References
- AtwoodCEisenbergMSHerlitzJReaTDIncidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in EuropeResuscitation2005671758016199289
- ParadisNAMartinGBRiversEPCoronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitationJAMA19902638110611132386557
- KosterRWBaubinMABossaertLLEuropean Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillatorsResuscitation201081101277129220956051
- LearyMAbellaBSThe challenge of CPR quality: improvement in the real worldResuscitation20087711318325434
- HightowerDThomasSHStoneCKDunnKMarchJADecay in quality of closed-chest compressions over timeAnn Emerg Med19952633003037661418
- SmekalDJohanssonJHuzevkaTRubertssonSNo difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device – a pilot studyResuscitation200980101104110719595496
- RubertssonSKarlstenRIncreased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitationResuscitation200565335736315919574
- LiaoQSjöbergTPaskeviciusAWohlfartBSteenSManual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigsBMC Cardiovasc Disord2010105321029406
- RubertssonSLindgrenESmekalDMechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the linc randomized trialJAMA20143111536124240611
- AliAHothiSSCoxDCoronary intervention on a moving target: A case report and procedural considerationsJ Invasive Cardiol2013258E178E17923913617
- WagnerHTerkelsenCJFribergHCardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation effortsResuscitation201081438338720007005