Effects of Impacted Lower Third Molar Extraction on Periodontal Tissue of the Adjacent Second Molar

References

• Xiao Y, Huang J, Xiao L. Effects of bone grafting after impacted mandibular third molar extraction for treatment of distal periodontal defects of second molar: a meta-analysis. J Clin Stomatol. 2019;35(2). doi:10.1016/j.joms.2018.07.025
   Google Scholar
• Passarelli PC, Pasquantonio G, D’Addona A. Management of surgical third lower molar extraction and postoperative progress in patients with factor VII deficiency: a clinical protocol and focus on this rare pathologic entity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(10):2070.e1–2070.e4. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvão EL, da Silveira EM, de Oliveira ES, et al. Association between mandibular third molar position and the occurrence of pericoronitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;107:104486. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho H, Lynham AJ, Hsu E. Postoperative interventions to reduce inflammatory complications after third molar surgery: review of the current evidence. Aust Dent J. 2017;62(4):412–414. doi:10.1111/adj.12526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayed N, Bakathir A, Pasha M, Al-Sudairy S. Complications of third molar extraction: a retrospective study from a tertiary healthcare centre in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019;19(3):e230–e235. doi:10.18295/squmj.2019.19.03.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Du YJ. Clinical effects and safety of mesial and horizontal impacted third molars removed by mesial occlusal surface grinding. Hebei Med J. 2018;40(03):416–420.
   Google Scholar
• Lei L, Li HX, Pan SB, Yan FH. [Expression of triggering receptors expressed on myeloid-1 in innate response to Porphyromonas gingivalis in macrophages]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;48(12):730–733. Chinese.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A, Thilander H. The influence of anatomical, pathophysiological and other factors on periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A multiple regression analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18(1):37–43. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb01117.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passarelli PC, Lajolo C, Pasquantonio G, et al. Influence of mandibular third molar surgical extraction on the periodontal status of adjacent second molars. J Periodontol. 2019;90(8):847–855. doi:10.1002/JPER.18-0415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiliu Q. Oral and Facial Surgery [M]. Version 6. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2008:76.
   Google Scholar
• Kim E, Eo MY, Nguyen TTH, Yang HJ, Myoung H, Kim SM. Spontaneous bone regeneration after surgical extraction of a horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: a retrospective panoramic radiograph analysis. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;41(1):4. doi:10.1186/s40902-018-0187-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A. Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A retrospective study. Int J Oral Surg. 1985;14(1):29–40. doi:10.1016/s0300-9785(85)80007-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Du LZ. The effect of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth on the health of adjacent teeth. Proc Clin Med. 2011;20(8).
   Google Scholar
• Leung WK, Corbet EF, Kan KW, Lo EC, Liu JK. A regimen of systematic periodontal care after removal of impacted mandibular third molars manages periodontal pockets associated with the mandibular second molars. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(7):725–731. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00773.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan ZY, Tan Y, Xie XY, He W, Guo CB, Cui NH. Computer-aided three-dimensional assessment of periodontal healing distal to the mandibular second molar after coronectomy of the mandibular third molar: a prospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):264. doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01250-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunn ME, Fish MD, Garcia RI, et al. Retained asymptomatic third molars and risk for second molar pathology. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12):1095–1099. doi:10.1177/0022034513509281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petsos H, Korte J, Eickholz P, Hoffmann T, Borchard R. Surgical removal of third molars and periodontal tissues of adjacent second molars. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(5):453–460. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi D, Rossi D, Rossi D, et al.; Dental Supplement. Complication in third molar extractions. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019;33(3 Suppl. 1):169–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogrel MA. What is the effect of timing of removal on the incidence and severity of complications? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(Suppl 9):S37–S40. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2012.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapasco M, Crescentini M, Romanoni G. Germectomy or delayed removal of mandibular impacted third molars: the relationship between age and incidence of complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:418. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(95)90715-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugelberg CF. Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. A comparative retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;19(6):341–345. doi:10.1016/s0300-9785(85)80007-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fickl S, Fischer KR, Negri B, et al. Tissue response following papilla-sparing and sulcular incisions in oral surgery–an experimental study. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(4):1313–1317. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1069-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqahtani NA, Khaleelahmed S, Desai F. Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017;21(2):317–318. doi:10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_75_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yaffe A, Iztkovich M, Earon Y, Alt I, Lilov R, Binderman I. Local delivery of an amino bisphosphonate prevents the resorptive phase of alveolar bone following mucoperiosteal flap surgery in rats. J Periodontol. 1997;68(9):884–889. doi:10.1902/jop.1997.68.9.884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa AL, Carneiro MG, Lavrador MA, Novaes AB. Influence of flap design on periodontal healing of second molars after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(4):404–407. doi:10.1067/moe.2002.122823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, Gutwald R, Reichman J, Otero-Cepeda XL, Schmelzeisen R. Marginal flap versus paramarginal flap in impacted third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95(4):403–408. doi:10.1067/moe.2003.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirtiloğlu T, Bulut E, Sümer M, Cengiz I. Comparison of 2 flap designs in the periodontal healing of second molars after fully impacted mandibular third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(11):2206–2210. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakse N, Bankaoglu V, Wimmer G, Eskici A, Pertl C. Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: evaluation of 2 different flap designs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(1):7–12. doi:10.1067/moe.2002.119519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaco G, Daprile G, Tavernese L, Corinaldesi G, Marchetti C. Mandibular third molar removal in young patients: an evaluation of 2 different flap designs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(1):15–21. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YW, Lee CT, Hum L, Chuang SK. Effect of flap design on periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(3):363–372. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz YT, Mollaoglu N, Ozmeriç N. Does laterally rotated flap design influence the short-term periodontal status of second molars and postoperative discomfort after partially impacted third molar surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(6):1031–1041. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briguglio F, Zenobio EG, Isola G, et al. Complications in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in relation to flap design: clinical and statistical evaluations. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(6):445–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry FK, Hegde ND, Hegde MN. Postsurgical consequences in lower third molar surgical extraction using micromotor and piezosurgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016;6(2):251–259. doi:10.4103/2231-0746.200334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang W, Shang YY. Clinical observation of minimally invasive extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar. World Latest Med Info. 2020;20(62).
   Google Scholar
• Coomes AM, Mealey BL, Huynh-Ba G, et al. Buccal bone formation after flapless extraction: a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2/absorbablecollagen carrier and collagen sponge alone. J Periodontol. 2014;85(4):525–535. doi:10.1902/jop.2013.130207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(6):545–549. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HB. The effect of minimally invasive extraction on the degree of discomfort and the healing of alveolar bone in patients.General. J Stomatol. 2018;5(5):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Basheer SA, Govind RJ, Daniel A, Sam G, Adarsh VJ, Rao A. Comparative study of piezoelectric and rotary osteotomy technique for third molar impaction. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(1):60–64. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1990
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stella PEM, Falci SGM, Oliveira de Medeiros LE, et al. Impact of mandibular third molar extraction in the second molar periodontal status: a prospective study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017;21(4):285–290. doi:10.4103/jisp.jisp_79_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang XM, Hou GY, Wang WW, Liao JX, Kang FW. Application of the buccal bone osteotomy with piezosurgery in extracting deeply impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;29(1):30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mattout P, Mattout C. Conditions for success in guided bone regeneration: retrospective study on 376 implant sites. J Periodontol. 2000;71(12):1904–1909. doi:10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osunde OD, Adebola RA, Saheeb BD. A comparative study of the effect of suture-less and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(10):1275–1279. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Influence of suturing on wound healing. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68(1):270–281. doi:10.1111/prd.12078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetinkaya BO, Sumer M, Tutkun F, Sandikci EO, Misir F. Influence of different suturing techniques on periodontal health of the adjacent second molars after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(2):156–161. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu YG, Zhong ZH, Chang SH. Influence of the suture method of mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction on the distal periodontal tissue of adjacent teeth. Jilin Medicine. 2014;35(17):3765–3766.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong JS, Chang M. food impaction and periodontal/peri-implant tissue conditions in relation to the embrasure dimensions between implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth: a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2015;86(12):1314–1320. doi:10.1902/jop.2015.150322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons-Vicente O, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Effect on pocket depth and attachment level of manual versus ultrasonic scaling of lower second molars following lower third molar extraction: a randomized controlled trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(3):e11–e9. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J. The influence of the impacted mandibular third molar extraction on the distal periodontal tissue of the mandibu- lar second molar. J Dent Prev Treat. 2016;24(1).
   Google Scholar
• Xie C, Guo FY, Li XS, Cheng B. Effect of third molar extraction combined with simultaneous periodontal repair on periodontal tissue. Chin J Aesthet Med. 2018;27(1).
   Google Scholar
• Wriedt S, Al-Nawas B, Schmidtmann I, et al. Analyzing the teeth next to the alveolar cleft: examination and treatment proposal prior to bone grafting based on three-dimensional versus twodimensional diagnosis-A diagnostic study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(8):1272–1277. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2017.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soeroso Y, Akase T, Sunarto H, et al. The risk reduction of recurrent periodontal pathogens of local application minocycline HCl 2% gel, used as an adjunct to scaling and root planing for chronic periodontitis treatment. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:307–314. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S130257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortell-Ballester I, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Gay-Escoda C. Effects of collagen resorbable membrane placement after the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(8):1457–1464. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corinaldesi G, Lizio G, Badiali G, Morselli-Labate AM, Marchetti C. Treatment of intrabony defects after impacted mandibular third molar removal with bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes. J Periodontol. 2011;82(10):1404–1413. doi:10.1902/jop.2011.100466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobb DC, DeGeorge BR, Chhabra AB. Bone graft substitutes: current concepts and future expectations. J Hand Surg Am. 2019;44(6):497–505. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge J, Yang C, Zheng J, Hu Y. Autogenous bone grafting for treatment of osseous defect after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(3):572–580. doi:10.1111/cid.12466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su YC. Autologous bone graft materials. Oral Implantol. 2014;(08):466–467. doi:10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1904
   Google Scholar
• Liang Y, Kang FW. Repair of distal bone defect of the second molar after extraction of fully impacted mandibular third molars. Stomatology. 2020;40(1).
   Google Scholar
• Singh M, Bhate K, Kulkarni D, Santhosh Kumar SN, Kathariya R. The effect of alloplastic bone graft and absorbable gelatin sponge in prevention of periodontal defects on the distal aspect of mandibular second molars, after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: a comparative prospective study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015;14(1):101–106. doi:10.1007/s12663-013-0599-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Throndson RR, Sexton SB. Grafting mandibular third molar extraction sites: a comparison of bioactive glass to a nongrafted site. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(4):413–419. doi:10.1067/moe.2002.127582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZF. Tissue engineered bone scaffold material in restoration of alveolar socket after extraction of lower impacted third molar. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2011;20(1):93–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sammartino G, Tia M, Bucci T, Wang HL. Prevention of mandibular third molar extraction-associated periodontal defects: a comparative study. J Periodontol. 2009;80(3):389–396. doi:10.1902/jop.2009.080503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer M. Processing of collagen based biomaterials and the resulting materials properties. Biomed Eng Online. 2019;18(1):24. doi:10.1186/s12938-019-0647-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshinuma S, Murakami S, Noi M, et al. Comparison of the wound healing efficacy of polyglycolic acid sheets with fibrin glue and gelatin sponge dressings in a rat cranial periosteal defect model. Exp Anim. 2016;65(4):473–483. doi:10.1538/expanim.16-0031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LC, Chen Z, Chen JP, Bai DH. Comparison of collagen sponge and gelatin sponge in preventing complications after impacted tooth extraction. J Guangdong Med Coll. 2018;36(5).
   Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Seong TW, Cho S, Kim SJ. Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of absorbable collagen sponge after extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: split-mouth design. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):77. doi:10.1186/s12903-020-1063-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelamali T, Saikrishna D. Role of platelet rich fibrin and platelet rich plasma in wound healing of extracted third molar sockets: a comparative study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015;14:410. doi:10.1007/s12663-014-0638-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gandevivala A, Sangle A, Shah D, et al. Autologous platelet-rich plasma after third molar surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017;7(2):245–249. doi:10.4103/ams.ams_108_16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhujbal R, Malik NA, Kumar N, Kv S, Parkar MI, Mb J. Comparative evaluation of platelet rich plasma in socket healing and bone regeneration after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12(3):153–158. doi:10.15171/joddd.2018.024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doiphode AM, Hegde P, Mahindra U, Santhosh Kumar SM, Tenglikar PD, Tripathi V. Evaluation of the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin in alveolar defects after removal of impacted bilateral mandibular third molars. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(Suppl 1):S47–S52. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.181167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renatus A, Trentzsch L, Schönfelder A, Schwarzenberger F, Jentsch H. Evaluation of an electronic periodontal probe versus a manual probe. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(11):ZH03–ZH07. doi:10.15171/joddd.2018.024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dias MJ, Franco A, Junqueira JL, Fayad FT, Pereira PH, Oenning AC. Marginal bone loss in the second molar related to impacted mandibular third molars: comparison between panoramic images and cone beam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020;25(3):e395–e402. doi:10.4317/medoral.23443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens V, De Bruyn H, Thevissen E, Koole S, Dierens M, Cosyn J. Assessment of periodontal bone level revisited: a controlled study on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical evaluation methods and intra-oral radiography. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(1):425–431. doi:10.1007/s00784-017-2129-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabrizi R, Arabion H, Gholami M. How will mandibular third molar surgery affect mandibular second molar periodontal parameters? Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013;10(4):523–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faria AI, Gallas-Torreira M, López-Ratón M. Mandibular second molar periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction in young adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(12):2732–2741. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone SA, Edenfield MJ, Cohen ME. Correlation of acute pericoronitis and the position of the mandibular third molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;62(3):245–250. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(86)90001-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng KY, Tseng YC, Shen EC, Chiu SC, Fu E, Huang YW. Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction. J Periodontol. 2001;72(12):1647–1651. doi:10.1902/jop.2001.72.12.1647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero J, Mazzaglia G. Effect of removing an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the mandibular second molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(11):2691–2697. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.06.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakey GH, Parker DW, Hull DJ, et al. Impact of removal of asymptomatic third molars on periodontal pathology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(2):245–250. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham TAV, Nguyen NH. Periodontal status of the adjacent second molar after impacted mandibular third molar surgical extraction. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019;10(2):311–318. doi:10.4103/ccd.ccd_634_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicus-Brookes C, Partrick M, Blakey GH, et al. Removal of symptomatic third molars may improve periodontal status of remaining dentition. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(10):1639–1646. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar