Prevention and management of urosepsis triggered by ureteroscopy

References

• BoneRCBalkRACerraFBDefinitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care MedicineChest19921016164416551303622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RhodesAEvansLEAlhazzaniWSurviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016Intensive Care Med201743330437728101605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SingerMThe new sepsis consensus definitions (Sepsis-3): the good, the not-so-bad, and the actually-quite-prettyIntensive Care Med201642122027202927815587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SingerMDeutschmanCSSeymourCWThe Third International Consensus Definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)JAMA2016315880181026903338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaironiPTognoniGMassonSAlbumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shockN Engl J Med2014370151412142124635772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DielubanzaEJSchaefferAJUrinary tract infections in womenMed Clin North Am2011951274121095409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarberAENortonJPWilesTJMulveyMAStrengths and limitations of model systems for the study of urinary tract infections and related pathologiesMicrobiol Mol Biol Rev201680235136726935136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohansenTECekMNaberKGStratchounskiLSvendsenMVTenkePPrevalence of hospital acquired urinary tract infections in urology departmentsEur Urol20075141100111217049419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WagenlehnerFMPilatzAWeidnerWNaberKGUrosepsis: overview of the diagnostic and treatment challengesMicrobiol Spectr201535
   Google Scholar
• AngusDCLinde-ZwirbleWTLidickerJClermontGCarcilloJPinskyMREpidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of careCrit Care Med20012971303131011445675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaguTRothbergMBShiehMSPekowPSSteingrubJSLindenauerPKHospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007Crit Care Med201240375476121963582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torio C (AHRQ), Moore B (Truven Health Analytics)National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2013 HCUP Statistical Brief #204Rockville, MDAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality2016 Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb204-Most-Expensive-Hospital-Conditions.pdfAccessed May 4, 2018
   Google Scholar
• WagenlehnerFMLichtensternCRolfesCDiagnosis and management for urosepsisInt J Urol2013201096397023714209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WagenlehnerFMPilatzANaberKGWeidnerWTherapeutic challenges of urosepsisEur J Clin Invest200838suppl 2454918826481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SohnDWKimSWHongCGYoonBIHaUSChoYHRisk factors of infectious complication after ureteroscopic procedures of the upper urinary tractJ Infect Chemother20131961102110823783396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlackmurJPMaitraNUMarriRRHousamiFMalkiMMcIlhennyCAnalysis of factors’ association with risk of postoperative urosepsis in patients undergoing ureteroscopy for treatment of stone diseaseJ Endourol201630996396927317017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MitsuzukaKNakanoOTakahashiNSatohMIdentification of factors associated with postoperative febrile urinary tract infection after ureteroscopy for urinary stonesUrolithiasis201644325726226321205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartovAGravasSEtemadianMClinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Study GroupPostoperative infection rates in patients with a negative baseline urine culture undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal: a matched case-control analysis on antibiotic prophylaxis from the CROES URS global studyJ Endourol201529217118025072350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CindoloLCastellanPScoffoneCMMortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six casesWorld J Urol201634330531026210344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GotoTNakameYNishidaMOhiYBacterial biofilms and catheters in experimental urinary tract infectionInt J Antimicrob Agents1999113–422723110394975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZumsteinVBetschartPAlbrichWCBiofilm formation on ureteral stents – incidence, clinical impact, and preventionSwiss Med Wkly2017147w1440828165539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChoongSWhitfieldHBiofilms and their role in infections in urologyBJU Int200086893594111069430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KehindeEORotimiVOAl-HunayanAAbdul-HalimHBolandFAl-AwadiKABacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stentsJ Endourol200418989189615659928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElwoodCNLoJChouEUnderstanding urinary conditioning film components on ureteral stents: profiling protein components and evaluating their role in bacterial colonizationBiofouling20132991115112224047458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChewBHFlanniganRKurtzMA single dose of intraoperative antibiotics is sufficient to prevent urinary tract infection during ureteroscopyJ Endourol2016301636826413885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KehindeEORotimiVOAl-AwadiKAFactors predisposing to urinary tract infection after J ureteral stent insertionJ Urol200216731334133711832726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LangeDBidnurSHoagNChewBHUreteral stent-associated complications – where we are and where we are goingNat Rev Urol2015121172525534997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoJLangeDChewBHUreteral stents and foley catheters-associated urinary tract infections: the role of coatings and materials in infection preventionAntibiotics (Basel)201431879727025736
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HollenbeckBKSchusterTGFaerberGJWolfJSJrSafety and efficacy of same-session bilateral ureteroscopyJ Endourol2003171088188514744354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÅAskimMoserFGustadLTPoor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality – a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency departmentScand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med20172515628599661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurnhamJPKollefMHqSOFA score: predictive validity in Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infectionsJ Crit Care20174314314728898743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DellingerRPCarletJMMasurHSurviving Sepsis Campaign Management Guidelines CommitteeSurviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shockCrit Care Med2004323858873 Review. Erratum in: Crit Care Med 2004;32(10):2169–217015090974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AikawaNFujishimaSEndoSMulticenter prospective study of procalcitonin as an indicator of sepsisJ Infect Chemother200511315215915990980
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SugimotoKAdomiSKoikeHEsaAProcalcitonin as an indicator of urosepsisRes Rep Urol20135778024400237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van NieuwkoopCBontenTNvan’t WoutJWProcalcitonin reflects bacteremia and bacterial load in urosepsis syndrome: a prospective observational studyCrit Care2010146R20621083886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FerrerRMartin-LoechesIPhillipsGEmpiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement programCrit Care Med20144281749175524717459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaramGChastreJWilcoxMHVincentJLAntibiotic strategies in the era of multidrug resistanceCrit Care201620113627329228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JoshiSHospital antibiogram: a necessityIndian J Med Microbiol201028427728020966554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElhananGSarhatMRazREmpiric antibiotic treatment and the misuse of culture results and antibiotic sensitivities in patients with community-acquired bacteraemia due to urinary tract infectionJ Infect19973532832889459403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RiversENguyenBHavstadSEarly Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative GroupEarly goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shockN Engl J Med2001345191368137711794169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KalraOPRaizadaAApproach to a patient with urosepsisJ Glob Infect Dis200911576320300389
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ParkJMBloomDAThe pathophysiology of ureteropelvic junction obstructionUrol Clin North Am1998251611699633571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VigilHRHicklingDRUrinary tract infection in the neurogenic bladderTransl Androl Urol201651728726904414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KnopfHJGraffHJSchulzeHPerioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic stone removalEur Urol200344111511812814685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WolfJSJrBennettCJDmochowskiRRUrologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis best practice policy panel. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxisJ Urol200817941379139018280509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EswaraJRShariftabriziASaccoDPositive stone culture is associated with a higher rate of sepsis after endourological proceduresUrolithiasis201341541141423760449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChangCLSuLHLuCMTaiFTHuangYCChangKKOutbreak of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae urinary tract infections due to a contaminated ureteroscopeJ Hosp Infect201385211812423954065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CareyRIGomezCSMauriciGLynneCMLeveilleeRJBirdVGFrequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care centerJ Urol200617660761016813899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OfsteadCLHeymannOLQuickMRJohnsonEAEilandJEWetzlerHPThe effectiveness of sterilization for flexible ureteroscopes: a real-world studyAm J Infect Control201745888889528625700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AORNAssociation of Perioperative Registered Nurses Guideline for Processing Flexible Endoscopes Sterilization and DisinfectionDenver, COAORN2016675758
   Google Scholar
• UsawachintachitMIsaacsonDSTaguchiKA prospective case-control study comparing LithoVue, a single-use, flexible disposable ureteroscope, with flexible, reusable fiber-optic ureteroscopesJ Endourol201731546847528287823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AugeBKPietrowPKLallasCDRajGVSanta-CruzRWPremingerGMUreteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulationJ Endourol2004181333615006050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuangJZhaoZAlSmadiJKUse of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysisPLoS One2018132e019360029489912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar