Neurostimulation for Cognitive Enhancement in Alzheimer’s Disease (the NICE-AD study): A Randomized Clinical Trial

References

• Collins FS . Stopping Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Bypass Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 2018.National Institutes of Health, Washington DC, USA (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Gebodh N , EsmaeilpourZ, AdairD, SchestattskyP, FregniF. Transcranial direct current stimulation among technologies for low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation: classification, history, and terminology. In: Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.KnotkovaH, NitscheMA, BiksonM, WoodsAJ ( Eds). Springer Nature, NY, USA, 3–43 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• (Ed.),ClaytonA, StevensM, RiggsA, CharvetL. Home-based patient-delivered remotely-supervised tDCS. In: Practical Guide to the Transcranial Direct Stimulation.KnotkovaH, NitscheMA, BiksonM, WoodsAJ ( Eds). Springer Nature, NY, USA, 379–406 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Reato D , SalvadorR, OpitzA, DmochowskiJ, MirandaPC. Principles of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): introduction to biophysics of tDCS. In: Practical Guide to the Transcranial Direct Stimulation.KnotkovaH, NitscheMA, BiksonM, WoodsAJ ( Eds). Springer Nature, NY, USA, 45–80 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA , LiebetanzD, AntalA, LangN, TergauF, PaulusW. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol., 56, 255–276 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liebetanz D , NitscheMA, TergauF, PaulusW. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain, 125(Pt 10), 2238–2247 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeser D , MeindlT, BorJet al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J. Neurosci., 31(43), 15284–15293 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polania R , NitscheMA, PaulusW. Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum. Brain Mapp., 32(8), 1236–1249 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber MJ , MessingSB, RaoH, DetreJA, Thompson-SchillSL. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation alters activation and connectivity in cortical and subcortical reward systems: a tDCS-fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp., 35(8), 3673–3686 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X , SchlaugG. Structural white matter changes in descending motor tracts correlate with improvements in motor impairment after undergoing a treatment course of tDCS and physical therapy. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 9(229), 229 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nitsche MA , LampeC, AntalAet al. Dopaminergic modulation of long-lasting direct current-induced cortical excitability changes in the human motor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci., 23(6), 1651–1657 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA , KuoMF, KarraschR, WachterB, LiebetanzD, PaulusW. Serotonin affects transcranial direct current-induced neuroplasticity in humans. Biol. Psychiatry, 66(5), 503–508 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polania R , PaulusW, NitscheMA. Modulating cortico-striatal and thalamo-cortical functional connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum. Brain Mapp., 33(10), 2499–2508 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasilva AF , MendoncaME, ZaghiSet al. tDCS-induced analgesia and electrical fields in pain-related neural networks in chronic migraine. Headache, 52(8), 1283–1295 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosconi L . Brain glucose metabolism in the early and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. FDG-PET studies in MCI and AD. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 32(4), 486–510 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X , LiY, WenH, ZhangY, TianX. Intensity-dependent effects of repetitive anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on learning and memory in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 123, 168–178 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu SH , ParkSD, SimKC. The effect of tDCS on cognition and neurologic recovery of rats with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Phys. Ther. Sci., 26(2), 247–249 (2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boggio PS , KhouryLP, MartinsDC, MartinsOE, DeMacedo EC, FregniF. Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 80(4), 444–447 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio PS , FerrucciR, MameliFet al. Prolonged visual memory enhancement after direct current stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimul., 5(3), 223–230 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrucci R , MameliF, GuidiIet al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 71(7), 493–498 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bystad M , GronliO, RasmussenIDet al. Transcranial direct current stimulation as a memory enhancer in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther., 8(1), 13 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suemoto CK , ApolinarioD, Nakamura-PalaciosEMet al. Effects of a non-focal plasticity protocol on apathy in moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimul., 7(2), 308–313 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs A , PatelV, PaneriB, PortenoyRK, BiksonM, KnotkovaH. At-home transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with telehealth support for symptom control in chronically-ill patients with multiple symptoms. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 12, 93 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs A , PatelV, CharvetL, KasschauM, HarounianJ, KnotkovaH. Developing patient and caregiver instructional materials and training for at-home, remotely-supervised, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in seriously ill patients with multiple symptoms. Brain Stimul., 10(4), e44 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Knotkova H , RiggsA, PortenoyRK. Proceedings #23. A patient-tailored protocol of tDCS stimulation paired with telehealth support for at-home symptom management in seriously ill patients with multiple chronic symptoms. Brain Stimul., 10(4), e77–e78 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Knotkova H , RiggsA, BerishaDet al. Automatic M1-SO montage headgear for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) suitable for home and high-throughput in-clinic applications. Neuromodulation, 22(8), 904–910 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charvet LE , KasschauM, DattaAet al. Remotely-supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for clinical trials: guidelines for technology and protocols. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 9, 26 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im JJ , JeongH, BiksonMet al. Effects of 6-month at-home transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition and cerebral glucose metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimul., 12(5), 1222–1228 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeste DV , PalmerBW, AppelbaumPSet al. A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 64(8), 966–974 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verghese J , MalikR, ZwerlingJ. Montefiore-Einstein Center for the aging brain: preliminary data. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 64(11), 2374–2377 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes CP , BergL, DanzigerWL, CobenLA, MartinRL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br. J. Psychiatry, 140, 566–572 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor DJ , SabbaghMN. Administration and scoring variance on the ADAS-Cog. J. Alzheimers Dis., 15(3), 461–464 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse TA , KerstenAW. Decomposing adult age differences in symbol arithmetic. Mem. Cognit., 21(5), 699–710 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafont S , Marin-LamelletC, Paire-FicoutL, Thomas-AnterionC, LaurentB, FabrigouleC. The Wechsler Digit Symbol Substitution Test as the best indicator of the risk of impaired driving in Alzheimer disease and normal aging. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord., 29(2), 154–163 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torisson G , StavenowL, MinthonL, LondosE. Reliability, validity and clinical correlates of the quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease (QoL-AD) scale in medical inpatients. Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 14, 90 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Marwijk HW , WallaceP, DeBock GH, HermansJ, KapteinAA, MulderJD. Evaluation of the feasibility, reliability and diagnostic value of shortened versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Br. J. Gen. Pract., 45(393), 195–199 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen WG , MohsRC, DavisKL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Psychiatry, 141(11), 1356–1364 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihl R , FerrisS, RobertP, WinbladB, GauthierS, TennigkeitF. Detecting treatment effects with combinations of the ADAS-Cog items in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 27(1), 15–21 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozzini L , ChiloviBV, ContiMet al. Conversion of amnestic mild cognitive impairment to dementia of Alzheimer type is independent to memory deterioration. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 22(12), 1217–1222 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng CP , ChanSS, MakADet al. Would transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhance the effects of working memory training in older adults with mild neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 16, 479 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doraiswamy PM , KaiserL, BieberF, GarmanRL. The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale: evaluation of psychometric properties and patterns of cognitive decline in multicenter clinical trials of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord., 15(4), 174–183 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podhorna J , KrahnkeT, ShearM, HarrisonJE. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale variants in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease: change over time and the effect of enrichment strategies. Alzheimers Res. Ther., 8(1), 8 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang P , ZhangX, LiuYet al. Perceptual and response interference in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Clin. Neurophysiol, 124(12), 2389–2396 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collette F , SchmidtC, ScherrerC, AdamS, SalmonE. Specificity of inhibitory deficits in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging, 30(6), 875–889 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods AJ , AntalA, BiksonMet al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin. Neurophysiol., 127(2), 1031–1048 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F , BoggioPS, NitscheMA, RigonattiSP, Pascual-LeoneA. Cognitive effects of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with depression. Depress. Anxiety, 23(8), 482–484 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern Y , HabeckC, SteffenerJet al. The reference ability neural network study: motivation, design, and initial feasibility analyses. Neuroimage, 103, 139–151 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S , JenkinsonM, BeckmannC, MillerK, WoolrichM. Meaningful design and contrast estimability in fMRI. Neuroimage, 34(1), 127–136 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson M , BeckmannCF, BehrensTE, WoolrichMW, SmithSM. FSL. Neuroimage, 62(2), 782–790 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolrich MW , JbabdiS, PatenaudeBet al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage, 45(Suppl. 1), S173–S186 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SM , JenkinsonM, WoolrichMWet al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage, 23(Suppl. 1), S208–S219 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann CF , SmithSM. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 23(2), 137–152 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy K , BirnRM, BandettiniPA. Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup. Neuroimage, 80, 349–359 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole DM , SmithSM, BeckmannCF. Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state fMRI data. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 4, 8 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox MD , RaichleME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 8(9), 700–711 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann CF , DelucaM, DevlinJT, SmithSM. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 360(1457), 1001–1013 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greicius MD , SrivastavaG, ReissAL, MenonV. Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer’s disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101(13), 4637–4642 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SM , FoxPT, MillerKLet al. Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106(31), 13040–13045 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly RE Jr , AlexopoulosGS, WangZet al. Visual inspection of independent components: defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data. J. Neurosci. Methods, 189(2), 233–245 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senn SJ . Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials. Stat. Med., 8(4), 467–475 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SK . Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect. Clin. Res., 2(3), 109–112 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unnebrink K , WindelerJ. Intention-to-treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases. Stat. Med., 20(24), 3931–3946 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little R , YauL. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-outs. Biometrics, 52(4), 1324–1333 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumdar S , LiuKS, HouckPR, ReynoldsCF3rd. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal clinical trials: coping with the challenge of missing values. J. Psychiatr. Res., 33(2), 87–95 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs DM , ArdMC, SalmonDP, GalaskoDR, BondiMW, EdlandSD. Potential implications of practice effects in Alzheimer’s disease prevention trials. Alzheimers Dement. (NY), 3(4), 531–535 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu WY , KuY, ZantoTP, GazzaleyA. Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiol. Aging, 36(8), 2348–2359 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar