Current Status of Simulation Training in Urology: A Non-Systematic Review

References

• Sealy W. Halsted is dead: time for change in graduate surgical education. Curr Surg. 1999;56(1–2):34–39. doi:10.1016/S0149-7944(99)00005-7
   Google Scholar
• Marron CD, Byrnes CK, Kirk SJ. An EWTD-compliant shift rota decreases training opportunities. Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(7):246–248. doi:10.1308/147363505X46880
   Google Scholar
• Young M, Kailavasan M, Taylor J, et al. The success and evolution of a urological “boot camp” for newly appointed UK urology registrars: incorporating simulation, nontechnical skills and assessment. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(5):1425–1432. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.04.00531036524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somani B, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Gozen A, et al. Outcomes of European Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills (EBLUS) Examinations: results from European School of Urology (ESU) and EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) over 6 years (2013–2018). Eur Urol Focus. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Tiong HY, Zhu G, Ong TA, et al. Performance in fundamentals in laparoscopic surgery (FILSTM) reflects global rating scales in objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for porcine laparoscopic surgery. Int J Urol. 2017;24(Suppl. 1):S45–S46.
   Google Scholar
• Campain N, Kailavasan M, Chalwe M, et al. An evaluation of the role of simulation training for teaching surgical skills in Sub-Saharan Africa. World J Surg. 2017;42(4):923–929. doi:10.1007/s00268-017-4261-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaba D. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S2–S10. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.009878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese R. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):50–63. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x20078756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruthappu M, Duclos A, Lipsitz S, Orgill D, Carty M. Surgical learning curves and operative efficiency: a cross-specialty observational study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006679. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cruz J, Dos Reis S, Cunha Frati R, et al. Does warm-up training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance? A prospective randomized analysis. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):974–978. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.02027233673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin A, Raison N, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(9):503–519. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2016.14727549358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kailavasan M, Abdul-Rahman A, Hanchanale V. The validation of the clinical male pelvic trainer Mk 2-advanced models for scrotal examination simulation. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(3):423–430. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.00827825660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards S, Cass G, Lenguerrand E, Fox R, Crofts J. Realism and construct validity of novel pelvic models of common gynecologic conditions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(3):270–273. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.01624373706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulmajed MI, Thomas M, Shergill IS. A new training model for adult circumcision. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(4):447–448. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.12.00422677579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnham A, Campain N, Biyani CS, Muneer A, Venn S. Validation of a reusable model for simulation training of adult circumcision. Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97:383–385. doi:10.1308/rcsbull.2015.383
   Google Scholar
• Pathak R, Alford S, Igel T. Mp23-07 vasectomy simulation module: didactic, audio-visual, and live-simulation experience. J Urol. 2015;193:e269. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.1250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shergill IS, Shaikh T, Arya M, Junaid I. A training model for suprapubic catheter insertion: the UroEmerge suprapubic catheter model. Urology. 2008;72(1):196–197. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.02118513785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singal A, Halverson A, Rooney DM, Davis LM, Kielb SJ. A validated low-cost training model for suprapubic catheter insertion. Urology. 2015;85(1):23–26. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.02425440817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossack T, Chris BB, Beer J, Thompson G. A cost-effective, easily reproducible, suprapubic catheter insertion simulation training model. Urology. 2013;82(4):955–958. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.01323915517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palvolgyi R, Lee A, Ramirez F, et al. VesEcho Training System: suprapubic catheterization under ultrasound guidance. Urol Pract. 2018;5(1):63–68. doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonde J, Adam A, Laher AE. Validation of a low cost, disposable, and ultrasound-guided suprapubic catheter insertion trainer. Urology. 2018;115:45–50. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.01329499259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai JC, Ahn JS, Cannon ST. Acute ischemic priapism management: an educational and simulation curriculum. MedEdPORTAL. 2018;14:1073. doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10731
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed K, Aydin A, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, McCabe JE. A novel cadaveric simulation program in urology. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(4):556–565. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.01.00525683152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabello R, González C, Quicios C, et al. An experimental model for training in renal transplantation surgery with human cadavers preserved using W. Thiel’s embalming technique. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(2):192–197. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.00225555672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: https://limbsandthings.com/uk/specialties/urology/?filters=tasktrainers.packs. Accessed 7 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gao W, Ou T, Jia J, et al. Development and evaluation of a training model for paracentetic suprapubic cystostomy and catheterization. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019. doi:10.6061/clinics/2019/e435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: https://www.baus.org.uk/professionals/events/2664/emergency_urology_cadaveric_courses_2019. Accessed 7 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Yiasemidou M, Roberts D, Glassman D, Tomlinson J, Biyani S, Miskovic D. A multispecialty evaluation of Thiel cadavers for surgical training. World J Surg. 2017;41(5):1201–1207. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3868-428144746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin A, Ahmed K, McCabe JE, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Sahai A. Validation of a dry-lab training model for cystoscopy and delivery of intravesical botulinum-toxin injections. J Endourol. 2015;29(S1):A80–A81.
   Google Scholar
• Soria F, Morcillo E, Serrano A, et al. Development and validation of a novel skills training model for retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1276–1281. doi:10.1089/end.2015.042126230750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Sharma R, Kumar A, Ganatra P, Sabnis RB, Desai MR. Comparative performance of high-fidelity training models for flexible ureteroscopy: are all models effective? Indian J Urol. 2011;27(4):451–456. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.9143122279308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD. A novel approach to endourological training: training at the surgical skills center. J Urol. 2001;166(4):1261–1266. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65749-711547054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou DS, Abdelshehid C, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Comparison of results of virtual-reality simulator and training model for basic ureteroscopy training. J Endourol. 2006;20(4):266–271. doi:10.1089/end.2006.20.26616646655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SM, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, et al. Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int. 2013;111(3):518–523. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11204.x22928639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewin J, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Jaye P, Dasgupta P. Face, content, and construct validation of the Bristol TURP trainer. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(4):500–505. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.01324776866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries AH, van Genugten HG, Hendrikx AJ, et al. The Simbla TURBT simulator in urological residency training: from needs analysis to validation. J Endourol. 2016;30(5):580–587. doi:10.1089/end.2015.072326671712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin A, Ahmed K, Brewin J, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Aho T. Face and content validation of the prostatic hyperplasia model and holmium laser surgery simulator. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(3):339–344. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.11.00424797849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa L, Şener TE, Somani BK, et al. Initial content validation results of a new simulation model for flexible ureteroscopy: the key-box. J Endourol. 2017;31(1):72–77. doi:10.1089/end.2016.067727869504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa L, Sener TE, Cloutier J, et al. Preliminary results of intensive training on a simulation model for flexible ureteroscopy in medical students: the Kidney-Box (K-BOX) model. Proceedings of the 33rd World Congress of Endourology; 10 2015; London.
   Google Scholar
• Blankstein U, Lantz AG, D’A Honey RJ, Pace KT, Ordon M, Lee JY. Simulation-based flexible ureteroscopy training using a novel ureteroscopy part-task trainer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(9–10):331–335. doi:10.5489/cuaj.281126644806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Jabir A, Aydin A, Abe T, et al. Validation of the advanced scope trainer for flexible ureterorenoscopy training. Urology. 2017;110:45–50. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.04728823640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazi A, Campbell T, Melnyk R, et al. Validation of a full-Immersion simulation platform for percutaneous nephrolithotomy using three-dimensional printing technology. J Endourol. 2017;31(12):1314–1320. doi:10.1089/end.2017.036629048214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado Alcaraz E, Moreno J, Montoya G, Torres-Mercado L, López V, Serrano-Brambila E. Use of a novel radiation-free fluoroscopy emulator (iPERC) to improve surgical skills in percutaneous nephrolithtotomy. Eur Urol Suppl. 2015;14(2):eV2. doi:10.1016/S1569-9056(15)61087-9
   Google Scholar
• Dolmans VEMG, Schout BMA, de Beer NAM, Hendrikx AJM. Determination of construct validity of the URO mentor, a virtual reality simulator for endourological procedures. J Soc Simul Healthcare. 2006;1(3):192. doi:10.1097/01266021-200600130-00053
   Google Scholar
• Gettman MT, Le CQ, Rangel LJ, Slezak JM, Bergstralh EJ, Krambeck AE. Analysis of a computer based simulator as an educational tool for cystoscopy: subjective and objective results. J Urol. 2008;179(1):267. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.14618001785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettman MT, Le CQ, Rangel LJ, Slezak JM, Bergstralh EJ, Krambeck AE. Development of a standardized curriculum for teaching cystoscopic skills using a computer-based endourologic simulator. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(2):92–97. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181871c3e19444046
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schout BM, Muijtjens AM, Hendrikx AJ, et al. Acquisition of flexible cystoscopy skills on a virtual reality simulator by experts and novices. BJU Int. 2010;105(2):234–239. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08733.x19583729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schout BM, Ananias HJ, Bemelmans BL, et al. Transfer of cysto-urethroscopy skills from a virtual-reality simulator to the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2010;106(2):226–231. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09049.x19912184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schout BM, Muijtjens AM, Hendrikx AJ, et al. Acquisition of flexible cystoscopy skills on a virtual reality simulator by experts and novices. BJU Int. 2010;105(2):234–239. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08733.x19583729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans VE, Schout BM, de Beer NA, Bemelmans BL, Scherpbier AJ, Hendrikx AJ. The virtual reality endourologic simulator is realistic and useful for educational purposes. J Endourol. 2009;23(7):1175–1181. doi:10.1089/end.2008.048719530899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloosh M, Couture F, Fahmy N, Elhilali M, Andonian S Assessment of urology postgraduate trainees’ competencies in flexible ureteroscopic stone extraction. Proceedings of the 35th World Congress of Endourology; 9 2017; Vancouver, Canada. doi:10.5489/cuaj.4570
   Google Scholar
• Brunckhorst O, Aydin A, Abboudi H, et al. Simulation-based ureteroscopy training: a systematic review. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(1):135–143. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.07.00325130385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto ED, Pace KT, D’A Honey RJ. Virtual reality ureteroscopy simulator as a valid tool for assessing endourological skills. Int J Urol. 2006;13(7):896–901. doi:10.1111/iju.2006.13.issue-716882051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogan K, Jacomides L, Shulman MJ, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Virtual ureteroscopy predicts ureteroscopic proficiency of medical students on a cadaver. J Urol. 2004;172(2):667–671. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000131631.60022.d915247757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Kurien A, Patel R, et al. Validation of virtual reality simulation for percutaneous renal access training. J Endourol. 2010;24(4):635–640. doi:10.1089/end.2009.016620218892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Kurien A, Ganpule A, Muthu V, Sabnis R, Desai M. Percutaneous renal access training: content validation comparison between a live porcine and a virtual reality (VR) simulation model. BJU Int. 2010;106(11):1753–1756. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09753.x20950308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noureldin YA, Fahmy N, Anidjar M, Andonian S. Is there a place for virtual reality simulators in assessment of competency in percutaneous renal access? World J Urol. 2016;34(5):733–739. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1652-y26242727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz GB, Grimm T, Buchner A, et al. Validation of a high-end virtual reality simulator for training transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(2):568–577. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.08.00130181038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjiam IM, Berkers CH, Schout BM, et al. Evaluation of the educational value of a virtual reality TURP simulator according to a curriculum-based approach. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(5):288–294. doi:10.1097/SIH.000000000000004125275719
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bright E, Vine S, Wilson MR, Masters RS, McGrath JS. Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality TURP simulator. Int J Surg. 2012;10(3):163–166. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.01222366646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet R, Kowalewski T, Oppenheimer P, Weghorst S, Satava R. Face, content and construct validity of the University of Washington virtual reality transurethral prostate resection trainer. J Urol. 2004;172:1953–1957. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000141298.06350.4c15540764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak SJ, Landt CL, Hernandez J, Soderdahl DW. External validation of a virtual reality transurethral resection of the prostate simulator. J Urol. 2010;184(5):2018–2022. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.14120850819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källström R, Hjertberg H, Kjölhede H, Svanvik J. Use of a virtual reality, real-time, simulation model for the training of urologists in transurethral resection of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(4):313–320. doi:10.1080/0036559051003124616118107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källström R, Hjertberg H, Svanvik J. Construct validity of a full procedure, virtual reality, real-time, simulation model for training in transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol. 2010;24(1):109–115. doi:10.1089/end.2009.011419961333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjiam IM, Berkers CH, Schout BM. Evaluation of the educational value of a virtual reality TURP simulator according to a curriculum-based approach. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(5):288–294. doi:10.1097/SIH.000000000000004125275719
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuronen-Stewart C, Ahmed K, Aydin A, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: simulation-based training curriculum and validation. Urology. 2015;86(3):639–646. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.00826126694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo JC, Arance I, García-Tello A, et al. Virtual reality simulator for training on photoselective vaporization of the prostate with 980 nm diode laser and learning curve of the technique. Actas Urol Esp. 2014;38(7):451–458. doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2014.02.01324704128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin A, Muir GH, Graziano ME, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Validation of the GreenLight™ simulator and development of a training curriculum for photoselective vaporisation of the prostate. BJU Int. 2015;115(6):994–1003. doi:10.1111/bju.1284224930949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda K, Kinoshita H, Okamoto Y. Prostatic Hyperplasia Model and Prostate Surgery Simulator. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2013 https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2013073210&_cid=P12-K7KCCJ-32997-1
   Google Scholar
• Lovegrove CE, Abe T, Aydin A, et al. Simulation training in upper tract endourology: myth or reality? Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69(6):579–588. doi:10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02873-928376609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noureldin YA, Andonian S. Simulation for percutaneous renal access: where are we? J Endourol. 2017;31(Suppl 1):S10–S19. doi:10.1089/end.2016.058727617641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida T, Inoue T, Taguchi M, Matsuzaki T, Matsuda T. Development of a new experimental model for in vitro study of retrograde intrarenal surgery: the “T-box”. Int J Urol. 2018;25(10):898–900. doi:10.1111/iju.1375330058087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein JT, Rassweiler J, Rassweiler-Seyfried MC. Validation of a novel cost effective easy to produce and durable in vitro model for kidney-puncture and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy-simulation. J Endourol. 2018;32(9):871–876. doi:10.1089/end.2017.083429597836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: https://www.virtamed.com/en/news/video-custom-made-virtamed-simulator-nxtheras-rezum-bph-treatment/. Accessed 7 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Available from: https://www.virtamed.com/en/about-us/virtamed-story/custom-simulator-neotract-urosim-urolift/. Accessed 7 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Huri E, Skolarikos A, Tatar İ, et al. Simulation of RIRS in soft cadavers: a novel training model by the Cadaveric Research On Endourology Training (CRET) Study Group. World J Urol. 2016;34(5):741–746. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1676-326318781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling CB, Greer WJ, Bryant SA, et al. Testing and validation of a low-cost cystoscopy teaching model: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):85–91. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e45a5220567172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bele U, Kelc R. Upper and lower urinary tract endoscopy training on Thiel-embalmed cadavers. Urology. 2016l;93:27–32. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.04026993350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mains E, Tang B, Golabek T, et al. Ureterorenoscopy training on cadavers embalmed by Thiel’s method: simulation or a further step towards reality? Initial report. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(1):81–87. doi:10.5173/ceju.2017.913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai B, Tang B, Healy S, et al. Face validity study of cadavers using Thiel method of embalming for endoscopic surgery in urology. Urology. 2014;84(4):S137–138.
   Google Scholar
• Soria F, Morcillo E, Serrano A, et al. Development and validation of a novel skills training model for retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1276–1281. doi:10.1089/end.2015.042126230750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Z, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Sun YC. Modified biological training model for percutaneous renal surgery with ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011;124(9):1286–1289.21740734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhan B, Soltani T, Do R, Perez C, Choi H, Ghoniem G. Face, content, and construct validations of endoscopic needle injection simulator for transurethral bulking agent in treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(6):1673–1678. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.01129730182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsby GM, Andrews PE, Castle EP, Wolter CE, Patel BM, Humphreys MR. Urologic surgical simulation: an endoscopic bladder model. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(6):352–355. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e318221109621642902
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez A, Chen E, Moore J, et al. A phantom model as a teaching modality for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26(1):1–5. doi:10.1089/end.2011.013121942798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Canales C, McDougall EM, Lin S. High-fidelity simulation based team training in urology: a preliminary interdisciplinary study of technical and nontechnical skills in laparoscopic complications management. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1385–1391. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.10622341287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunitsky E, Murphy A, Barber MD, Simmons M, Jelovsek JE. Development and validation of a ureteral anastomosis simulation model for surgical training. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(6):346–351. doi:10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a331bf24165448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbagh R, Chatterjee S, Chawla A, Hoogenes J, Kapoor A, Matsumoto ED. Transfer of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy skills from bench model to animal model: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Urol. 2012;187(5):1861–1866. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.05022425041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Tomé B, Díaz-Güemes I, Enciso Sanz S, et al. Validation of a new artificial model for simulated training of a laparoscopic vesicourethral anastomosis. Actas Urol Esp. 2019;23:S0210-4806(19)30069–5.
   Google Scholar
• Molinas CR, Binda MM, Mailova K, Koninckx PR. The rabbit nephrectomy model for training in laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):185–190. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh02514688180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teber D, Guven S, Yaycioglu O, et al. Single-knot running suture anastomosis (one-knot pyeloplasty) for laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: training model on a porcine bladder and clinical results. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010;42(3):609–614. doi:10.1007/s11255-009-9668-019902379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Liu M, Chen J, et al. Construct validity of the chicken crop model in the simulation of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2013;27(8):1032–1036. doi:10.1089/end.2013.008523590561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AG, Jai SJ, Ganpule AP, Vijayakumar M, Sabnis RB, Desai MR. Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation. Indian J Urol. 2018;34(3):189–195. doi:10.4103/iju.IJU_46_1830034129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguna MP, Arce-Alcazar A, Mochtar CA, Van Velthoven R, Peltier A. de la Rosette JJ. Construct validity of the chicken model in the simulation of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy suture. J Endourol. 2006;20(1):69–73. doi:10.1089/end.2006.20.6916426137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RM, Bellman GC. Laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis: a model to assess surgical competency. J Endourol. 2006;20(9):679–682. doi:10.1089/end.2006.20.67916999626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon JR, Salas N, Avila D, Boone TB, Lipshultz LI, Link RE. Construct validity of the pig intestine model in the simulation of laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis: tools for objective evaluation. J Endourol. 2008;22(12):2713–2716. doi:10.1089/end.2008.005819099517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: https://cleruro.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/program-web-compressed.pdf. Accessed 8 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rai BP, Stolzenburg JU, Healy S, Tang B, Jones P, Sweeney C. Preliminary validation of Thiel embalmed cadavers for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29(5):595–603. doi:10.1089/end.2014.071925565549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol. 2016;69(6):1065–1080. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.02126433570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz AM, George EI, Vaccaro CM, Brand TC. Head-to-head comparison of three virtual-reality robotic surgery simulators. JSLS. 2018;22(1):e2017.00081. doi:10.4293/JSLS.2017.00081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCraith E, Forde JC, Davis NF. Robotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges. J Robot Surg. 2019;13(3):371–377. doi:10.1007/s11701-019-00934-130796671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehurst SV, Lockrow EG, Lendvay TS, et al. Comparison of two simulation systems to support robotic-assisted surgical training: a pilot study (Swine model). J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(3):483–488. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.16025543068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker G, Aydin A, Raison N, et al. Validation of the RobotiX mentor robotic surgery simulator. J Endourol. 2016;30(3):338–346. doi:10.1089/end.2015.062026576836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison P, Raison N, Abe T, et al. The validation of a novel robot-assisted radical prostatectomy virtual reality module. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(3):758–766. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.00528974429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowriappa A, Raza SJ, Fazili A, et al. Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: a multi-institutional randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2015;115(2):336–345. doi:10.1111/bju.1270424612471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SG, Cho S, Kang SH, et al. The Tube 3 module designed for practicing vesicourethral anastomosis in a virtual reality robotic simulator: determination of face, content, and construct validity. Urology. 2014;84(2):345–350. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.00524975707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Kim SB, Pyun JH, et al. Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(11):756–761. doi:10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.75626568793
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shim JS, Noh TI, Kim JY, et al. Predictive validation of a robotic virtual reality simulator: the tube 3 module for practicing vesicourethral anastomosis in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2018;122:32–36. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.01330144481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung AJ, Shah SH, Dalag L, Shin D, Gill IS. Development and validation of a novel robotic procedure specific simulation platform: partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2015;194(2):520–526. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.294925801765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Perez M, Perrenot C, Hubert N, Hubert J. Face, content, construct, and concurrent validity of a novel robotic surgery patient-side simulator: the Xperience™ team trainer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3334–3344. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4607-x26659239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos P, Montez J, Tripp A, Ng CK, Gill IS, Hung AJ. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool. BJU Int. 2014;113(5):836–842. doi:10.1111/bju.1255924224500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazi A, Stone J, Candela B, Richards M, Joseph J. Simulated inanimate model for physical learning experience (simple) for robotic partial nephrectomy using a 3d printed kidney model. J Urol. 2015;193:e778. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candela B, Stone J, Park J, et al. Concurrent validity of a simulated inanimate model for physical learning experience in partial nephrectomy (SIMPLE-PN). J Urol. 2016;195:e220. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monda SM, Weese JR, Anderson BG, et al. Development and validity of a silicone renal tumor model for robotic partial nephrectomy training. Urology. 2018;114:114–120. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.03029421300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BA, Timberlake M, Steinberg RL, Kosemund M, Mueller B, Gahan JC. Design and validation of a low-cost, high-fidelity model for urethrovesical anastomosis in radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2019;33(4):331–336. doi:10.1089/end.2018.087130734578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shee K, Koo K, Wu X, Ghali FM, Halter RJ, Hyams ES. A novel ex vivo trainer for robotic vesicourethral anastomosis. J Robot Surg. 2019;2019(Epub):28.
   Google Scholar
• Hung AJ, Ng CK, Patil MB, et al. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model. BJU Int. 2012;110(6):870–874. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10953.x22313582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Rundstedt FC, Aghazadeh MA, Scovell J, et al. Validation of a simulation-training model for robotic intracorporeal bowel anastomosis using a step-by-step technique. Urology. 2018;120:125–130. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.03530092304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciamani G, De Marco V, Siracusano S, et al. A new training model for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis and posterior muscle-fascial reconstruction: the Verona training technique. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(2):123–128. doi:10.1007/s11701-016-0626-427440232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemozaffar M, Narayanan R, Percy AA, et al. Validation of a novel, tissue-based simulator for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;28(8):995–1000. doi:10.1089/end.2014.004124762174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolo R, Garisto J, Dagenais J, Sagalovich D, Kaouk JH. Single session of robotic human cadaver training: the immediate impact on urology residents in a teaching hospital. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(10):1157–1162. doi:10.1089/lap.2018.010929708828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe A, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P, et al. Pilot validation study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):292–299. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.02525454612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener S, Haddock P, Shichman S, Dorin R. Construction of a urologic robotic surgery training curriculum: how many simulator sessions are required for residents to achieve proficiency? J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1289–1293. doi:10.1089/end.2015.039226154108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills JT, Hougen HY, Bitner D, Krupski TL, Schenkman NS. Does robotic surgical simulator performance correlate with surgical skill? J Surg Educ. 2017;74(6):1052–1056. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.01128623113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novara G, Volpe A, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P, Van Der Poel H, Mottrie A. 193 validation of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum: pilot study II. Eur Urol Suppl. 2015;14(2):e193. doi:10.1016/S1569-9056(15)60195-6
   Google Scholar
• Sclaverano S, Chevreau G, Vadcard L, et al. Biopsym: a simulator for enhanced learning of ultra- sound-guided prostate biopsy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;142:301–306.19377173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiard G, Selmi S-Y, Promayon E, et al. Initial validation of a virtual-reality learning environment for prostate biopsies: realism matters!. J Endourol. 2014;28:453–458. doi:10.1089/end.2013.045424147849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiard G, Selmi S, Promayon E, Descotes J, Troccaz J. Simulation-based training for prostate biopsies: towards the validation of the Biopsym simulator. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;1–7. doi:10.1080/13645706.2019.1653926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalasani V, Cool D, Sherebrin S, Fenster A, Chin J, Izawa J. Development and validation of a virtual reality transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy simulator. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;19–26. doi:10.5489/cuaj.0915921470507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: https://simulation.health.ufl.edu/technology-development/augmented-reality-mixed-simulation/trus-pbx-sim/mixed-simulator-of-transrectal-transperineal-ultrasound-guided-prostate-biopsy-video/. Accessed 2 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ritsos PD, Edwards MR, Shergill IS, John NW A Haptics-enabled simulator for transperineal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine The Eurographics Association; 2015; Chester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Thaker N, Kudchadker R, Swanson D, et al. Establishing high-quality prostate brachytherapy using a phantom simulator training program. Inter J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(3):579–586. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goksel O, Sapchuk K, Morris W, Salcudean S. Prostate brachytherapy training with simulated ultrasound and fluoroscopy images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(4):1002–1012. doi:10.1109/TBME.2012.222264223047861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poder J, Carrara M, Howie A, Cutajar D, Bucci J, Rosenfeld A. Derivation of in vivo source tracking error thresholds for TRUS-based HDR prostate brachytherapy through simulation of source positioning errors. Brachytherapy. 2019;18(5):711–719. doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2019.05.00131175015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehrawat A, Keelan R, Shimada K, Wilfong D, McCormick J, Rabin Y. Simulation-based cryosurgery training. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2016;15(6):805–814. doi:10.1177/153303461561150926546576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther JR, Liauw SL, Choi S, et al. A prostate fossa contouring instructional module: implementation and evaluation. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(7):835–841.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.03027210232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson O, Davis R, Hanna GB, Vincent CA. Surgical adverse events: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2013;206(2):253–262. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.00923642651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panesar SS, Carson-Stevens A, Mann BS, Bhandari M, Madhok R. Mortality as an indicator of patient safety in orthopedics: lessons from qualitative analysis of a database of medical errors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):93. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-9322682470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuschner S, Leuschner M, Kropf S, Niederbichler AD. Non-technical skills training in the operating theatre: a meta-analysis of patient outcomes. Surgeon. 2019;17(4):233–243. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2018.07.00130093229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ounounou E, Aydin A, Brunckhorst O, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Nontechnical skills in surgery: a systematic review of current training modalities. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(1):14–24. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.05.01730122636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong JC, Lee JY, Goldenberg MG. Understanding and assessing nontechnical skills in robotic urological surgery: a systematic review and synthesis of the validity evidence. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(1):193–200. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.05.00929958854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somasundram K, Spence H, Colquhoun AJ, Mcilhenny C, Biyani CS, Jain S. Simulation in urology to train non-technical skills in ward rounds. BJU Int. 2018;122(4):705–712. doi:10.1111/bju.2018.122.issue-429777617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelshehid CS, Quach S, Nelson C, et al. High-fidelity simulation-based team training in urology: evaluation of technical and nontechnical skills of urology residents during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(5):588–595. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.04.00924016369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Canales C, McDougall EM, Lin S. High-fidelity simulation based team training in urology: a preliminary interdisciplinary study of technical and nontechnical skills in laparoscopic complications management. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1385–1391. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.10622341287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettman MT, Pereira CW, Lipsky K, et al. Use of high-fidelity operating room simulation to assess and teach communication, teamwork and laparoscopic skills: initial experience. J Urol. 2009;181(3):1289–1296. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.01819152929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewin J, Tang J, Dasgupta P, et al. Full immersion simulation: validation of a distributed simulation environment for technical and non-technical skills training in urology. BJU Int. 2015;116(1):156–162. doi:10.1111/bju.2015.116.issue-125053251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunckhorst O, Shahid S, Aydin A, et al. The relationship between technical and nontechnical skills within a simulation-based ureteroscopy training environment. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(5):1039–1044. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.00225980828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/search-results?query=gunner%20goggles&labels=books&page=1#top. Accessed 9 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Available from: https://3d4medical.com/press/pearson-and-3d4medical-mixed-reality-and-hololens. Accessed 9 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman R, Wood ME, Qian L, Price CL, Johnson AA, Osgood GM. Head-mounted display use in surgery: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2019;27:88–100. Epub 2019 Sept 12.31514682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Bertolo R. Hyperaccuracy three-dimensional reconstruction is able to maximize the efficacy of selective clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses. Eur Urol. 2018;74(5):651–660. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.02729317081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Three-dimensional elastic augmented-reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hyperaccuracy three-dimensional reconstruction technology: a step further in the identification of capsular involvement. Eur Urol. 2019;76(4):505–514. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.03730979636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolo R, Hung A, Porpiglia F, Bove P, Schleicher M, Dasgupta P. Systematic review of augmented reality in urological interventions: the evidences of an impact on surgical outcomes are yet to come. World J Urol. 2019; 1–10. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: https://www.proximie.com. Accessed 10 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Remulla D, Nguyen JH, et al. Current status of artificial intelligence applications in urology and their potential to influence clinical practice. BJU Int. 2019;2019(Epub):20.
   Google Scholar