Contributions of an annual invasive kelp to native algal assemblages: algal resource allocation and seasonal connectivity across ecotones

REFERENCES

• Adams N.M. 1994. Seaweeds of New Zealand: an illustrated guide. Canterbury University Press, Christchurch. 360 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson M.J., Gorley R.N. & Clarke K.R. 2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK. 214 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Barreiro F., Gómez M., Lastra M., López J. & de la Huz R. 2011. Annual cycle of wrack supply to sandy beaches: effect of the physical environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 433: 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnell P.E. & Keough M.J. 2014. Spatially variable synergistic effects of disturbance and additional nutrients on kelp recruitment and recovery. Oecologia 175: 409–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas G., Scrosati R. & Piriz M.L. 2004. The invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) reduces native seaweed diversity in Nuevo Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina). Biological Invasions 6: 411–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie H., Norderhaug K. & Fredriksen S. 2009. Macrophytes as habitat for fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 396: 231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley K.R., Hyndes G.A., Vanderklift M.A., Revill A.T. & Nichols P.D. 2009. Allochthonous brown algae are the primary food source for consumers in a temperate, coastal environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 376: 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curiel D., Bellemo G., Marzocchi M., Scattolin M. & Parisi G. 1998. Distribution of introduced Japanese macroalgae Undaria pinnatifida, Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta) and Antithamnion pectinatum (Rhodophyta) in the Lagoon of Venice. Hydrobiologia 385: 17–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean P.R. & Hurd C.L. 2007. Seasonal growth, erosion rates, and nitrogen and photosynthetic ecophysiology of Undaria pinnatifida (Heterokontophyta) in southern New Zealand. Journal of Phycology 43: 1138–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugan J.E., Hubbard D.M., McCrary M.D. & Pierson M.O. 2003. The response of macrofauna communities and shore-birds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of southern California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58: 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggins D.O., Simenstad C.A. & Estes J.A. 1989. Magnification of secondary production by kelp detritus in coastal marine ecosystems. Science 245: 170–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell P. & Fletcher R. 2006. An investigation of dispersal of the introduced brown alga Undaria pinnatifida(Harvey) Suringar and its competition with some species on the man-made structures of Torquay Marina (Devon, UK). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 334: 236–243.
   Google Scholar
• Floc'h J.Y., Pajot R. & Wallentinus I. 1991. The Japanese brown alga Undaria pinnatifida on the coast of France and its possible establishment in European waters. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 47: 379–390.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest B.M. & Taylor M.D. 2002. Assessing invasion impact: survey design considerations and implications for management of an invasive marine plant. Biological Invasions 4: 375–386.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe J., Israel S.A., Chong A., Ismail N., Hurd C.L. & Probert K. 1999. Mapping marine habitats in Otago, southern New Zealand. Geocarto International 14: 3.
   Google Scholar
• Gestoso I., Olabarria C. & Troncoso J.S. 2010. Variability of epifaunal assemblages associated with native and invasive macroalgae. Marine and Freshwater Research 61: 724–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez M., Barreiro F., López J., Lastra M. & de la Huz R. 2013. Deposition patterns of algal wrack species on estuarine beaches. Aquatic Botany 105: 25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves S.C. & Marques J.C. 2011. The effects of season and wrack subsidy on the community functioning of exposed sandy beaches. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 95: 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gribben P.E., Byers J.E., Wright J.T. & Glasby T.M. 2013. Positive versus negative effects of an invasive ecosystem engineer on different components of a marine ecosystem. Oikos 122: 816–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay C. & Villouta E. 1993. Seasonality of Undaria pinnatifida in New Zealand. Botanica Marina 36: 461–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay C.H. & Luckens P.A. 1987. The Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyta: Laminariales) found in a New Zealand harbour. New Zealand Journal of Botany 25: 329–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndes G.A., Nagelkerken I., McLeod R.J., Connolly R.M., Lavery P.S., Vanderklift M.A. 2014. Mechanisms and ecological role of carbon transfer within coastal seascapes. Biological Reviews 89: 232–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince R., Hyndes G., Lavery P. & Vanderklift M. 2007. Marine macrophytes directly enhance abundances of sandy beach fauna through provision of food and habitat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 74: 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irigoyen A.J., Trobbiani G., Sgarlatta M.P. & Raffo M.P. 2011. Effects of the alien algae Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) on the diversity and abundance of benthic macrofauna in Golfo Nuevo (Patagonia, Argentina): potential implications for local food webs. Biological Invasions 13: 1521–1532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaramillo E., Duarte C. & Contreras H. 2006. Algal wrack deposits and macroinfaunal arthropods on sandy beaches of the Chilean coast. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 79: 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman H. & Kendrick G.A. 1997. Ecological significance and commercial harvesting of drifting and beach-cast macro-algae and seagrasses in Australia: a review. Journal of Applied Phycology 9: 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh C.H. & Shin H.C. 1990. Growth and size distribution of some large brown algae in Ohori, east coast of Korea. Hydrobiologia 204: 225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastra M., Page H.M., Dugan J.E., Hubbard D.M. & Rodil I.F. 2008. Processing of allochthonous macrophyte subsidies by sandy beach consumers: estimates of feeding rates and impacts on food resources. Marine Biology 154: 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan M.R. & Quijón P.A. 2012. Wrack patches and their influence on upper-shore macrofaunal abundance in an Atlantic Canada sandy beach system. Journal of Sea Research 72: 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K.H. 1973. Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth: the role of large marine algae in coastal productivity is far more important than has been suspected. Science 182: 975–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden I.D. 1991. Kelp–sandhopper interactions on a sand beach in New Zealand. I. Drift composition and distribution. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 152: 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr K.K., Wilding T.A., Horstmeyer L., Weigl S. & Heymans J.J. 2014. Detached macroalgae: its importance to inshore sandy beach fauna. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 150: 125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr M., Zimmer M., Jelinski D.E. & Mews M. 2005. Wrack deposition on different beach types: spatial and temporal variation in the pattern of subsidy. Ecology 86: 1496–1507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piovia-Scott J., Spiller D.A. & Schoener T.W. 2011. Effects of experimental seaweed deposition on lizard and ant predation in an island food web. Science 331: 461–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piriz M.L. & Casas G. 1994. Occurrence of Undaria pinnatifida in Golfo Nuevo, Argentina. Applied Phycology Forum 10: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Piriz M.L., Eyras M.C. & Rostagno C.M. 2003. Changes in biomass and botanical composition of beach-cast seaweeds in a disturbed coastal area from Argentine Patagonia. Journal of Applied Phycology 15: 67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polis G.A. & Hurd S.D. 1996. Linking marine and terrestrial food webs: allochthonous input from the ocean supports high secondary productivity on small islands and coastal land communities. American Naturalist 147: 396–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primo C., Hewitt C.L. & Campbell M.L. 2010. Reproductive phenology of the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) in Port Phillip Bay (Victoria, Australia). Biological Invasions 12: 3081–3092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffo M.P., Eyras M.C. & Iribarne O.O. 2009. The invasion of Undaria pinnatifida to a Macrocystis pyrifera kelp in Patagonia (Argentina, south-west Atlantic). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89: 1571–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards D.K. 2009. Subtidal rocky reef communities of the East Otago Taiapure: community structure, succession and productivity. MSc thesis. University of Otago, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi F., Olabarria C., Incera M. & Garrido J. 2010. The trophic significance of the invasive seaweed Sargassum muticum in sandy beaches. Journal of Sea Research 63: 52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell L.K., Hepburn C.D., Hurd C.L. & Stuart M.D. 2008. The expanding range of Undaria pinnatifida in southern New Zealand: distribution, dispersal mechanisms and the invasion of wave-exposed environments. Biological Invasions 10: 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito Y. 1975. Undaria. In: Advance of phycology in Japan (Ed. by J. Tokida & H. Hirose), pp. 304–320. Dr. W. Junk Publisher, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez I. & Fernández C. 2005. Impact of the invasive seaweed Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta) on an intertidal macroalgal assemblage. Journal of Phycology 41: 923–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez I., Fernández C. & Arrontes J. 2005. Long-term changes in the structure of intertidal assemblages after invasion by Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta). Journal of Phycology 41: 942–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Moyano J.E., García-Asencio I. & García-Gómez J.C. 2007. Effects of temporal variation of the seaweed Caulerpa prolifera cover on the associated crustacean community. Marine Ecology 28: 324–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffelke B. & Hewitt C.L. 2007. Impacts of introduced seaweeds. Botanica Marina 50: 397–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiel D.R. & Thompson G.A. 2012. Demography and population biology of the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida on shallow reefs in southern New Zealand. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 434-435: 25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shears N.T. & Babcock R.C. 2007. Quantitative description of mainland New Zealand's shallow subtidal reef communities. Science for Conservation 280. Science & Technical Publishing, Department of Conservation, Wellington. 128 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Silva P.C., Woodfield R.A., Cohen A.N., Harris L.H. & Goddard J.H.R. 2002. First report of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Biological Invasions 4: 333–338.
   Google Scholar
• Spiller D.A., Piovia-Scott J., Wright A.N., Yang L.H., Takimoto G., Schoener T.W. & Iwata T. 2010. Marine subsidies have multiple effects on coastal food webs. Ecology 91: 1424–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart M.D. 1997. Seasonal ecophysiology of Undaria pinnatifida in Otago Harbour, New Zealand. PhD thesis. University of Otago, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart M.D. 2004. Review of research on Undaria pinnatifida in New Zealand and its potential impacts on the eastern coast of the South Island. DOC Science Internal Series 166. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 40 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart M.D., Hurd C.L. & Brown M.T. 1999. Effects of seasonal growth rate on morphological variation of Undaria pinnatifida (Alariaceae, Phaeophyceae). Hydrobiologia 389/399: 191–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor R.B. & Steinberg P.D. 2005. Host use by Australasian seaweed mesograzers in relation to feeding preferences of larger grazers. Ecology 86: 2955–2967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson G. & Schiel D. 2012. Resistance and facilitation by native algal communities in the invasion success of Undaria pinnatifida. PLoS One 468: 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen M.S., Wernberg T., Engelen A.H., Tuya F., Vanderklift M.A., Holmer M., McGlathery K.J., Arenas F., Kotta J. & Silliman B.R. 2012. A meta-analysis of seaweed impacts on seagrasses: generalities and knowledge gaps. PloS One 7: e28595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornber C., Kinlan B., Graham M. & Stachowicz J. 2004. Population ecology of the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida in California: environmental and biological controls on demography. Marine Ecology Progress Series 268: 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine J. & Johnson C.R. 2003. Establishment of the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida in Tasmania depends on disturbance to native algal assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 295: 63–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine J. & Johnson C.R. 2004. Establishment of the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida following dieback of the native macroalga Phyllospora comosa in Tasmania, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 55: 223–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar