Advanced search
Publication Cover
Epigenomics Volume 5, 2013 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
886
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Effects of the in Vitro Manipulation of Stem Cells: Epigenetic Mechanisms as Mediators of Induced Metabolic Fluctuations

András PaldiEcole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, INSERM U951, Genethon 1bis rue de l‘Internationale91002 Evry, [email protected]View further author information
Pages 429-437 | Published online: 29 Jul 2013

References

  • Weissman IL . Stem cells: units of development, units of regeneration, and units in evolution. Cell100(1) , 157–168 (2000).
  • Ramalho-Santos M , WillenbringH. On the origin of the term ‘stem cell‘. Cell Stem Cell1(1) , 35–38 (2007).
  • Martin GR . Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA78(12) , 7634–7638 (1981).
  • Smith AG , HeathJK, DonaldsonDD et al. Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 336(6200) , 688–690 (1988).
  • Williams RL , HiltonDJ, PeaseS et al. Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 336(6200) , 684–687 (1988).
  • Zhang Y , LiW, LaurentT, DingS. Small molecules, big roles – the chemical manipulation of stem cell fate and somatic cell reprogramming. J. Cell Sci.125(Pt 23) , 5609–5620 (2012).
  • Narsinh KH , SunN, Sanchez-FreireV et al. Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 121(3) , 1217–1221 (2011).
  • Hayashi K , LopesSM, TangF, SuraniMA. Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell3(4) , 391–401 (2008).
  • Singh AM , HamazakiT, HankowskiKE, TeradaN. A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells25(10) , 2534–2542 (2007).
  • Kalmar T , LimC, HaywardP et al. Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol. 7(7) , e1000149 (2009).
  • Stockholm D , BenchaouirR, PicotJ et al. The origin of phenotypic heterogeneity in a clonal cell population in vitro. PLoS One 2(4) , e394 (2007).
  • Stockholm D , Edom-VovardF, CoutantS et al. Bistable cell fate specification as a result of stochastic fluctuations and collective spatial cell behavior. PLoS One 5(12) , e14441 (2010).
  • Chang HH , HembergM, BarahonaM, IngberDE, HuangS. Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature453(7194) , 544–547 (2008).
  • Ying QL , WrayJ, NicholsJ et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453(7194) , 519–523 (2008).
  • Hebert JM . FGFs: neurodevelopment‘s jack-of-all-trades – how do they do it? Front. Neurosci.5 , 133 (2011).
  • Lanner F , RossantJ. The role of FGF/Erk signaling in pluripotent cells. Development137(20) , 3351–3360 (2010).
  • Woodgett JR . Judging a protein by more than its name: GSK-3. Sci. STKE2001(100) , re12 (2001).
  • Folmes CD , NelsonTJ, Martinez-FernandezA et al. Somatic oxidative bioenergetics transitions into pluripotency-dependent glycolysis to facilitate nuclear reprogramming. Cell Metab. 14(2) , 264–271 (2011).
  • Zhu S , LiW, ZhouH et al. Reprogramming of human primary somatic cells by OCT4 and chemical compounds. Cell Stem Cell 7(6) , 651–655 (2010).
  • Yoshida Y , TakahashiK, OkitaK, IchisakaT, YamanakaS. Hypoxia enhances the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell5(3) , 237–241 (2009).
  • Folmes CD , DzejaPP, NelsonTJ, TerzicA. Metabolic plasticity in stem cell homeostasis and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell11(5) , 596–606 (2012).
  • Yanes O , ClarkJ, WongDM et al. Metabolic oxidation regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6(6) , 411–417 (2010).
  • Paldi A . What makes the cell differentiate? Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.110(1) , 41–43 (2012).
  • Jordan B . Are expression profiles meaningless for cancer studies? Bioessays34(9) , 730–733 (2012).
  • Williams R , SchuldtB, MullerFJ. A guide to stem cell identification: progress and challenges in system-wide predictive testing with complex biomarkers. Bioessays33(11) , 880–890 (2011).
  • Lund RJ , NarvaE, LahesmaaR. Genetic and epigenetic stability of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Rev. Genet.13(10) , 732–744 (2012).
  • Taapken SM , NislerBS, NewtonMA et al. Karotypic abnormalities in human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 29(4) , 313–314 (2011).
  • Dean W , BowdenL, AitchisonA et al. Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes. Development 125(12) , 2273–2282 (1998).
  • Humpherys D , EgganK, AkutsuH et al. Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science 293(5527) , 95–97 (2001).
  • Lengner CJ , GimelbrantAA, ErwinJA et al. Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations. Cell 141(5) , 872–883 (2010).
  • Tompkins JD , HallC, ChenVC et al. Epigenetic stability, adaptability, and reversibility in human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109(31) , 12544–12549 (2012).
  • Kim K , DoiA, WenB et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 467(7313) , 285–290 (2010).
  • Lister R , PelizzolaM, KidaYS et al. Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471(7336) , 68–73 (2011).
  • Engler AJ , SenS, SweeneyHL, DischerDE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell126(4) , 677–689 (2006).
  • Fehrer C , BrunauerR, LaschoberG et al. Reduced oxygen tension attenuates differentiation capacity of human mesenchymal stem cells and prolongs their lifespan. Aging Cell 6(6) , 745–757 (2007).
  • Csete M , WalikonisJ, SlawnyN et al. Oxygen-mediated regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and adipogenesis in culture. J. Cell Physiol. 189(2) , 189–196 (2001).
  • Mohyeldin A , Garzon-MuvdiT, Quinones-HinojosaA. Oxygen in stem cell biology: a critical component of the stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell7(2) , 150–161 (2010).
  • Glimm H , OhIH, EavesCJ. Human hematopoietic stem cells stimulated to proliferate in vitro lose engraftment potential during their S/G(2)/M transit and do not reenter G(0). Blood96(13) , 4185–4193 (2000).
  • Schellenberg A , LinQ, SchulerH et al. Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells causes DNA-methylation changes which correlate with repressive histone marks. Aging 3(9) , 873–888 (2011).
  • Till JE , MccullochEA, SiminovitchL. A stochastic model of stem cell proliferation, based on the growth of spleen colony-forming cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA51 , 29–36 (1964).
  • Socolovsky M , LodishHF, DaleyGQ. Control of hematopoietic differentiation: lack of specificity in signaling by cytokine receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA95(12) , 6573–6575 (1998).
  • Abkowitz JL , CatlinSN, GuttorpP. Evidence that hematopoiesis may be a stochastic process in vivo. Nat. Med.2(2) , 190–197 (1996).
  • Kupiec JJ . The Origin of Individuals. World Scientific, NJ, USA (2009).
  • Kupiec JJ . A chance-selection model for cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ.3(4) , 385–390 (1996).
  • Kupiec JJ . A Darwinian theory for the origin of cellular differentiation. Mol. General Genet.255(2) , 201–208 (1997).
  • Gandrillon O , Kolesnik-AntoineD, KupiecJJ, BeslonG. Chance at the heart of the cell. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.110(1) , 1–4 (2012).
  • Simons BD , CleversH. Strategies for homeostatic stem cell self-renewal in adult tissues. Cell145(6) , 851–862 (2011).
  • Yamanaka S . Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation. Nature460(7251) , 49–52 (2009).
  • Buganim Y , FaddahDA, ChengAW et al. Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell 150(6) , 1209–1222 (2012).
  • Hanna J , SahaK, PandoB et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462(7273) , 595–601 (2009).
  • Elowitz MB , LevineAJ, SiggiaED, SwainPS. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science297(5584) , 1183–1186 (2002).
  • Kaern M , ElstonTC, BlakeWJ, CollinsJJ. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet.6(6) , 451–464 (2005).
  • Balazsi G , Van Oudenaarden A, Collins JJ. Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals. Cell144(6) , 910–925 (2011).
  • Neildez-Nguyen TM , ParisotA, VignalC et al. Epigenetic gene expression noise and phenotypic diversification of clonal cell populations. Differ. Res. Biol. Div. 76(1) , 33–40 (2008).
  • Misteli T . Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science291(5505) , 843–847 (2001).
  • Meshorer E , YellajoshulaD, GeorgeE, ScamblerPJ, BrownDT, MisteliT. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev. Cell10(1) , 105–116 (2006).
  • Melcer S , HezroniH, RandE et al. Histone modifications and lamin A regulate chromatin protein dynamics in early embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nat. Commun. 3 , 910 (2012).
  • Imamura T , KerjeanA, HeamsT, KupiecJJ, ThenevinC, PaldiA. Dynamic CpG and non-CpG methylation of the Peg1/Mest gene in the mouse oocyte and preimplantation embryo. J. Biol. Chem.280(20) , 20171–20175 (2005).
  • Yamagata Y , SzaboP, SzutsD, BacquetC, AranyiT, PaldiA. Rapid turnover of DNA methylation in human cells. Epigenetics7(2) , 141–145 (2012).
  • Paldi A . Stochastic gene expression during cell differentiation: order from disorder? Cell. Mol. Life Sci.60(9) , 1775–1778 (2003).
  • Kaelin WG Jr, Mcknight SL. Influence of metabolism on epigenetics and disease. Cell153(1) , 56–69 (2013).
  • Lu C , ThompsonCB. Metabolic regulation of epigenetics. Cell Metab.16(1) , 9–17 (2012).
  • Cyr AR , DomannFE. The redox basis of epigenetic modifications: from mechanisms to functional consequences. Antioxid. Redox Signal.15(2) , 551–589 (2011).
  • Huang S . The molecular and mathematical basis of Waddington‘s epigenetic landscape: a framework for post-Darwinian biology? Bioessays34(2) , 149–157 (2012).
  • Frost J , MonkD, MoschidouD et al. The effects of culture on genomic imprinting profiles in human embryonic and fetal mesenchymal stem cells. Epigenetics 6(1) , 52–62 (2011).
  • Yamagata Y , PariettiV, StockholmD et al. Lentiviral transduction of CD34+ cells induces genome-wide epigenetic modifications. PLoS One 7(11) , e48943 (2012).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.