https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-8010
References
- Larner AJ . The 2x2 matrix: contingency, confusion and the metrics of binary classification.Springer, London, UK (2021).
- Powers DMW . What the F measure doesn’t measure … Features, flaws, fallacies and fixes. arXivdoi:1503.06410.2015 (2015).
- Chicco D , TötschN, JurmanG. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markendness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation. BioData Mining, 14, 13 (2021).
- Larner AJ . Communicating risk: developing an “Efficiency Index” for dementia screening tests. Brain Sci., 11, 1473 (2021).
- Jaeschke R , GuyattG, SackettDL. Users’ guide to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients. JAMA, 271, 703–707 (1994).
- McGee S . Simplifying likelihood ratios. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 17, 647–650 (2002).
- Larner AJ . Accuracy of cognitive screening instruments reconsidered: overall, balanced, or unbiased accuracy. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag., 12,67–76( 2022).
- Mitchell AJ . Index test. Encyclopedia of medical decision making.KattanMW ( Ed.). Sage, CA, USA, 613–617 (2009).
- Hsieh S , McGroryS, LeslieFet al. The Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination: a new assessment tool for dementia. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord., 39, 1–11 (2015).
- Larner AJ . MACE for diagnosis of dementia and MCI: examining cut-offs and predictive values. Diagnostics (Basel), 9, E51 (2019).
- Brodersen KH , OngCS, StephanKE, BuhmannJM. The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. In: Proceedings of ICPR 2010 – the 20th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. OliveiraDM, LinsRD ( Eds). IEEE3121–3124 (2010).
- Garrett CT , SellS. Summary and perspective: assessing test effectiveness – the identification of good tumour markers. In: Cellular cancer markers.GarrettCT, SellS ( Eds). Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 455–477 (1995).
- Kraemer HC . Evaluating medical tests. Objective and quantitative guidelines.Sage. CA, USA (1992).
- Larner AJ . Applying Kraemer’s Q (positive sign rate): some implications for diagnostic test accuracy study results. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Dis. Extra, 9, 389–396 (2019).
- Youden WJ . Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3, 32–35 (1950).
- Katz D , BaptistaJ, AzenSP, PikeMC. Obtaining confidence intervals for the risk ratio in cohort studies. Biometrics, 34, 469–474 (1978).
- Larner AJ . Manual of screeners for dementia. Pragmatic test accuracy studies.Springer, London, UK (2020).
- Brenner H , GefellerO. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat. Med., 16, 981–991 (1997).
- Rosenthal JA . Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. J. Soc. Serv. Res., 21, 37–59 (1996).
- Mendez MF . The mental status examination handbook.Elsevier, PA, USA, 88 (2022).
- Chen H , CohenP, ChenS. How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 39, 860–864 (2010).
- Larner AJ . What is test accuracy? Comparing unitary accuracy metrics for cognitive screening instruments. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag., 9, 277–281 (2019).