41
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editor

Significant heterogeneity of published literature comparing radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 277-278 | Received 09 Sep 2022, Accepted 31 Jan 2023, Published online: 14 Mar 2023

References

  • Chow R , SimoneCB2nd, JairamMP, SwaminathA, BoldtG, LockM. Comparing treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma: the value of network meta-analyses. Acta Oncol.61(4), 495 (2022).
  • Chow R , SimoneCB2nd, JairamMP, SwaminathA, BoldtG, LockM. Radiofrequency ablation vs radiation therapy vs transarterial chemoembolization vs yttrium 90 for local treatment of liver cancer – a systematic review and network meta-analysis of survival data. Acta Oncol.61(4), 484–494 (2022).
  • Zhang H , ChangN, HanTet al. Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Future Oncol.17(30), 4027–4040 (2021).
  • Malik A , JairamMP, ChowR, MirshahvaladSA, Veit-HaibachP, SimoneCB2nd. Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-regression. Future Oncol.17(30), 4027–4040 (2022).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.