Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. II. Subgenus Hyalochaete

REFERENCES

• Anonymous 1975. Proposals for a standardization of diatom terminology and diagnoses. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 53: 523–354.
   Google Scholar
• Assmy P., Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Montresor M. 2008. Morphological variability and life cycle traits of the type species of the diatom genus Chaetoceros, C. dichaeta. Journal of Phycology 44: 152–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamnansinp A., Li Y., Lundholm N. & Moestrup Ø. 2013. Global diversity of two widespread, colony-forming diatoms of the marine plankton, Chaetoceros socialis (Syn. C. radians) and Chaetoceros gelidus sp. nov. Journal of Phycology 49: 1128–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clément A. & Lembeye G. 1993. Phytoplankton monitoring program in the fish farming region of South Chile. In: Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea (Ed. by T.J. Smayda & Y. Shimizu), pp.223228. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Cupp E.E. 1943. Marine plankton diatoms of the west coast of North America. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography of the University of California 5: 1–238.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1844. Einige vorläufige Resultate seiner Untersuchungen der ihm von der Südpolreise des Capitain Rofs, so wie von den Herren Schayer und Darwin zugekommenen Materialien über das Verhalten des kleinsten lebens in den Oceanen und den gröfsten bisher zugänglichen Tiefen des Weltmeers. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1844: 182–207.
   Google Scholar
• Evensen D.L. & Hasle G.R. 1975. The morphology of some Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) species as seen in the electron microscopes. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 53: 153–184.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrario M.E., Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Garibotti I. 2004. Morphological study of the marine planktonic diatom Chaetoceros castracanei Karsten (Bacillariophyceae) from Antarctic waters, with a discussion on its possible taxonomic relationships. Botanica Marina 47: 349–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryxell G.A. 1978. Chain-forming diatoms: three species of Chaetoceraceae. Journal of Phycology 14: 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryxell G.A. & Medlin L.K. 1981. Chain forming diatoms: evidence of parallel evolution in Chaetoceros. Cryptogamie. Algologie 2: 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gran H.H. 1897. Botanik. Protophyta: Diatomaceae, Silicoflagellata og Cilioflagellata. Den Norske Nordhavs-Expedition 1876–1878. 7: 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gran H.H. 1908. Nordisches Plankton. In: XIX Diatomaceae (Ed. by K. Brandt & C. Apstein). Botanischer Teil 8: 1–146. Lipsius & Tischer, Kiel und Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Gran H.H. & Yendo K. 1914. Japanese diatoms. I. On Chaetoceras. II. On Stephanopyxis. Videnskap. Skr. I. Mat.-Naturv. Kl. 8: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2014. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 10 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hargraves P.E. 1972. Studies on marine plankton diatoms. I. Chaetoceros diadema (Ehr.) Gran: life cycle, structural morphology, and regional distribution. Phycologia 11: 247–257.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Fryxell G.A. 1970. Diatoms: cleaning and mounting for light and electron microscopy. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 89: 469–474.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1997. Marine Diatoms. In: Identifying marine diatoms and dinoflagellates. (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5–385. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1991. The morphology and taxonomy of the planktonic diatom Chaetoceros coarctatus Lauder (Bacillariophyceae). Diatom Research 6: 281–287.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1993. Note on the morphology of two planktonic diatoms: Chaetoceros bacteriastroides and C. seychellarus, with comments on their taxonomy and distribution. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society 111: 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1996. A morphological study of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyta) from the plankton of the Pacific Ocean of Mexico. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, Botany Series. 26: 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1999. Chaetoceros sumatranus, a member of Chaetoceros section Coarctati, sect. nov. (Bacillariophyceae). Cryptogamie. Algologie 20: 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 2000. Morphology and taxonomy of three little-known marine planktonic Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyceae). European Journal of Phycology 5: 183–188.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Aké-Castillo J.A. 2001. Morphological study of two marine planktonic diatoms of the genus Chaetoceros: C. anastomosans and C. costatus. In: Lange-Bertalot-Festschrift: studies on diatoms (Ed. by R. Jahn, J.P. Kociolek, A. Witkowski & P. Compére), pp. 53–62. Gentner, Ruggell.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Flores Grandos C. 1998. Species of the diatom genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in the plankton from the southern Gulf of Mexico. Botanica Marina. 41: 505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1930. Die kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtihung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In: Kryptogamen Flora von Deutschland, Österreichs und der Schweiz (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst), pp. 1–920. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.h. Leipzig 7.
   Google Scholar
• Kooistra W.H.C.F., Sarno D., Hernández-Becerril D.U., Assmy P., Prisco C.D. & Montresor M. 2010. Comparative molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of taxa in the Chaetocerotaceae (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 49: 471–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S.D. & Lee J.H. 2011. Morphology and taxonomy of the planktonic diatom Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyceae) with special intercalary setae in Korean coastal waters. Algae 26: 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S.D. & Lee J.H. 2014. Chaetoceros atlanticus var. koreanus var. nov. (Bacillariophyta) from the East Sea of Korea and closely related taxa: insight into the ultrastructure of the setae. Diatom Research. DOI:10.1080/0269249X.2014.929031.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S.D., Park J.S., Yun S.M. & Lee J.H. 2014. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. I. Subgenus Chaetoceros. Phycologia 53: 174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno Ruiz J.L., Soto P.J., Zamudio M.E., Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Licea S. 1993. Morphology and taxonomy of Chaetoceros diversus (Bacillariophyceae) based on material from the southern Gulf of Mexico. Diatom Research 8: 419–428.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro J.N. 1982. A survey of the marine diatoms of Puerto Rico III. Suborder Biddulphiineae: family Chaetoceraceae. Botanica Marina 25: 305–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlova, T. Y. (1990). Aperture formation in the diatom genus Chaetoceros. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by H. Simola), pp. 111–116. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.
   Google Scholar
• Ostenfeld C.H. 1903. Phytoplankton from the sea around the Færöes. In: Botany of the Færöes II (Ed. by E. Warning), pp. 559–611. Nordish Forlag, Copenhague.
   Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. 1999. Morphology and taxonomy of Chaetoceros contortus Schütt 1895, with preliminary observations on Chaetoceros compressus Lauder 1964 (subgenus Hyalochaete, section Compressa). Botanica Marina 42: 539–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. & Hargraves P.E. 1988. The Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae) flora of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, U.S.A. Bibliotheca Phycologica 79: 1–196.
   Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. & Hargraves P.E. 1990. Morphology and taxonomy of Chaetoceros compressus Lauder var. hirtisetus var. nova, with preliminary consideration of closely related taxa. Diatom Research 5: 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. & Theriot E.C. 2003. Systematics of Chaetocerotaceae (Bacillariophyceae). I. A phylogenetic analysis of the family. Phycological Research 51: 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R., Cox E.J., Karayeva N.I., Mann D.G., Paddock T.B.B., Simonsen R. & Sims P.A. 1979. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 64: 513–533.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Castillo P.M., Ubierna-León M.A. & Round F.E. 1992. Estudio de Chaetoceros whigamii Brightwell: un taxón mal interpretado. Diatom Research 7: 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Shevchenko O.G. & Orlova T.Y. 2010. Morphology and ecology of the bloom-forming diatom Chaetoceros contortus from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 36: 243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevchenko O.G., Orlova T.Y. & Hernández-Becerril D.U. 2006. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Botanica Marina 49: 236–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smayda T.J. 2006. Harmful algal bloom communities in Scottish coastal waters: relationship to fish farming and regional comparisons — a review. Paper 2006/3. Scottish Executive, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, Stirling, UK. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/02/03095327.
   Google Scholar
• Sunesen I., Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Sar E.A. 2008. Marine diatoms from Buenos Aires coastal waters (Argentina). V. Species of the genus Chaetoceros. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 43: 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift E. 1967. Cleaning diatom frustules with ultraviolet radiation and peroxide I. Phycologia 6: 161–163.
   Google Scholar
• Takano H. 1983. New and rare diatoms from Japanese marine waters. X. A new Chaetoceros common in estuaries. Bulletin Tokai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory 110: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Trigueros J.M., Orive E. & Arriluzea J. 2002. Observations on Chaetoceros salsugineus (Chaetocerotales, Bacillariophyceae): first record of this bloom-forming diatom in a European estuary. European Journal of Phycology 37: 571–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar