312
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Report

PET/CT Imaging to Guide Cervical Cancer Therapy

Pages 953-958 | Published online: 30 Sep 2009

Bibliography

  • Wright JD , DehdashtiF, HerzogTJet al.: Preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma by [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography.Cancer104(11), 2484–2491 (2005).
  • Yen TC , NgKK, MaSYet al.: Value of dual-phase 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in cervical cancer.J. Clin. Oncol.21(19), 3651–3658 (2003).
  • Rose PG , AdlerLP, RodriguezMet al.: Positron emission tomography for evaluating para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: a surgicopathologic study.J. Clin. Oncol.17, 41–45 (1999).
  • Narayan K , HicksRJ, JoblingTet al.: A comparison of MRI and PET scanning in surgically staged loco-regional advanced cervical cancer: potential impact on treatment.Int. J. Gynecologic Cancer11, 263–271 (2001).
  • Reinhardt MJ , Ehritt-BraunC, VogelgesangDet al.: Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET.Radiology218, 776–782 (2001).
  • Kuhnel G , HornLC, FischerUet al.: 18F-FDG positron-emission-tomography in cervical carcinoma: preliminary findings.Zentralbl Gynakol.123(4), 229–235 (2001).
  • Yeh LS , HungYC, ShenYYet al.: Detecting para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis by positron emission tomography of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in advanced cervical cancer with negative magnetic resonance imaging findings.Oncol. Rep.9(6), 1289–1292 (2002).
  • Lin WC , HungYC, YehLSet al.: Usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings.Gynecol. Oncol.89(1), 73–76 (2003).
  • Pandharipande PV , ChoyG, del CarmenMGet al.: MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: decision analysis to assess patient outcomes.Am. J. Roentgenol.192(3), 802–814 (2009).
  • Landoni F , ManeoA, ColombAet al.: Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer.Lancet350, 535–540 (1997).
  • Park J-Y , KimEN, KimD-Yet al.: Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.108(3), 486–492 (2008).
  • Hricak H , GatsonisC, CoakleyFVet?al.: Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation – ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.Radiology245(2), 491–498 (2007).
  • Grills IS , YanD, BlackQC, WongC-YO, MartinezAA, KestinLL: Clinical implications of defining the gross tumor volume with combination of CT and 18FDG-positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.67(3), 709–719 (2007).
  • Kruser TJ , BradleyKA, BentzenSMet al.: The impact of hybrid PET-CT scan on overall oncologic management, with a focus on radiotherapy planning: a prospective, blinded study.Technol. Cancer Res. Treat.8(2), 149–158 (2009).
  • Nestle U , KrempS, GrosuA-L: Practical integration of [18F]-FDG-PET and PET-CT in the planning of radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the technical basis, ICRU-target volumes, problems, perspectives.Radiother. Oncol.81(2), 209–225 (2006).
  • Topkan E , YavuzA, AydinM, OnalC, YaparF, YavuzM: Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.27(1), 41 (2008).
  • Deantonio L , BeldiD, GambaroGet al.: FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and radiotherapy treatment planning of head and neck carcinoma.Radiat. Oncol.3(1), 29 (2008).
  • Greco C , RosenzweigK, CasciniGL, TamburriniO: Current status of PET/CT for tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Lung Cancer57(2), 125–134 (2007).
  • Morris M , EifelPJ, LuJet al.: Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer.N. Engl. J. Med.340(15), 1137–1143 (1999).
  • Beriwal S , GanGN, HeronDEet al.: Early clinical outcome with concurrent chemotherapy and extended-field, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.68(1), 166–171 (2007).
  • Grigsby PW , HeydonK, MutchDG, KimRY, EifelPJ: Long-term follow-up of RTOG 92–10: cervical cancer with positive para-aortic lymph nodes.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.51(4), 982–987 (2001).
  • MacManus M , NestleU, RosenzweigKEet al.: Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006–2007.Radiother. Oncol.91(1), 85–94 (2009).
  • Brunetti J , CaggianoA, RosenbluthB, VialottiC: Technical aspects of positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion planning.Semin. Nucl. Med.38(2), 129–136 (2008).
  • Esthappan J , ChaudhariS, SantanamLet al.: Prospective clinical trial of PET/CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma with postive para-aortic lymph nodes.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.72(4), 1134–1139 (2008).
  • Schwarz JK , LinLL, SiegelBA, MillerTR, GrigsbyPW: 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography evaluation of early metabolic response during radiation therapy for cervical cancer.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.72(5), 1502–1507 (2008).
  • Schwarz JK , SiegelBA, DehdashtiF, GrigsbyPW: Association of post-therapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma.JAMA298(19), 2289–2295 (2007).
  • Bodurka-Bevers D , MorrisM, EifelP, LevenbackCet al.: Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an outcomes analysis.Gynecol. Oncol.78, 187–193 (2000).
  • Brooks RA , RaderJS, DehdashtiFet al.: Surveillance FDG-PET detection of asymptomatic recurrences in patients with cervical cancer.Gynecol. Oncol.112(1), 104–109 (2009).
  • Gregoire V , HaustermansK, GeetsX, RoelsS, LonneuxM: PET-based treatment planning in radiotherapy: a new standard?J. Nucl. Med.48(Suppl. 1), 68S–77S (2007).
  • Grosu AL , PiertM, WeberWAet al.: Positron emission tomography for radiation treatment planning.Strahlenther Onkol.181(8), 483–499 (2005).
  • Dolezelova H , SlampaP, OndrovaBet al.: The impact of PET with 18FDG in radiotherapy treatment planning and in the prediction in patients with cervix carcinoma: results of pilot study.Neoplasma55(5), 437–441 (2008).
  • S⊘vik Å, Malinen E, Olsen DR: Strategies for biologic image-guided dose escalation: a review. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.73(3), 650–658 (2009).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.