Preoperative assessment of high-grade endometrial cancer using a radiomic signature and clinical indicators

References

• Siegel RL , MillerKD, JemalA. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin.69(1), 7–34 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo N , CreutzbergC, AmantFet al. ESMO–ESGO–ESTRO Consensus Conference on endometrial cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol.27(1), 16–41 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shachar I , PavelkaJ, CohnDEet al. Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Obstet. Gynecol.105(3), 487–493 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelippeau J , CanlorbeG, BendifallahSet al. Preoperative diagnosis of tumor grade and type in endometrial cancer by pipelle sampling and hysteroscopy: results of a French study. Surg. Oncol.25(4), 370–377 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner HM , TrovikJ, MarcickiewiczJet al. A discordant histological risk classification in preoperative and operative biopsy in endometrial cancer is reflected in metastatic risk and prognosis. Eur. J. Cancer49(3), 625–632 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamran SC , ManuelMM, CatalanoPet al. MR- versus CT-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy16(6), 1159–1168 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pete I , GodényM, TóthE, RadóJ, PeteB, PulayT. Prediction of cervical infiltration in stage II endometrial cancer by different preoperative evaluation techniques (D&C, US, CT, MRI). Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol.24(6), 517–522 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanarateş A , BudakE. Prognostic role of PET/CT in endometrial cancer. Ginekologia polska. 90(9), 491–495 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart KI , ChasenB, ErwinWet al. Preoperative PET/CT does not accurately detect extrauterine disease in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk endometrial cancer: a prospective study. Cancer125(19), 3347–3353 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SB , MoonMH, SungCK, OhS, LeeYH. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of endometrial cancer: optimizing the imaging delay for tumour–myometrium contrast. Eur. Radiol.24(11), 2795–2799 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii S , KidoA, BabaTet al. Subendometrial enhancement and peritumoral enhancement for assessing endometrial cancer on dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. Eur. J. Radiol.84(4), 581–589 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie H , MaS, WangX, ZhangX. Noncontrast computer tomography-based radiomics model for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage expansion: preliminary findings and comparison with conventional radiological model. Eur. Radiol.30(1), 87–98 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litvin AA , BurkinDA, KropinovAA, ParamzinFN. Radiomics and digital image texture analysis in oncology (review). Sovrem. Tekhnologii Med.13(2), 97–104 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ayachy R , GiraudN, GiraudPet al. The role of radiomics in lung cancer: from screening to treatment and follow-up. Front. Oncol.11, 603595 (2021).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ai Y , ZhuH, XieC, JinX. Radiomics in cervical cancer: current applications and future potential. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.152, 102985 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola F , GianniniV, GabelloniMet al. Radiomics and magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: from engineering to clinical practice. Diagnostics (Basel)11(5), 756 (2021).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanzione A , CuocoloR, DelGrosso Ret al. Deep myometrial infiltration of endometrial cancer on MRI: a radiomics-powered machine learning pilot study. Acad. Radiol.28(5), 737–744 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan BC , LiY, MaFHet al. Radiologists with MRI-based radiomics aids to predict the pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: a multicenter study. Eur. Radiol.31(1), 411–422 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board . Female Genital Tumours: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. (5th Edition). IARC Press, Lyon, France (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Mccluggage WG , SinghN, GilksCB. Key changes to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of female genital tumours introduced in the 5th edition (2020). Histopathology80(5), 762–778 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D , YangL, DuDet al. Multi-parameter MR radiomics based model to predict 5-year progression-free survival in endometrial cancer. Front. Oncol.12, 813069 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissnitzer M , ForstnerR. MRI of endometrium cancer – how we do it. Cancer Imaging16, 11 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y , ZhangJ, ZhangYDet al. FeAture Explorer (FAE): a tool for developing and comparing radiomics models. PLOS ONE15(8), e0237587 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigatti SJ . Random Forest. J. Insurance Med.. 47(1), 31–39 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delong ER , DelongDM, Clarke-PearsonDL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics44(3), 837–845 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito T , RehmsmeierM. The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLOS ONE10(3), e0118432 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganeshan B , MilesKA. Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT. Cancer Imaging13(1), 140–149 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia G , O’DellC, HeverhagenJTet al. Colorectal liver metastases: contrast agent diffusion coefficient for quantification of contrast enhancement heterogeneity at MR imaging. Radiology248(3), 901–909 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y , GuccioneJM, RatcliffeMB, HsuEW. Transmural heterogeneity of diffusion anisotropy in the sheep myocardium characterized by MR diffusion tensor imaging. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.293(4), H2377–2384 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L . Random forests. Machine Learning45, 5–32 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler DR , EdwardsTCJr, BeardKHet al. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology. 88(11), 2783–2792 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang R , QiS, YueY, ZhangX, SongJ, QianW. Predictive radiomic models for the chemotherapy response in non-small-cell lung cancer based on computerized-tomography images. Front. Oncol.11, 646190 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura K , YoshidaS, TsuchiyaJet al. Usefulness of texture features of apparent diffusion coefficient maps in predicting chemoradiotherapy response in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur. Radiol.32(1), 671–679 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesapane F , RotiliA, BottaFet al. Radiomics of MRI for the prediction of the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a single referral centre analysis. Cancers (Basel)13(17), 4271 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno Y , ForghaniB, ForghaniRet al. Endometrial carcinoma: MR imaging-based texture model for preoperative risk stratification-a preliminary analysis. Radiology284(3), 748–757 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart GR , YanV, HuangGSet al. Population-based screening for endometrial cancer: human vs. machine intelligence. Front. Artif. Intell.3, 539879 (2020).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gharibvand MM , AhmadzadehA, AsadiF, FazelinejadZ. The diagnostic precision of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in grading of malignant endometrial lesions compared with histopathological findings. J. Family Med. Prim. Care.8(10), 3372–3378 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakir VL , BakirB, SanliSet al. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of endometrioid and non-endometrioid cancer of the uterus. Acta Radiol.58(6), 758–767 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q , OuyangH, YeFet al. Multiple mathematical models of diffusion-weighted imaging for endometrial cancer characterization: correlation with prognosis-related risk factors. Eur. J. Radiol.130, 109102 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nougaret S , ReinholdC, AlsharifSSet al. Endometrial cancer: combined MR volumetry and diffusion-weighted imaging for assessment of myometrial and lymphovascular invasion and tumor grade. Radiology276(3), 797–808 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereby-Kahane M , DautryR, Matzner-LoberEet al. Prediction of tumor grade and lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial adenocarcinoma with MR imaging-based radiomic analysis. Diagn. Interv. Imaging101(6), 401–411 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otani S , HimotoY, NishioMet al. Radiomic machine learning for pretreatment assessment of prognostic risk factors for endometrial cancer and its effects on radiologists’ decisions of deep myometrial invasion. Magn. Reson. Imaging85, 161–167 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LY , SiowTY, LinYCet al. Computer-aided segmentation and machine learning of integrated clinical and diffusion-weighted imaging parameters for predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Cancers (Basel)13(6), 1406 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y , XuH, MingYet al. Predicting myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer based on whole-uterine magnetic resonance radiomics. J. Cancer Res. Ther.16(7), 1648–1655 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X , YingJ, YangH, FuL, LiB, JiangB. Detection of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer MR imaging based on multi-feature fusion and probabilistic support vector machine ensemble. Comput. Biol. Med.134, 104487 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue W , MengN, WangJet al. Comparative analysis of the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating the histological features of endometrial cancer. Cancer Imaging19(1), 9 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Si Y , LiuRB. Diagnostic performance of monoexponential DWI versus diffusion kurtosis imaging in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol.211(2), 358–368 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nougaret S , LakhmanY, VargasHAet al. From staging to prognostication: achievements and challenges of MR imaging in the assessment of endometrial cancer. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am.25(3), 611–633 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T , LiY, LuSSet al. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging. Clin. Radiol.72(11), 995.e911–995.e920 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang GQ , XiYY, ZhangCJ, JiangX. Serum human epididymis protein 4 combined with carbohydrate antigen 125 for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers23(8), 580–588 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD , LewinSN, BarrenaMedel NIet al. Endometrial cancer in the oldest old: tumor characteristics, patterns of care, and outcome. Gynecol. Oncol.122(1), 69–74 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ytre-Hauge S , DybvikJA, LundervoldAet al. Preoperative tumor texture analysis on MRI predicts high-risk disease and reduced survival in endometrial cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging48(6), 1637–1647 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan BC , LiY, MaFHet al. Preoperative assessment for high-risk endometrial cancer by developing an MRI- and clinical-based radiomics nomogram: a multicenter study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging52(6), 1872–1882 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar