Advanced search
Publication Cover
Future Neurology Volume 15, 2020 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
633
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

What is New About Somatosensory Evoked Potentials as Neurological Predictors of Comatose Survivors After Cardiac Arrest?

Maenia Scarpino1 Servizio di Neurofisiopatologia, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy;2 SODc Neurofisiopatologia, Dipartimento Neuromuscolo-Scheletrico e degli Organi di Senso, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy
,
Giovanni Lanzo1 Servizio di Neurofisiopatologia, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy
,
Aldo Amantini1 Servizio di Neurofisiopatologia, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy;2 SODc Neurofisiopatologia, Dipartimento Neuromuscolo-Scheletrico e degli Organi di Senso, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy
&
Antonello Grippo1 Servizio di Neurofisiopatologia, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy;2 SODc Neurofisiopatologia, Dipartimento Neuromuscolo-Scheletrico e degli Organi di Senso, AOU Careggi, Firenze, ItalyCorrespondence[email protected]
Article: FNL41 | Received 20 Jan 2020, Accepted 07 Feb 2020, Published online: 24 Apr 2020

References

  • NolanJP, SoarJ, CariouAet al.European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines for post-resuscitation care 2015: section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation95, 202–222 (2015).
  • TsetsouS, NovyJ, PfeifferC, OddoM, RossettiAO. Multimodal outcome prognostication after cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management: analysis at 36°. Neurocrit. Care28, 104–109 (2018).
  • GlimmerveenAB, RuijterBJ, KeijzerHM, Tjepkema-CloostermansMC, van PuttenMJAM, HofmeijerJ. Association between somatosensory evoked potentials and EEG in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Clin. Neurophysiol.130, 2026–2031 (2019).
  • GrippoA, CarraiR, FossiSet al.Absent SEP during therapeutic hypothermia did not reappear after re-warming in comatose patients following cardiac arrest. Minerva Anestesiol.79, 360–369 (2013).
  • ScarpinoM, LanzoG, LolliFet al.Neurophysiological and neuroradiological multimodal approach for early poor outcome prediction after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation129, 114–120 (2018).
  • RobinsonLR, MicklesenPJ, TirschwellDL, LewHL. Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma. Crit. Care Med.31, 960–967 (2003).
  • WijdicksEF, HijdraA, YoungGBet al.Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology67, 203 (2006).
  • RossettiAO, OddoM, LogroscinoG, KaplanPW. Prognostication after cardiac arrest and hypothermia: a prospective study. Ann. Neurol.67, 301 (2010).
  • BouwesA, BinnekadeJM, KuiperMAet al.Prognosis of coma after therapeutic hypothermia: a prospective cohort study. Ann. Neurol.71, 206 (2012).
  • LeithnerC, PlonerCJ, HasperD, StormC. Does hypothermia influence the predictive value of bilateral absent N20 after cardiac arrest?Neurology74, 965 (2010).
  • SandroniC, CavallaroF, CallawayCWet al.Predictors of poor neurological outcome in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 2: patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Resuscitation84, 1324–1338 (2013).
  • ScarpinoM, GrippoA, LanzoGet al.The burden of clinical neurophysiology for the neurological prognosis of coma. Future Neurol.13, 127–129 (2018).
  • TacconeFS, BaarI, DeDeyne Cet al.Neuroprognostication after adult cardiac arrest treated with targeted temperature management: task force for Belgian recommendations. Acta Neurol. Belg.117, 3–15 (2017).
  • ScarpinoM, LolliF, LanzoGet al.Neurophysiology and neuroimaging accurately predict poor neurological outcome within 24 hours after cardiac arrest: the ProNeCA prospective multicentre prognostication study. Resuscitation143, 115–123 (2019).
  • ScarpinoM, LanzoG, LolliFet al.Data on multimodal approach for early poor outcome (cerebral performance categories 3–5) prediction after cardiac arrest. Data Brief19, 704–711 (2018).
  • ScarpinoM, LolliF, LanzoGet al.Neurophysiological and neuroradiological test for early poor outcome (cerebral performance categories 3–5) prediction after cardiac arrest: prospective multicentre prognostication data. Data Brief27, 104755 (2019).
  • ScarpinoM, CarraiR, LolliFet al.Neurophysiology for predicting good and poor neurological outcome at 12 and 72h after cardiac arrest: the ProNeCA multicentre prospective study. Resuscitation14795–103 ( 2019).
  • CarraiR, ScarpinoM, LolliFet al.Early-SEPs’ amplitude reduction is reliable for poor-outcome prediction after cardiac arrest?Acta Neurol. Scand.139, 158–165 (2019).
  • EndischC, StormC, PlonerCJ, LeithnerC. Amplitudes of SSEP and outcome in cardiac arrest survivors: a prospective cohort study. Neurology85, 1752–1760 (2015).
  • CarraiR, GrippoA, ScarpinoMet al.Time-dependent and independent neurophysiological indicators of prognosis in post-anoxic coma subjects treated by therapeutic hypothermia. Minerva Anestesiol.82, 940–949 (2016).
  • ScarpinoM, LanzoG, CarraiRet al.Predictive patterns of sensory evoked potentials in comatose brain injured patients evolving to brain death. Neurophysiol. Clin.47, 19–29 (2017).
  • ScarpinoM, LanzoG, LolliFet al.Is brain computed tomography combined with somatosensory evoked potentials useful in the prediction of brain death after cardiac arrest?Neurophysiol. Clin.47, 327–335 (2017).

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.