Toward a more holistic approach to the study of exposures and child outcomes

References

• Gillman MW, Blaisdell CJ. Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes, a Research Program of the National Institutes of Health. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 30(2), 260–262 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport SM. Implications of the exposome for exposure science. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 21(1), 5–9 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport SM. Genetic factors are not the major causes of chronic diseases. PLOS ONE 11(4), e0154387 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport SM, Smith MT. Environment and disease risks. Science 330(6003), 460–461 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willett WC. Balancing life-style and genomics research for disease prevention. Science 296(5568), 695–698 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzel RA, Balk SJ ( Eds). Pediatric Environmental Health (4th edition). American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA (2019).
   Google Scholar
• The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Reducing prenatal exposure to toxic environmental agents. (2013). www.acog.org/en/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2021/07/reducing-prenatal-exposure-to-toxic-environmental-agents
   Google Scholar
• Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14(8), 1847–1850 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen R, Schymanski EL, Barabási A-L, Miller GW. The exposome and health: where chemistry meets biology. Science 367(6476), 392–396 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller GW, Jones DP. The nature of nurture: refining the definition of the exposome. Toxicol. Sci. 137(1), 1–2 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David A, Chaker J, Price EJ et al. Towards a comprehensive characterisation of the human internal chemical exposome: challenges and perspectives. Environ. Int. 156, 106630 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price EJ, Vitale CM, Miller GW et al. Merging the exposome into an integrated framework for “omics” sciences. iScience 25(3), 103976 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zota AR, Shamasunder B. Environmental health equity: moving toward a solution-oriented research agenda. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 31(3), 399–400 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis KK, Auerbach SS, Balshaw DM et al. The importance of the biological impact of exposure to the concept of the exposome. Environ. Health Perspect. 124(10), 1504–1510 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller GW. Integrating the exposome into a multi-omic research framework. Exposome 1(1), osab002 (2021).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nobile S, Di Sipio Morgia C, Vento G. Perinatal origins of adult disease and opportunities for health promotion: a narrative review. J. Pers. Med. 12(2), 157 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itoh H, Ueda M, Suzuki M, Kohmura-Kobayashi Y. Developmental origins of metaflammation; a bridge to the future between the DOHaD theory and evolutionary biology. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 839436 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung EH, Chou J, Brown KA. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants: a recent literature review. Transl. Pediatr. 9(S1), S3–S8 (2020).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camerota M, Graw S, Everson TM et al. Prenatal risk factors and neonatal DNA methylation in very preterm infants. Clin. Epigenetics 13(1), 171 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantino JN, Gruber C. Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2), 2nd Ed. Western Psychological Services, Torrance, CA, USA (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Constantino JN, Davis SA, Todd RD et al. Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: comparison of the Social Responsiveness Scale with the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 33(4), 427–433 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni TP. Test review: Social Responsiveness Scale–Second Edition (SRS-2). J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 32(4), 365–369 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conners C. Conners Kiddie Continuous Performance Test 2nd Edition (K-CPT 2). Multi-Health Systems North Tonawanda, NY, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mahone EM. Measurement of attention and related functions in the preschool child. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 11(3), 216–225 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putnam SP, Rothbart MK. Development of short and very short forms of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. J. Pers. Assess. 87(1), 102–112 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothbart MK, Ahadi SA, Hershey KL, Fisher P. Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Child Dev. 72(5), 1394–1408 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelazo PD, Anderson JE, Richler J, Wallner-Allen K, Beaumont JL, Weintraub S. II. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): measuring executive function and attention. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 78(4), 16–33 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon RC, Cook KF, Mungas D et al. Language measures of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 20(6), 642–651 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everson TM, O'Shea TM, Burt A et al. Serious neonatal morbidities are associated with differences in DNA methylation among very preterm infants. Clin. Epigenetics 12(1), 1–15 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Siegmund KD. An evaluation of processing methods for HumanMethylation450 BeadChip data. BMC Genomics 17(1), 469 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30(10), 1363–1369 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 17(1), 208 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidsley R, Y Wong CC, Volta M, Lunnon K, Mill J, Schalkwyk LC. A data-driven approach to preprocessing Illumina 450K methylation array data. BMC Genomics 14(1), 293 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teschendorff AE, Marabita F, Lechner M et al. A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics 29(2), 189–196 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatev E, Gladish N, Mostafavi S, Kobor MS. CoMeBack: DNA methylation array data analysis for co-methylated regions. Bioinformatics 36(9), 2675–2683 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logue MW, Smith AK, Wolf EJ et al. The correlation of methylation levels measured using Illumina 450K and EPIC BeadChips in blood samples. Epigenomics 9(11), 1363–1371 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey VJ. gee: Generalized Estimating Equation Solver (2023). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gee
   Google Scholar
• McEwen BS, Seeman T. Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress: elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 896(1), 30–47 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishwaran H, Kogalur UB. Fast unified Random Forest for Survival, Regression, and Classification (RF-SRC) (2023). www.randomforestsrc.org/
   Google Scholar
• Wright MN, Ziegler A. ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. J. Stat. Softw. 77(1), 1–17 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng SC, Webster AP, Dong D et al. A novel cell-type deconvolution algorithm reveals substantial contamination by immune cells in saliva, buccal and cervix. Epigenomics 10(7), 925–940 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester BM, LaGasse LL, Shankaran S et al. Prenatal cocaine exposure related to cortisol stress reactivity in 11-year-old children. J. Pediatr. 157(2), 288–295 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu L, Mahoney ER, Mukherjee S et al. Genetic variants and functional pathways associated with resilience to Alzheimer's disease. Brain J. Neurol. 143(8), 2561–2575 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Schrott R, Song A, Ladd-Acosta C. Epigenetics as a biomarker for early-life environmental exposure. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 9(4), 604–624 (2022).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh K, McCormack CA, Webster R et al. Maternal prenatal stress phenotypes associate with fetal neurodevelopment and birth outcomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116(48), 23996–24005 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar