.
  • Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(2):189–194.
  • von Kaisenberg CS, Fritzer E, Kuhling H, Jonat W. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20(6):564–574.
  • Verburg BO, Mulder PG, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW, Witteman JC, Steegers EA. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(4):323–331.
  • Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Dorion A, Ville Y. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(1):63–66.
  • de Biasio P, Prefumo F, Lantieri PB, Venturini PL. Reference values for fetal limb biometry at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(6):588–591.
  • Bukowski R, Smith GC, Malone FD, et al. Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2007;334(7598):836.
  • Bahado-Singh RO, Lynch L, Deren O, et al. First-trimester growth restriction and fetal aneuploidy: the effect of type of aneuploidy and gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(5):976–980.
  • Schemmer G, Wapner RJ, Johnson A, Schemmer M, Norton HJ, Anderson WE. First-trimester growth patterns of aneuploid fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17(2):155–159.
  • Mantoni M, Pedersen JF. Fetal growth delay in threatened abortion: an ultrasound study. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;89(7):525–527.
  • Falco P, Milano V, Pilu G, et al. Sonography of pregnancies with firsttrimester bleeding and a viable embryo: a study of prognostic indicators by logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7(3):165–169.
  • Reljic M. The significance of crown-rump length measurement for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome of threatened abortion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17(6):510–512.
  • Kalish RB, Chasen ST, Gupta M, Sharma G, Perni SC, Chervenak FA. First trimester prediction of growth discordance in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(3):706–709.
  • Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or second- trimester screening, or both, for Down’s syndrome. NEngl J Med. 2005;353(19):2001–2011.
  • Smith GC, Smith MF, McNay MB, Fleming JE. First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(25):1817–1822.
  • Smith GC, Stenhouse EJ, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Cameron AD, Connor JM. Early-pregnancy origins of low birth weight. Nature. 2002;417(6892):916.
  • McGalliard C, Gaudoin M. Routine ultrasound for pregnancy termination requests increases women’s choice and reduces inappropriate treatments. BJOG. 2004;111(1):79–82.
  • Wald NJ, Cuckle HS, Densem JW, Kennard A, Smith D. Maternal serum screening for Down’s syndrome: the effect of routine ultrasound scan determination of gestational age and adjustment for maternal weight. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1992;99(2):144–149.