Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success

References

• Cao C, Zhang C, Sriskandarajah C, et al. Trends and racial disparities in the prevalence of urinary incontinence among men in the USA, 2001–2020. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(6):1758–1767. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boorjian SA, Eastham JA, Graefen M, et al. A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol. 2012;61(4):664–675. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost L, Elliott DS. Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:1–13. doi:10.1155/2012/287489
   Google Scholar
• Kim BH, Byun HJ. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center preliminary study in Korea. Prostate Int. 2022;10(3):123–128. doi:10.1016/j.prnil.2022.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madalinska JB, Essink-Bot M-L, de Koning HJ, Kirkels WJ, van der Maas PJ, Schröder FH. Health-related quality-of-life effects of radical prostatectomy and primary radiotherapy for screen-detected or clinically diagnosed localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1619–1628. doi:10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong J, de Gregorio G, Schuth W. Quality-of-life-Fragebogen bei Patientinnen mit Harninkontinenz. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1998;58(11):597–604. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1023008
   Google Scholar
• Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1306–1315. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson L, Brown JS, Shin GP, Luc K-O, Subak LL. Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(3):398–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhanvadia R, Dropkin B, Wolfe A, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter reverses weight gain associated with post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Sex Med. 2022;19(4):S81–S82. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.01.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, et al. US householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(9):1569–1580. doi:10.1007/BF01303162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch GE, Kaufman MR. Male stress urinary incontinence. Urol Clin. 2022;49(3):403–418. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2022.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khouri RK Jr, Ortiz NM, Baumgarten AS, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter outperforms sling for moderate male stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2020;141:168–172. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krhut J, Zachoval R, Smith PP, et al. Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(5):507–510. doi:10.1002/nau.22436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jura YH, Comiter CV. Urodynamics for postprostatectomy incontinence: when are they helpful and how do we use them? Urol Clin. 2014;41(3):419–427. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2014.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs JS, Shakir N, McKibben MJ, Scott JM, Morey AF. Prolonged duration of incontinence for men before initial anti-incontinence surgery: an opportunity for improvement. Urology. 2018;119:149–154. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakir NA, Fuchs JS, McKibben MJ, et al. Refined nomogram incorporating standing cough test improves prediction of male transobturator sling success. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2632–2637. doi:10.1002/nau.23703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco E, Bientinesi R, Gandi C, et al. Patient pad count is a poor measure of urinary incontinence compared with 48‐h pad test: results of a large‐scale multicentre study. BJU Int. 2019;123(5A):E69–E78. doi:10.1111/bju.14566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi YA, Keith CG, Graziano CE, et al. Strong correlation between standing cough test and 24‐hour pad weights in the evaluation of male stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(1):319–323. doi:10.1002/nau.24200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu JS, Breyer B, Comiter C, et al. Incontinence after prostate treatment: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):369–378. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brede C, Angermeier K, Wood H. Continence outcomes after treatment of recalcitrant postprostatectomy bladder neck contracture and review of the literature. Urology. 2014;83(3):648–652. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branche B, Crocerossa F, Carbonara U, et al. Management of bladder neck contracture in the age of robotic prostatectomy: an evidence-based guide. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;8(1):297–301. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bang SL, Yallappa S, Dalal F, Almallah YZ. Post prostatectomy Vesicourethral stenosis or bladder neck contracture with concomitant urinary incontinence: our experience and recommendations. Curr Urol. 2016;10(1):32–39. doi:10.1159/000447148
   Google Scholar
• Gousse AE, Tunuguntla HS, Leboeuf L. Two-stage management of severe postprostatectomy bladder neck contracture associated with stress incontinence. Urology. 2005;65(2):316–319. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Mmonu NA, Thomas H, Rios N, Enriquez A, Breyer BN. Qualitative analysis of Amazon customer reviews of penile clamps for male urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021;40(1):384–390. doi:10.1002/nau.24572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajivassiliou C. The development and evolution of artificial urethral sphincters. J Med Eng Technol. 1998;22(4):154–159. doi:10.3109/03091909809032533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson CC. Artificial urinary sphincter: current status and future directions. Asian J Androl. 2020;22(2):154. doi:10.4103/aja.aja_5_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islah M, Cho SY, Son H. The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter in male and female urinary incontinence. World J Men’s Health. 2013;31(1):21–30. doi:10.5534/wjmh.2013.31.1.21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petero VG Jr, Diokno AC. Comparison of the long-term outcomes between incontinent men and women treated with artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2006;175(2):605–609. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00243-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder BJ, Piotrowski JT, Ziegelmann MJ, Rivera ME, Rangel LJ, Elliott DS. Perioperative complications following artificial urinary sphincter placement. J Urol. 2015;194(3):716–720. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brant WO, Martins FE. Artificial urinary sphincter. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):682. doi:10.21037/tau.2017.07.31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson S, Delk J II. Ectopic placement of AMS 800 urinary control system pressure-regulating balloon. Urology. 2005;65(1):167–170. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brant WO, Erickson BA, Elliott SP, et al. Risk factors for erosion of artificial urinary sphincters: a multicenter prospective study. Urology. 2014;84(4):934–939. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey AF, Cefalu CA, Hudak SJ. High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via transscrotal approach. J Sex Med. 2013;10(2):603–610. doi:10.1111/jsm.12000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal UK, Lopez JP, Flores-Sandoval FN, Khera M. Ectopic low submuscular pressure regulating balloon placement with transfascial fixation for artificial urinary sphincter. Can J Urol. 2021;28(6):10936–10940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mykoniatis I, Osmonov D, van Renterghem K. A modified surgical technique for reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Sex Med. 2020;8(3):378–382. doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2020.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaumier S, Solomon E, Jenks J, et al. Radiotherapy is associated with reduced continence outcomes following implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. Urol Ann. 2017;9(3):253. doi:10.4103/UA.UA_25_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavi A, Boone TB, Cohen M, Gross M. The patient beyond the sphincter–cognitive and functional considerations affecting the natural history of artificial urinary sphincters. Urology. 2020;137:14–18. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1974;112(1):75–80. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59647-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutolo M, Cornu JN, Bauer RM, et al. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): results of a large multi‐institutional cohort of patients with mid‐term follow‐up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(2):710–718. doi:10.1002/nau.23901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS. Long-term outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement: an analysis of 1082 cases at Mayo Clinic. Urology. 2015;86(3):602–607. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deruyver Y, Schillebeeckx C, Beels E, Ridder DD, Van der Aa F. Long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. World J Urol. 2022;40(2):497–503. doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03877-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert KJ, Linder BJ, Morrisson GT, Latuche LR, Elliott DS. A comparison of artificial urinary sphincter outcomes after primary implantation and first revision surgery. Asian J Urol. 2021;8(3):298–302. doi:10.1016/j.ajur.2021.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder BJ, Rangel LJ, Elliott DS. Evaluating success rates after artificial urinary sphincter placement: a comparison of clinical definitions. Urology. 2018;113:220–224. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco E, Gandi C, Marino F, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study. BJU Int. 2021;127(2):229–237. doi:10.1111/bju.15197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacomani CAR, Zequi SC, Costa WH, et al. Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial Sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience. BJU Int. 2018;44(1):114–120.
   Google Scholar
• Sayedahmed K, Olianas R, Kaftan B, et al. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation. World J Urol. 2019;38(1):183–191. doi:10.1007/s00345-019-02756-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüsch T, Kretschmer A, Thomsen F, et al. Antibiotic coating of the artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800): is it worthwhile? Urology. 2017;103:179–184. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.056
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James MH, McCammon KA. Artificial urinary sphincter for post‐prostatectomy incontinence: a review. Int J Urol. 2014;21(6):536–543. doi:10.1111/iju.12392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cógáin MR, Elliott DS. The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate. J Urol. 2013;190(1):113–117. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diao L, Nealon SW, Carpinito GP, et al. Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48:679–685. doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.0089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandyke ME, Johnson BE, Ali SS, Langford BT, Franzen BP, Morey AF. MP71-11 artificial urinary sphincter cuff is most common site of mechanical failure. J Urol. 2023;209(Supplement 4):e1018. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000003339.11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott DS, Barrett DM. Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol. 1998;159(4):1206–1208. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63557-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Joice GA, Patel HD, Manka MG, Sopko NA, Wright EJ. Causes of artificial urinary sphincter failure and strategies for surgical revision: implications of device component survival. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(5):887–893. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2018.02.014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singla N, Siegel JA, Simhan J, et al. Does pressure regulating balloon location make a difference in functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter? J Urol. 2015;194(1):202–206. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman AM, Rasper AM, Terlecki RP. Proof of concept: exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon. Investig Clin Urol. 2018;59(4):275–279. doi:10.4111/icu.2018.59.4.275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMARCO DS, Elliott DS. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 2003;170(4 Part 1):1252–1254. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000085787.21140.db
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, Webster GD. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2075–2079. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65088-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heah NH, Tan RB. Management of urethral atrophy after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: what are the weaknesses? Asian J Androl. 2020;22(1):60. doi:10.4103/aja.aja_110_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Paolone DR. Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy. J Urol. 2001;166(2):547–549. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65981-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrowski I, Ciechan J, Sledz E, Dys W, Golabek T, Chłosta PL. Four-year follow-up on a Zephyr Surgical Implants 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence from one urological centre in Poland. Cent Eur J Urol. 2018;71(3):320. doi:10.5173/ceju.2018.1704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens C, Pottek T. Urinary artificial sphincter ZSI 375 for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men: 5 and 7 years follow-up report. Urologia J. 2017;84(4):263–266. doi:10.5301/uj.5000243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ameli G, Weibl P, Rutkowski M, Hübner WA. PD37-08 A single center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable artificial urinary sphincter (VICTO): results after follow-up> 12 months. J Urol. 2020;203:e731. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000908.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi IG, Ravindra P, Pipe M, Sohawon R, King T, Belal M. The AdVance™ male sling: does it stand the test of time? Scand J Urol. 2021;55(2):155–160. doi:10.1080/21681805.2021.1877342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbert M, Mumm JN, Klehr B, et al. Extended follow‐up of the AdVance XP male sling in the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence after 48 months: results of a prospective and multicenter study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(7):1973–1978. doi:10.1002/nau.24101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye H, Haab F, de Ridder D, et al. Effectiveness and complications of the AMS AdVance™ male sling system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a prospective multicenter study. Urology. 2018;120:197–204. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies TO, Bepple JL, McCammon KA. Urodynamic changes and initial results of the AdVance male sling. Urology. 2009;74(2):354–357. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bole R, Hebert KJ, Gottlich HC, Bearrick E, Kohler TS, Viers BR. Narrative review of male urethral sling for post-prostatectomy stress incontinence: sling type, patient selection, and clinical applications. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(6):2682. doi:10.21037/tau-20-1459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah A, Machkour F, Bouchet E, Plainard X, Descazeaud A. Efficacy of the VIRTUE male quadratic sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective study. Prog Urol. 2019;29(10):490–495. doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajay D, Kahokehr AA, Lentz AC, Peterson AC. Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) greater than 70 cm H2O is an indicator for sling success: a success prediction model for the male transobturator sling. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;2022:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chua ME, Zuckerman J, Mason JB, et al. Long-term success durability of transobturator male sling. Urology. 2019;133:222–228. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giammo A, Ammirati E, Tullio A, et al. Implant of ATOMS® system for treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: results of a single centre. BJU Int. 2019;45(1):127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Marquez-Sanchez GA, Padilla-Fernandez BY, Peran-Teruel M, et al. Remeex® system effectiveness in male patients with stress urinary incontinence. J Clin Med. 2021;10(10):2121. doi:10.3390/jcm10102121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumm JN, Klehr B, Rodler S, et al. Five-year results of a prospective multicenter trial: AdVance XP for postprostatectomy-incontinence in patients with favorable prognostic factors. Urol Int. 2021;105(5–6):421–427. doi:10.1159/000512881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queissert F, Rourke K, Schonburg S, et al. ATOMS (adjustable transobturator male system) is an effective and safe second-line treatment option for recurrent urinary incontinence after implantation of an AdVance/AdVance XP fixed male sling? A multicenter cohort analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;11(1):81. doi:10.3390/jcm11010081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towe M, El-Khatib F, Osman M, Choi J, Yafi FA. The use of autologous fascia in the Mini-Jupette graft: two cases. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32(1):140–141. doi:10.1038/s41443-019-0178-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright HC, McGeagh K, Richter LA, et al. Transobturator sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: radiation’s effect on efficacy/satisfaction. Can J Urol. 2017;24(5):8998–9002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RM, Grabbert MT, Klehr B, et al. 36-month data for the AdVance XP® male sling: results of a prospective multicentre study. BJU Int. 2017;119(4):626–630. doi:10.1111/bju.13704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro M, Bottero D, D’Elia C, et al. Virtue male sling for post‐prostatectomy stress incontinence: a prospective evaluation and mid‐term outcomes. BJU Int. 2017;119(3):482–488. doi:10.1111/bju.13672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doudt AD, Zuckerman JM. Male slings for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Rev Urol. 2018;20(4):158. doi:10.3909/riu080
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer MC, Huckabay C, Nitti VW. The male perineal sling: assessment and prediction of outcome. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1414–1418. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey AF. Re: a valsalva leak-point pressure of> 100 cmH2O is associated with greater success in AdVance™ sling placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2015;193(4):1316. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornu JN, Sèbe P, Ciofu C, Peyrat L, Cussenot O, Haab F. Mid‐term evaluation of the transobturator male sling for post‐prostatectomy incontinence: focus on prognostic factors. BJU Int. 2011;108(2):236–240. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09765.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye BM, Premo HA, Weil D, Peterson AC. The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: tips and tricks for success. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47:1131–1135. doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prebay ZJ, Foss HE, Wang KR, Chung PH. A narrative review on surgical treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence. Transl Androl Urol. 2023;12(5):874–886. doi:10.21037/tau-22-629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo JC, Ruiz S, Lozano M, Arance I, Virseda M, Lora D. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and male Readjustment Mechanical External (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence. World J Urol. 2021;39(4):1083–1092. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03300-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash S, Aboseif S, Gilling P, et al. Four‐year follow‐up on 68 patients with a new post‐operatively adjustable long‐term implant for post‐prostatectomy stress incontinence: proACT™. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(1):248–253. doi:10.1002/nau.23838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash S, Aboseif S, Gilling P, et al. Treatment with an adjustable long‐term implant for post‐prostatectomy stress incontinence: the ProACT™ pivotal trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2854–2859. doi:10.1002/nau.23802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson T, Jhaveri H, Yeung LL. Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(8):2051–2059. doi:10.1002/nau.24135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouprêt M, Misraï V, Gosseine P-N, Bart S, Cour F, Chartier-Kastler E. Management of stress urinary incontinence following prostate surgery with minimally invasive adjustable continence balloon implants: functional results from a single center prospective study. J Urol. 2011;186(1):198–203. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori A, Romano AL, Scieri F, et al. Transrectal ultrasound–guided implantation of adjustable continence therapy (ProACT): surgical technique and clinical results after a mean follow-up of 2 years. Eur Urol. 2010;57(3):430–436. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebret T, Cour F, Benchetrit J, et al. Treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence using a minimally invasive adjustable continence balloon device, ProACT: results of a preliminary, multicenter, pilot study. Urology. 2008;71(2):256–260. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturino L, Dalpiaz O, Pummer K, Primus G. Adjustable continence balloons in men: adjustments do not translate into long-term continence. Urology. 2015;85(6):1448–1453. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjær L, Fode M, Nørgaard N, Sønksen J, Nordling J. Adjustable continence balloons: clinical results of a new minimally invasive treatment for male urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012;46(3):196–200. doi:10.3109/00365599.2012.660986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüsch T, Kretschmer A, Thomsen F, et al. The AdVance and AdVanceXP male sling in urinary incontinence: is there a difference? World J Urol. 2018;36(10):1657–1662. doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2316-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung E, Liao L, Kim JH, et al. The Asia‐Pacific AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter consensus statement. Int J Urol. 2023;30(2):128–138. doi:10.1111/iju.15083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko KJ, Kim SJ, Cho ST. Sling surgery for male urinary incontinence including post prostatectomy incontinence: a challenge to the urologist. Int Neurourol J. 2019;23(3):185. doi:10.5213/inj.1938108.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biardeau X, Hached S, Loutochin O, Campeau L, Sawan M, Corcos J. Montreal electronic artificial urinary sphincters: our futuristic alternatives to the AMS800™. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(10):E396. doi:10.5489/cuaj.4493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yafi FA, Andrianne R, Alzweri L, et al. Andrianne mini-jupette graft at the time of inflatable penile prosthesis placement for the management of post-prostatectomy climacturia and minimal urinary incontinence. J Sex Med. 2018;15(5):789–796. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela RJ, Ziegelmann MJ, Hillelsohn JH, Farrell MR, Kent MA, Levine LA. Preliminary outcomes of the male urethral “mini-sling”: a modified approach to the Andrianne Mini-Jupette procedure with penile prosthesis placement for climacturia and mild stress urinary incontinence. J Sex Med. 2019;16(8):1310–1317. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herschorn S, Bruschini H, Comiter C, et al. Surgical treatment of stress incontinence in men. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):179–190. doi:10.1002/nau.20844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr LA. Bulking agents in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: history, outcomes, patient populations, and reimbursement profile. Rev Urol. 2005;7(Suppl 1):S3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar