68
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Trial Evaluation

Insights From the Axillary Vein Puncture Guided By Ultrasound Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection Trial

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 923-929 | Received 10 Nov 2020, Accepted 17 Nov 2020, Published online: 18 Feb 2021

References

  • Kusumoto FM , SchoenfeldMH, BarrettCet al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation, 140(8), e382–e482 (2019).
  • Al-Khatib SM , StevensonWG, AckermanMJet al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm, 15(10), e190–e252 (2018).
  • Aizawa Y , NegishiM, KashimuraSet al. Predictive factors of lead failure in patients implanted with cardiac devices. Int. J. Cardiol., 199, 277–281 (2015).
  • Burri H , SunthornH, DorsazPA, ShadD. Prospective studies of axillary vein puncture with or without contrast venography for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol., 28(1), S280–S283 (2005).
  • Tagliari AP , KochiAN, MastellaBet al. Axillary vein puncture guided by ultrasound vs cephalic vein dissection in pacemaker and defibrillator implant: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Heart Rhythm, 17(9), 1554–1560 (2020).
  • Beddy P , GeogheganT, RameshNet al. Valsalva and gravitational variability of the internal jugular vein and common femoral vein: ultrasound assessment. Eur. J. Radiol., 58(2), 307–309 (2006).
  • Benz AP , VamosM, ErathJW, HohnloserSH. Cephalic vs. subclavian lead implantation in cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace, 21(1), 121–129 (2019).
  • Migliore F , FaisL, VioRet al. Axillary vein access for permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: fluoroscopy compared to ultrasound. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol., 43(6), 566–572 (2020).
  • Barbhaiya CR , NiaziO, BostromJet al. Early ICD lead failure in defibrillator systems with multiple leads via cephalic access. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol., 31(6), 1462–1469 (2020).
  • Staszewicz W , NaikenSP, MennetAet al. Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord., 7(6), 865–869 (2019).
  • Polyzos KA , KonstanteliasAA, FalagasME. Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace, 17(5), 767–777 (2015).
  • Squara F , TomiJ, ScarlattiD, TheodoreG, MoceriP, FerrariE. Self-taught axillary vein access without venography for pacemaker implantation: prospective randomized comparison with the cephalic vein access. Europace, 19(12), 2001–2006 (2017).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.