References
- MosesSBaileyRCRonaldARMale circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risksSex Transm Infect199874536837310195035
- FrischMEarpBDCircumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: a critical assessment of recent evidenceGlob Public Health201813562664127194404
- PersadRSharmaSMctavishJImberCMouriquandPDClinical presentation and pathophysiology of meatal stenosis following circumcisionBr J Urol199575191937850308
- LazarusJAlexanderARodeHCircumcision complications associated with the Plastibell deviceS Afr Med J200797319219317440666
- FrischMSimonsenJCultural background, non-therapeutic circumcision and the risk of meatal stenosis and other urethral stricture disease: two nationwide register-based cohort studies in Denmark 1977-2013Surgeon201816210711828017691
- BanieghbalBOptimal time for neonatal circumcision: an observation-based studyJ Pediatr Urol20095535936219223238
- HolmanJRLewisELRinglerRLNeonatal circumcision techniquesAm Fam Physician1995522511519518520
- ReynoldsRDUse of the Mogen clamp for neonatal circumcisionAm Fam Physician19965411771828677833
- ManjiKPCircumcision of the young infant in a developing country using the PlastibellAnn Trop Paediatr200020210110410945058
- Al-SamarraiAYMoftiABCranksonSJJawadAHaqueKAl-MeshariAA review of a Plastibell device in neonatal circumcision in 2,000 instancesSurg Gynecol Obstet198816743413433047894
- MousaviSASalehifarECircumcision complications associated with the Plastibell device and conventional dissection surgery: a trial of 586 infants of ages up to 12 monthsAdv Urol200860612315
- CeylanKBurhanKYilmazYCanSKuşAMustafaGSevere complications of circumcision: an analysis of 48 casesJ Pediatr Urol200731323518947695
- MahmoudiHEvaluation of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcisionUrol J200522868817629876