The Heritable Effects of Nanotoxicity

References

• Oberdorster G , OberdorsterE, OberdorsterJ. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect.113 (7), 823–839 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug HF , WickP. Nanotoxicology: an interdisciplinary challenge. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.50 (6), 1260–1278 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pumera M . Nanotoxicology: the molecular science point of view. Chem. Asian j.6 (2), 340–348 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffa V , VittorioO, RiggioC, CuschieriA. Progress in nanotechnology for healthcare. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol.19 (3), 127–135 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Villa KR , TakemotoJK, YanezJA, RemsbergCM, ForrestML, DaviesNM. Clinical toxicities of nanocarrier systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.60 (8), 929–938 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N , ManshianB, JenkinsGJSet al. NanoGenotoxicology: the DNA damaging potential of engineered nanomaterials. Biomaterials30 (23–24), 3891–3914 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone V , JohnstonH, SchinsRP. Development of vitro systems for nanotoxicology: methodological considerations. Crit. Rev. Toxicol.39 (7), 613–626 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsiedel R , KappMD, SchulzM, WienchK, OeschF. Genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials: methods, preparation and characterization of test material, potential artifacts and limitations – many questions, some answers. Mutat. Res.681 (2–3), 241–258 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson K , PolandCA, SchinsRP. Possible genotoxic mechanisms of nanoparticles: criteria for improved test strategies. Nanotoxicology4, 414–420 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng CT , DheenST, YipWCG, OngCN, BayBH, YungLYL. The induction of epigenetic regulation of PROS1 gene in lung fibroblasts by gold nanoparticles and implications for potential lung injury. Biomaterials32 (30), 7609–7615 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdolenova Z , CollinsA, KumarA, DhawanA, StoneV, DusinskaM. Mechanisms of genotoxicity. a review of vitro and vivo studies with engineered nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology8 (3), 233–278 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tino A , AmbrosoneA, MarchesanoV, TortiglioneC. Molecular bases of nanotoxicology. In : Bio- and Bioinspired Nanomaterials.Ruiz-MolinaD, NovioF, RosciniC. ( Eds). Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 229–293 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Choi AO , BrownSE, SzyfM, MaysingerD. Quantum dot-induced epigenetic and genotoxic changes in human breast cancer cells. J. Mol. Med.86 (3), 291–302 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng J , XingJM, WangYZet al. Epigenetic modulation of human breast cancer by metallofullerenol nanoparticles: in ivo treatment and in vitro analysis. Nanoscale3 (11), 4713–4719 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ema M , KobayashiN, NayaM, HanaiS, NakanishiJ. Reproduction and developmental toxicity studies of manufactured nanomaterials. Reprod. Toxicol.30 (3), 343–352 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J , ZhangQ, WangZ, YanB. Effects of nanotoxicity on female reproductivity and fetal development in animal models. Int. J. Mol. Sci.14 (5), 9319–9337 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hougaard KS , PetraJ, KeldAJet al. Effects of prenatal exposure to surface-coated nanosized titanium dioxide (UV-Titan): a study in mice. Part. Fibre Toxicol.7, 16 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WMS , BurchRL, HumeCW. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen, London, UK (1959).
   Google Scholar
• Giannaccini M , CuschieriA, DenteL, RaffaV. Non-mammalian vertebrate embryos as models in nanomedicine. Nanomedicine10 (4), 703–719 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaise C , GagnéF, FérardJ, EullaffroyP. Ecotoxicity of selected nano-materials to aquatic organisms. Environ. Toxicol.23 (5), 591–598 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baun A , HartmannNB, GriegerK, KuskKO. Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: a brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology17 (5), 387–395 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S , ZhaoY, JiZet al. Zebrafish high-throughput screening to study the impact of dissolvable metal oxide nanoparticles on the hatching enzyme, ZHE1. Small9 (9–10), 1776–1785 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt DA , ChenJ, MouaM, KlaperRD. Multigeneration impacts on Daphnia magna of carbon nanomaterials with differing core structures and functionalizations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.33 (3), 541–547 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW , KimSM, ChoiJ. Genotoxicity and ecotoxicity assays using the freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna and the larva of the aquatic midge Chironomus riparius to screen the ecological risks of nanoparticle exposure. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.28 (1), 86–91 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam N , SchmittC, GalceranJet al. The chronic toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles and ZnCl2 to Daphnia magna and the use of different methods to assess nanoparticle aggregation and dissolution. Nanotoxicology8 (7), 709–717 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensberg MC , MadangopalR, YaleGet al. Silver nanoparticle-specific mitotoxicity in Daphnia magna. Nanotoxicology8 (8), 833–842 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S , WangX, JiZet al. Aspect ratio plays a role in the hazard potential of CeO2 nanoparticles in mouse lung and zebrafish gastrointestinal tract. ACS Nano8 (5), 4450–4464 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosone A , TortiglioneC. Methodological approaches for nanotoxicology using cnidarian models. Toxicol. Mech. Methods23 (3), 207–216 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortiglione : An ancient model organism to test vivo novel functional nanocrystals. In : Biomedical Engineering: From Theory to ApplicationFazel-RezaiR. ( Ed.). InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 225–252 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Khalturin K , Anton-ErxlebenF, MildeSet al. Transgenic stem cells in Hydra reveal an early evolutionary origin for key elements controlling self-renewal and differentiation. Develop. Biol.309 (1), 32–44 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosone A , MarchesanoV, TinoA, HobmayerB, TortiglioneC. Hymyc1 downregulation promotes stem cell proliferation in Hydra vulgaris. PLoS ONE7 (1), e30660 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chera S , De RosaR, Miljkovic-LicinaMet al. Silencing of the Hydra serine protease inhibitor Kazal1 gene mimics the human SPINK1 pancreatic phenotype. J. Cell Sci.119 (Pt 5), 846–857 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilby O , TeshJm. The Hydra assay as an early screen for teratogenic potential. Toxicol. Vitro4 (4–5), 582–583 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollino CA , HoldwayDA. Potential of two Hydra species as standard toxicity test animals. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety43 (3), 309–316 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karntanut W , PascoeD. The toxicity of copper, cadmium and zinc to four different Hydra (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa). Chemosphere47 (10), 1059–1064 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortiglione C , QuartaA, MalvindiMA, TinoA, PellegrinoT. Fluorescent nanocrystals reveal regulated portals of entry into and between the cells of Hydra. PLoS ONE4 (11), e7698 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosone A , MatteraL, MarchesanoVet al. Mechanisms underlying toxicity induced by CdTe quantum dots determined in an invertebrate model organism. Biomaterials33 (7), 1991–2000 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tino A , AmbrosoneA, MatteraLet al. A new vivo model system to assess the toxicity of semiconductor nanocrystals. Int. J. Biomater.2011, 792854 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ambrosone A , Marchesano, V, Mattera, L, Tino, A, Tortiglione, C. Bridging the fields nanoscience toxicology: nanoparticle impact on biological models. In : Colloidal Quantum Dots/Nanocrystals for Biomedical Applications VI, ParakWJ, YamamotoK, OsinskiM. ( Eds). SPIE, Bellingham, WA, USA (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Genikhovich G , TechnauU. Induction of spawning in the starlet sea anemone Nematostella vectensis, vitro fertilization of gametes, and dejellying of zygotes. Cold Spring Harb. Proto.2009 (9), pdb prot5281 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ambrosone A , MarchesanoV, MazzarellaV, TortiglioneC. Nanotoxicology using the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis: from developmental toxicity to genotoxicology. Nanotoxicology8 (5), 508–520 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaiger M , SchonauerA, RendeiroAFet al. Evolutionary conservation of the eumetazoan gene regulatory landscape. Genome Res.24 (4), 639–650 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y , HuM, FanCet al. The cytotoxicity of CdTe quantum dots and the relative contributions from released cadmium ions and nanoparticle properties. Biomaterials31 (18), 4829–4834 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King-Heiden TC , WiecinskiPN, ManghamANet al. Quantum dot nanotoxicity assessment using the zebrafish embryo. Environ. Sci. Technol.43 (5), 1605–1611 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulis JM , ThevenodF. New perspectives in cadmium toxicity: an introduction. Biometals23 (5), 763–768 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posgai R , Cipolla-MccullochC, MurphyK, HussainS, RoweJ, NielsenM. Differential toxicity of silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on Drosophila melanogaster development, Reprod. effort, and viability: size, coatings and antioxidants matter. Chemosphere85 (1), 34–42 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philbrook N , WinnL, AfroozA, SalehN, WalkerV. The effect of TiO(2) and Ag nanoparticles on reproduction and development of Drosophila melanogaster and CD-1 mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.257 (3), 429–436 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorth D , RandD, WebsterT. Silver nanoparticle toxicity in Drosophila: size does matter. Int. J. Nanomedicine6, 343–350 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vales G , DemirE, KayaB, CreusA, MarcosR. Genotoxicity of cobalt nanoparticles and ions in Drosophila. Nanotoxicology7 (4), 462–468 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio G , GaleoneA, BrunettiVet al. Mutagenic effects of gold nanoparticles induce aberrant phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Nanomedicine8 (1), 1–7 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S , KwakJ, AnY-J. Multigenerational study of gold nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans: transgenerational effect of maternal exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol.47 (10), 5393–5399 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu Y , LiW, ZhouYet al. Full assessment of fate and physiological behavior of quantum dots utilizing Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism. Nano Lett.11 (8), 3174–3183 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan N , ChenC-S, HsiehH-H, WuY-C, ChangH-C. vivo imaging and toxicity assessments of fluorescent nanodiamonds in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nano Lett.10 (9), 3692–3699 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden PA , NisbetRM, LenihanHSet al. Ecological nanotoxicology: integrating nanomaterial hazard considerations across the subcellular, population, community, and ecosystems levels. Acc. Chem. Res.46 (3), 813–822 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CR , GeorgeS, HorstAMet al. Nanomaterials in the environment: from materials to high-throughput screening to organisms. ACS Nano5 (1), 13–20 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King-Heiden T , WiecinskiP, ManghamAet al. Quantum dot nanotoxicity assessment using the zebrafish embryo. Environ. Sci. Technol.43 (5), 1605–1611 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asharani P , LianwuY, GongZ, ValiyaveettilS. Comparison of the toxicity of silver, gold and platinum nanoparticles in developing zebrafish embryos. Nanotoxicology5 (1), 43–54 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Ilan O , LouisKM, YangSPet al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles produce phototoxicity in the developing zebrafish. Nanotoxicology6 (6), 670–679 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Ilan O , AlbrechtRM, FakoVE, FurgesonDY. Toxicity assessments of multisized gold and silver nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos. Small5 (16), 1897–1910 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Ilan O , ChuangCC, SchwahnDJet al. TiO2 nanoparticle exposure and illumination during zebrafish development: mortality at parts per billion concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol.47 (9), 4726–4733 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan J , YuY, LiY, YuY, SunZ. Cardiovascular toxicity evaluation of silica nanoparticles in endothelial cells and zebrafish model. Biomaterials34 (23), 5853–5862 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SJ , ZhaoY, NelAE, LinS. Zebrafish: an vivo model for nano EHS studies. Small9 (9–10), 1608–1618 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George S , XiaT, RalloRet al. Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials. ACS Nano5 (3), 1805–1817 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asharani P , Lian WuY, GongZ, ValiyaveettilS. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles in zebrafish models. Nanotechnology19 (25), 255102 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong L , TiltonSC, ZaikovaTet al. Surface functionalities of gold nanoparticles impact embryonic gene expression responses. Nanotoxicology7 (2), 192–201 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson S , MahmoudT, BeauxM, ShapiroP, McIlroyD, StenkampD. Toxic and teratogenic silica nanowires in developing vertebrate embryos. Nanomedicine6 (1), 93–102 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyjovska ZO , BoisenAM, JacksonP, WallinH, VogelU, HougaardKS. Daily sperm production: application in studies of prenatal exposure to nanoparticles in mice. Reprod. Toxicol.36, 88–97 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisen AM , ShipleyT, JacksonPet al. NanoTiO2 (UV-Titan) does not induce ESTR mutations in the germline of prenatally exposed female mice. Part. Fibre Toxicol.9, 19 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisen AM , ShipleyT, JacksonPet al. In utero exposure to nanosized carbon black (Printex90) does not induce tandem repeat mutations in female murine germ cells. Reprod. Toxicol.41, 45–48 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hougaard KS , JacksonP, KyjovskaZOet al. Effects of lung exposure to carbon nanotubes on female fertility and pregnancy: a study in mice. Reprod. Toxicol.41, 86–97 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson P , HougaardKS, BoisenAMet al. Pulmonary exposure to carbon black by inhalation or instillation in pregnant mice: effects on liver DNA strand breaks in dams and offspring. Nanotoxicology6 (5), 486–500 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson P , HougaardKS, VogelUet al. Exposure of pregnant mice to carbon black by intratracheal instillation: toxicogenomic effects in dams and offspring. Mutat. Res.745 (1–2), 73–83 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson P , VogelU, WallinH, HougaardKS. Prenatal exposure to carbon black (Printex 90): effects on sexual development and neurofunction. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol.109 (6), 434–437 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu M , WuQ, YangHet al. Transfer of quantum dots from pregnant mice to pups across the placental barrier. Small6 (5), 670–678 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan WH , ShiaoNH. Cytotoxic effect of CdSe quantum dots on mouse embryonic development. Acta Pharmacol. Sin.29 (2), 259–266 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refuerzo JS , GodinB, BishopKet al. Size of the nanovectors determines the transplacental passage in pregnancy: study in rats. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.204 (6), 546e545–e549 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita K , YoshiokaY, HigashisakaKet al. Silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles cause pregnancy complications in mice. Nat. Nanotechnol.6 (5), 321–328 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian F , RazanskyD, EstradaGGet al. Surface modification and size dependence in particle translocation during early embryonic development. Inhal. Toxicol.21 (Suppl. 1), 92–96 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu WJ , SonJM, LeeJet al. Effects of silver nanoparticles on pregnant dams and embryo-fetal development in rats. Nanotoxicology8 (Suppl. 1), 85–91 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campagnolo L , MassimianiM, MagriniA, CamaioniA, PietroiustiA. Physico-chemical properties mediating reproductive and developmental toxicity of engineered nanomaterials. Curr. Med. Chem.19 (26), 4488–4494 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buerki-Thurnherr T , Von MandachU, WickP. Knocking at the door of the unborn child: engineered nanoparticles at the human placental barrier. Swiss Med. Wkly142, w13559 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick P , MalekA, ManserPet al. Barrier capacity of human placenta for nanosized materials. Environ. Health Perspect.118 (3), 432–436 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders M . Transplacental transport of nanomaterials. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol.1 (6), 671–684 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietroiusti A , CampagnoloL, FadeelB. Interactions of engineered nanoparticles with organs protected by internal biological barriers. Small9 (9–10), 1557–1572 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida S , HiyoshiK, OshioS, TakanoH, TakedaK, IchinoseT. Effects of fetal exposure to carbon nanoparticles on reproduction function in male offspring. Fertil. Steril.93 (5), 1695–1699 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujitani T , OhyamaK-I, HiroseA, NishimuraT, NakaeD, OgataA. Teratogenicity of multi-wall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) in ICR mice. J. Toxicol. Sci.37 (1), 81–89 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietroiusti A , MassimianiM, FenoglioIet al. Low doses of pristine and oxidized single-wall carbon nanotubes affect mammalian embryonic development. ACS Nano5 (6), 4624–4633 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagnolo L , MassimianiM, PalmieriGet al. Biodistribution and toxicity of pegylated single wall carbon nanotubes in pregnant mice. Part. Fibre Toxicol.10 (1), 21 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu J , ErogbogboF, YongKTet al. Assessing clinical prospects of silicon quantum dots: studies in mice and monkeys. ACS Nano7 (8), 7303–7310 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong KT , LawWC, HuRet al. Nanotoxicity assessment of quantum dots: from cellular to primate studies. Chem. Soc. Rev.42 (3), 1236–1250 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye L , YongK-T, LiuLet al. A pilot study in non-human primates shows no adverse response to intravenous injection of quantum dots. Nat. Nanotechnol.7 (7), 453–458 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou L , ChanW. Nanotoxicology: no signs of illness. Nat. Nanotechnol.7 (7), 416–417 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philbrook N , WalkerV, AfroozA, SalehN, WinnL. Investigating the effects of functionalized carbon nanotubes on reproduction and development in Drosophila melanogaster and CD-1 mice. Reprod. Toxicol.32 (4), 442–448 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y , MizuoK, ShinkaiY, OshioS, TakedaK. Prenatal exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles increases dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex and neostriatum of mice. J. Toxicol. Sci.35 (5), 749–756 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda K , SuzukiK-I, IshiharaAet al. Nanoparticles transferred from pregnant mice to their offspring can damage the genital and cranial nerve systems. J. Health Sci.55 (1), 95–102 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Balansky R , LongobardiM, GanchevGet al. Transplacental clastogenic and epigenetic effects of gold nanoparticles in mice. Mutat. Res.751–752, 42–48 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias FT , RomanoRM, KizysMMet al. Daily exposure to silver nanoparticles during prepubertal development decreases adult sperm and reproduction parameters. Nanotoxicology doi: 10.3109/17435390.2014.889237 (2014) ( Epub ahead of print).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar