Bone Remodelling of the Proximal Femur After Hip Revision with a Metaphyseal-Fixation Femoral Stem Component

References

• Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year +results of extensively porouscoated stems in revision Hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1999;369:230. doi:10.1097/00003086-199912000-00024
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald SJ, Rosenzweig S, Guerin JS, et al. Proximally versus fully porous-coated femoral stems: a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):424. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1092-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JH, Liu C, You L, Simmons CA. Boning up on Wolff’s law: mechanical regulation of the cells that make and maintain bone. J Biomech. 2010;43:108e18. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:839–847. doi:10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90152-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyen H, Shimmin AJ. Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total Hip replacement? Bone Jt J. 2014;96(4):442–448. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33036
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohm P, Bischel O. The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:148e59.
   Google Scholar
• Young PS, Middleton RG, Learmonth ID, et al. Conversion of a long distally fixed uncemented revision femoral stem to a proximally fixed implant following fatigue fracture. Hip Int. 2011;21(6):766. doi:10.5301/HIP.2011.8859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanuja HS, Issa K, Naziri Q, Banerjee S, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Results of a tapered proximally-coated primary cementless stem for revision Hip surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(1):225–228. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson RH, Head WC, Higgins LL. Clinical and radiographic analysis of the Mallory Head femoral component in revision total Hip arthroplasty. A minimum 8.8-year and average eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(10):1921–1926. doi:10.2106/00004623-200310000-00009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freitag T, Hein MA, Wernerus D, Reichel H, Bieger R. Bone remodelling after femoral short stem implantation in total Hip arthroplasty: 1-year results from a randomized DEXA study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(1):125–130. doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2370-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh CA, McGovern TF, Schmidt LM. Roentgenographic densitometry of bone adjacent to a femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 1993;292:177–190. doi:10.1097/00003086-199307000-00023
   Google Scholar
• West JD, Mayor MB, Collier JP. Potential errors inherent in quantitative densitometric analysis of orthopaedic radiographs: a study after total Hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1987;69:58–64. doi:10.2106/00004623-198769010-00010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochreiter J, Mattiassich G, Ortmaier R, Steinmair M, Anderl C. Femoral bone remodeling after short-stem total Hip arthroplasty: a prospective densitometric study. Int Orthop. 2020;44(4):753–759. doi:10.1007/s00264-020-04486-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Paprosky WG. Femoral bone loss in revision total Hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(10):601–612. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-21-10-601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruen TA, McNeicep GM, Amstutzm HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17e27.
   Google Scholar
• Martini F, Lebherz C, Mayer F, et al. Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1065e1071. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.82B7.0821065
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JM, Hamer AJ, Rogers A, Stockley I, Eastell R. Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in aseptic loosening after total Hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(4):691–696. doi:10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00237-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M, et al. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered Hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;73(2):115–121. doi:10.1007/s00223-002-2036-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgus DJ, Shimaoka EE, Tipton JS, Eberle RW. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants.Methods and preliminary results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(2):279–287. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.75B2.8444950
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lacko M, Filip V, Gharaibeh A, Lackova A, Folvarsky M, Zamborsky R. Comparison of bone remodelling around short stem and conventional straight stem in total Hip replacement: a prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122(8):548–554. doi:10.4149/BLL_2021_087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasbarra E, Celi M, Perrone FL, et al. Osseointegration of Fitmore stem in total Hip arthroplasty. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17(2):307–313. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2013.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Del Alamo J, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Castellanos V, Gil-Garay E. Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(4):515–524. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated Hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:45–55. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.69B1.3818732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision Hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop. 1995;319:141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL. Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6S):S79–S85. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burger H, Van Daele PL, Odding E, et al. Association of radiographically evident osteoarthritis with higher bone mineral density and increased bone loss with age. Rotterdam Study Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(1):81–86. doi:10.1002/art.1780390111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• David BB. Muscle strength, bone mass, and age-related bone loss. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(10):1547–1551. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibon E, Lu LY, Nathan K, Goodman SB. Inflammation, ageing, and bone regeneration. J Orthop Translat. 2017;10:28–35. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2017.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitani Y. Effective treatment of a steroid-induced femoral neck fracture nonunion with a once-weekly administration of teriparatide in a rheuma-toid patient: a case report. Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:131. doi:10.1007/s11657-013-0131-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang JS, Jeon YS, Ahn CH, Roh TH. Osteosynthesis versus endoprosthesis for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in Asian elderly patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:264. doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1123-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aro HT, Alm JJ, Moritz N, Mäkinen TJ, Lankinen P. Low BMD affects initial stability and delays stem osseointegration in cementless total Hip arthroplasty in women: a 2-year RSA study of 39 patients. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:107–114. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.678798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Xu JW, Li MY, Wu LM, Zeng Y, Shen B. Zoledronic acid for periprosthetic bone mineral density changes in patients with osteoporosis after hip arthroplasty-an updated meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials. Front Med. 2021;8:801282. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.801282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar