Key Aspects of Analyzing Microarray Gene-Expression Data

• MicroArray Quality Control Consortium: The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat. Biotech.24 , 1151–1169 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perket JM : Six things you won‘t find in the MAQC.Scientist20(11) , 68–72 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klebanov L , QiuX, WelleS, YakovlevA: Statistical methods and microarray data.Nat. Biotech.25 , 25–26 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JJ , DelongchampRR, TsaiCA et al.: Analysis of variance components in gene expression data. Bioinformatics20 , 1436–1446 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JJ , ChenCH: Microarray gene expression. In: Encyclopedia of Biopharmaceutical Statistics (2nd Edition). Chow S (Ed.). Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY, USA, 599–613 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Kerr MK , MartinM, ChurchillGA: Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data.J. Comput. Biol.7 , 819–837 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YW , DudoitS, LuuP, SpeedTP: Normalization of cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation.Nucleic Acids. Res.30 , e15 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolstad BM , IrizarryRA, AstrandM, Speed TP:A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics19 , 185–193 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irizarry RA , WuZ, JaffeeHA: Comparison of Affymetrix gene-chip expression measures.Bioinformatics21 , 1–7 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Tsai CA , HsuehHM, ChenJJ: A generalized additive model for microarray gene expression data analysis.J. Biopharm. Stat.14 , 553–573 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qui LX , Kerr,KF, and Contributing members of the Toxicogenomics Research Consortium: Empirical evaluation of data transformations and ranking statistics for microarray analysis. Nucleic Acids Res.32 , 5471–5479 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisen MB , SpellmanPT, BrownPO, BotsteinD: Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA95 , 14863–14868 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizadeh AA , EisenMB, DavisRE et al.: Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature403 , 503–511 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub T , SlonimD, TamayoP et al.: Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science286 , 531–536 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudoit S , YangYH, CallowMJ, SpeedTP: Statistical methods for identifying differential expressed gene in replicated cDNA microarray experiments.Statistica Sinica12 , 111–139 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusher VG , TibshiraniR, ChuG: Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA98 , 5116–5121 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B , TibshiraniR, StoreyJD, TusherV: Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment.J. Am. Stat. Assoc.96 , 1151–1160 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldi P , LongAD: A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes.Bioinformatics17 , 509–519 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonnstedt I , SpeedTP: Replicated microarray data.Statistica Sinica12 , 31–46 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright GW , SimonRM: A random variance model for detection of differential gene expression in small microarray experiments.Bioinformatics19(18) , 2448–2455 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain N , ThatteJ, BracialeT, LeyK, O‘ConnellM, LeeJK: Local-pooled-error test for identifying differentially expressed genes with a small number of replicated microarrays.Bioinformatics19 , 1945–1951 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth GK : Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments.Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol.3(1) , A3 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Cui X , HwangJTG, QiuJ, BladesNJ, ChurchillGA: Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.Biostatistics6 , 59–75 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin LX , KerrKF: Empirical evaluation of data transformations and ranking statistics for microarray analysis.Nucleic Acids Res.32 , 5471–5479 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JJ , WangSJ, TsaiCA, LinCJ: Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.Pharmacogenomics J. (In Press) (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfinger RD , GibsonG, WolfingerED et al.: Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models. J. Comput. Biol.8 , 625–637 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin W , RileyRM, WolfingerRD, WhiteKP, Passador-GurgelG, GibsonG: The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster.Nat. Genet.29 , 389–395 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y , HochbergY: Controlling the false discovery rate – a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.J. Royal Stat. Soc. B57 , 289–300 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai CA , HsuehHM, ChenJJ: Estimation of false discovery rates in multiple testing: application to gene microarray data.Biometrics59 , 1071–1081 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey JD : A direct approach to false discovery rates.J. Royal Stat. Soc. B64 , 479–498 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Delongchamp RR , BowyerJF, ChenJJ, KodellRL: Multiple testing strategy for analyzing cDNA array data on gene expression.Biometrics60 , 774–782 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller RA , GaleckiA, Shmookler-ReisRJ: Interpretation, design, and analysis of gene array expression experiments.J. Gerontol. A56 , B52–B57 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Smyth GK , YangYH, SpeedTP: Statistical issues in cDNA microarray data analysis.Methods Mol. Biol.224 , 111–136 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hastie T , TibshiraniRT, FriedmanJ: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer-Verlag, NY, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN : Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, NY, USA (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Tsai CA , LeeTC, HoIC, YangUC, Chen CH, Chen, JJ: Gene selection for multi-class clustering and prediction. Math. Biosci.193 , 79–100 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furey TS , ChristianiniN, DuffyN, BednarskiDW, SchummerM, HausslerD: Support vector machine classification andvalidation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data.Bioinformatics16 , 906–914 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brieman L , FriedmanJH, OlshenRA, Stone CJ, Steinberg D, Colla P: CART: Classification and Regression Trees. CRC Press LLC, CA, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Moon H , AhnH, KodellRL, LinCJ, Baek S, Chen JJ: Classification methods for the development of genomic signatures from high-dimensional data. Genome Biol.7 , R121 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyon I , WestonJ, BarnhillS, VapnikV: Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines.Mach. Learn.46 , 389–422 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenwald A , WrightG, ChanWC et al.: The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med.346 , 1937–1947 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai CA , ChenCH, LeeTC, HoIC, Yang UC, Chen JJ: Gene selection for sample classifications in microarray experiments. DNA Cell Biol.23 , 607–614 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambroise C , McLachlanGJ: Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99 , 6562–6566 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuy A , SimonR: Critical review of published microarray studies for cancer outcome and guidelines on statistical analysis and reporting.J. Natl Cancer Inst.99 , 147–157 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y , DoughertyER, BittnerML: Ratio-based decisions and the quantitative analysis of cDNA microarray images.J. Biomed. Optics2(4) , 364–374 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parrish RS , DelongchampRR: Normalization of microarray data. In: DNA Microarrays and Related Genomic Techniques: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Experiments. Allison DB, Page GP, Beasley TM, Edwards JW (Eds), Chapman & Hall/CRC, FL, USA, 9–28 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Draghici S , KhatriP, MartinsRP, OstermeierGC, KrawetzSA: Global functional profiling of gene expression.Genomics81 , 98–104 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mootha VK , LindgrenCM, ErikssonK. et al.: PGC-1-α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately down regulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet.34 , 267–273 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlidis P , QinJ, ArangoV, MannJJ, Sibille E: Using the gene ontology for microarray data mining: A comparison of methods and application to age effects in human prefrontal cortex. Neurochem. Res.29 , 1213–1222 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian L , GreenbergSA, KongSW, Altschuler J, Kohane IS, Park PJ: Discovering statistically significant pathways in expression profiling studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102 , 13544–13549 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JJ , TsengSL, TsaiCA, ChenCH. Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria. BMC Bioinformatics8 , 74 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michiels S , KoscielnyS, HillC: Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy.Lancet365 , 488–492 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon R : Development and evaluation of therapeutically relevant predictive classifiers using gene expression profiling.J. Natl Cancer Inst.98 , 1169–1171 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon R : Road map for developing and validating therapeutically relevant genomic classifiers.J. Clin. Oncol.23(29) , 7332–7341 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon R : Validation of pharmacogenomic biomarker classifier for treatment selection.Dis. Markers21 , 1–8 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai CA , ChenYJ, ChenJJ: Testing for differentially expressed genes with microarray data.Nucleic Acids Res.31 , e52 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh H , ChenJJ, KodellRL: Comparison of methods for estimating number of true null hypothesis in multiplicity testing.J. Biopharm. Stat.13 , 675–689 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar

Websites

• Significance Analysis of Microarrays www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/SAM/
   Google Scholar
• US FDA: MicroArray Quality Control project on the evaluation of analysis protocols for deoxyribonucleic acid microarray data. www.fda.gov/nctr/Science/centers/ toxicoinformatics/maqc/
   Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute Biometric Research Branch http://linus.nci.nih.gov/brb
   Google Scholar