Andersenia, a genus of filamentous, sand-dwelling Pelagophyceae from southeastern Australia

REFERENCES

• Andersen R.A., Saunders G.W., Paskind M.P. & Sexton J.P. 1993. Ultrastructure and 18S rRNA gene sequence for Pelagomonas calceolata gen. et sp. nov. and the description of a new algal class, the Pelagophyceae classis nov. Journal of Phycology 29: 701–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billard C. 1984. Recherches sur les Chrysophyceae marines de l'ordre des Sarcinochrysidales. Biologie, systématique, phylogénie. PhD thesis, Université de Caen, 224 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Carter N. 1937. New or interesting algae from brackish water. Archiv für Protistenkunde 90: 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Chadefaud M. 1947. Une nouvelle Chrysophycée marine filamenteuse: Nematochrysopsis roscoffensis n. g. n. sp. Bulletin de la Société botanique de France 94: 239–243.
   Google Scholar
• Cienkowsky L. 1881. An account of the White Sea excursion for 1880. Trudy Imperatorskago s.-Peterburgskago obshchestva estestvoispytateleĭ (= Travaux de la Société impériale des naturalistes de St.-Pétersbourg), vol. 12: 130–171. [ In Russian.]
   Google Scholar
• Conrad W. 1914. Contribution à l'étude des Flagellates II. Thallochrysis pascheri n. g. n. sp. type d'une familie nouvelle (Thallochrysidaceae nob.) de Chrysomonadines. Annales de Biologie Lacustre 7: 126–152.
   Google Scholar
• Dangeard P. 1965. Sur un nouveau genre de Phéophycées: Giraudyopsis nov. gen. (Giraudyopsis stellifer nov. sp.). Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences 261: 2699–2701.
   Google Scholar
• Derbès A. & Solier A.J.J. 1851. Algues. In: Supplément au catalogue des plantes qui croissant naturellement aux environs de Marseille (Ed. by J.L.M. Castagne), pp. 93–121. Nicot & Pardigon, Aix.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoe H.R., Stockell D.A., Bidigare R.R., Latas M., Johnson P.W., Hargraves P.E. & Suttle C.A. 1997. Description and characterization of the algal species Aureoumbra lagunensis gen. et sp. nov. and referral of Aureoumbra and Aureococcus to the Pelagophyceae. Journal of Phycology 33: 1042–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann J. 1941. Une nouvelle Xanthophycée marine: Tribonema marinum nov. sp. Le Bulletin de la Société d'histoire naturelle d'Afrique du Nord 32: 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gayral P. & Billard C. 1977. Synopsis du nouvel ordre des Sarcinochrysidales (Chrysophyceae). Taxon 26: 241–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayral P. & Lepailleur H. 1971. Ètude de deux Chrysophycées filamenteuses: Nematochrysopis roscoffensis Chadefaud, Nematochrysis hieroglyphica Waern. Revue générale de Botanique 78: 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Giner J-L., Zhao H., Boyer G.L., Satchwell M.F., & Andersen R.A. 2009. Sterol chemotaxonomy of marine pelagophyte algae. Chemistry & Biodiversity 6: 1111–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant B., Waller R.F., & Wetherbee R. (2011) Platychrysis moestrupii sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae): a new dimorphic, sand-dwelling haptophyte species from southeastern Australia. Phycologia 50: 608–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansgirg A. 1889. Addenda ad synopsis generum subgenerumque Myxophycearum cum descriptione sp. nov. Cyanoderma rivulare et generis nov. Phaeophycearum ‘Phaeodermatium’. Notarisia 4: 656–658.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann L., Billard C., Janssens M., Leruth M. & Demoulin V. 2000. Mass development of benthic Sarcinochryidales (Chrysophyceae s. l.) in Corsica. Botanica Marina 43: 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda D. & Inouye I. 1995. Ultrastructure and reconstruction of the flagellar apparatus architecture in Ankylochrysis lutea (Chrysophyceae, Sarcinochrysidales). Phycologia 34: 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller M.D., Selvin R.C., Claus W. & Guillard R.R.L. 1987. Media for the culture of oceanic ultraphytoplankton. Journal of Phycology 23: 633–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerheim G. 1884. Über Phaeothamnion, eine neue Gattung unter den Süsswasseralgen. Bihang till Kongliga Svenska vetenskaps-akademiens handlingar 9 (19): 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin J., Norris R.E., Jeffrey S.W. and Pearson B.E. 1977. An aberrant chrysophycean alga Pelagococcus subviridis gen. et sp. nov. from the North Pacific Ocean. Journal of Phycology 13: 259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis I.F. & Bryan H.F. 1941. A new protophyte from the Dry Tortugas. American Journal of Botany 28: 343–348.
   Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S., Honda D., Chihara M. & Shefter M. 1995. Chrysocystis fragilis gen. nov., sp. nov. (Chrysophyceae, Sarcinochrysidales), with notes on other macroscopic Chrysophytes (golden algae) on Guam reefs. Micronesica 28: 91–201.
   Google Scholar
• Pascher A. 1914a. Über Flagellaten und Algen. Berichte der Deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft 32: 136–160.
   Google Scholar
• Pascher A. 1914b. Zur Notiz über Flagellaten und Algen. Berichte der Deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft 32: 430.
   Google Scholar
• Pascher A. 1925. Die braune Algenreihe der Chrysophyceen. Archiv für Protistenkunde 52: 489–564.
   Google Scholar
• Pascher A. 1931. Eine neue braune Fadenalge des Süsswassers (Chrysophyceae). Archiv für Portistenkunde 73: 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Pascher A. 1939. Heterokonten. In: Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland Österreich und der Schweiz, Aufl 2, Bd XI, pp. 1–1092. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W., Potter D. & Andersen R.A. 1997. Phylogenetic affinities of the Sarcinochrysidales and Chrysomeridales (Heterokonta) based on analysis of molecular and combined data. Journal of Phycology 33: 310–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schussnig B. 1940. Über einige neue Protophyten aus der Adria. Archiv für Protistenkunde 93: 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Sieburth J.M., Johnson P.W. & Hargraves P.E. 1988. Ultrastructure and ecology of Aureococcus anophageferens gen. nov., sp. nov. (Chrysophyceae): the dominant picoplankter during a bloom in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, summer of 1985. Journal of Phycology 24: 416–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva P.C. 1952. A review of nomenclatural conservation in the algae from the point of view of the type method. University of California Publications in Botany 25: 241–324.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A., Hoover P. & Rougement J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web-servers. Systematic Biology 75: 758–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor W.R. 1951. Structure and reproduction of Chrysophaum lewisii. Hydrobiologia 3: 122–130.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor W.R. 1952. The algal genus Chrysophaeum. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 79: 79.
   Google Scholar
• Waern M. 1952. Rocky-shore algae in the Öregrund Archipelago. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 30: 1–298.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne M.J & Furnari G. 2014. A census of J.P.L. Dangeard's invalid taxa with proposals to resolve the nomenclatural problems of some of them. Nova Hedwigia 98 (3–4): 515–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne M.J., Andersen R.A., Graf L. & Yoon H.S. 2014. Aureoscheda, a new genus of marine Pelagophyceae from the Bahamas, Caribbean Sea. Phycologia 53: 513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang E.C., Boo G.H., Kim H.J., Cho S.M., Boo S.M., Andersen R.A. & Yoon H.S. 2012. Supermatrix data highlight the phylogenetic relationships of photosynthetic stramenopiles. Protist 163: 217–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar