Licmophora colosalis sp. nov. (Licmophoraceae, Bacillariophyta), a large epiphytic diatom from coastal waters

REFERENCES

• Alverson A.J., Jansen R.K. & Theriot E.C. 2007. Bridging the Rubicon: phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonizations of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 193–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belando M.D., Marin A. & Aboal M. 2012. Licmophora species from a Mediterranean hypersaline coastal lagoon (Mar Menor, Murcia, SE Spain). Nova Hedwigia 141: 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Cannone J.J., Subramanian S., Schnare M.N., Collett J.R., D'Souza L.M., Du Y.S., Feng B., Lin N., Madabusi L.V., Muller K.M., Pande N., Shang Z.D., Yu N. & Gutell R.R. 2002. The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics 3.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle J.J. & Doyle J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goloboff P.A., Farris J.S. & Nixon K.C. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Honeywill C. 1998. A study of British Licmophora species and a discussion of its morphological features. Diatom Research 13: 221–271.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1959. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der ubrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrezenden Meeresgebiete. 2 Teil. In: Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (Ed. By L. Rabenhorst). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, Germany. 845 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W., Lobban C.S. & Theriot E.C. 2009–2015. ProtistCentral. World-wide electronic publication, Western Pacific Diatoms Project. http://www.protistcentral.org/index.php/Project/get/project_id/17; searched on December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1844. Die kieselschaligen Bacillarien oder Diatomeen. W. Köhne, Nordhausen, Germany. 152 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S. 2013. The marine araphid diatom genus Licmosphenia in comparison with Licmophora, with the description of three new species. Diatom Research 28: 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S. & Schefter M. 2013. Licmophora comnavmaria sp. nov. (Licmophorales, Bacillariophyta), a new diatom with intercalary rimoportulae. Marine Biodiversity Records 6: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S., Schefter M. & Ruck E.C. 2011. Licmophora flucticulata sp. nov. (Licmophoraceae, Bacillariophyceae), an unusual flabellate species from Guam and Palau. Phycologia 50: 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mereschkowsky C. 1901. Diagnosis of new Licmophorae. Nuova Notarisia Series 12: 141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Nawrocki E.P. 2009. Structural RNA homology search and alignment using covariance models. PhD thesis. Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 266 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Nawrocki E.P., Kolbe D.L. & Eddy S.R. 2009. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 25: 1335–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. & Peragallo M. 1897–1908. Diatomées marines de france et des districts maritimes voisins. J. Tempère, Grez-sur-Loing, France. 491 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. & Crandall K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Technelysium Pty. Ltd. 2002. Chromas Lite, version 2.01 http://technelysium.com.au/wordpress/?page_id=13.
   Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Cannone J.J., Gutell R.R. & Alverson A.J. 2009. The limits of nuclear-encoded SSU rDNA for resolving the diatom phylogeny. European Journal of Phycology 44: 277–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F. & Higgins D.G. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876–4882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomás X. 1988. Diatomeas de las aguas epicontinentales saladas del litoral mediterráneo de la Península Ibérica. PhD thesis. Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. 687 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Woods D.C. & Fletcher R.L. 1991. Studies on the strength of adhesion of some common marine fouling diatoms. Biofouling 3: 287–303.
   Google Scholar