Electronic Pain Assessment in Clinical Practice

• Jamison RN . Mastering Chronic Pain: A Professional‘s Guide To Behavioral Treatment. Professional Resource Press, Sarasota, FL, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Linton S . The socioeconomic impact of chronic back pain: is anyone benefiting. Pain75 , 163–168 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohman M , SoderbergS, LundmanB. Hovering between suffering and enduring: the meaning of living with serious chronic illness. Qual. Health Res.13(4) , 528–542 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderberg S , StrandM, HaapalaM, LundmanB. Living with a woman with fibromyalgia from the perspective of the husband. J. Adv. Nurs.42 , 143–150 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otis JD , CardellaLA, KernsRD. The influence of family and culture on pain. In: Psychosocial Aspects of Pain: A Handbook for Health Care Providers. Dworkin RH, Breitbart WS (Eds). IASP Press, Seattle, WA, USA, 29–45 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich GE . Back pain. J. Rheumatol. Suppl.67 , 26–31 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrari R , RussellAS. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: neck pain. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol.17(1) , 57–70 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk DC , MelzackR. Handbook of Pain Assessment (2nd Edition). The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ahles TA , SevilleJ, WassonJ, JohnsonD, CallahanE, StukelTA. Panel-based pain management in primary care: a pilot study. J. Pain Symptom Manage.22 , 584–590 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seville JL , AhlesTA, WassonJH, JohnsonD, CallahanE, StukelTA. Ongoing distress from emotional trauma is related to pain, mood, and physical function in a primary care population. J. Pain Symptom Manage.25(3) , 256–263 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott TE , MurrayDM, ElliotBA et al. Physician knowledge and attitudes about cancer pain management: a survey from the Minnesota Cancer Pain Project. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 10 , 494–504 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoens S , ScottA, SibbaldB. Job satisfaction, work-related stress and intentions to quit of Scottish GPS. Scot. Med. J.47 , 80–86 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick C . New advocates of adequate treatment say have no fear of pain or prosecution. JAMA281 , 406–407 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joranson DE , GilsonAM, DahlJL, HaddoxJD. Pain management, controlled substances, and state medical board policy: a decade of change. J. Pain Symptom Manage.23 , 138–147 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettleton S . The emergence of e-scaped medicine. Sociology38 , 661–680 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Nettleton S , HanlonG. “Pathways to the doctor” in the information age: the role of ICTs in contemporary lay referral systems. In: Innovative Health Technologies: New Perspectives, Challenging and Change. Webster A, Wyatt S (Eds). Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Coons SJ , GwaltneyCJ, HaysRD et al. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health 12(4) , 419–429 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , BrownGK. Validation of hourly pain intensity profiles with chronic pain patients. Pain45(2) , 123–128 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , RaymondSA, LevineJG, SlawsbyEA, NedeljkovicSS, KatzNP. Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain91(3) , 277–285 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone AA , BroderickJE, SchwartzJE, ShiffmanS, Litcher-KellyL, CalvaneseP. Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain104 , 343–351 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone AA , ShiffmanS, SchwartzJE, BroderickJE, HuffordMR. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control. Clin. Trials24 , 182–199 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bushnell DM , MartinML, ParasuramanB. Electronic versus paper questionnaires: a further comparison in persons with asthma. J. Asthma40 , 751–762 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello EJ , TaplinS, ReidR et al. In a randomized controlled trial, patients preferred electronic data collection of breast cancer risk-factor information in a mammography setting. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 59 , 77–81 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook AJ , RobertsDA, HendersonMD, Van Winkle LC, Chastain DC, Hamill-Ruth RJ. Electronic pain questionnaires: a randomized crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment. Pain110 , 310–317 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvien TK , MowinckleP, HeibergT et al. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 64 , 1480–1484 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , RaymondSA, SlawsbyEA, McHugoGJ, BairdJC. Pain assessment in patients with low back pain: comparison of weekly recall and momentary electronic data. J. Pain7(3) , 192–199 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannes C , WoodsJ, CrawfordS, CochranH, TranD, SchuthB. Electronic versus paper instruments for daily data collection. Ann. Epidemiol.10 , 457 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie DJ , JudgeMKM, BerryDL, DellJ, ZongS, GilespieR. Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain. J. Pain Symptom Manage.25 , 213–224 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng HM , MacleodHA, WrightP. Computer anxiety and measurement mood change. Comp. Hum. Behav.13 , 305–316 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters ML , SorbiMJ, KruiseDA, KerssensJJ, VerhaakPFM, BensingJM. Electronic diary assessment of pain, disability and psychological adaptation in patients differing in duration of pain. Pain84 , 181–192 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , GracelyRH, RaymondSA et al. Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers. Pain 99(1–2) , 341–347 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDenKerkhof EG , GoldsteinDH, LaneJ, RimmerMJ, Van Dijk JP. Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study. Can. J. Anaesth.50(4) , 368–375 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski AS , PalermoTM, KirchnerHL, DrotarD. Comparing diary and retrospective reports of pain and activity restriction in children and adolescents with chronic pain conditions. Clin. J. Pain25(4) , 299–306 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson JN , PetrozGC, StevensBJ et al. Working out the kinks: testing the feasibility of an electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Pain Res. Manag. 13(5) , 375–382 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson JN . Improving the assessment of pediatric chronic pain: harnessing the potential of electronic diaries. Pain Res. Manag.14(1) , 59–64 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson JN , PetrozGC, TaitG et al. e-Ouch: usability testing of an electronic chronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Clin. J. Pain 22(3) , 295–305 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velikova G , WrightEP, SmithAB et al. Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J. Clin. Oncol. 17(3) , 998–1007 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karoly P , JensenMP. Multimethod Assessment of Chronic Pain. Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Redline S , WrightEC, KattanM, KercsmarC, WeissK. Short-term compliance with peak flow monitoring: results from a study of inner city children with asthma. Pediatr. Pulmonol.21(4) , 203–210 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straka RJ , FishJT, BensonSR, SuhJT. Patient self-reporting of compliance does not correspond with electronic monitoring: an evaluation using isosorbide dinitrate as a model drug. Pharmacotherapy17(1) , 126–132 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg J , Dunbar-JacobJ, RohayJM. Compliance with inhaled medications: the relationship between diary and electronic monitor. Ann. Behav. Med.20(1) , 36–38 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provenzano DA , FanciulloGJ, JamisonRN, McHugoGJ, BairdJC. Computer assessment and diagnostic classification of chronic pain patients. Pain Med.8 , 167–175 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , FanciulloGJ, BairdJC. Usefulness of pain drawings in identifying real or imagined pain: accuracy of pain professionals, nonprofessionals, and a decision model. J. Pain5 , 476–482 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , FanciulloGJ, BairdJC. Computerized dynamic assessment of pain: comparison of chronic pain patients and healthy controls. Pain Med.5(2) , 168–177 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , WashingtonTA, GulurP et al. Reliability of a preliminary 3-D pain mapping program. Pain Med. 12(3) , 344–351 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe F , ClauwDL, FitzcharlesMA et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res. 62 , 600–610 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marceau LD , LinkC, JamisonRN, CarolanS. Electronic diaries as a tool to improve pain management: is there any evidence? Pain Med.8(Suppl. 3) , S101–S109 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouwer F , SnoekFJ, van der Ploeg HM, Heine RJ, Brand AN. A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Qual. Life Res.7(1) , 33–38 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanciullo GJ , JamisonRN, ChawarskiMC, BairdJC. Interactive computer method for rating quality of life: comparison of chronic pain patients and healthy controls. Pain Med.2(4) , 298–308 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanciullo GJ , JamisonRN, ChawarskiMC, BairdJC. Reliability and validity of an interactive computer method for rating quality of life. Pain Med.4(3) , 257–268 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burfeind RC , FanciulloGJ, JamisonRN, BairdJC. Pain assessment based on a fixed resource method. Cog. Technol.9 , 47–53 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , FanciulloGJ, McHugoGJ, BairdJC. Validation of the short-form interactive computerized quality of life scale (ICQOL-SF). Pain Med.8(3) , 243–250 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podichetty VK , WeissLT, FanciulloGJ, BairdJC. Web-based health survey systems in outcome assessment and management of pain. Pain Med.8(Suppl. 3) , S189–S198 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington TA , FanciulloGJ, SorensenJA, BairdJC. Quality of chronic pain websites. Pain Med.9(8) , 994–1000 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abernethy AP , HerndonJE 2nd, Wheeler JL et al. Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology. J. Pain Symptom Manage.37(6) , 1027–1038 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Science of Real-Time Data Capture. Stone AA, Shiffman S, Atienza AA, Nebeling L (Eds). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Redelmeimer D , KahnemanD. Patients‘ memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations to two minimally invasive procedures. Pain Med.66 , 3–8 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Stone AA , BroderickJE, ShiffmanSS, SchwartzJE. Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain Med.107 , 61–69 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau RJ , HuffordMR, StoneAA. Measuring clinical pain in chronic widespread pain: selected methodological issues. Best Prac. Res. Clin. Rheumatol.17 , 575–592 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , SbroccoT, ParrisWC. The influence of physical and psychosocial factors on accuracy of memory for pain in chronic pain patients. Pain37(3) , 289–294 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone AA , BroderickJE, PorterLS, KaellAT. The experience of rheumatoid arthritis pain and fatigue: examining momentry reports and correlates over one week. Arthritis Care Res.10 , 185–193 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone AA , ShiffmanS. Ecological momentary assessment: measuring real world processes in behavioral medicine. Ann. Behav. Med.16 , 199–202 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Wright J , MorleyS. Autobiographical memory and chronic pain. Br. J. Clin. Psychol.34 , 255–265 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marceau LD , LinkCL, SmithLD, CarolanSJ, JamisonRN. In-clinic use of electronic pain diaries: barriers of implementation among pain physicians. J. Pain Symptom Manage.40(3) , 391–404 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , GintnerL, RogersJF, FairchildDG. Disease management for chronic pain: barriers of program implementation with primary care physicians. Pain Med.3(2) , 92–101 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green AS , RafaeliE, BolgerN, ShroutPE, ReisHT. Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychol. Methods11(1) , 87–105 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasecki TM , HuffordMR, SolhanM, TrullTJ. Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers. Psychol. Assess.19(1) , 25–43 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton C , WellerD, SharpeM. Are electronic diaries useful for symptoms research? A systematic review. J. Psychosom. Res.62(5) , 553–561 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Website

• Assessment CenterSMwww.assessmentcenter.net
   Google Scholar