Antibiotics in 3D-Printed Implants, Instruments and Materials: Benefits, Challengesâ and Future Directions

References

• Ballard DH , TraceAP, AliSet al. Clinical applications of 3D printing: primer for radiologists. Acad. Radiol.25(1), 52–65 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Huang W , ZhengQ, SunW, XuH, YangX. Levofloxacin implants with predefined microstructure fabricated by three-dimensional printing technique. Int. J. Pharm.339(1–2), 33–38 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W , ZhengQ, GuoX, SunJ, LiuY. A programmed release multi-drug implant fabricated by three-dimensional printing technology for bone tuberculosis therapy. Biomed. Mater.4(6), 065005 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glatzel S , HezwaniM, KitsonPhilip J, GromskiPiotr S, SchürerS, CroninL. A portable 3D printer system for the diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Chem1(3), 494–504 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzana JA , TrombettaRP, SchwarzEM, KatesSL, AwadHA. 3D printed bioceramics for dual antibiotic delivery to treat implant-associated bone infection. Eur. Cell Mater.30, 232–247 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W , YeC, ZhengQ, WuG, ChengZ. A therapeutic delivery system for chronic osteomyelitis via a multi-drug implant based on three-dimensional printing technology. J. Biomater. Appl.31(2), 250–260 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim J-H , KimM-J, ParkJYet al. Three-dimensional printing of antibiotics-loaded poly-ε-caprolactone/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds for treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. Tissue Eng. Regenerative Med.12(5), 283–293 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler N , SalmelaI, FallareroAet al. Towards fabrication of 3D printed medical devices to prevent biofilm formation. Int. J. Pharm.459(1–2), 62–64 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman JA , NicholsonJC, TappaK, JammalamadakaU, WilsonCG, MillsDK. Antibiotic and chemotherapeutic enhanced three-dimensional printer filaments and constructs for biomedical applications. Int. J. Nanomedicine10, 357–370 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weisman JA , BallardDH, JammalamadakaUet al. 3D printed antibiotic and chemotherapeutic eluting catheters for potential use in interventional radiology. Acad. Radiol.26(2), 270–274 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard DH , WeismanJA, JammalamadakaU, TappaK, AlexanderJS, GriffenFD. Three-dimensional printing of bioactive hernia meshes: in vitro proof of principle. Surgery161(6), 1479–1481 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z , YaoQ, LiLet al. Antimicrobial activity of 3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) composite scaffolds presenting vancomycin-loaded polylactic acid-glycolic acid (PLGA) microspheres. Med. Sci. Monit.24, 6934–6945 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer CJ , WoernerJE, GaleaCet al. Personalized bioactive nasal supports for postoperative cleft rhinoplasty. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.76(7), 1562.e1–1562.e5 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer CJ , BallardDH, WeismanJAet al. Three-dimensional printing antimicrobial and radiopaque constructs. 3D Printing Additive Manufacturing5, 29–35 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muwaffak Z , GoyanesA, ClarkV, BasitAW, HiltonST, GaisfordS. Patient-specific 3D scanned and 3D printed antimicrobial polycaprolactone wound dressings. Int. J. Pharm.527, 161–170 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TWB , LopezOJ, SharkeyJP, MardenKR, MurshedMR, RanganathanSI. 3D printed liner for treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. Med. Hypotheses102, 65–68 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills DK , JammalamadakaU, TappaK, WeismanJ. Studies on the cytocompatibility, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of 3D printed poly(methyl methacrylate) beads. Bioact. Mater.3, 157–166 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visscher LE , DangHP, KnackstedtMA, HutmacherDW, TranPA. 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffolds with dual macro–microporosity for applications in local delivery of antibiotics. Mater. Sc. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl.87, 78–89 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y , YangS, WangYet al. Anti-infective efficacy, cytocompatibility and biocompatibility of a 3D-printed osteoconductive composite scaffold functionalized with quaternized chitosan. Acta Biomater.46, 112–128 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CS . Modulation, functionality, and cytocompatibility of three-dimensional printing materials made from chitosan-based polysaccharide composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater Biol Appl.69, 27–36 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y , ZhaiD, XuMet al. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with antibacterial and osteogenic activity. Biofabrication9(2), 025037 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuniga MJ . 3D printed antibacterial prostheses. Appl. Sci.8(9), 1651 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Tardajos MG , CamaG, DashMet al. Chitosan functionalized poly-ε-caprolactone electrospun fibers and 3D printed scaffolds as antibacterial materials for tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr. Polymers191, 127–135 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S , YangJ, JiaY-G, LuB, RenL. A study of 3D-printable reinforced composite resin: PMMA modified with silver nanoparticles loaded cellulose nanocrystal. Materials11(12), E2444 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao J , MaJ, LinLet al. Three-dimensional printing of drug-loaded scaffolds for antibacterial and analgesic applications. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods25(4) 222–231 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue J , ZhaoP, GerasimovJYet al. 3D-printable antimicrobial composite resins. Adv. Funct. Mater.25, 6756–6767 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa L , KaiwuL, ShengguiCet al. 3D printing dental composite resins with sustaining antibacterial ability. J. Mater. Sci.54, 3309–3318 (2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanepps JS , YoungerJG. Implantable device-related infection. Shock46(6), 597–608 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schierholz JM , BeuthJ. Implant infections: a haven for opportunistic bacteria. J. Hosp. Infect.49(2), 87–93 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun JH , MaderJT. Antibiotic beads in the management of surgical infections. Am. J. Surg.157, 443–449 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DK . Drug-eluting stent in malignant biliary obstruction. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg.16(5), 628–632 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchholz HW , EngelbrechtH. [Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed withPalacos resins]. Chirurg41, 511–515 (1970).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappa K , JammalamadakaU. Novel biomaterials used in medical 3D printing techniques. J. Funct. Biomater.9, 17 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jammalamadaka U , TappaK. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D printing and tissue engineering. J. Funct. Biomater.9, 22 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgdon T , DanradR, PatelMJet al. Logistics of three-dimensional printing: primer for radiologists. Acad. Radiol.25(1), 40–51 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleksaeedi S , WangJK, El-HajjeAet al. Toward 3D printed bioactive titanium scaffolds with bimodal pore size distribution for bone ingrowth. Procedia CIRP5, 158–163 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Tappa K , JammalamadakaU, WeismanAJet al. 3D printing custom bioactive and absorbable surgical screws, pins, and bone plates for localized drug delivery. J. Funct. Biomater.10(2), E17 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappa K , JammalamadakaU, BallardDHet al. Medication eluting devices for the field of OBGYN (MEDOBGYN): 3D printed biodegradable hormone eluting constructs, a proof of concept study. PLoS ONE12(8), e0182929 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu BM , BorlandSW, GiordanoRA, CimaLG, SachsEM, CimaMJ. Solid free-form fabrication of drug delivery devices. J. Control. Rel.40, 77–87 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer CJ , BoktorM, SamantHet al. 3D printing for bio-synthetic biliary stents. Bioengineering6(16), E16 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballard DH , JammalamadakaU, TappaKet al. 3D printing of surgical hernia meshes impregnated with contrast agents: in vitro proof of concept with imaging characteristics on computed tomography. 3D Print. Med.4(1), 13 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Prima M , CoburnJ, HwangD, KellyJ, KhairuzzamanA, RiclesL. Additively manufactured medical products – the FDA perspective. 3D Print. Med.2 (1) doi:10.1186/s41205-016-0005-9 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricles LM , CoburnJC, DiPrima M, OhSS. Regulating 3D-printed medical products. Sci. Transl. Med.10 (461) eaan6521 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen A , RybickiFJ. Maintaining safety and efficacy for 3D printing in medicine. 3D Print. Med.3(1), 1 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison RJ , HollisterSJ, NiednerMFet al. Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients. Sci. Transl. Med.7(285), 285ra64 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chepelev L , WakeN, RyanJet al. Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios. 3D Print. Med.4(1), 11 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloomquist CJ , MechamMB, ParadzinskyMDet al. Controlling release from 3D printed medical devices using CLIP and drug-loaded liquid resins. J. Control. Rel.278, 9–23 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar