Comparing Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Two Neovaginoplasty Techniques for Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study with Swine Small Intestinal Submucosa and Homologous Skin Grafts

References

• Kolle A, Taran F-A, Rall K, et al. Neovagina creation methods and their potential impact on subsequent uterus transplantation: a review. BJOG. 2019;126(11):1328–1335. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morcel K, Lavoué V, Jaffre F, et al. Sexual and functional results after creation of a neovagina in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a comparison of nonsurgical and surgical procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;169(2):317–320. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gari A. Mclndoe Neovagina in patients with mullerian agenesis: a single center experience. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(1):236–240. doi:10.12669/pjms.331.11867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uncu G, Özerkan K, Ata B, et al. Anatomic and functional outcomes of paramesonephric remnant-supported laparoscopic double-layer peritoneal pull-down vaginoplasty technique in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: uncu modification. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(3):498–506. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng Y, Zhu L, Chong Y, et al. The modified McIndoe technique: a scar-free surgical approach for vaginoplasty with an autologous micromucosa graft. Urology. 2019;131:240–244. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisku S, Varghese L, Kekre A, et al. Bowel vaginoplasty in children and young women: an institutional experience with 55 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(10):1441–1448. doi:10.1007/s00192-015-2728-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J, Gehrmann N, et al. Functional and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):317–323. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagani M, Agrawal P, Meka K, et al. Novel minimally invasive technique of neovaginoplasty using an absorbable adhesion barrier. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(1):206–211. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc IA. The treatment of congenital absence and obliterative conditions of the vagina. Br J Plast Surg. 1950;2(4):254–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, et al. Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. J Surg Res. 2001;99(2):282–287. doi:10.1006/jsre.2001.6176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevel CD, Eppley BL, Summerlin D-J, et al. Small intestinal submucosa: utilization for repair of rodent abdominal wall defects. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35(4):374–380. doi:10.1097/00000637-199510000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, et al. Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device. J Surg Res. 2002;103(2):190–202. doi:10.1006/jsre.2001.6349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez Puccini P, Briceno Triana JC. Visco-elasto-plastic modeling of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) for application as a vascular graft. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;88:386–394. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaramillo J, Valencia-Rivero KT, Cedano-Serrano FJ, et al. Design and evaluation of a structural reinforced small intestinal submucosa vascular graft for hemodialysis access in a porcine model. Asaio j. 2018;64(2):270–277. doi:10.1097/MAT.0000000000000618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll MR, Cook JL, Pope ER, et al. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a biomaterial for perineal herniorrhaphy in the dog. Vet Surg. 2002;31(4):379–390. doi:10.1053/jvet.2002.33596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HK, Godiwalla SY, Palmer B, et al. Understanding roles of porcine small intestinal submucosa in urinary bladder regeneration: identification of variable regenerative characteristics of small intestinal submucosa. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014;20(1):73–83. doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greca FH, Noronha L, Bendhack M, et al. Use of small intestine submucosa as ureteral allograft in pigs. Int Braz J Urol. 2004;30(4):327–34; discussion 335. doi:10.1590/S1677-55382004000400013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badylak SF. The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2002;13(5):377–383. doi:10.1016/S1084952102000940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodde J, Janis A, Ernst D, et al. Effects of sterilization on an extracellular matrix scaffold: part I. Composition and matrix architecture. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(4):537–543. doi:10.1007/s10856-007-2300-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodde J, Janis A, Hiles M. Effects of sterilization on an extracellular matrix scaffold: part II. Bioactivity and matrix interaction. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(4):545–550. doi:10.1007/s10856-007-2301-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Ahn HH, Shin YN, et al. An in vivo study of the host tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of PLGA- and/or porcine small intestinal submucosa-based scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2007;28(34):5137–5143. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele L, Frontino G, Restelli E, et al. Creation of a neovagina by Davydov’s laparoscopic modified technique in patients with Rokitansky syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(1):33.e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabaghi S, Zandi M, Ilkhani M. Sexual satisfaction in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome after surgical and non-surgical techniques: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(3):353–362. doi:10.1007/s00192-018-3854-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Adolescent Health Care. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 728: Müllerian agenesis: diagnosis, management, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(1):e35–e42. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callens N, Weyers S, Monstrey S, et al. Vaginal dilation treatment in women with vaginal hypoplasia: a prospective one-year follow-up study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(3):228.e1–228.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt R, Slade P. Living with an incomplete vagina and womb: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of vaginal agenesis. Psychol Health Med. 2003;8(1):19–33. doi:10.1080/1354850021000059232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herlin M, Bay Bjørn A-M, Jørgensen LK, et al. Treatment of vaginal agenesis in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in Denmark: a nationwide comparative study of anatomical outcome and complications. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):746–753. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong X, Xie Z, Jin H. 腹腔镜 Vecchietti 与 Davydov 阴道成形术治疗 MRKH 综合征的对比研究 [Comparison study between Vecchietti’s and Davydov’s laparoscopic vaginoplasty in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015;50(4):278–282. Chinese.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgas K, Belgrano V, Andreasson M, et al. Bowel vaginoplasty: a systematic review. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018;52(5):265–273. doi:10.1080/2000656X.2018.1482220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamiak-Godlewska A, Skorupska K, Rechberger T, et al. Urogynecological and sexual functions after vecchietti reconstructive surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:2360185. doi:10.1155/2019/2360185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliegner JR. Long-term satisfaction with Sheares vaginoplasty for congenital absence of the vagina. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36(2):202–204. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.1996.tb03286.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Liu M, Hua K, et al. Sexuality after laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(6):720–729. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2009.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar