Biofabrication and biomaterials for urinary tract reconstruction

References

• WoodhouseCRReconstructive urologyCurr Opin Urol200919655520072104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SievertKDSeiboldJSchultheissDRekonstruktive Urologie im Wandel [Reconstructive urology in transition. From its origin into the all too near future]Urologe A200645Suppl 45258 German16933123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DamaserMSSievertKDTissue engineering and regenerative medicine: bench to bedside in urology. PrefaceAdv Drug Deliv Rev201582–83vvii
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlbersenMCartwrightRChoykePLooking forward, looking back – 10 years in urologyNat Rev Urol2014111164965525348169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JordanGHPrinciples of tissue transfer techniques in urethral reconstructionUrol Clin North Am200229226727512371218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrykDJYamaguchiYZhaoLCTissue transfer techniques in reconstructive urologyKorean J Urol201556747848626175866
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TraxelEJMinevichEANohPHA review: the application of minimally invasive surgery to pediatric urology: lower urinary tract reconstructive proceduresUrology201076111512020303150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MundyARThe future of urologyBJU Int200392433733912930411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangCMurphySVAtalaARegenerative medicine in urologySemin Pediatr Surg201423310611124994523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’BrienFJBiomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineeringMater Today20111438895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UleryBDNairLSLaurencinCTBiomedical applications of biodegradable polymersJ Polym Sci B Polym Phys2011491283286421769165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FengCXuYMFuQZhuWDCuiLChenJEvaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for urethral reconstructionJ Biomed Mater Res A201094131732520166222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeikoDTKnudsenBEWattersonJDCadieuxPAReidGDenstedtJDUrinary tract biomaterialsJ Urol20041716 Pt 12438244415126872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AtalaABauerSBSokerSYooJJRetikABTissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplastyLancet200636795181241124616631879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdamowiczJJuszczakKBajekAMorphological and uro-dynamic evaluation of urinary bladder wall regeneration: muscles guarantee contraction but not proper function – a rat model research studyTransplant Proc20124451429143422664029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuSHSacksMSChungSYBiaxial mechanical properties of muscle-derived cell seeded small intestinal submucosa for bladder wall reconstitutionBiomaterials200526444344915275818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro-FilhoLASievertKDAcellular matrix in urethral reconstructionAdv Drug Deliv Rev201582–833846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VaeglerMMaurerSToomeyPAmendBSievertKDTissue engineering in urothelium regenerationAdv Drug Deliv Rev201582–836468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinHKMadihallySVPalmerBFrimbergerDFungKMKroppBPBiomatrices for bladder reconstructionAdv Drug Deliv Rev201582–834763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YanYWangXXiongZDirect construction of a three-dimensional structure with cells and hydrogelJ Bioact Compat Polym2005203259269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JiaJRichardsDJPollardSEngineering alginate as bioink for bioprintingActa Biomater201410104323433124998183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChungBIHamawyKJZinmanLNLibertinoJAThe use of bowel for ureteral replacement for complex ureteral reconstruction: long-term resultsJ Urol2006175117918316406903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DahmsSEPiechotaHJDahiyaRLueTFTanaghoEAComposition and biomechanical properties of the bladder acellular matrix graft: comparative analysis in rat, pig and humanBr J Urol19988234114199772881
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZheZJunDYangZBladder acellular matrix grafts seeded with adipose-derived stem cells and incubated intraperitoneally promote the regeneration of bladder smooth muscle and nerve in a rat model of bladder augmentationStem Cells Dev20162540541426863067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiaoWYangSSongCLiXLiYXiongYConstruction of ureteral grafts by seeding bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and smooth muscle cells into bladder acellular matrixTransplant Proc201345273073423498814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MengLLiaoWYangSXiongYSongCLiuLTissue-engineered tubular substitutions for urinary diversion in a rabbit modelExp Biol Med (Maywood)2016241214715626286106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiCLLiaoWBYangSXUrethral reconstruction using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell- and smooth muscle cell-seeded bladder acellular matrixTransplant Proc20134593402340724182824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChengEYKroppBPUrologic tissue engineering with small-intestinal submucosa: potential clinical applicationsWorld J Urol2000181263010766040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinHKGodiwallaSYPalmerBUnderstanding roles of porcine small intestinal submucosa in urinary bladder regeneration: identification of variable regenerative characteristics of small intestinal submucosaTissue Eng Part B Rev2014201738323777420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangFLiuTYangLUrethral reconstruction with tissue-engineered human amniotic scaffold in rabbit urethral injury modelsMed Sci Monit2014202430243825424000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FengCXuYMFuQZhuWDCuiLReconstruction of three-dimensional neourethra using lingual keratinocytes and corporal smooth muscle cells seeded acellular corporal spongiosumTissue Eng Part A20111723–243011301921736450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SongLMurphySVYangBXuYZhangYAtalaABladder acellular matrix and its application in bladder augmentationTissue Eng Part B Rev201420216317223895225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FengCXuYMFuQZhuWDCuiLChenJEvaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for urethral reconstructionJ Biomed Mater Res A201094131732520166222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SackBSMauneyJREstradaCRJrSilk fibroin scaffolds for urologic tissue engineeringCurr Urol Rep20161721626801192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XieMXuYSongLWangJLvXZhangYTissue-engineered buccal mucosa using silk fibroin matrices for urethral reconstruction in a canine modelJ Surg Res201418811724411303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangYRudymDDWalshAIn vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffoldsBiomaterials20082924–253415342818502501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimUJParkJKimHJWadaMKaplanDLThree-dimensional aqueous-derived biomaterial scaffolds from silk fibroinBiomaterials200526152775278515585282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TuDDChungYGGilESBladder tissue regeneration using acellular bi-layer silk scaffolds in a large animal model of augmentation cystoplastyBiomaterials201334348681868923953839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChungYGTuDFranckDAcellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support tissue regeneration in a rabbit model of onlay urethroplastyPLoS One201493e9159224632740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuangJWXuYMLiZBTissue performance of bladder following stretched electrospun silk fibroin matrix and bladder acellular matrix implantation in a rabbit modelJ Biomed Mater Res A2016104191626148477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangYLGuXMKongYFengQLYangYMElectrospun and woven silk fibroin/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nerve guidance conduits for repairing peripheral nerve injuryNeural Regen Res201510101635164226692862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AitkenKJBagliDJThe bladder extracellular matrix. Part I: architecture, development and diseaseNat Rev Urol200961159661119890339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AitkenKJBagliDJThe bladder extracellular matrix. Part II: regenerative applicationsNat Rev Urol200961161262119890340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HorstMMadduriSMilleretVSulserTGobetREberliDA bilayered hybrid microfibrous PLGA–acellular matrix scaffold for hollow organ tissue engineeringBiomaterials20133451537154523177021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LawrenceBJMaaseELLinHKMadihallySVMultilayer composite scaffolds with mechanical properties similar to small intestinal submucosaJ Biomed Mater Res A200988363464318314898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ImaniRPazokiMZupancicDBiocompatibility of different nanostructured TiO2 scaffolds and their potential for urologic applicationsProtoplasma20152531439144726497540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChunYWLimHWebsterTJHaberstrohKMNanostructured bladder tissue replacementsWiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol20113213414520730887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangYLeongKWNanoscale surfacing for regenerative medicineWiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol20102547849520803682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhangDLuJYaoCHaberstrohKMWebsterTJThe role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titaniumBiomaterials200829897098318096222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GaoJNiklasonLLangerRSurface hydrolysis of poly(glycolic acid) meshes increases the seeding density of vascular smooth muscle cellsJ Biomed Mater Res19984234174249788505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangXZhaoKChenGQEffect of surface treatment on the biocompatibility of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoatesBiomaterials20022351391139711804295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MazzoliAFerrettiCGiganteASalvoliniEMattioli-BelmonteMSelective laser sintering manufacturing of polycaprolactone bone scaffolds for applications in bone tissue engineeringRapid Prototyp J2015214386392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrehmerBRohrmannDBeckerCRauGJakseGDifferent types of scaffolds for reconstruction of the urinary tract by tissue engineeringUrol Int2007781232917192728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurphyCMDuffyGPSchindelerAO’BrienFJEffect of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold pore size on matrix mineralization and cellular behavior in different cell typesJ Biomed Mater Res A201610429130426386362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoratiRColonnaCTomasiCGentaIBruniGContiBDesign of 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering testing a tough polylactide-based graft copolymerMater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl20143413013924268242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LohQLChoongCThree-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore sizeTissue Eng Part B Rev201319648550223672709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChunYWKhangDHaberstrohKMWebsterTJThe role of polymer nanosurface roughness and submicron pores in improving bladder urothelial cell density and inhibiting calcium oxalate stone formationNanotechnology200920808510419417440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rnjak-KovacinaJWeissASIncreasing the pore size of electrospun scaffoldsTissue Eng Part B Rev201117536537221815802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PuppiDZhangXYangLChielliniFSunXChielliniENano/microfibrous polymeric constructs loaded with bioactive agents and designed for tissue engineering applications: a reviewJ Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater201410271562157924678016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiannitelliSMAccotoDTrombettaMRainerACurrent trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineeringActa Biomater201410258059424184176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MelchelsFPWDomingosMANKleinTJMaldaJBartoloPJHutmacherDWAdditive manufacturing of tissues and organsProg Polym Sci201237810791104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiannitelliSMMozeticPTrombettaMRainerACombined additive manufacturing approaches in tissue engineeringActa Biomater20152411126134665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DorjBParkJ-HKimH-WRobocasting chitosan/nanobioactive glass dual-pore structured scaffolds for bone engineeringMater Lett201273119122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhuNLiMGCooperDChenXBDevelopment of novel hybrid poly(L-lactide)/chitosan scaffolds using the rapid freeze prototyping techniqueBiofabrication20113303410521725153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimMSKimGElectrohydrodynamic jet process for pore-structure-controlled 3D fibrous architecture as a tissue regenerative material: fabrication and cellular activitiesLangmuir201430288551855724971728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimMKimGPhysical and biological activities of newly designed, macro-pore-structure-controlled 3D fibrous poly(ε-caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffoldsRSC Adv20155342695426964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarrugiaBLBrownTDUptonZHutmacherDWDaltonPDDargavilleTRDermal fibroblast infiltration of poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds fabricated by melt electrospinning in a direct writing modeBiofabrication20135202500123443534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownTDSlotoschAThibaudeauLDesign and fabrication of tubular scaffolds via direct writing in a melt electrospinning modeBiointerphases20127111622589044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownTDDaltonPDHutmacherDWDirect writing by way of melt electrospinningAdv Mater201123475651565722095922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BillietTVandenhauteMSchelfhoutJVan VlierbergheSDubruelPA review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineeringBiomaterials201233266020604122681979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MauneyJRAdamRMDynamic reciprocity in cell-scaffold interactionsAdv Drug Deliv Rev201582–837785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KanematsuAYamamotoSNoguchiTOzekiMTabataYOgawaOBladder regeneration by bladder acellular matrix combined with sustained release of exogenous growth factorJ Urol20031701633163814501679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MondalekFGAshleyRARothCCEnhanced angiogenesis of modified porcine small intestinal submucosa with hyaluronic acid-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles: from fabrication to preclinical validationJ Biomed Mater Res2010A 94712719
   Google Scholar
• RiceJJMartinoMMDe LaporteLTortelliFBriquezPSHubbellJAEngineering the regenerative microenvironment with biomaterialsAdv Healthc Mater201321577123184739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharmaAKChengEYGrowth factor and small molecule influence on urological tissue regeneration utilizing cell seeded scaffoldsAdv Drug Deliv Rev201582–838692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenWShiCHouXZhangWLiLBladder acellular matrix conjugated with basic fibroblast growth factor for bladder regenerationTissue Eng Part A20142015–162234224224483233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RothCCMondalekFGKibarYBladder regeneration in a canine model using hyaluronic acid-poly(lactic-co-glycolic-acid) nanoparticle modified porcine small intestinal submucosaBJU Int2011108114815520942834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JiangXXiongQXuGVEGF-loaded nanoparticle-modified BAMAs enhance angiogenesis and inhibit graft shrinkage in tissue-engineered bladderAnn Biomed Eng201543102577258625711152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LorentzKMYangLFreyPHubbellJAEngineered insulin-like growth factor-1 for improved smooth muscle regenerationBiomateri-als2012332494503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BauerSMBauerRJLiuZJChenHGoldsteinLVelazquezOCVascular endothelial growth factor-C promotes vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and collagen constriction in three-dimensional collagen gelsJ Vasc Surg200541469970715874936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KikunoNKawamotoKHirataHNerve growth factor combined with vascular endothelial growth factor enhances regeneration of bladder acellular matrix graft in spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic rat bladderBJU Int2009103101424142818990142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussifMShiinaHUrakamiSEffect of vascular endothelial growth factor on regeneration of bladder acellular matrix graft: histologic and functional evaluationUrology200566120120715992890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XiongQLinHHuaXA nanomedicine approach to effectively inhibit contracture during bladder acellular matrix allograft-induced bladder regeneration by sustained delivery of vascular endothelial growth factorTissue Eng Part A2015211–2455224947133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangBZhouLPengBSunZDaiYZhengJIn vitro comparative evaluation of recombinant growth factors for tissue engineering of bladder in patients with neurogenic bladderJ Surg Res20141861637224095026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharmaAKBuryMIFullerNJGrowth factor release from a chemically modified elastomeric poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citrate) thin film promotes angiogenesis in vivoJ Biomed Mater Res A2012100356157022162300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StorrieHGulerMOAbu-AmaraSNSupramolecular crafting of cell adhesionBiomaterials200728314608461817662383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PierschbacherMDRuoslahtiECell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the moleculeNature1984309596330336325925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarringtonDAChengEYGulerMOBranched peptide-amphiphiles as self-assembling coatings for tissue engineering scaffoldsJ Biomed Mater Res A200678115716716619254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KearnsVRMcMurrayRJDalbyMJBiomaterial surface topography to control cellular response: technologies, cell behaviour and biomedical applicationsWilliamsRSurface Modification of BiomaterialsWoodhead Publishing2011169201
   Google Scholar
• UchidaNSivaramanSAmorosoNJNanometersized extracellular matrix coating on polymer-based scaffold for tissue engineering applicationsJ Biomed Mater Res A20161049410326194176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-GarciaJMLopezLParisRSurface modification of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) copolymer films for promoting interaction with bladder urothelial cellsJ Biomed Mater Res A2012100171721972181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-GarciaJMQuijada-GarridoILopezLThe surface modification of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) copolymers to improve the attachment of urothelial cellsMater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl201333136236925428082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChuPKChenJYWangLPHuangNPlasma-surface modification of biomaterialsMater Sci Eng R Rep2002365–6143206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoshidaSHagiwaraKHasebeTHottaASurface modification of polymers by plasma treatments for the enhancement of biocompatibility and controlled drug releaseSurf Coat Technol201323399107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PandiyarajKNDeshmukhRRMahendiranRInfluence of operating parameters on surface properties of RF glow discharge oxygen plasma treated TiO2/PET film for biomedical applicationMater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl20143630931924433917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLongSAMoonJJWestJLCovalently immobilized gradients of bFGF on hydrogel scaffolds for directed cell migrationBiomaterials200526163227323415603817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MastersKSShahDNWalkerGLeinwandLAAnsethKSDesigning scaffolds for valvular interstitial cells: cell adhesion and function on naturally derived materialsJ Biomed Mater Res A200471117218015368267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GobinASWestJLVal-ala-pro-gly, an elastin-derived non-integrin ligand: smooth muscle cell adhesion and specificityJ Biomed Mater Res A200367125525914517884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaroliBPhotopolymerization of biomaterials: issues and potentialities in drug delivery, tissue engineering, and cell encapsulation applicationsJ Chem Technol Biotechnol2006814491499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZakrzewskiJLvan den BrinkMRHubbellJAOvercoming immunological barriers in regenerative medicineNat Biotechnol201432878679425093888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangYAtalaAUrothelial cell culture: stratified urothelial sheet and three-dimensional growth of urothelial structureMethods Mol Biol201394538339923097119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KloskowskiTUzarskaMGurtowskaNHow to isolate urothelial cells? Comparison of four different methods and literature reviewHum Cell2014272859324368576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BasuJJayoMJIlaganRMRegeneration of native-like neo-urinary tissue from nonbladder cell sourcesTissue Eng A2012189–1010251034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrewaTAdamowiczJSharmaATissue engineering for the oncologic urinary bladderNat Rev Urol201291056157222907387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SubramaniamRHinleyJStahlschmidtJSouthgateJTissue engineering potential of urothelial cells from diseased bladdersJ Urol201118652014202021944117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OsmanNIHillaryCBullockAJMacNeilSChappleCRTissue engineered buccal mucosa for urethroplasty: progress and future directionsAdv Drug Deliv Rev201582–836976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MikamiHKuwaharaGNakamuraNYamatoMTanakaMKodamaSTwo-layer tissue engineered urethra using oral epithelial and muscle derived cellsJ Urol201218751882188922439965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarbagliGRam LiebigGFahlenkampDLazzeriMNew bulbar urethroplasty using tissue-engineered oral mucosal graft: a preliminary clinical reportJ Urol20131894 Supple1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MousaNAAbou-TalebHAOrabiHStem cell applications for pathologies of the urinary bladderWorld J Stem Cells20157581582226131312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoltzJFde IslaNLiYPStem cells and regenerative medicine: myth or reality of the 21th centuryStem Cells Int2015201573473126300923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JiangYJahagirdarBNReinhardtRLPluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrowNature20024186893414912077603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SterodimasAde FariaJNicarettaBPitanguyITissue engineering with adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs): current and future applicationsJ Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg201063111886189219969517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BharadwajSLiuGShiYMultipotential differentiation of human urine-derived stem cells: potential for therapeutic applications in urologyStem Cells20133191840185623666768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangDWeiGLiPZhouXZhangYUrine-derived stem cells: a novel and versatile progenitor source for cell-based therapy and regenerative medicineGenes Dis20141181725411659
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MoadMPalDHepburnACA novel model of urinary tract differentiation, tissue regeneration, and disease: reprogramming human prostate and bladder cells into induced pluripotent stem cellsEur Urol201364575376123582880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmolarJSalemiSHorstMSulserTEberliDStem cells in functional bladder engineeringTransfus Med Hemother201643532833527781020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LangRLiuGShiYSelf-renewal and differentiation capacity of urine-derived stem cells after urine preservation for 24 hoursPLoS One201381e5398023349776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangYMcNeillETianHUrine derived cells are a potential source for urological tissue reconstructionJ Urol200818052226223318804817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BodinABharadwajSWuSGatenholmPAtalaAZhangYTissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversionBiomaterials201031348889890120800278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KanematsuAYamamotoSIwai-KanaiEInduction of smooth muscle cell-like phenotype in marrow-derived cells among regenerating urinary bladder smooth muscle cellsAm J Pathol2005166256557315681839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuJTianLPrabhakaranMDingXRamakrishnaSFabrication of nerve growth factor encapsulated aligned poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers and their assessment as a potential neural tissue engineering scaffoldPolymers20168254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeynsCFUrinary tract infection associated with conditions causing urinary tract obstruction and stasis, excluding urolithiasis and neuropathic bladderWorld J Urol2012301778321720861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad-JafariHSaffarMJNemateISaffarHKhalilianARIncreasing antibiotic resistance among uropathogens isolated during years 2006–2009: impact on the empirical managementInt Braz J Urol2012381253222397779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZowawiHMHarrisPNRobertsMJThe emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urologyNat Rev Urol2015121057058426334085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShameliKAhmadMBZargarMYunusWMRustaiyanAIbrahimNASynthesis of silver nanoparticles in montmorillonite and their antibacterial behaviorInt J Nanomedicine2011658159021674015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SticklerDJClinical complications of urinary catheters caused by crystalline biofilms: something needs to be doneJ Intern Med2014276212012924635559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoibyNCiofuOJohansenHKThe clinical impact of bacterial biofilmsInt J Oral Sci201132556521485309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchafferJNPearsonMMProteus mirabilis and urinary tract infectionsMicrobiol Spectr201535
   Google Scholar
• SighinolfiMCSighinolfiGPGalliEChemical and mineralogical analysis of ureteral stent encrustation and associated risk factorsUrology201586470370626297602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BouzidiHTraxerODoreBCaractéristiques des incrustations des endoprothèses urétérales chez les patients lithiasiques [Characteristics of encrustation of ureteric stents in patients with urinary stones]Prog Urol2008184230237 French18501303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BithelisGBouropoulosNLiatsikosENPerimenisPKoutsoukosPGBarbaliasGAAssessment of encrustations on polyurethane ureteral stentsJ Endourol200418655055615333220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnselmeKDavidsonPPopaAMGiazzonMLileyMPlouxLThe interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scaleActa Biomater20106103824384620371386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarrettTRBhakooMZhangZBacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfacesProg Nat Sci200818910491056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoriKMatsumotoSBacterial adhesion: from mechanism to controlBiochem Eng J2010483424434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaiMIngleAPGuptaIBrandelliABioactivity of noble metal nanoparticles decorated with biopolymers and their application in drug deliveryInt J Pharm2015496215917226520406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiXRobinsonSMGuptaAFunctional gold nanoparticles as potent antimicrobial agents against multi-drug-resistant bacteriaACS Nano2014810106821068625232643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoeDKarandikarBBonn-SavageNGibbinsBRoulletJBAntimicrobial surface functionalization of plastic catheters by silver nanoparticlesJ Antimicrob Chemother200861486987618305203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KishikawaHEbberydARömlingUControl of pathogen growth and biofilm formation using a urinary catheter that releases antimicrobial nitrogen oxidesFree Radic Biol Med2013651257126424084579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regev-ShoshaniGKoMMillerCAv-GayYSlow release of nitric oxide from charged catheters and its effect on biofilm formation by Escherichia coliAntimicrob Agents Chemother201054127327919884372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CollettaAWuJWoYS-Nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) impregnated silicone foley catheters: a potential biomaterial/device to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infectionsACS Biomater Sci Eng20151641642426462294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de MelMuradFSeifalianAMNitric oxide: a guardian for vascular grafts?Chem Rev201111195742576721663322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RibeiroCSencadasVCorreiaDMLanceros-MéndezSPiezoelectric polymers as biomaterials for tissue engineering applicationsColloids Surf B Biointerfaces2015136465526355812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AguilarMRSan RománJIntroduction to smart polymers and their applicationsAguilarMRRománJSSmart Polymers and Their ApplicationsWoodhead Publishing2014111
   Google Scholar
• HardyJGPalmaMWindSJBiggsMJResponsive biomaterials: advances in materials based on shape-memory polymersAdv Mater201628275717572427120512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KulkarniRBellamyENickel-titanium shape memory alloy Memokath 051 ureteral stent for managing long-term ureteral obstruction: 4-year experienceJ Urol200116651750175411586216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PerryMJRoodhouseAJGidlowABSpicerTGEllisBWThermo-expandable intraprostatic stents in bladder outlet obstruction: an 8-year studyBJU Int200290321622312133055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RickertDMosesMALendleinAKelchSFrankeRPThe importance of angiogenesis in the interaction between polymeric biomaterials and surrounding tissueClin Hemorheol Microcirc200328317518112775899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TzonevaRSeifertBBehlMLendleinAElastic multiblock copolymers for vascular regeneration: protein adsorption and hemocompatibilityClin Hemorheol Microcirc2012522–433734822975945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorreiaCOLeiteAJManoJFChitosan/bioactive glass nanoparticles scaffolds with shape memory propertiesCarbohydr Polym2015123394525843832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FuYQHuangWMLuoJKLuHPolyurethane shape-memory polymers for biomedical applicationsYahiaLShape Memory Polymers for Biomedical ApplicationsWoodhead Publishing2015167195
   Google Scholar
• HardyJCornelisonRSukhavasiRElectroactive tissue scaffolds with aligned pores as instructive platforms for biomimetic tissue engineeringBioengineering20152115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WuYWangLGuoBShaoYMaPXElectroactive biodegradable polyurethane significantly enhanced Schwann cells myelin gene expression and neurotrophin secretion for peripheral nerve tissue engineeringBiomaterials201687183126897537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AhyaiSASchmidMKuhlMOutcomes of ventral onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty in patients after radiotherapyJ Urol2015194244144625846417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoltingMNArnoldASHaralampievaDHandschinCSulserTEberliDMagnetic stimulation supports muscle and nerve regeneration after trauma in miceMuscle Nerve201653459860726202157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShiZGaoXUllahMWLiSWangQYangGElectroconductive natural polymer-based hydrogelsBiomaterials2016111405427721086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurphySVAtalaA3D bioprinting of tissues and organsNat Biotechnol201432877378525093879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KangHWLeeSJKoIKKenglaCYooJJAtalaAA 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrityNat Biotechnol20163431231926878319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JungJWLeeJSChoDWComputer-aided multiple-head 3D printing system for printing of heterogeneous organ/tissue constructsSci Rep201662168526899876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatiFJangJHaDHPrinting three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioinkNat Commun20145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefRFSpradlingKYoonRApplications of three-dimensional printing technology in urological practiceBJU Int201511669770226010346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PriesterANatarajanSLeJDA system for evaluating magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer using patient-specific 3D printed moldsAm J Clin Exp Urol20142212713525374914
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CheungCLLooiTLendvayTSDrakeJMFarhatWAUse of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplastyJ Surg Educ201471576276724776857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SolimanYFeibusAHBaumN3D printing and its urologic applicationsRev Urol2015171202426028997
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZhangKFuQYooJ3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environmentActa Biomater20175015416427940192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangXYanYZhangRRecent trends and challenges in complex organ manufacturingTissue Eng B Rev2010162189197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MundyARAndrichDEUrethral stricturesBJU Int2011107162621176068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CraigJRWallisCBrantWOHotalingJMMyersJBManagement of adults with prior failed hypospadias surgeryTransl Androl Urol20143219620426816767
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MundyARFailed hypospadias repair presenting in adultsEur Urol200649577477616564128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndrichDEMundyARWhat is the best technique for urethroplasty?Eur Urol20085451031104118715692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndrichDEMundyARNon-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty: a preliminary reportBJU Int201210971090109421933325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuoTLVenugopalSInmanRDChappleCRSurgical tips and tricks during urethroplasty for bulbar urethral strictures focusing on accurate localisation of the stricture: results from a tertiary centreEur Urol201567476477025578622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LumenNVierstraete-VerlindeSOosterlinckWBuccal versus lingual mucosa graft in anterior urethroplasty: a prospective comparison of surgical outcome and donor site morbidityJ Urol201619511211726241906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MangeraAPattersonJMChappleCRA systematic review of graft augmentation urethroplasty techniques for the treatment of anterior urethral stricturesEur Urol201159579781421353379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LumenNOosterlinckWHoebekePUrethral reconstruction using buccal mucosa or penile skin grafts: systematic review and meta-analysisUrol Int201289438739422889835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarbagliGVallascianiSRomanoGFabbriFGuazzoniGLazzeriMMorbidity of oral mucosa graft harvesting from a single cheekEur Urol2010581334120106587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoodDNAllenSEAndrichDEGreenwellTJMundyARThe morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative painJ Urol2004172258058315247736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiersSMVennSNGreenwellTJThe past, present and future of augmentation cystoplastyBJU Int201210991280129322117733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CodyJDNabiGDublinNUrinary diversion and bladder reconstruction/replacement using intestinal segments for intractable incontinence or following cystectomyCochrane Database Syst Rev20122CD003306
   Google Scholar
• LeeRKAbol-EneinHArtibaniWUrinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomesBJU Int20141131112324330062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenwellTJVennSNMundyARAugmentation cystoplastyBJU Int200188651152511678743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinRKamalMMRubenwolfPZieselCSchroderAThuroffJWBladder augmentation using bowel segments (enterocystoplasty)BJU Int201211071078109422954030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinRSchröderAThüroffJWBladder augmentation and urinary diversion in patients with neurogenic bladder: non-surgical considerationsJ Pediatr Urol20128214515221493159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinRSchröderAThüroffJWBladder augmentation and urinary diversion in patients with neurogenic bladder: surgical considerationsJ Pediatr Urol20128215316122264521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KnightRBHudakSJMoreyAFStrategies for open reconstruction of upper ureteral stricturesUrol Clin North Am201340335136123905933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali-el-DeinBGhoneimMABridging long ureteral defects using the Yang-Monti principleJ Urol200316931074107712576849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar