Robot-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology: a review

References

• Conrad LB, Ramirez PT, Burke W, et al. Role of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: an updated survey of members of the society of gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(6):1121–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surgical I. Investor FAQ; 2015. Available from: http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-faq#22324. Accessed September 02, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs – the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfakianos GP, Frederick PJ, Kendrick JE, Straughn JM, Kilgore LC, Huh WK. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors. Int J Med Robot. 2010;6(4):405–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(2):180–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno AK, Fader AN. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):922–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(3):407–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):e361–e369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElSahwi KS, Hooper C, De Leon MC, et al. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(2):260–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2015. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):103–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5331–5336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(7):695–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou HY, Chiu LH, Chen CH, Yen YK, Chang CW, Liu WM. Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management: a cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;13:17–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronado PJ, Herraiz MA, Magrina JF, Fasero M, Vidart JA. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165(2):289–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW, et al. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101(2):116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado G, Cutillo G, Pomati G, et al. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(8):1074–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal F, Rafii A. Lymph node assessment in endometrial cancer: towards personalized medicine. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:892465.
   Google Scholar
• Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS, et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):16–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam A, Kim KH, Bryant SA, et al. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(3):604–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Shepherd A, Momeni M, et al. Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):e160–e161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113(1):36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seror J, Bats AS, Huchon C, Bensaid C, Douay-Hauser N, Lecuru F. Laparoscopy vs robotics in surgical management of endometrial cancer: comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(1):120–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey MK, Lin JF, Stewart LE, Makaroun L, Panico VJ, Holcomb K. Comparison of two minimally invasive approaches to endometrial cancer staging: a single-surgeon experience. J Reprod Med. 2015;60(3–4):127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, Chernick M, Dunton CJ. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(4):500–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(1):11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert MB, Abeler V. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon’s experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(3):600–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):e351–e357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J, Reynisson P, Borgfeldt C, Kannisto P, Lindahl B, Bossmar T. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113(2):185–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asciutto KC, Kalapotharakos G, Lofgren M, Hogberg T, Borgfeldt C. Robot-assisted surgery in cervical cancer patients reduces the time to normal activities of daily living. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(3):260–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, Estape E, Dunkin N, Rivera A. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113(3):357–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(3):425–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(1):86–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, et al. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(9):2622–2628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Feijoo B, Gil-Ibáñez B, Pérez-Benavente A, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(1):98–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman PT, Langley G, Munsell MF, Vaniya HA, Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT. Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(4):1355–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M, Slomovitz BM, Ramirez PT. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2(2):101–106.
   Google Scholar
• Magrina JF, Kho R, Montero RP, Magtibay PM, Pawlina W. Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: development of a technique. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113(1):32–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergote I, Pouseele B, Van Gorp T, et al. Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):783–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudry D, Ahmad S, Zanagnolo V, et al; SERGS Group. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(3):504–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Leblanc E, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(9):2430–2435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrina JF, Long JB, Kho RM, Giles DL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy: technique and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(1):184–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes N, Abu-Rustum NR, Ramirez PT, Plante M. Options in the management of fertility-related issues after radical trachelectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(1):117–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Niaimi AN, Einstein MH, Perry L, Hartenbach EM, Kushner DM. Uterine artery sparing robotic radical trachelectomy (AS-RRT) for early cancer of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112(1):76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett AF, Stone PJ, Duckworth LA, Roman JJ. Robotic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer: case series and description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(5):569–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang LT, Lerner DL, Liu CS, Nezhat FR. Fertility-sparing robotic-assisted radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):767–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler JP, Orr CJ, Manahan KJ. Robotically assisted total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for fertility sparing in stage IB1 adenosarcoma of the cervix. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(5):727–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejia-Gomez J, Feigenberg T, Arbel-Alon S, Kogan L, Benshushan A. Radical trachelectomy: a fertility-sparing option for early invasive cervical cancer. Isr Med Assoc J. 2012;14(5):324–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nick AM, Frumovitz MM, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT. Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: open vs robotic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(2):276–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J, Imboden S, Reynisson P, Andersson B, Borgfeldt C, Bossmar T. Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(3):484–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Malpica A, Soliman PT. Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(3):512–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitobello D, Siesto G, Bulletti C, Accardi A, Ieda N. Robotic radical parametrectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our experience and review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(6):548–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Wolf JK, Brown J, Soliman PT. Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(1):18–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrina JF, Magtibay PM. Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy: feasibility and technique. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8(2):206–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz VL. Comprehensive Gynecology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lim PC. Robotic assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115(2):310–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MA, Adams S, Eun D, Lee D, Randall TC. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic exenteration in recurrent cervical cancer Robotics improved the surgical experience for 2 women with recurrent cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(6):663e661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntambekar S, Lawande A, Desai R, Puntambekar S, Joshi GA, Joshi SN. Initial experience of robotic anterior pelvic exenteration at a single institute. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;126(1):41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID. Robotic technology for pelvic exenteration in cases of cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):15–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tergas AI, et al. An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):1038–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynisson P, Persson J. Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(1):95–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Chiu LH, Chen HH, Chan C, Liu WM. Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Med Robot. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
   Google Scholar
• Feuer GA, Lakhi N, Barker J, Salmieri S, Burrell M. Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(3):520–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, Kho RM, Magtibay P. Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(1):100–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno AK, Fader AN, Roche KL, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Tanner EJ. A comparison of colorimetric versus fluorometric sentinel lymph node mapping during robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(2):281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell EL, Huang JJ, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(2):274–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi EC, Ivanova A, Boggess JF. Robotically assisted fluorescence-guided lymph node mapping with ICG for gynecologic malignancies: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(1):78–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson KL, Auer M, Escobar PF. Evolving technologies in robotic surgery for minimally invasive treatment of gynecologic cancers. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10(5):603–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway RW, Bravo RA, Rakowski JA, et al. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging: a comparison of colorimetric and fluorescence imaging. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(1):25–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akdemir A, Yildirim N, Zeybek B, Karaman S, Sendag F. Single incision trans-umbilical total hysterectomy: robotic or laparoscopic? Gynecol Obstet Invest. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
   Google Scholar
• Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G, Ruggiero M, Tana R, Pluchino N. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(7):2638–2643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno AK, Fader AN, Tanner EJ 3rd. Single site robotic sentinel lymph node biopsy and hysterectomy in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(1):190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo HN, Kim TJ, Lee YY, et al. Single-site robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer: a pilot study. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26(1):62–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar