Central Neuraxial Analgesia For Labor: An Update of The Literature

References

• Anim-Somuah M , SmythRM , JonesL . Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour . Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3 ( 2011 ) ( Epub ahead of print ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L , OthmanM , DowswellTet al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews . Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2 ( 2012 ) ( Epub ahead of print ).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson JE , PaechMJ , McDonaldSJ , EvansSF . Maternal satisfaction with childbirth and intrapartum analgesia in nulliparous labour. . Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol.43 ( 6 ), 463 – 468 ( 2003 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding T , WangD-X , QuY , ChenQ , ZhuS-N . Epidural labor analgesia is associated with a decreased risk of postpartum depression: a prospective cohort study . Anesth. Analg.119 ( 2 ), 383 – 392 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gizzo S , Di GangiS , SaccardiCet al. Epidural analgesia during labor: impact on delivery outcome, neonatal well-being, and early breastfeeding . Breastfeed. Med.7 , 262 – 268 ( 2012 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hincz P , PodciechowskilL , GrzesiakM , HorzelskiW , WilczyflskiJ . Epidural analgesia during labor: a retrospective cohort study on its effects on labour, delivery and neonatal outcome . Ginekol. Pol.85 ( 12 ), 923 – 928 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroni E , YoussefA , RainaldiMPet al. The descent of the fetal head is not modified by mobile epidural analgesia: a controlled sonographic study . Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.93 ( 5 ), 512 – 516 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambling D , BerkowitzJ , FarrellTR , PueA , ShayD . A randomized controlled comparison of epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in a private practice setting: pain scores during first and second stages of labor and at delivery . Anesth. Analg.116 ( 3 ), 636 – 643 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual-Ramirez J , HayaJ , Pérez-LópezFR , Gil-TrujilloS , Garrido-EstebanRA , BernalG . Effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia versus epidural analgesia on labor and delivery duration . Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.114 ( 3 ), 246 – 250 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail MT , HassaninMZ . Neuraxial analgesia versus intravenous remifentanil for pain relief in early labor in nulliparous women . Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.286 ( 6 ), 1375 – 1381 ( 2012 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigo MG , LarcipreteG , RossiFet al. Rebuilding the labor curve during neuraxial analgesia . J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res.37 ( 11 ), 1532 – 1539 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsen LC , ThueB , DattaS , SegalS . Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia?Anesthesiology91 ( 4 ), 920 – 925 ( 1999 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons SW , TaghizadehN , DennisAT , HughesD , CynaAM . Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour . Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub3 ( 2012 ) ( Epub ahead of print ).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesen M , van de VeldeM , KlöhrS , LehbergerJ , RossaintR , StraubeS . Meta-analysis of the success of block following combined spinal-epidural vs epidural analgesia during labour . Anaesthesia69 ( 1 ), 64 – 71 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook TM , CounsellD , WildsmithJAW . Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the third national audit project of the royal college of anaesthetists . Br. J. Anaesth.102 ( 2 ), 179 – 190 ( 2009 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigler ML , DrasnerK , KrejcieTCet al. Cauda equina syndrome after continuous spinal anesthesia . Anesth. Analg.72 ( 3 ), 275 – 281 ( 1991 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn J , MoaveniD , SznolJ , RanasingheJ . Complications of 761 short-term intrathecal macrocatheters in obstetric patients: a retrospective review of cases over a 12 year period . Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.25 , 30 – 36 ( 2015 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao W , GrantEN , CraigMG , McIntireDD , LevenoKJ . Continuous spinal analgesia for labor and delivery: an observational study with a 23-gauge spinal catheter . Anesth. Analg.121 ( 5 ), 1290 – 1294 ( 2015 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society . International classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition . Cephalalgia24 , 9 – 160 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.036962 ( 2004 ) ( Epub ahead of print ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty R , MooreM , MacarthurA . Identification of the lumbar interspinous spaces: palpation versus ultrasound . Anesth. Analg.106 ( 2 ), 538 – 540 ( 2008 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlas A . Evidence for the use of ultrasound in neuraxial blocks . Reg. Anesth. Pain Med.35 ( 2 ), S43 – S46 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzola C , MikhaelR , MargaridoC , CarvalhoJCA . Spinal ultrasound versus palpation for epidural catheter insertion in labour: randomised controlled trial . Eur. J. Anaesthesiol.32 ( 7 ), 499 – 505 ( 2015 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari T , YousefA , El GamassyA , FayezM . Ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics: is there an advantage over the landmark technique in patients with easily palpable spines?Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.23 ( 3 ), 213 – 216 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo MC , PhelpsAL , SinghS , OrebaughSL , SahN . Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees . Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.19 ( 4 ), 373 – 378 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar M , AbdelazimIA . Pre-puncture ultrasound guided epidural insertion before vaginal delivery . J. Clin. Monit. Comput.29 ( 5 ), 573 – 577 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin T , BalabanO , SahinL , SolakM , TokerK . A randomized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy: outcomes among obese and lean parturients – ultrasound for spinal anesthesia in pregnancy . J. Anesth.28 ( 3 ), 413 – 419 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar MK , LiX , HoAMH , KwokWH , ChuiPT . Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique . Br. J. Anaesth.102 ( 6 ), 845 – 854 ( 2009 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan KK , LeePJ , IohomG . Ultrasound for neuraxial blockade . Med Ultrason.16 ( 4 ), 356 – 363 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister N , ToddC , BallS , Thorp-JonesD , CoghillJ . Minimising the risk of accidental dural puncture with epidural analgesia for labour: a retrospective review of risk factors . Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.21 ( 3 ), 236 – 241 ( 2012 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada A , YamakageM , KiiN , YoshikawaY . Epidrum®: a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle . J. Anesth.26 ( 2 ), 292 – 295 ( 2012 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deighan M , BriainDO , ShakebanHet al. A randomised controlled trial using the Epidrum for labour epidurals . Ir. Med. J.108 ( 3 ), 73 – 75 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carabuena JM , MitaniAM , LiuX , KodaliBS , TsenLC . The learning curve associated with the epidural technique using the Episure™ AutoDetect™ versus conventional glass syringe: an open-label, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of experienced anesthesiologists in obstetric patients . Anesth. Analg.116 ( 1 ), 145 – 154 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassen MM , ZuijlenJ , RoumenFJ , SmitsLJ , MarcusMA , NijhuisJG . Early versus late epidural analgesia and risk of instrumental delivery in nulliparous women: a systematic review . BJOG.118 ( 6 ), 655 – 661 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sng BL , LeongYL , WengZet al. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour . Cochrane Libr. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007238.pub2 ( 2014 ) ( Epub ahead of print ).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling D , YuP , ColeC , McMorlandGH . A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour . Can. J. Anaesth.35 ( 3 ), 249 – 254 ( 1988 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vyver M , HalpernS , JosephG . Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis . Br. J. Anaesth.89 ( 3 ), 459 – 465 ( 2002 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern SH , CarvalhoB . Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor . Anesth. Analg.108 ( 3 ), 921 – 928 ( 2009 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loubert C , HinovaA , FernandoR . Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years . Anaesthesia66 ( 3 ), 191 – 212 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patkar C , VoraK , PatelH , ShahV , ModiM , ParikhG . A comparison of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus administration of 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl for epidural labor analgesia . J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol.31 ( 2 ), 234 – 238 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capogna G , CamorciaM , StirparoS , FarcomeniA . Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women . Anesth. Analg.113 ( 4 ), 826 – 831 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo S , OcampoCE , LimY , SiaAT . A randomized comparison of automated intermittent mandatory boluses with a basal infusion in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery . Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.19 ( 4 ), 357 – 364 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CA , RatliffJT , SullivanJT , ScavoneBM , ToledoP , McCarthyRJ . A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia . Anesth. Analg.102 ( 3 ), 904 – 909 ( 2006 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CA , McCarthyRJ , HewlettB . The effect of manipulation of the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and injection volume on total drug use for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial . Anesth. Analg.112 ( 4 ), 904 – 911 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George RB , AllenTK , HabibAS . Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Anesth. Analg.116 ( 1 ), 133 – 144 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sia A , LimY , OcampoC . Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour . Singapore Med. J.47 ( 11 ), 951 – 956 ( 2006 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim Y , SiaAT , OcampoCE . Comparison of computer integrated patient controlled epidural analgesia vs. conventional patient controlled epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour . Anaesthesia61 ( 4 ), 339 – 344 ( 2006 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sng BL , WooD , LeongWL , WangH , AssamPN , SiaAT . Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial . J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol.30 ( 4 ), 496 – 501 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sia AT , LeoS , OcampoCE . A randomised comparison of variable-frequency automated mandatory boluses with a basal infusion for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour and delivery . Anaesthesia68 ( 3 ), 267 – 275 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar