Morphological studies on type material of widely cited araphid diatoms (Bacillariophyta)

REFERENCES

• Ács E., Morales E.A., Kiss K.T., Bolla B., Plenković-Moraj A., Reskone M.N. & Ector L. 2009. Staurosira grigorszkyi nom. nov. (Bacillariophyceae) an araphid diatom from Lake Balaton, Hungary, with notes on Fragilaria hungarica Pantocsek. Nova Hedwigia 89: 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber H.G. & Haworth E.Y. 1981. A guide to the morphology of the diatom frustule with a key to the British freshwater genera. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication 44: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Belanger S.E., Lowe R.L. & Rosen B.H. 1985. The effects of current and cells size on epiphytism of Synedra parasitica var. parasitica on Surirella robusta var. splendida. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 104: 378–386.
   Google Scholar
• Cantonati M., Lange-Bertalot H. & Angeli N. 2010. Neidiomorpha gen. nov. (Bacillariophyta): a new freshwater diatom genus separated from Neidium Pfitzer. Botanical Studies 51: 195–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers W. 1864. The Diatomaceae. In: Handbook of British water weeds or algae (Ed. by J.E. Gray), pp. 75–116. R. Hardwick, London.
   Google Scholar
• Catalogue of Diatom Names, California Academy of Sciences. 2011. World-wide electronic publication, Compiled by E. Fourtanier & J.P. Kociolek http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Cejudo-Figueiras C., Morales E.A., Wetzel C.E., Blanco S., Hoffmann L. & Ector L. 2011. Analysis of the type of Fragilaria construens var. subsalina (Bacillariophyceae) and description of two morphologically related taxa from Europe and the United States. Phycologia 50: 67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang T.-P. & Steinberg C. 1988. Epiphytische Diatomeen auf Cymatopleura und Nitzschia. Diatom Research 3: 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1868. Svenska och Norska Diatomacéer. Öfversigt af Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar, Stockholm 25 (3): 213–240.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. & Möller J.D. 1877. Diatoms. Part I, No. 1–48. Esatas Edquists Boktryckeri, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Comère J. 1892. Diatomées du bassin sous-pyrénéen et de la partie des Pyrénées correspondant aux départements de la Haute-Garonne, de l'Ariège et des Hautes-Pyrénées. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 26: 85–112.
   Google Scholar
• Cox E.J. 2012. Ontogeny, homology, and terminology – wall morphogenesis as an aid to character recognition and character state definition for pennate diatom systematics. Journal of Phycology 48: 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox E.J. & Ross R. 1981. The striae of pennate diatoms. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Recent and Fossil Diatoms (Ed. by Ross R.), pp. 267–278. Otto Koeltz Science Publishers, Koenigstein, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Edlund M.B, Morales E.A. & Spaulding S.A. 2006. The type and taxonomy of Fragilaria elliptica Schumann, a widely misconstrued taxon. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Diatom Symposium, Miedzyzdroje, Poland. (Ed. by Witkowski A.), pp. 53–59. Biopress Limited, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1840. Charakteristik von 274 neuen Arten von Infusorien. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten. Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1840: 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1841. Über Verbreitung und Einfluss des mikroskopischen Lebens in Süd- und Nordamerika. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1841: 139–144.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1843. Verbreitung und Einfluss des mikroskopischen Lebens in Süd- und Nord- Amerika. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1841: 291–445.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1854. Mikrogeologie. Einundvierzig Tafeln mit über viertausend grossentheils colorirten Figuren, Gezeichnet vom Verfasser. [Atlas]. Leopold Voss, Leipzig, Germany. 40 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Frenguelli J. 1924. Diatomeas de Tierra del Fuego. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina 98: 5–63.
   Google Scholar
• Grunow A. 1862. Die österreichischen Diatomaceen nebst Anschluss einiger neuen Arten von andern Lokalitäten und einer kritischen Uebersicht der bisher bekannten Gattungen und Arten. Erste Folge. Epithemieae, Meridioneae, Diatomeae, Entopyleae, Surirelleae, Amphipleureae. Zweite Folge. Familie Nitzschieae. Verhandlungen der KaiserlichKöniglichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 12: 315–472, 545–588.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2015. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 27 June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton P.B., Poulin M., Charles D.F. & Angell M. 1992. Americarum Diatomarum Exsiccata: Cana, Voucher slides from eight acidic lakes in Northeastern North America. Diatom Research 7: 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Heiberg P.A.C. 1863. Conspectus criticus Diatomacearum Danicarum. Kritisk Oversigt over De Danske Diatomeer. Wilhelm Priors Forlag, Kjøbenhavn, Denmark. 135 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Héribaud J. 1903. Les Diatomées Fossiles d'Auvergne (Second Mémoire). Librairie des Sciences Naturelles, Paris. 166 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Héribaud J. 1908. Les Diatomées Fossiles d'Auvergne (Troisième Mémoire). Librairie des Sciences Naturelles, Paris. pp v–x, 1–70, pls 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann G., Werum M. & Lange-Bertalot H. 2011. Diatomeen in Süsswasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa. Bestimmungsflora Kieselalgen für die ökologische Praxis. Über 700 der häufigsten Arten und ihre Ökologie. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Rugell, Liechtenstein. 908 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover R.B. 1976. Types du Synopsis of British Diatomeaceae. Inventory of the original typical collection of the Reverend Williams Smith (1808–1857). Koninklijke Maatschappij voor Dierkunde/Koninklijke Bibliotheek Albert I en het Stadsbestuur van Antwerpen, Belgium. 101 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1927. Fossile Bacillariaceen aus dem Loa-Becken in der Atacama-Wüste, Chile. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 18: 224–251.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1930. Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In: Die Süsswasser-Flora Mitteleuropas. Zweite Auflage. Heft 10. (Ed. by Pascher A.), pp. 1–466. Gustav Fischer, Jena, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1945. Diatomeen aus Seen und Quellgebieten der Balkan-Halbinsel. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 40: 867–973.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1991. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/3. (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer), pp. 1–576. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kulikovskiy M.S., Genkal S.I. & Mikheyeva T.M. 2011. New data on the Bacillariophyta of Belarussia. 2. Fam. Fragilariaceae (Kütz.) De Tony, Diatomaceae Dumort. and Tabellariaceae F. Schütt. Algologia 21: 357–373.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntze O. 1898. Revisio Generum Plantarum. Part III. pp. [1]–576. Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Leuduger-Fortmorel G. & Petit P. 1878. Des gisements siliceux fossiles de l'Auvergne. Employés à la préparation de la dynamite (1). Journal de Micrographie 2: 173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Levkov Z. & D.M. Williams. 2011. Fifteen new diatom (Bacillariophyta) species from Lake Ohrid, Macedonia. Phytotaxa 30: 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. 1999. The species concept in diatoms. Phycologia 38: 437–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. 2001. The systematics of the Sellaphora pupula complex: typification of S. pupula. In: Lange-Bertalot Festschrift (Ed. by R. Jahn, J.P. Kociolek, A. Witkowski & P. Compère), pp. 225–241. Gantner, Ruggell, Liechtenstein.
   Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. 2010. Discovering diatom species: is a long history of disagreements about species-level taxonomy now at an end? Plant Ecology and Evolution 143: 251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. & Droop S.J.M. 1996. Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms. Hydrobiologia 336: 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. & Vanormelingen P. 2013. An inordinate fondness? The number, distributions, and origins of diatom species. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 60: 414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer A. 1937. Die Bacillariophyten-Gattungen Fragilaria u. Asterionella in Bayern. Berichte Bayerischen Botanischen Geselschaft zur Erforschung der Heimischen Flora 22: 50–85.
   Google Scholar
• Morales E.A. 2003. On the taxonomic position of the Belonastrum and Synedrella, two new fragilarioid genera described by Round and Maidana (2001). Cryptogamie Algologie 24: 277–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales E.A. 2005. Observations of the morphology of some known and new fragilarioid diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) from rivers in the USA. Phycological Research 53: 113–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales E.A. 2006. Staurosira incerta (Bacillariophyceae) a new fragilarioid taxon from freshwater systems in the United States with comments on the structure of girdle bands in Staurosira Ehrenberg and Staurosirella Williams et Round. In: Fossil and Recent Phycological studies. Dobrina Temniskova-Topalova. Festschrift. (Ed. by K. Manoylov & N. Ognjanova), pp. 133–145. Pensoft Publishers and University Publishing House, Sofia, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Morales E.A. & Manoylov K.M. 2006a. Morphological studies on selected taxa in the genus Staurosirella Williams et Round (Bacillariophyceae) from rivers in North America. Diatom Research 21: 343–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales E.A. & Manoylov, K.M. 2006b. Staurosirella incognita Morales et Manoylov sp. nov., a non-spiny species from North America, with an emended description of Staurosirella Williams et Round (Bacillariophyceae). In: Proceedings of the 18th International Diatom Symposium. Miedzyzdroje, Poland, 2004 (Ed. by Witkowski A.), pp. 325–336. Biopress Ltd., Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Morales E.A., Edlund M.B. & Spaulding S.A. 2010a. Description and ultrastructure of araphid diatom species (Bacillariophyceae) morphologically similar to Pseudostaurosira elliptica (Schumann) Edlund et al. Phycological Research 58: 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales E.A., Wetzel C.E. & Ector L. 2010b. Two short-striated species of Staurosirella (Bacillariophyceae) from Indonesia and the United States. Polish Botanical Journal 55: 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Morales E.A., Guerrero J.-M., Wetzel C.E., Sala S. & Ector L. 2013. Unraveling the identity of Fragilaria pinnata Ehrenberg and Staurosira pinnata Ehrenberg: research progress on a convoluted story. Cryptogamie Algologie 34: 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales E.A., Buczkó K., Wetzel C.E., Novais M.H., Ognjanova-Rumenova N., Hoffmann L. & Ector L. 2014a. Transfer of Staurosira grunowii to Staurosirella. Diatom Research 29: 105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales E.A., Wetzel C.E., Rivera S.F., Van de Vijver B. & Ector L. 2014b. Current taxonomic studies on the diatom flora (Bacillariophyceae) of the Bolivian Altiplano, South America, with possible consequences for palaeoecological assessments. Journal of Micropalaeontology 33: 121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Meara E. 1875. Report on the Irish Diatomaceae. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Second Series, Science, 2: 235–425.
   Google Scholar
• Pantocsek J. 1892. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fossilen Bacillarien Ungarns. Teil III, Susswasser Bacillarien. Anhang–analysen 15 neuer Depots von Bulgarien, Japan, Mahern, Russland und Ungarn. Buchdrucherei von Julius Platzko, Nagy-Tapolcsány, Slovakia.
   Google Scholar
• Pantocsek J. 1902. Die Bacillarien des Balatonsees. Herausgegeben von der Balatonsee Comission der Ungarischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 2 (2): 1–112.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick R.M. & C.W. Reimer. 1966. The diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii, Vol. 1. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 13: 1–688.
   Google Scholar
• Petit P. 1877. Liste des diatomées observées dans les environs de Paris. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 24: 34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pfitzer E. 1871. Untersuchungen über Bau und Entwicklung der Bacillariaceen (Diatomaceen). Botanische Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiet der Morphologie und Physiologie. Herausg. von J. Hanstein, Bonn. Heft 2: 189 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard A. 1861. A history of infusoria, living and fossil: arranged according to “Die Infusionsthierchen” of C.G. Ehrenberg; containing colored engravings, illustrative of all the genera, and descriptions of all the species in that work, with several new ones; to which is appended an account of those recently discovered in the chalk formations. xii. Edition IV, revised and enlarged by J.T. Arlidge, W. Archer, J. Ralfs, W.C. Williamson and the author. Whittaker and Co., London. xiii + 968 pp., 40 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Roper F.C.S. 1854. Some observations on the Diatomaceae of the Thames. Transactions of the Microscopical Society, New Series, London 2: 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E. & Maidana N.I. 2001. Two problematic freshwater araphid taxa re-classified in new genera. Diatom. The Japanese Journal of Diatomology 17: 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Smith W. 1853. Synopsis of the British Diatomaceae. Vol. 1. John Van Voorst, London. 89 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. 1856. Synopsis of the British Diatomaceae. Vol. 2. John Van Voorst, London. 107 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Smith W. 1859. British Diatomaceae in the collection of the British Museum. Taylor & Francis, London. 55 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Trobajo R., Rovira L., Ector L., Wetzel C.E., Kelly M. & Mann D.G. 2013. Morphology and identity if some ecologically important small Nitzschia species. Diatom Research 28: 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuji A. & Williams D.M. 2006. Typification of Conferva pectinalis O.F. Müll. (Bacillariophyceae) and the identity of the type of an alleged synonym, Fragilaria capucina Desm. Taxon 55: 196–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler P.A. 1996. Endemism in freshwater algae. Hydrobiologia 336: 127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vijver B., Ector L., Beltrami M.E., de Haan M., Falasco E., Hlúbiková D., Jarlman A., Kelly M., Novais M.H. & Wojtal A.Z. 2011. A critical analysis of type material of Achnanthidium lineare W. Sm. (Bacillariophyceae). Algological Studies 136/137: 167–191.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1881. Synopsis des Diatomées de Belgique. Atlas. Ducaju & Cie., Anvers, Belgium. pls 31–77.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1885. Synopsis des Diatomées de Belgique. Texte. Martin Brouwers & Co., Anvers, Belgium. 235 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Vanormelingen P., Verleyen E. & Vyverman W. 2008. The diversity and distribution of diatoms: from cosmopolitanism to narrow endemism. Biodiversity Conservation 17: 393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werum M. & Lange-Bertalot H. 2004. Diatoms in springs from Central Europe and elsewhere under the influence of hydrogeology and anthropogenic impacts. Iconographia Diatomologica 13: 1–417.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel C.E., Morales E.A., Blanco S. & Ector L. 2013. Pseudostaurosira cataractarum comb. nov. (Bacillariophyta): type analysis, ecology and world distribution of a former “centric” diatom. Acta Nova 6: 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D.M. 1986. Comparative morphology of some species of Synedra Ehrenb. with a new definition of the genus. Diatom Research 1: 131–152.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D.M. & Round F.E. 1987. Revision of the genus Fragilaria. Diatom Research 2: 267–288.
   Google Scholar