Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Patient Selection and Special Considerations

References

• Berretta P, Andreas M, Carrel TP, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment valves: a report from an international registry (Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry). Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2019;56(4):793–799. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borger MA, Dohmen PM, Knosalla C, et al. Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(4):713–720. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezw042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meco M, Montisci A, Miceli A, et al. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve versus conventional stented bioprostheses: meta‐analysis of postoperative and midterm results in isolated aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(4):e006091. doi:10.1161/jaha.117.006091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa E, Messina A, Cirillo M, et al. Perceval sutureless valve in freestyle root: new surgical valve-in-valve therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(6):e155–7. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Eusanio M, Phan K, Berretta P, et al. Sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement international registry (SURD-IR): early results from 3343 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(4):768–773. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischlein T, Folliguet T, Meuris B, et al. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161(3):920–932. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu Y, Wang J, Chen Z, Wei J, Li F, Cai Z. Does quicker mean better? Comparison of rapid deployment versus conventional aortic valve replacement. Int Heart J. 2020;61(5):951–960. doi:10.1536/ihj.19-717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmasi MY, Ramaraju S, Haq I, et al. Rapid deployment technology versus conventional sutured bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg. 2022;37(3):640–655. doi:10.1111/jocs.16223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(7):561–632. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143(5):e72–e227. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrel T, Heinisch PP. History, development and clinical perspectives of sutureless and rapid deployment surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Cardiothor Surg. 2020;9(5):375–385. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-surd-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher AA, Laufer G, Haverich A, et al. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):110–5;discussion 115–6. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan JM, Holmes DR, Sherwood MW, et al. The association of transcatheter aortic valve replacement availability and hospital aortic valve replacement volume and mortality in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(6):2016–22; discussion 2022. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel S, Pasam RT, Wats K, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: an updated meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(1):169–178. doi:10.1002/ccd.28520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldendorp K, Doyle MP, Bannon PG, et al. Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothor Surg. 2020;9(5):347–363. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-surd-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischlein T, Meuris B, Folliguet T, et al. Midterm outcomes with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;164(6):1772–1780 e11. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber M, Di Bacco L, Cuenca J, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless valves: results from an international prospective registry. Innovations. 2020;15(2):120–130. doi:10.1177/1556984519892585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solinas M, Bianchi G, Chiaramonti F, et al. Right anterior mini-thoracotomy and sutureless valves: the perfect marriage. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;9(4):305–313. doi:10.21037/acs-2019-surd-172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flameng W, Herregods MC, Hermans H, et al. Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):1453–1457. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.02.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart NA, Dieberg G, King N. Long-term outcomes of on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(9):983–991. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselink RM, de Boer A, Morshuis WJ, Leusink JA. Cardio-pulmonary-bypass time has important independent influence on mortality and morbidity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11(6):1141–1145. doi:10.1016/s1010-7940(97)01217-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers J, Pullan M, Mediratta N, Poullis M. A need for speed? Bypass time and outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(1):21–26. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivu102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salis S, Mazzanti VV, Merli G, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass duration is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22(6):814–822. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2008.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanedan MO, Yuruk MA, Parlar AI, et al. Sutureless versus conventional aortic valve replacement: outcomes in 70 high-risk patients undergoing concomitant cardiac procedures. Tex Heart Inst J. 2018;45(1):11–16. doi:10.14503/THIJ-16-6092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacchino C, Bona G, Rinaldi S, Vallana F. Design and performance characteristics of the Pericarbon Stentless valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(Suppl 1):S102–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranucci M, Frigiola A, Menicanti L, Castelvecchio S, de Vincentiis C, Pistuddi V. Aortic cross-clamp time, new prostheses, and outcome in aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21(6):732–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio A, Salizzoni S, Filippini C, et al. Surgical aortic valve replacement with new-generation bioprostheses: sutureless versus rapid-deployment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(2):432–442 e1. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iino K, Miyata H, Motomura N, et al. Prolonged cross-clamping during aortic valve replacement is an independent predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality: analysis of the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(2):602–609. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abicht JM, Mayr TAJ, Jauch J, et al. Large-animal biventricular working heart perfusion system with low priming volume-comparison between in vivo and ex vivo cardiac function. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(1):71–82. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1580604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca G, Vismara R, Mangini A, et al. Comparison of the performance of a sutureless bioprosthesis with two pericardial stented valves on small annuli: an in vitro study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):139–144. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischlein T, Meuris B, Folliguet T, et al. Midterm outcomes with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeilias P, Baikoussis NG, Prappa E, Asvestas D, Argiriou M, Charitos C. Aortic valve replacement in elderly with small aortic root and low body surface area; the Perceval S valve and its impact in effective orifice area. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11(1):54. doi:10.1186/s13019-016-0438-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berretta P, Meuris B, Kappert U, et al. Sutureless versus rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: results from a multicenter registry. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114(3):758–765. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.08.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio A, Tarja E, Besola L, et al. Early and midterm clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation: results from a multicenter experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(6):1966–1973. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadri V, Bloodworth CH, Madukauwa-David ID, Midha PA, Raghav V, Yoganathan AP. A mechanistic investigation of the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve’s hemodynamic performance. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(1):9–17. doi:10.1007/s11748-019-01154-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverich A, Wahlers TC, Borger MA, et al. Three-year hemodynamic performance, left ventricular mass regression, and prosthetic-patient mismatch after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in 287 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(6):2854–2860. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelli C, Corsini C, Biscarini D, et al. Pledget-armed sutures affect the haemodynamic performance of biologic aortic valve substitutes: a preliminary experimental and computational study. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2017;8(1):17–29. doi:10.1007/s13239-016-0284-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreas M, Coti I, Rosenhek R, et al. Intermediate-term outcome of 500 consecutive rapid-deployment surgical aortic valve procedures dagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55(3):527–533. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer G, Haverich A, Andreas M, et al. Long-term outcomes of a rapid deployment aortic valve: data up to 5 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52(2):281–287. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coti I, Haberl T, Scherzer S, et al. Outcome of rapid deployment aortic valves: long-term experience after 700 implants. Ann Cardiothor Surg. 2020;9(4):314–321. doi:10.21037/acs.2020.04.01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Yi G, Youn YN, Lee S, Yoo KJ, Chang BC. Effect of the prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term clinical outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a prospective observational study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(5):1098–1104. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannacio V, Mannacio L, Mango E, et al. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: analysis of risk factors for early and long-term mortality. J Cardiol. 2017;69(1):333–339. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL, et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(12):1518–1529. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Das S, Nanjappa A, Morcos K, et al. The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival after aortic and mitral valve replacement: a 10 year, single institution experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14(1):214. doi:10.1186/s13019-019-1034-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koene BM, Soliman Hamad MA, Bouma W, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on early and late mortality after aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:96. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-8-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theron A, Gariboldi V, Grisoli D, et al. Rapid deployment of aortic bioprosthesis in elderly patients with small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1434–1441. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvidal P, Bergstrom R, Horte LG, Stahle E. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(3):747–756. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00584-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd D, Luc JGY, Indja BE, Leung V, Wang N, Phan K. Transcatheter, sutureless and conventional aortic-valve replacement: a network meta-analysis of 16,432 patients. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(1):188–199. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.12.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn CD, Williams ML, Chakos A, Hirst L, Muston B, Tian DH. Sutureless valve and rapid deployment valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Ann Cardiothor Surg. 2020;9(5):364–374. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-surd-27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bacco L, Pfeiffer S, Fischlein TJM, Santarpino G. Rapid explantation of rapid-deployment sutureless valve in case of acute endocarditis: how to remove safely sutureless Perceval S prostheses. Innovations. 2017;12(6):483–485. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000427
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah S, Alashi A, Pettersson GB, et al. Characteristics and longer-term outcomes of paravalvular leak after aortic and mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(5):1785–1792 e1. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando T, Briasoulis A, Telila T, Afonso L, Grines CL, Takagi H. Does mild paravalvular regurgitation post transcatheter aortic valve implantation affect survival? A meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(1):135–147. doi:10.1002/ccd.27336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleid MF, Cabalka AK, Malouf JF, Sanon S, Hagler DJ, Rihal CS. Techniques and outcomes for the treatment of paravalvular leak. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(8):e001945. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan K, Tsai YC, Niranjan N, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):100–111. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.06.01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari E, Siniscalchi G, Tozzi P, von Segesser L. Aortic annulus stabilization technique for rapid deployment aortic valve replacement. Innovations. 2015;10(5):360–362. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hori D, Yamamoto T, Kusadokoro S, et al. Evaluation of oversizing in association with conduction disorder after implantation of a rapid deployment valve. J Artif Organs. 2022;25(3):238–244. doi:10.1007/s10047-021-01301-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensminger S, Fujita B, Bauer T, et al. Rapid deployment versus conventional bioprosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(13):1417–1428. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berretta P, Arzt S, Fiore A, et al. Current trends of sutureless and rapid deployment valves: an 11-year experience from the sutureless and rapid deployment international registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;58(5):1054–1062. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezaa144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Gilmanov D, et al. Exploring the learning curve for minimally invasive sutureless aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(6):1537–1546 e1. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muneretto C, Solinas M, Folliguet T, et al. Sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valves in elderly patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate risk: a multi-institutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;163(3):925–935 e5. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilalta V, Cediel G, Mohammadi S, et al. New-onset persistent left bundle branch block following sutureless aortic valve replacement. Heart. 2022;109(2):143–150. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamandi C, Barbanti M, Munoz-Garcia A, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with new-onset persistent left bundle branch block following TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(12):1175–1184. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folliguet TA, Laborde F, Zannis K, Ghorayeb G, Haverich A, Shrestha M. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(5):1483–1488. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalen M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, et al. Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: a multicenter study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(2):524–530. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.08.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT, et al. Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1Pt A):60–69. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehaffey JH, Haywood NS, Hawkins RB, et al. Need for permanent pacemaker after surgical aortic valve replacement reduces long-term survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106(2):460–465. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greason KL, Lahr BD, Stulak JM, et al. Long-term mortality effect of early pacemaker implantation after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(4):1259–1264. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt F, Moscarelli M, Nicoletti A, et al. Sutureless aortic valve and pacemaker rate: from surgical tricks to clinical outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(1):99–105. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt F, Dell’Aquila AM, Santarpino G. How to prevent pacemaker implantation after sutureless aortic valve replacement: tips and tricks. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(2):720–721. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagawa B, Cruz J, Boisvert L, Bonneau D. A simple modification to lower incidence of heart block with sutureless valve implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(2):630–632. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuris B, Lamberigts M, Szecel D. The importance of sizing in sutureless valves. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(3). doi:10.1093/icvts/ivac206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabre O, Radutoiu M, Carjaliu I, Rebet O, Gautier L, Hysi I. Recent improvement in operative techniques lead to lower pacemaker rate after Perceval implant. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(2). doi:10.1093/icvts/ivac182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscarelli M, Santarpino G, Athanasiou T, et al. A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021;33(4):501–509. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivab137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes JDL, Mathew M, Brookes EM, Jaya JS, Almeida AA, Smith JA. Predictors of pacemaker insertion post-sutureless (Perceval) aortic valve implantation. Heart Lung Circ. 2021;30(6):917–921. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2020.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmeier P, Schlomicher M, Stiegler H, Strauch JT, Bechtel JFM. Thrombocytopenia after implantation of the Perceval S aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(1):61–68 e8. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.07.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiritano F, Cristodoro L, Malta E, Mastroroberto P. Thrombocytopenia after sutureless aortic valve implantation: comparison between Intuity and Perceval bioprostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(6):1631–1633. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorusso R, Jiritano F, Roselli E, et al. Perioperative platelet reduction after sutureless or stented valve implantation: results from the PERSIST-AVR controlled randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60(6):1359–1365. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezab175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt D, Thielmann M, Buck T, et al. First clinical experience and 1-year follow-up with the sutureless 3F-enable aortic valve prosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(4):542–547. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillai R, Ratnatunga C, Soon JL, Kattach H, Khalil A, Jin XY. 3f prosthesis aortic cusp replacement: implantation technique and early results. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2010;18(1):13–16. doi:10.1177/0218492309355489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aymard T, Kadner A, Walpoth N, et al. Clinical experience with the second-generation 3f enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(2):313–316. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart GR, Accola KD, Grossi EA, et al. TRANSFORM (Multicenter Experience With Rapid Deployment Edwards INTUITY Valve System for Aortic Valve Replacement) US clinical trial: performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153(2):241–251.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laborde F, Fischlein T, Hakim-Meibodi K, et al. Clinical and haemodynamic outcomes in 658 patients receiving the Perceval sutureless aortic valve: early results from a prospective European multicentre study (the Cavalier Trial)dagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(3):978–986. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerillo AG, Amoretti F, Mariani M, et al. Increased gradients after aortic valve replacement with the Perceval valve: the role of oversizing. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106(1):121–128. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szecel D, Lamberigts M, Rega F, Verbrugghe P, Dubois C, Meuris B. Avoiding oversizing in sutureless valves leads to lower transvalvular gradients and less permanent pacemaker implants postoperatively. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(2). doi:10.1093/icvts/ivac157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimansohn D, Moainie S. Aortic valve replacement using a Perceval sutureless aortic bioprosthesis. Operat Techniq Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;21(4):282–305. doi:10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2017.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Chandola R, Teoh K, Elhenawy A, Christakis G. Perceval sutureless valve – are sutureless valves here? Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11(3):220–228. doi:10.2174/1573403x11666141113155744
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonzalez Barbeito M, Estevez-Cid F, Pardo Martinez P, et al. Surgical technique modifies the postoperative atrioventricular block rate in sutureless prostheses. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(7):2945–2954. doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.07.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen SN, Cohn BM, Nguyen TC. Combined valve surgery with sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: when and why. Ann Cardiothor Surg. 2020;9(5):408–410. doi:10.21037/acs-2019-surd-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokollari A, Ramlawi B, Torregrossa G, et al. Benefits and pitfalls of the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:789392. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.789392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JM, O’Brien SM, Wu C, Sikora JA, Griffith BP, Gammie JS. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(1):82–90. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbanti M, Tamburino C, D’Errigo P, et al. Five-year outcomes of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement in a real world population. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(7):e007825. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar RR, Thourani VH, Mack MJ, et al. Five-year outcomes of transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):799–809. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreas M, Wallner S, Habertheuer A, et al. Conventional versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a single-centre comparison between the Edwards Magna valve and its rapid-deployment successor. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22(6):799–805. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivw052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmanian PB, Kaya S, Eghbalzadeh K, Menghesha H, Madershahian N, Wahlers T. Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: excellent results and increased effective orifice areas. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(1):24–30. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.07.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Eusanio M, Berretta P. The sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement international registry: lessons learned from more than 4500 patients. Ann Cardiothor Surg. 2020;9(4):289–297. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-surd-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arribas-Leal JM, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Aranda-Domene R, et al. Mid-term outcomes of rapid deployment aortic prostheses in patients with small aortic annulus. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021;33(5):695–701. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivab175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C, Raza S, Altarabsheh SE, et al. Minimally invasive approaches to surgical aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106(6):1881–1889. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paparella D, Malvindi PG, Santarpino G, et al. Full sternotomy and minimal access approaches for surgical aortic valve replacement: a multicentre propensity-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(4):709–716. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welp HA, Herlemann I, Martens S, Deschka H. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27(4):481–486. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivy083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(4):1499–1511. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehada SE, Elhmidi Y, Mourad F, et al. Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25(4):624–632. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivx212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita B, Ensminger S, Bauer T, et al. Trends in practice and outcomes from 2011 to 2015 for surgical aortic valve replacement: an update from the German Aortic Valve Registry on 42 776 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(3):552–559. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher A, Coti I, Laufer G, Andreas M. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through an upper hemisternotomy: the Vienna technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(suppl_2):ii29–ii31. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx514
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vola M, Fuzellier JF, Campisi S, et al. Total endoscopic sutureless aortic valve replacement: rationale, development, perspectives. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):170–174. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.11.04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkhy HH, Kitahara H. First human totally endoscopic robotic-assisted sutureless aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(1):e9–e11. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelena HI, Prakash SK, Della Corte A, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon). Circulation. 2014;129(25):2691–2704. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WC, Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 2005;111(7):920–925. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000155623.48408.C5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentias A, Sarrazin MV, Desai MY, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(19):2518–2519. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong TY, Ali WB, Feng Y, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid valve morphology: a roadmap towards standardization. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(1):52–67. doi:10.1038/s41569-022-00734-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersak B, Fischlein T, Folliguet TA, et al. Sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an International Expert Consensus Panel. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(3):709–718. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli A, Berretta P, Fiore A, et al. Sutureless and rapid deployment implantation in bicuspid aortic valve: results from the sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement international registry. Ann Cardiothor Surg. 2020;9(4):298–304. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-surd-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durdu MS, Gumus F, Ozcinar E, et al. Sutureless valve replacement through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy in elderly patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;31(3):458–464. doi:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.09.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen A, Fortin W, Mazine A, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement in patients who have bicuspid aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(4):851–857. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.05.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, Stambulic T, Payne D, Fernandez AL, El‐Diasty M. The use of sutureless and rapid‐deployment aortic valve prosthesis in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: a focused review. J Card Surg. 2022;37(10):3355–3362. doi:10.1111/jocs.16795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri RM, Javadikasgari H, Heimansohn DA, et al. Prospective US investigational device exemption trial of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: one-year outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(5):1773–1782 e3. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szecel D, Eurlings R, Rega F, Verbrugghe P, Meuris B. Perceval sutureless aortic valve implantation: midterm outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(4):1331–1337. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohira S, Pena CDL. The role of sutureless or rapid‐deployment aortic valve prosthesis in bicuspid aortic valve: standard AVR, TAVR, or somewhere in between? J Card Surg. 2022;37(10):3363–3364. doi:10.1111/jocs.16802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Comendador JM, Estevez-Cid F, Gonzalez Barbeito M, et al. Mid-term assessment of structural valve deterioration of Perceval S sutureless prosthesis using the last European consensus definition. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021;32(4):499–505. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivaa299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinelli M, Schwartz L, Spagnola J, et al. Early structural deterioration of a sutureless bioprosthetic aortic valve. Cardiol Res. 2020;11(2):113–117. doi:10.14740/cr1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Eusanio M, Saia F, Pellicciari G, et al. In the era of the valve-in-valve: is transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in sutureless valves feasible? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):214–217. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.11.12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun X, Song Z, Soffer D, Pirris JP. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for early failure of sutureless aortic bioprosthesis. J Card Surg. 2018;33(4):172–175. doi:10.1111/jocs.13567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangner N, Holzhey D, Misfeld M, Linke A. Treatment of a degenerated sutureless Sorin Perceval(R) valve using an Edwards SAPIEN 3. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;26(2):364–366. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivx338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel PM, Chiou E, Cao Y, et al. Isolated redo aortic valve replacement versus valve-in-valve transcatheter valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;112(2):539–545. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile N, Zannis K, Veugeois A, Caussin C. Early outcome of degenerated self-expandable sutureless aortic prostheses treated with transcatheter valve implantation: a pilot series. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(6):1635–1637. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misfeld M, Abdel-Wahab M, Thiele H, Borger MA, Holzhey D. A series of four transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed Perceval valves. Ann Cardiothor Surg. 2020;9(4):280–288. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-surd-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landes U, Dvir D, Schoels W, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in degenerative rapid deployment bioprostheses. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(1):37–43. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapat VN, Attia R, Thomas M. Effect of valve design on the stent internal diameter of a bioprosthetic valve: a concept of true internal diameter and its implications for the valve-in-valve procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(2):115–127. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Chaudhuri K, Nand P. Long-term durability of a Perceval aortic valve implanted inside a calcified homograft root in a patient with Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome. J Card Surg. 2022;37(1):242–244. doi:10.1111/jocs.16091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanekula AS, Nishath T, Aldea GS, Burke CR. Use of a sutureless aortic valve in reoperative aortic valve replacement. JTCVS Techniq. 2022;13:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.02.025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folliguet TA, Laborde F. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve replacement in aortic homograft. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(5):1866–1868. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber M, Moten SC, Quaini E, et al. International expert consensus on sutureless and rapid deployment valves in aortic valve replacement using minimally invasive approaches. Innovations. 2016;11(3):165–173. doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar