Description and phylogenetic position of Amphora aliformis (Bacillariophyta), a new species from Tokyo Bay

LITERATURE CITED

• Ács É., Ector L., Kiss K.T., Cserháti C., Morales E.A. & Levkov Z. 2011. Morphological observations and emended description of Amphora micrometra from the Bolivian Altiplano, South America. Diatom Research 26: 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J., Jansen R.K. & Theriot E.C. 2007. Bridging the rubicon: phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonization of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 193–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1895. Synopsis of naviculoid diatoms. II. Kongliga Svenska-Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar 27 (3): 1–219.
   Google Scholar
• Cox E.J. & Ross R. (ed). 1981. The striae of pennate diatoms. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Recent and Fossil Diatoms, Budapest, Hungary. pp. 115–133. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond A.J., Ashton B., Buxton S., Cheung M., Cooper A., Duran C., Heled J., Kearse M., Markowitz S., Moir R., Stones-Havas S., Sturrock S., Swidan F., Thierer T. & Wilson A. 2012. Geneious version 5.6. http://www.geneious.com.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouy M., Guindon S. & Gascuel O. 2010. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 221–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guindon S. & Gascuel O. 2003 A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W. & Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamsher S.E., Evans K.M., Mann D.G., Poulíčková A. & Saunders G.W. 2011. Barcoding diatoms: exploring alternatives to COI-5P. Protist 162: 405–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1955. Marine littoral diatoms of Beaufort, North Carolina. Bulletin Duke University Marine Station 6: 1–67.
   Google Scholar
• John J. 1981. Amphora australiensis sp. nov. Nova Hedwigia 31: 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Levkov Z. 2009. Amphora sensu lato. In: Diatoms of Europe, volume 5 (Ed. by Lange-Bertalot H.). A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell, Liechtenstein. Pp. 1–916.
   Google Scholar
• Mereschkowsky C. 1903. Les types de l'endochrome chez les diatomées. Botanicheskiia Zhurnal 21: 1–106.
   Google Scholar
• Nagumo T. 2003. Taxonomic studies of the subgenus Amphora Cleve of the genus Amphora (Bacillariophyceae) in Japan. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 49: 1–265.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. & Peragallo M. 1897 – 1908. Diatomées marines de France et des districts maritimes voisins. M.J. Tempère micrographe-éditeur, Grez-sur-Loing, France. 492 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richlen M.L. & Barber P.H. 2005. A technique for the rapid extraction of microalgal DNA from single live and preserved cells. Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 688–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato S., Nagumo T. & Mann D.G. 2013. Morphology and life history of Amphora commutata (Bacillariophyta) I: the vegetative cell and phylogenetic position. Phycologia 52: 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., Schmidt M., Fricke F., Heiden H., Müller O. & Hustedt F. 1874 – 1959. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. O.R. Reisland, Leipzig, Germany. 460 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeman F.R. & Archibald R.E.M. 1986. Observations on Amphora species (Bacillariophyceae) in the British Museum (Natural History). IV. Some species from the subgenus Diplamphora Cleve. Cryptogamie Algologie 7: 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanek J.G. & Kociolek J.P. 2013. Several new species of Amphora and Halamphora from the western USA. Diatom Research 28: 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanek J.G. & Kociolek J.P. 2014. Molecular phylogeny of Amphora sensu lato (Bacillariophyta): an investigation into the monophyly and classification of the amphoroid diatoms. Protist 165: 177–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoermer E.F. & Yang J.J. 1971. Contributions to the diatom flora of the Laurentian Great Lakes. I. New and little-known species of Amphora (Bacillariophyta Pennatibacillariophyceae). Phycologia 10: 397–409.
   Google Scholar
• Wachnicka A.H. & Gaiser E.E. 2007. Characterization of Amphora and Seminavis from South Florida, U.S.A. Diatom Research 22: 387–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P., Park B.S., Kim J.H., Kim J., Lee, H.L. & Han M. 2014. Phylogenetic position of eight Amphora sensu lato (Bacillariophyceae) species and comparative analysis of morphological characteristics. Algae 29: 57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T., Kodama Y. & Mayama S. 2010. Application of a novel cleaning method using low-temperature plasma on tidal flat diatoms with heterovalvy or delicate structure. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 160: 83–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar