Evolution of the diatoms: major steps in their evolution and a review of the supporting molecular and morphological evidence

REFERENCES

• Agardh C.A. 1823–1828. Systema algarum, Literis Berlingianis, Lundae. Vol. 1. 536 pp. Vol. 2. 189 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Agardh C.A. 1829–1830. Lärobok i botanik, N.M. Thomsons Boktryckeri, Malm.v. 416 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Agardh C.A. 1830–1832. Conspectus criticus diatomacearum, Litteris Berlingianis, Lundae.c 66 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J. 2014. Timing marine-freshwater transitions in the diatom order Thalassiosirales. Paleobiology 40: 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J. & Kessenich C. 2015. Untangling the origin and diversification of diatoms. Abstract, Molecular life of the diatoms 2015, Seattle, WA. https://www.ocean.washington.edu/story/Evolution#morning1.
   Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J. & Theriot E.C. 2003. Taxon sampling and inferences about diatom phylogeny. Abstracts Journal of Phycology 39 (supplement): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J., Cannone J.J., Gutell R.R. & Theriot E.C. 2006. The evolution of elongate shape in diatoms. Journal of Phycology 42: 655–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J., Jansen R.K. & Theriot E.C. 2007. Bridging the Rubicon: phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonizations of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 193–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J., Beszteri B., Julius M.L. & Theriot E.C. 2011. The model marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana likely descended from a freshwater ancestor in the genus Cyclotella. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 125. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous 1975. Proposals for a standardization of diatom terminology and diagnoses. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 53: 323–354.
   Google Scholar
• Armbrust E.V. 2009. The life of diatoms in the world's oceans. Nature 459: doi:10.1033/nature08057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth M., Ruck E., Lobban C., Romanovicz R. & Theriot E. 2012. A revision of the genus Cyclophora and description of Astrosyne gen. nov. (Bacillariophyta), two genera with the pyrenoids contained within pseudosepta. Phycologia 51: 684–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth M.P., Nakov T. & Theriot E.C. 2013. Revisiting Ross and Sims 1971: toward a molecular phylogeny of the Biddulphiaceae and Eupodiscaceae Bacillariophyceae. Journal of Phycology 49: 1207–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berney C. & Pawlowski J. 2006. A molecular timescale for eukaryotic evolution recalibrated with the continuous microfossil record. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 273: 1867–1872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya D. & Medlin L.K. 1995. The phylogeny of plastids: a review based on comparisons of small subunit ribosomal RNA coding regions. Journal of Phycology 31: 489–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya D., Medlin L.K. Wainwright P.O., Ariztia E.V., Bibeau C., Stickel S.K. & Sogin M.L. 1992. Algae containing chlorophyll- a+c are paraphyletic: molecular evolutionary analysis of the Chromophyta. Evolution 46: 1801–1817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya D., Helmchen T. & Melkonian M. 1995. Molecular evolutionary analyses of nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA identify an independent rhizopod lineage containing the Euglyphina and the Chlorarachniophyta. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 42: 65–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosak S., Šupraha L., Nanjappa D., Kooistra W.H.C.F & Sarno D. 2015. Morphology and phylogeny of four species from the genus Bacteriastrum (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 54: 130–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler C., Allen A.E., Badger J.H., Grimwood J., Jabbari K., Kuo A., Maheswari U., Martens C., Maumus F., Otillar R.P., Rayko E., Salamov E.A., Vandepoele K., Beszteri B., Gruber A., Heijde M., Katinka M., Mock T., Valentin K., Vérret F., Berges J.A., Brownlee C., Cadoret J.-P., Chiovitti A., Choi C., Jae C., De Martino S., Alessandra D., Durkin J., Chris C., Falciatore A., Fournet J., Haruta M., Huysman M., Jenkins B.D., Jiroutova K., Jorgensen R.E., Joubert Y., Kaplan A., Kroeger N., Kroth P., La Roche J., Lindquist E., Lommer M., Martin-Jézéquel V. Lopez P.J., Lucas S., Mangogna M., McGinnis K., Medlin L.K., Montsant A., Oudot-Le Secq M.-P., Napoli C., Obornik M., Petit J.-L., Porcel B.M., Poulsen N., Robison M., Rychlewski L., Rynearson T.A., Schmutz J., Schnitzler P.M., Shapiro H., Siaut M., Stanley M., Sussman M.J., Taylor A., Vardi A.F., von Dassow P., Vyverman W., Willis A., Wyrwicz L.S., Rokhsar D.S., Weissenbach J., Armbrust E.V., Green B.R., Van de Peer Y. & Grigoriev I.V. 2008. The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the dynamic nature and multi-lineage evolutionary history of diatom genomes. Nature 456: 239–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J.W. & Sorhannus U. 2010. A molecular genetic timescale for the diversification of autotrophic Stramenopiles (Ochrophyta): substantive underestimation of putative fossil ages. PLoS ONE 5: e12759. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder K. & Medlin L.K. 2007. Molecular assessment of phylogenetic relationships in selected species/genera in the naviculoid diatoms (Bacillariophyta). I. The genus Placoneis. Nova Hedwigia 85: 331–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder K. & Medlin L.K. 2008a. Molecular assessment of phylogenetic relationships in selected species/genera in the naviculoid diatoms (Bacillariophyta). II. Selected genera and families. Diatom Research 23: 331–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder K. & Medlin L.K. 2008b. Molecular assessment of phylogenetic relationships in selected species/genera in the naviculoid diatoms (Bacillariophyta). III. The genus Hippondonta. Diatom Research 23: 283–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder K., Sato S. & Medlin L.K. 2008. Molecular assessment of phylogenetic relationships in selected species/genera in the naviculoid diatoms (Bacillariophyta). IV. The genera Pinnularia and Caloneis. Diatom 24: 8–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalier-Smith T. & Chao E.E.-Y. 2006. Phylogeny and megasystematics of phagotrophic heterokonts Kingdom Chromista. Journal of Molecular Research 62: 388–420.
   Google Scholar
• Choi H.G., Joo H.M., Jung W., Hong S.S., Kang J.S. & Kang S.H. 2008. Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of some psychrophilic polar diatoms (Bacillariophyta). Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 133: 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford R.M. & Sims P.A. 2006. The diatoms Radialiplicata sol Ehrenb. Gleser and R. clavigera Grun. Gleser and their transfer to Ellerbeckia thus a genus with freshwater and marine representatives. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 130: 137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Davidovich N.A. 2012. Pseudopodial activity of the gamete surface in araphid pennate diatoms. XXII International Diatom Symposium Abstracts (Ed. by Soen K.). p. 150. Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Davidovich N.A., Kaczmarska I., Karpov S.A., Davidovich O.I., Michael L., MacGillivary M.L. & Mather L. 2012. Mechanism of male gamete motility in araphid pennate diatoms from the genus Tabularia (Bacillariophyta). Protist 163: 480–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehara M., Inagaki Y., Watanabe K.I. & Ohama T. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of diatom coxI genes and implications of a fluctuating GC content on mitochondrial genetic code evolution. Current Genetics 37: 29–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans K.M., Wortley A.H. & Mann D.G. 2007. An assessment of potential diatom barcode genes (cox1 rbcL 18S, ITS rDNA) and their effectiveness in determining relationships in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta). Protist 158: 349–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkowski P.G., Katz M.E., Knoll A.J., Quigg A., Raven J.A., Schofield O. & Taylor F.J.R. 2004a. The evolution of the modern phytoplankton. Science 305: 354–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkowski P.G., Schofield O., Katz M.E., van de Schootbrugge B. & Knoll A. 2004b. Why is the land green and the ocean red? In: Coccolithophores – from molecular processes to global impact (Ed. by H. Thierstein & J. Young), pp. 429–453. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel Z.V. & Kotrc B. 2010. Silica use through time: macroevolutionary change in the morphology of the diatom frustule. Geomicrobiology Journal 27: 596–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forti A. 1926. Achille forti bibliografia (1898–1925). La Tipografica Veronese, Verona. 16 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Frada M.J., Bidle K.D., Probert I. & de Vargas C. 2012. In-situ survey of life cycle phases of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyta). Environmental Microbiology 14: 1558–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frommolt R., Werner S., Paulsen H., Goss R., Wilhelm C., Zauner S., Maier U.G., Grossman A.R., Bhattacharya D. & Lohr M. 2008. Ancient recruitment by chromists of green algal genes encoding enzymes for carotenoid biosynthesis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 2653–2657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geitler L. 1932. Der Formwechsel der pennaten Diatomeen (Kieselalgen). Archiv für Protistenkunde 78: 1–226.
   Google Scholar
• Graham L.E. & Wilcox L.W. 2000. Algae. Prentice-Hall, London, UK. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Guillou L. 2011. Characterization of the Parmales: much more than the resolution of a taxonomic enigma. Journal of Phycology 47: 2–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillou L., Chrétiennot-Dinet M.J., Medlin L.K., Claustre H., Loiseauxde-Goër S. & Vaulot D. 1999. Bolidomonas, a new genus with two species belonging to a new algal class, the Bolidophyceae (Heterokonta). Journal of Phycology 35: 368–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson J., Elwood H., Ingold A., Kindle K. & Sogin M.L. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships between chlorophytes, chrysophytes, and oomycetes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unites States of America 84: 5823–5827.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood D.M. & Gersonde R. 1990. Lower Cretaceous diatoms from ODP Leg 113 Site 693 (Weddell Sea) part 2, resting spores, chrysophycean cysts, and endoskeletal dinoflagellates, and notes on the origins of diatoms. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results 113: 403–425.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood D.M., Chang K.H. & Nikolaev V.A. 2004. Late Jurassic to earliest Cretaceous diatoms from Jasong Synthem, Southern Korea: evidence for a terrestrial origin. In: 18th International Diatom Symposium, Abstracts. (Ed. by A. Witkowski, T. Radziejewska, B. Wawrzyniak-Wydrowska G. Daniszewska-Kowalczyk & M. Bok), p. 81. Gdansk, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand M. & Lerch S.J.L. 2015. Diatom silica biomineralization: parallel development of approaches and understanding. Seminars in Cell & Developmental and Biology http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis D.M., Moritz C. & Mable B.K. 1996. Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, 655 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ichinomiya M., Yoshikawa S., Kamiya M., Ohki K., Takaichi S. & Kuwata A. 2011. Isolation and characterization of Parmales (Heterokonta/Heterokontophyta/Stramenopiles) from the oyashio region western north pacific. Journal of Phycology 47: 144–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idei M., Osada K., Sato S., Toyoda K., Nagumo T. & Mann D.G. 2012. Gametogenesis and auxospore development in Actinocyclus (Bacillariophyta). PLoS ONE 7: e41890. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonski D. 2005. Mass extinctions and macroevolution. Paleobiology 31: 192–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John U., Fensome R.A. & Medlin L.K. 2003. The application of a molecular clock based on molecular sequences and the fossil record to explain the biogeographic distribution within the Alexandrium tamarense ‘species complex’. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1015–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarska I. & Ehrman J.M. 2015. Auxosporulation in Paralia guyana MacGillivary (Bacillariophyta) and possible new insights into the habit of the earliest diatoms. PLoS ONE 10 (10): e0141150. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarska I. & Medlin L.K. 2009. Reply to Theriot (2008; 44:821–833) comments on Kaczmarska et al. (2006) “Application of phylogenetic principles”. Journal of Phycology 45: 987–994.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarska I., Ehrman J.M. & Bates S.S. 2001. A review of auxospore structure ontogeny and diatom phylogeny. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by Economou-Amill A.), pp. 153–168. University of Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarska I., Beaton M., Benoit A.C. & Medlin L.K. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of selected members of the Order Thalassiosirales (Bacillariophyta) and evolution of the fultoportula. Journal of Phycology 42: 121–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarska I., Poulíčková A., Sato S., Edlund M.B., Idei M., Watanabe T. & Mann D.G. 2013. Proposals for a terminology for diatom sexual reproduction, auxospores and resting stages. Diatom Research 28: 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten G. 1928. Bacillariophyta (Diatomaceae). In: Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilie, 2nd ed. (Ed. by A. Engler & K. Prantl), pp. 105–303. W. Englemann, Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kessenich C.R., Ruck E.C., Schurko A.M., Wickett N.J. & Alverson A.J. 2014. Transcriptomic insights into the life history of bolidophytes, the sister lineage to diatoms. Journal of Phycology 50: 977–983.
   Google Scholar
• Konno S. & Jordan R.W. 2012. Parmales. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK. DOI:10.10029789470015902.a0023691.
   Google Scholar
• Kooistra W.H.C.F. & Medlin L.K. 1996. Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). IV.A reconstruction of their age from small subunit rRNA coding regions and fossil record. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 391–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooistra W.H.C.F., de Stefano M., Mann D.G., Salma N. & Medlin L.K. 2003. The phylogenetic position of Toxarium within the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology 39: 185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooistra W.H.C.F., Forlani G., & de Stefano M. 2008. Adaptation of araphid pennate diatoms to a planktonic existance. Marine Ecology 30: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooistra W.H.F.C., Sarno D., Hernandez-Becerril D.U., Assmy P., Di Prisco C. & Montresor M. 2010. Comparative molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of taxa in the Chaetocerotaceae (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 49: 471–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger N. & Poulsen N. 2008. Diatoms–From cell wall biogenesis to nanotechnology. Annual Review of Genetics 42: 83–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn S.F., Klein G., Halliger H., Hargraves P. & Medlin L.K. 2006. A new diatom, Mediopyxis helysia gen. nov. and sp. nov. (Mediophyceae), from the North Sea and the Gulf of Maine as determined from morphological and phylogenetic characteristics. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 130: 307–324.
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1844a. Die Sophisten und Dialektiker die gefährlicihsten Feinde der wissenschaftlichen Botanik. W. Köhn, Nordhausen. 21 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1844b. Die kieselschaligen Bacillarien oder Diatomeen. W. Köhn, Nordhausen. Table 30, 152 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lee M.A., Faria D.G., Han M.S. & Lee J. 2013. Evaluation of nuclear ribosomal RNA and chloroplast gene markers for the DNA taxonomy of centric diatoms. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 50: 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C., Ashworth M.P., Witkowski A., Dąbek P., Medlin L.K., Kooistra W.H.C.F., Sato S., ZgŁobicka I., KurzydŁowski K.J., Theriot E.C., Sabir J.S.M., Khiyami M.A., Mutwakil M.H.Z., Sabir M.H., Alharbi N.S., Hajarah N.H., Qing S. & Jansen R.K. 2015. New insights into Plagiogrammaceae (Bacillariophyta) based on multigene phylogenies and morphological characteristics with the description of a new genus and three new species. PLOS One 10: e0139300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipps J.H. 1970. Plankton evolution. Evolution 24: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S. & Ashworth M.P. 2014. Hanicella moenia, gen. et sp. nov., a ribbon-forming diatom (Bacillariophyta) with complex girdle bands, compared to Microtabella interrupta and Rhabdonema cf.adriaticum: implications for Striatellales, Rhabdonematales, and Grammatophoraceae, fam. nov. Journal of Phycology 50: 860–884.doi: 10.1111/jpy.12217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne-Simon M.-F. 1962. L'auxosporulation chez une Tabellariacée marine, Grammatophora marina Lyngb. Kütz Diatomée. Cahiers des Biologie Marine 3: 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. & Marchant H.J. 1989. The origin of the diatom and its life cycle. In: The chromophyte algae: problems and perspectives (Ed. by J.C. Green, B.S.C. Leadbeater & W.L. Diver), pp. 307–323. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. & Vanormelingen P. 2013. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 60: 414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2002. Why silica or better yet why not silica? Speculations as to why the diatoms utilise silica as their cell wall material. Diatom Research 17: 453–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2007. Continued ideas on the evolution of silica. Diatom Research 22: 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2008. Molecular clocks and inferring evolutionary milestones and biogeography. In: The microalgae. Origin and evolution of natural diversity (Ed. by H. Okada, S.F. Mawatari, N. Suzuki & P. Gautam), pp. 31–42. 21st Century COE for Neo-Science of Natural History, Hokkaido, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2010. Pursuit of a natural classification of diatoms: an incorrect comparison of published data. European Journal of Phycology 45: 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2011a. A review of the evolution of the diatoms from the origin of the lineage to their populations. In: The diatom world (Ed. by J. Seckbach & P. Kociolek), pp. 93–118. CRC Publications, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2011b. The Permian Triassic extinction forces the radiation of the modern phytoplankton. Phycologia 50: 684–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2014. Evolution of the diatoms: VIII. Re-examination of the SSU-rRNA gene using multiple outgroups and a cladistic analysis of valve features. Journal of Biodiversity, Bioprospecting and Development 1: 129.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2016a. Opinion: can coalescent models explain deep divergences in the diatoms and argue for the acceptance of paraphyletic taxa at all taxonomic hierarchies? Nova Hedwigia, DOI:10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2015/0295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2016b. A timescale for diatom evolution based on four molecular markers: reassessment of ghost lineages and major steps defining diatom evolution. Vie et Milleu, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. & Kaczmarska I. 2004. Evolution of the diatoms: V. Morphological and cytological support for the major clades and a taxonomic revision. Phycologia 43: 245–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. & Kaczmarska I. 2008. Correctly assigning original discoveries to original authors. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50: 407–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Williams D.M. & Sims P.A. 1993. The evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). I. Origin of the group and assessment of the monophyly of its major divisions. European Journal of Phycology 28: 261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Gersonde R., Kooistra W.H.C.F. & Wellbrock U. 1996a. Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta): II. Nuclear-encoded small-subunit rRNA sequences comparisons confirm a paraphyletic origin for the centric diatoms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Gersonde R., Kooistra W.H.C.F. & Wellbrock U. 1996b. Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). III. Molecular evidence for the origin of the Thalassiosirales. Desikachary Festschrift Nova Hedwigia 112: 221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Kooistra W.C.H.F., Potter D., Saunders G.W. & Andersen R.A. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the ‘golden algae’ Haptophytes heterokont chromophytes and their plastids. Plant Systematics and Evolution (Supplement) 11: 187–219.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Kooistra W.C.H.F. & Schmid A.-M. 2000. A review of the evolution of the diatoms a total approach using molecules, morphology and geology. In: The origin and early evolution of the diatoms (Ed. by A. Wittkowski & J. Sieminska), pp. 13–35. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica Special volume. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Science, Cracow.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Metfies K., John U. & Olsen J. 2007a. Algal molecular systematics: a review of the past and prospects for the future. In: Unravelling the algae: the past, present and future of algal systematics. (Ed. by J. Broadie & J. Lewis), pp. 234–253.Systematics Association, Special Volume 75. Wiley, London.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Saez A.G. & Young J.R. 2007b. Did mixotrophy prevent phytoplankton extinctions across the K/T boundary? Marine Micropaleontology 67: 69–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Jung I., Bahulikar R., Mendgen K. & Kroth P. 2008a. Evolution of the diatoms. VI. Assessment of the new genera in the araphids using molecular data. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 133: 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Sato S., Mann D.G. & Kooistra W.C.H.F. 2008b. Molecular evidence confirms sister relationship of Ardissonea, Climacosphenia, and Toxarium within the bipolar centric diatoms (Bacillariophyta, Mediophyceae), and cladistic analyses confirm that extremely elongated shape has arisen twice in the diatoms. Journal of Phycology 44: 1340–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. Yang I & Sato S. 2011. Evolution of the Diatoms. VII. Four gene phylogeny assesses the validity of selected araphid genera. Festschrift for Prof. H. Lange-Bertalot. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 141: 505–551.
   Google Scholar
• Meneghini G. 1846. Sulla animaliti delle Diatomee e revisione organografica dei generi di Diatomee dal Kützing. Atti del Real Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettered Arti 1845: 1–191.
   Google Scholar
• Meneghini G. 1853. On the animal nature of diatomeae with an organographical revision of the genera established by Kützing. Botanical and Physiological Memoirs (Ray Society) II: 345–513.
   Google Scholar
• Merezhkowsky C. 1901a. K voprosu o Klassifikatsii diatomovkh vodorosle [On the classification of diatomic algae]. Botanischeskaya Zapiski 18: 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Merezhkowsky C. 1901b. Étude sur l'endochrome des diatomées. Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Petersbourg, ser. 8, 116: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Merezhkowsky C. 1902. On the classification of diatoms. Annals and Magazine of Natural History ser. 7, 9: 65–68.
   Google Scholar
• Merezhkowsky C. 1902–1903. Le types de l'endochrome chez les diatomees. Scripta Botanica Horti Universitatis Imperialis Petropolitanae 21: 1–193.
   Google Scholar
• Merezhkowsky C. 1903a. Les types des auxospores chez les diatomées et leur évolution. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Botanique 17: 225–262.
   Google Scholar
• Merezhkowsky C. 1903b. K morfologii diatomovkh vodorovslei = Zur morphologie der diatomeen = [= Morphology of diatoms]. Imperatorskaya Universiteta, Kasan. 427 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mock T. & Medlin L.K. 2012. Genomics and genetics of diatoms. In: Genomic insights into the biology of algae (Ed. by Piganeau G.), pp. 245–284. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Moniz M.B.J. & Kaczmarska I. 2009a. Barcoding diatoms: is there a good marker? Molecular Ecological Research 9: 65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniz M.B.J. & Kaczmarska I. 2009b. Barcoding of diatoms: nuclear encoded ITS revisited. Protist DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2009.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa A., Beszteri B., Maier U.G., Bowler C., Valentin K.U. & Bhattacharya D. 2009. Genomic footprints of a cryptic plastid endosymbiosis in diatoms. Science 324: 1724–1726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaev V.L. & Harwood D.M. 2002. Diversity and system of classification in centric diatoms. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by Economu-Amilli A.), pp. 127–152. University of Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Not F., Valentin K., Romari K., Massana R., Vaulot D. & Medlin L.K. 2007. Picobiliphytes: a marine picoplanktonic algal group with unknown affinities to other eukaryotes. Science 315: 253–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Z., Lerch S.J.L., Xu L., Li X., Yen-Jun Chuang Y.-J., Jane Y., Howe J.Y., Mahurin S.M., Dai S. & Hildebrand M. 2014. Electronically transparent graphene replicas of diatoms: a new technique for the investigation of frustule morphology. Science Reports 4: doi :10.1038/srep06117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascher A. 1921. Über die einstimmungen zwischen Diatomeen, Heterokonten und Chrysomonaden. Berichte der Deutsch Botanisches Gesellschaft 39: 236–240.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. & Peragallo M. 1897–1908. Diatomées marines de France et des districts maritimes voisin. Micrographie-éditeur, Grez-sur-Loing. 557 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen J., Teich R., Brinkmann H. & Cerff R. 2007. A “green” phosphoribulokinase in complex algae with red plastids: evidence for a single secondary endosymbiosis leading to haptophytes, cryptophytes, heterokonts, and dinoflagellates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 62: 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillippe H., Sorhanuus U., Baroin A., Perasso R., Gasse F. & Adoutte A. 1994. Comparison of molecular and palaeontological record in diatoms suggests a major gap in the fossil record. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 7: 247–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett-Heaps J., Schmid A.-M.M. & Edgar L.A. 1990. The cell biology of diatom valve formation. In: Progress in phycological research, vol. 7 (Ed. by F.E. Round & D.J. Chapman), pp. 1–168. Biopress Ltd., Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rabosky D.L. & Sorhannus U. 2009. Diversity dynamics of marine phytoplankton diatoms across the Cenozoic. Nature 457: 183–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renne P.R. 1995. Excess 40Ar in biotite and hornblende from the Nor'il 1 intrusion, Siberia, implications for the age of the Siberian Traps. Earth Planet Scientific Letters 131: 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards T.A., Vepritskiy A.A., Gouliamova D.E. & Nierzwicki-Bauer S.A. 2005. The molecular diversity of freshwater picoeukaryotes from an oligotrophic lake reveals diverse distinctive and globally dispersed lineages. Environmental Microbiology 7: 1413–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Kermarrec L., Bouchez A., Hoffmann L., Ector L. & Medlin L.K. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of the family Bacillariaceae based on 18S rDNA sequences: focus on freshwater Nitzschia of the Lanceolatae section. Diatom Research 26: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokitta S.D., de Nooijer L.J., Trimborn S., de Vargas C., Rost B. & John U. 2011. Transcriptome analyses reveal differential gene expression patterns between the life-cycle stages of Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyta) and reflect specialization to different ecological niches. Journal of Phycology 47: 829–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roshchin A.M. 1994. Zhiznennye tsikly diatomovykh vodoroslej. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, Ukraine. 170 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Roshchin A.M. & Chepurnov V.A. 1999. Dioecy and monoecy in the pennate diatoms (with reference to the centric taxa). In: Proceedings of the 14th International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by S. Mayama M. Idei & I. Koizumi), pp. 197–204. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Rothpletz A. 1896. Uber die Flysch Fucoiden und einige andere fossile Algen, sowie uberliasische diatomeen fuhrende Hornschwamme. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 48: 854–915.
   Google Scholar
• Rothpletz A. 1900. Uber einen neuen jurassichen Hornschwamme und die darin eingeschlossenen Diatomeen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 52: 154–160.
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E. & Crawford R.M. 1981. The lines of evolution of the Bacillariophyta. I. Origin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 211: 237–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sabir J.S.M., Yu M., Ashworth M.P., Baeshen N.A., Baeshen M.N., Bahieldin A., Theriot E.C. & Jansen R.K. 2014. Conserved gene order and expanded inverted repeats characterize plastid genomes of Thalassiosirales. PLoS ONE 9: e107854. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato S. 2008. Phylogeny of araphid diatoms, inferred from morphological and molecular data. PhD Dissertation. University of Bremen. http://elib.suub.uni-bremen.de/diss/docs/00011057.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sato S., Beakes G., Idei M., Nagumo T. & Mann D.G. 2011. Novel sex cells and evidence for sex pheromones in diatoms. PLoS One 6: e26923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffel A., Pousen N., Shian S. & Kröger N. 2011. Nanopatterned protein microrings from a diatom that direct silica morphogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States of America 108: 3175–3180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid A.-M.M. 1988. The special Golgi–ER–mitochondrium unit in the diatom genus Coscinodiscus. Plant Systematics and Evolution 158: 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütt F. 1896. Bacillariales. In: Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilie (Ed. by A. Engler & K. Prantl), Vol. 1 pp. 31–153, W. Englemann, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1972. Ideas for a more natural system of the centric diatoms. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 39: 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1979. The diatom system: ideas on phylogeny. Bacillaria 2: 9–71.
   Google Scholar
• Sims P.A., Mann D.G. & Medlin L.K. 2006. Evolution of the diatoms, insights from fossil, biological and molecular data. Phycologia 45: 361–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinninghe-Damsté J.S., Muyzer G., Abbas B., Rampen S.W., Masse G., Allard W.G., Belt S.T., Robert J.M., Rowland S.J., Moldowan J.M., Barbanti S.M., Fago F.J., Denisevich P., Dahl J., Trindade L.A.F. & Schouten S. 2004. The rise of the rhizosolenoid diatoms. Science 304: 584–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetacek V. 1999. Diatoms and the ocean carbon cycle. Protist 150: 25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith H.L. 1872. Conspectus of the families and genera of the Diatomaceae. The Lens 1: 1–19, 72–93, 154–157.
   Google Scholar
• Smith W. 1853. A synopsis of the British Diatomaceae, vol. 1, Smith and Beck, London. 89 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Smith W. 1856. A synopsis of the British Diatomaceae, vol. 2, Smith and Beck, London. 104 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sorhannus U. 1997. The origination time of diatoms, an analysis based on ribosomal RNA data. Micropaleontology 43: 215–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorhannus U. 2004. Diatom phylogenetics inferred based on direct optimization of nuclear encoded SSU rRNA sequences. Cladistics 20: 487–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorhannus U. 2007. A nuclear encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA timescale for diatom evolution. Marine Micropaleontology 65: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorhannus U. & Fox M.G. 2012. Phylogenetic analyses of a combined data set suggest that the Attheya lineage is the closest living relative of the pennate diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Protist 163: 252–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumper M. 2002. A phase separation model for the nanopatterning of diatom biosilica. Science 295: 2430–2433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesson B. & Hildebrand M. 2009. Dynamics of silica cell wall morphogenesis in the diatom Cyclotella cryptica: Substructure formation and the role of microfilaments. Journal of Structural Biology 169: 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesson B. & Hildebrand M. 2010. Extensive and intimate association of the cytoskeleton with forming silica in diatoms: control over patterning on the meso- and micro-scale. PLoS ONE 5: e14300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesson B. & Hildebrand M. 2013. Characterization and localization of insoluble organic matrices associated with diatom cell walls: insight into their roles during cell wall formation. PLoS ONE 8 (4): e61675. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E., Alverson A.J. & Gutell R. 2009. The limits of nuclear-encoded SSU rDNA for resolving the diatom phylogeny. European Journal of Phycology 44: 277–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Ashworth M., Ruck E., Nakov T. & Jansen R.K. 2010. A preliminary multi-gene phylogeny of the diatoms. Plant Ecology and Evolution 143: 278–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Ruck E.C., Ashworth M., Nakov T. & Jansen R.K. 2011. Status of the pursuit of the diatom phylogeny: are traditional views and new molecular paradigms really that different? In: The diatom world (Ed. by J. Seckbach & J.P. Kociolek), pp. 119–142, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Ashworth M.P., Nakov T., Ruck E., Jansen R. 2015. Dissecting signal and noise in diatom chloroplast protein encoding genes with phylogenetic information profiling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 89: 28–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hoek C., Mann D.G. & Jahns H.M. 1995. Algae. An introduction to phycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 627 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Peer Y., Neefs J.M., De Rijk P. & De Wachter R. 1993. Reconstructing evolution from eukaryotic small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences: calibration of the molecular clock. Journal of Molecular Evolution 37: 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Peer Y., Caers A., De Rijk P. & De Wachter R. 1998. Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Research 26: 179–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaulot D., Eikrem W., Viprey M. & Moreau H. 2007. The diversity of small eukaryotic phytoplankton (< 3 μm) in marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiological Reviews 32: 795–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen H. & Theriot E.C. 2008. Building trees of algae: some advances in phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis. European Journal of Phycology 43: 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergroeben H., Marcelino V.R. & Costa J.F. 2014. Evolutionary dynamics of algal traits and diversity. Perspectives in Phycology 1: 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• von Stosch H.A. 1950. Oogamy in a centric diatom. Nature 165: 531–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stosch H.A. 1958. Kann die oogame Araphidee Rhabdonema adriaticum as Bindeglei zwischen den beiden grossen Diatomeengruppen angesehen warden? Berichten der Deutschen Botanischen Gellschaft 71: 241–249.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D.M. 2007. Classification and diatom systematics, the past, the present and the future. In: Unravelling the algae (Ed. by J. Brodie & J. Lewis), pp. 57–91. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D.M. & Kociolek J.P. 2007. The rejection of paraphyletic taxa. European Journal of Phycology 42: 313–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada K., Yoshikawa S., Ichinomiya M., Kuwata A., Kamiya M. & Ohki K. 2014. Effects of silicon-limitation on growth and morphology of Triparma laevis Nies-2565 (Parmales, Heterokontophyta). PLoS ONE 9: e103289. doi:10.1371/journal.pone
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada K., Ichinomiya M., Kuwata A., Kamiya M., Ohki K., Saitoh K., Nakamura Y., Sato N. & Yoshikawa S. 2015. Growth and cell wall morphogenesis of Triparma laevis (Parmales) under silicon-limitation. Abstract, Molecular life of the diatoms 2015. http://www.ocean.washington.edu/story/Poster+Session+II.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon H.S., Hackett J.D. & Bhattacharya D. 2004. A single origin of the peridinin and fucoxanthin containing plastids in dinoflagellates through tertiary endosymbiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 11724–11729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar