Revisiting Chaetoceros subtilis and C. subtilis var. abnormis (Bacillariophyceae), reinstating the latter as C. abnormis

REFERENCES

• Aké-Castillo J.A., Guerra-Martínez S.L. & Zamudio-Reséndiz M.E. 2004. Observations on some species of Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) with reduced number of setae from a tropical coastal lagoon. Hydrobiologia 524: 203–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous 1975. Proposals for a standardization of diatom terminology and diagnoses. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 53: 323–354.
   Google Scholar
• Boc A., Diallo A.B. & Makarenkov V. 2012. T-REX: a web server for inferring, validating and visualizing phylogenetic trees and networks. Nucleic Acids Research 40: 573–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosak S. & Sarno D. 2017. The planktonic diatom genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta) from the Adriatic Sea. Phytotaxa 314: 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunel J. 1972. Orientation of setae in the genus Chaetoceros, in regard to the apical axis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 14: 315–327.
   Google Scholar
• Burone F.S. & Bayssé C. 1985. Diatomeas de la Bahía de Maldonado (Uruguay). II. Biddulphiaceae y Chaetoceraceae. Contribuciones. Departamento de Oceanografía. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias. Montevideo 2: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chamnansinp A., Li Y., Lundholm N. & Moestrup Ø. 2013. Global diversity of two widespread, colony-forming diatoms of the marine plankton, Chaetoceros socialis (syn. C. radians) and Chaetoceros gelidus sp. nov. Journal of Phycology 49: 1128–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamnansinp A., Moestrup Ø. & Lundholm N. 2015. Diversity of the marine diatom Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in Thai waters – revisiting Chaetoceros compressus and Chaetoceros contortus. Phycologia 54: 161–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z. & Li Y. 2017. Morphological and phylogenetic studies on Chaetoceros brevis Schütt and its allied taxa. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany 25: 399–408.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1896. Planktonundersökningar: Vegetabilsk plankton. Bihang till Kungliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 22 (5): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Guillard R.R.L. & Hargraves P.E. 1993. Stichochrysis immobilis is a diatom, not a chrysophyte. Phycologia 32: 234–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2018. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 08 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hall T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1997. Marine diatoms. In: Identifying marine diatoms and dinoflagellates (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5–385. Academic Press San Diego, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part. 5: Bacillariophyceae. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Fishery Investigation Series IV. HMSO London, UK. 317 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1996. A morphological study of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyta) from the plankton of the Pacific Ocean of Mexico. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Botany) 26: 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1930. Die kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtihung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In: Kryptogamen Flora von Deutschland, Österreichs und der Schweiz (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst), Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.h. pp. 920. Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ishii K.I., Iwataki M., Matsuoka K. & Imai I. 2011. Proposal of identification criteria for resting spores of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyceae) from a temperate coastal sea. Phycologia 50: 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen K.G. & Moestrup Ø. 1998. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in inner Danish coastal waters. Opera Botanica 133: 5–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kooistra W.H.C.F., Sarno D., Hernández-Becerril D.U., Assmy P., Prisco C.D. & Montresor M. 2010. Comparative molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of taxa in the Chaetocerataceae (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 49: 471–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus D. 2014. Daniel's XL Toolbox add-in for Excel, version 6.10. http://xltoolbox.sourceforge.net.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S.D., Joo H.M. & Lee J.H. 2014a. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. II. Subgenus Hyalochaete. Phycologia 53: 614–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S.D., Park J.S., Yun S.M. & Lee J.H. 2014b. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. I. Subgenus Chaetoceros. Phycologia 53: 174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y., Boonprakob A., Gaonkar C.C., Kooistra W.H.C.F., Lange C.B., Hernández-Becerril D.U., Chen Z., Moestrup Ø. & Lundholm N. 2017. Diversity in the globally distributed diatom genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae): three new species from warm-temperate waters. PLoS One 12: 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundholm N., Daugbjerg N. & Moestrup Ø. 2002. Phylogeny of the Bacillariaceae with emphasis on the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) based on partial LSU rDNA. European Journal of Phycology 37: 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunn G.B., Theisen B.F., Christensen B. & Arctander P. 1996. Simplicity-correlated size growth of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order Isopoda. Journal of Molecular Evolution 42: 211–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylander J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Center Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Proschkina-Lavrenko A.I. 1953. Species Chaetoceros novae et curiosae Maris Nigri I. Botaniceskie Materialy Otdela Sporovyh Rastnenij Botaniceskogo Instituta Imeni V.L. Komarova Akademii Nauk SSSR 9: 46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Proschkina-Lavrenko A.I. 1961a. De prioritate et taxonomia speciei Chaetoceros abnormis Pr.-Lavr. Botaniceskie Materialy Otdela Sporevyh Rastnenij Botaniceskogo Instituta Imeni V.L. Komarova Akademii Nauk SSSR 14: 39–40.
   Google Scholar
• Proschkina-Lavrenko A.I. 1961b. Species Chaetoceros Ehr. Novae e mari Azoviano (Maeotico) 14: 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. & Hargraves P.E. 1988. The Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae) flora of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, U.S.A. Bibliotheca Phycologica 79: 1–196.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist T.F., Teslenko M. & van der Mark P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. Biology & morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Scholin C.A., Herzog M., Sogin M. & Anderson D.M. 1994. Identification of group- and strain-specific genetic markers for globally distributed Alexandrium (Dinophyceae). II. Sequence analysis of a fragment of the LSU rDNA gene. Journal of Phycology 30: 999–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevchenko O.G., Orlova T.Y. & Hernández-Becerril D.U. 2006. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Botanica Marina 49: 236–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunesen I., Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Sar E.A. 2008. Marine diatoms from Buenos Aires coastal waters (Argentina). V. Species of the genus Chaetoceros. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 43: 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suto I. 2003. Taxonomy of the marine resting spore genera Dicladia Ehrenberg, Monocladia gen. nov. and Syndendrium Ehrenberg and their stratigraphic significance in Miocene strata. Diatom Research 18: 331–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgan L.C., Becker V. & Prates H.M. 1999. Checklist das diatomáceas (Bacillariophyceae) de ambientes de águas continentais e costeiros do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Iheringia, Série Botânica 52: 89–144.
   Google Scholar