Comparison of Balanced Crystalloids versus Normal Saline in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

References

• Hayakawa K. Aggressive fluid management in the critically ill: pro. J Intensive Care. 2019;7(1):1–3. doi:10.1186/s40560-019-0361-9
   Google Scholar
• Gardner TB, Vege SS, Chari ST, et al. Faster rate of initial fluid resuscitation in severe acute pancreatitis diminishes in-hospital mortality. Pancreatology. 2009;9(6):770–776. doi:10.1159/000210022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finfer S, Liu B, Taylor C, Bellomo R, Myburgh J. SAFE TRIPS Investigators. Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R185. doi:10.1186/cc9293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheingraber S, Rehm M, Sehmisch C, Finsterer U. Rapid saline infusion produces hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(5):1265–1270. doi:10.1097/00000542-199905000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golla R, Kumar S, Dhibhar DP, Bhalla A, Sharma N. 0.9% saline V/S Ringer’s lactate for fluid resuscitation in adult sepsis patients in emergency medical services: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2020;2020:1024907920948983.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox CS. Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest. 1983;71(3):726–735. doi:10.1172/JCI110820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Glassford N, Sutcliffe H, Lam Q, Bailey M. Chloride-liberal vs. chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration and acute kidney injury: an extended analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(2):257–264. doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3593-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellomo R, Hegarty C, Story D, Ho L, Bailey M, Bailey M. Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012;308(15):1566–1572. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.13356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):829–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semler MW, Kellum JA. Balanced crystalloid solutions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(8):952–960. doi:10.1164/rccm.201809-1677CI
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soussi S, Ferry A, Chaussard M, Legrand M. Chloride toxicity in critically ill patients: what’s the evidence? Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(2):125–130. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2016.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roquilly A, Loutrel O, Cinotti R, et al. Balanced versus chloride-rich solutions for fluid resuscitation in brain-injured patients: a randomised double-blind pilot study. Crit Care. 2013;17(2):R77. doi:10.1186/cc12686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanan M, Attokaran A, Murray L, et al. Sodium chloride or Plasmalyte-148 evaluation in severe diabetic ketoacidosis (SCOPE-DKA): a cluster, crossover, randomized, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1248–1257. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06480-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu BU, Hwang JQ, Gardner TH, et al. Lactated Ringer’s solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(8):710–717. e711. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choosakul S, Harinwan K, Chirapongsathorn S, et al. Comparison of normal saline versus Lactated Ringer’s solution for fluid resuscitation in patients with mild acute pancreatitis, A randomized controlled trial. Pancreatology. 2018;18(5):507–512. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2018.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de-Madaria E, Herrera-Marante I, González-Camacho V, et al. Fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s solution vs normal saline in acute pancreatitis: a triple-blind, randomized, controlled trial. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018;6(1):63–72. doi:10.1177/2050640617707864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond DA, Lam SW, Rech MA, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2020;54(1):5–13. doi:10.1177/1060028019866420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jae-Hyun N. Balanced Crystalloids versus Normal Saline in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hanyang University; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Finfer S, Micallef S, Hammond N, et al. Balanced multielectrolyte solution versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(9):815–826. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2114464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; Group* P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10:Ed000142. doi:10.1002/14651858.ED000142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, et al.; Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Inter Suppl. 2012;2(1):1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second international consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality Initiative (ADQI) group. Crit Care. 2004;8(4):R204–212. doi:10.1186/cc2872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926. doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer W, Cheung MW. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):112–125. doi:10.1002/jrsm.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkin I, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA. GOSH - a graphical display of study heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(3):214–223. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(1):64–75. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019;22(4):153–160. doi:10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrer M, Cuijpers P, Furukawa T, Ebert DD. Dmetar: companion R Package For The Guide “Doing Meta-Analysis in R”. R Package Version. 2019;9000:1.
   Google Scholar
• Waters JH, Gottlieb A, Schoenwald P, Popovich MJ, Sprung J, Nelson DR. Normal saline versus lactated Ringer’s solution for intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an outcome study. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(4):817–822. doi:10.1097/00000539-200110000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zyl DG, Rheeder P, Delport E. Fluid management in diabetic-acidosis--Ringer’s lactate versus normal saline: a randomized controlled trial. Qjm. 2012;105(4):337–343. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman H, Mahathar AW, Azlan NNM. Comparing sterofundin to 0.9% sodium chloride infusion in managing diabetic ketoacidosis: a pilot study. Med Health Kuala Lumpur. 2017;12(2):179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Young JB, Utter GH, Schermer CR, et al. Saline versus Plasma-Lyte A in initial resuscitation of trauma patients: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2014;259(2):255–262. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318295feba
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karki B, Thapa S, Khadka D, et al. Intravenous Ringers lactate versus normal saline for predominantly mild acute pancreatitis in a Nepalese Tertiary Hospital. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0263221. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma B, Luethi N, Cioccari L, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled pilot study of fluid resuscitation with saline or Plasma-Lyte 148 in critically ill patients. Crit Care Resusc. 2016;18(3):205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(17):1809–1817. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young P, Bailey M, Beasley R, et al. Effect of a buffered crystalloid solution vs saline on acute kidney injury among patients in the intensive care unit: the SPLIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(16):1701–1710. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.12334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semler MW, Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in the intensive care unit. The SALT randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(10):1362–1372. doi:10.1164/rccm.201607-1345OC
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, et al. Effect of intravenous fluid treatment with a balanced solution vs 0.9% saline solution on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326(9):1–12. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.11684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellum JA, Romagnani P, Ashuntantang G, Ronco C, Zarbock A, Anders H-J. Acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):52. doi:10.1038/s41572-021-00284-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickkers P, Darmon M, Hoste E, et al. Acute kidney injury in the critically ill: an updated review on pathophysiology and management. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(8):835–850. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06454-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond Naomi E, Zampieri Fernando G, Di Tanna Gian L, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults — a systematic review with meta-analysis. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(2):EVIDoa2100010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowell SE, Fair KA, Barbosa RR, et al. The impact of pre-hospital administration of lactated ringer’s solution versus normal saline in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(11):1054–1059. doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan MH, Hassan WM, Zaini RHM, Shukeri WF, Abidin HZ, Eu CS. Balanced fluid versus saline-based fluid in post-operative severe traumatic brain injury patients: acid-base and electrolytes assessment. Malays J Med Sci. 2017;24(5):83. doi:10.21315/mjms2017.24.5.9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esteban-Zubero E, García-Muro C, Alatorre-Jiménez MA. Fluid therapy and traumatic brain injury: a narrative review. Med Clin. 2023;161(1):27–32. doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2023.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng C-H, Chen -T-T, M-Y W, Chan M-C, Shih M-C, Y-K T. Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):693. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03419-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters ME, Sherwin R, Vilke GM, Wardi G. What is the preferred resuscitation fluid for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock? J Emerg Med. 2017;928. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chowdhury AH, Cox EF, Francis ST, Lobo DN. A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and plasma-lyte® 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):18–24. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256be72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury AH, Cox EF, Francis ST, Lobo DN. A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 1-L infusions of 6% hydroxyethyl starch suspended in 0.9% saline (voluven) and a balanced solution (Plasma Volume Redibag) on blood volume, renal blood flow velocity, and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. 2014;259(5):881–887. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfortmueller CA, Funk GC, Reiterer C, et al. Normal saline versus a balanced crystalloid for goal-directed perioperative fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery: a double-blind randomised controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(2):274–283. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL, et al. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg. 2012;255(5):821–829. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825074f5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayebale ET, Kwizera A, Mijumbi C, Kizito S, Roche AM. Ringer’s lactate versus normal saline in urgent cesarean delivery in a resource-limited setting: a pragmatic clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(2):533–539. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent J-L. Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials. Crit Care. 2008;12(2):1–2. doi:10.1186/cc6861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar