38
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Application of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Genetic Reasons of Miscarriage Tissues

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 85-93 | Received 27 Jan 2024, Accepted 14 May 2024, Published online: 31 May 2024

References

  • Rull K, Nagirnaja L, Laan M. Genetics of recurrent miscarriage: challenges, current knowledge, future directions. Front Genet. 2012;3:34. doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00034
  • van den Berg MM, van Maarle MC, van Wely M M, Goddijn M. Goddijn, Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(12):1951–1959. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.07.001
  • Zheng D, Li C, Wu T, Tang K. Factors associated with spontaneous abortion: a cross-sectional study of Chinese populations. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0297-2
  • Woods L, Perez-Garcia V, Kieckbusch J, et al. Decidualisation and placentation defects are a major cause of age-related reproductive decline. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):352. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00308-x
  • Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368(9535):601–611. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69204-0
  • Kacprzak M, Chrzanowska M, Skoczylas B, Moczulska H, Borowiec M, Sieroszewski P. Genetic causes of recurrent miscarriages. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(10):722–726. doi:10.5603/GP.2016.0075
  • Warburton D, Susser M, Stein Z, Kline J. Genetic and epidemiologic investigation of spontaneous abortion: relevance to clinical practice. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(5a):127–136.
  • A. Swedish Council on Health Technology, SBU Systematic Review Summaries. Prenatal Diagnosis Through Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA). Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU)Copyright © 2016 by the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment; 2016.
  • McNamee K, Dawood F, Farquharson RG. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization in recurrent miscarriage. Br J Hosp Med. 2013;74(1):36–40. doi:10.12968/hmed.2013.74.1.36
  • Hu T, Tian T, Zhang Z, et al. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in 2466 fetuses with ultrasonographic soft markers: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(5):516.e1–516.e16. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.039
  • Wu XL, Li R, Fu F, et al. Chromosome microarray analysis in the investigation of children with congenital heart disease. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):117. doi:10.1186/s12887-017-0863-3
  • Brady PD, Vermeesch JR. Genomic microarrays: a technology overview. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(4):336–343. doi:10.1002/pd.2933
  • McQueen DB, Lathi RB. Miscarriage chromosome testing: indications, benefits and methodologies. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(2):101–104. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2018.12.007
  • Deshpande M, Harper J, Holloway M, Palmer R, Wang R. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010;14(3):421–424. doi:10.1089/gtmb.2010.0014
  • Wenstrom KD. Microarray analysis: elegant, accurate, and expensive. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):199–201. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000407
  • Manning M, Hudgins L. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med. 2010;12(11):742–745. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f8baad
  • Menasha J, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Kardon NB. Incidence and spectrum of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: new insights from a 12-year study. Genet Med. 2005;7(4):251–263. doi:10.1097/01.GIM.0000160075.96707.04
  • Tur-Torres MH, Garrido-Gimenez C, Alijotas-Reig J. Genetics of recurrent miscarriage and fetal loss. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;42:11–25. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.03.007
  • Subramaniyam S, Pulijaal VR, Mathew S. Double and multiple chromosomal aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions: a single institutional experience. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7(4):262–268. doi:10.4103/0974-1208.147494
  • Choi TY, Lee HM, Park WK, Jeong SY, Moon HS. Spontaneous abortion and recurrent miscarriage: a comparison of cytogenetic diagnosis in 250 cases. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57(6):518–525. doi:10.5468/ogs.2014.57.6.518
  • Cai M, Lin N, Xu L, Huang H. Comparative clinical genetic testing in spontaneous miscarriage: insights from a study in Southern Chinese women. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(12):5721–5728. doi:10.1111/jcmm.16588
  • Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Katano K, Suzumori N, Kitaori T, Mizutani E. Abnormal embryonic karyotype is the most frequent cause of recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(8):2297–2303. doi:10.1093/humrep/des179
  • Pylyp LY, Spynenko LO, Verhoglyad NV, Mishenko AO, Mykytenko DO, Zukin VD. Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(2):265–271. doi:10.1007/s10815-017-1069-1
  • Heffner LJ. Advanced maternal age--how old is too old? N Engl J Med. 2004;351(19):1927–1929. doi:10.1056/NEJMp048087
  • Gogiel M, Begemann M, Spengler S, et al. Genome-wide paternal uniparental disomy mosaicism in a woman with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and ovarian steroid cell tumour. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(7):788–791. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.259
  • Lalou I, Gkrozou F, Meridis E, Tsonis O, Paschopoulos M, Syrrou M. Molecular investigation of uniparental disomy (UPD) in spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;236:116–120. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.03.004
  • Fritz B, Aslan M, Kalscheuer V, et al. Low incidence of UPD in spontaneous abortions beyond the 5th gestational week. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9(12):910–916. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200741