What Effect can Manual Therapy have on a Patient’s Pain Experience?

References

• Pettman E . A history of manipulative therapy . J. Man. Manip. Ther.15 ( 3 ), 165 – 174 ( 2007 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silvernail J . Manual therapy: process or product?J. Man. Manip. Ther.20 ( 2 ), 109 – 110 ( 2012 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paterson C , DieppeP . Characteristic and incidental (placebo) effects in complex interventions such as acupuncture . BMJ330 ( 7501 ), 1202 – 1205 ( 2005 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merskey H . Logic, truth and language in concepts of pain . Qual. Life Res.3 ( Suppl. 1 ), S69 – S76 ( 1994 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melzack R , CaseyKL . Sensory, motivational and central control determinants of chronic pain: a new conceptual model . In : The Skin Senses . KenshaloDR ( Ed. ). Thomas , IL, USA , 423 – 443 ( 1968 ).
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research C, And Education . Relieving Pain in America. A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research . National Academies Press , Washington, DC, USA ( 2011 ).
   Google Scholar
• Michaleff ZA , LinCW , MaherCG , Van TulderMW . Spinal manipulation epidemiology: Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies . J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.22 ( 5 ), 655 – 662 ( 2012 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein SM . Adverse events following chiropractic care for subjects with neck or low-back pain: do the benefits outweigh the risks?J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.31 ( 6 ), 461 – 464 ( 2008 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes D , MarsTS , MullingerB , FroudR , UnderwoodM . Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review . Man. Ther.15 ( 4 ), 355 – 363 ( 2010 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bialosky JE , GeorgeSZ , HornMEet al. Spinal manipulative therapy-specific changes in pain sensitivity in individuals with low back pain (NCT01168999) . J. Pain15 ( 2 ), 136 – 148 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain TK , SharmaNK . The effectiveness of physiotherapeutic interventions in treatment of frozen shoulder/adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review . J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil.27 ( 3 ), 247 – 273 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Lopez A , Alonso PerezJL , Gonzalez GutierezJLet al. Mobilization versus manipulations versus sustain appophyseal natural glide techniques and interaction with psychological factors for patients with chronic neck pain: randomized control trial . Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med.51 ( 2 ), 121 – 132 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher BE , DavenportTE , KuligK , WuAD . Identification of potential neuromotor mechanisms of manual therapy in patients with musculoskeletal disablement: rationale and description of a clinical trial . BMC Neurol.9 , 20 ( 2009 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahner-Roedler DL , VincentA , ElkinPLet al. Physicians’ attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine and their knowledge of specific therapies: a survey at an academic medical center . Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med.3 ( 4 ), 495 – 501 ( 2006 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus T , MilesC , FroudRet al. Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study . BMC Med. Res. Methodol.11 , 14 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE , BishopMD , PriceDD , RobinsonME , GeorgeSZ . The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model . Man. Ther.14 ( 5 ), 531 – 538 ( 2009 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson OP , PettyNJ , MooreAP . Clinical decision-making and therapeutic approaches in osteopathy – a qualitative grounded theory study . Man. Ther.19 ( 1 ), 44 – 51 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderson CN . The basis for spinal manipulation: chiropractic perspective of indications and theory . J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.22 ( 5 ), 632 – 642 ( 2012 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland GD , HengeveldE . Maitland’s Vertebral Manipulation . Butterworth-Heinemann , Oxford, UK ( 2001 ).
   Google Scholar
• Mckenzie R , MayS . The Lumbar Spine Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy . Spinal Publications , New Zealand ( 2003 ).
   Google Scholar
• Colloca CJ , KellerTS , GunzburgR . Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part II. Neurophysiological response . J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.26 ( 9 ), 579 – 591 ( 2003 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppieters MW , ButlerDS . Do ‘sliders’ slide and ‘tensioners’ tension? An analysis of neurodynamic techniques and considerations regarding their application . Man. Ther.13 ( 3 ), 213 – 221 ( 2008 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog W , KatsM , SymonsB . The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thoracic manipulation . Spine (Phila. Pa 1976)26 ( 19 ), 2105 – 2110 ( 2001 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog W . The biomechanics of spinal manipulation . J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther.14 ( 3 ), 280 – 286 ( 2010 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie PF , ArnotCF , DonleyJW , NodaH , BaileyL . The immediate reduction in low back pain intensity following lumbar joint mobilization and prone press-ups is associated with increased diffusion of water in the l5–s1 intervertebral disc . J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.40 ( 5 ), 256 – 264 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgecombe TL , KawchukGN , LongCR , PickarJG . The effect of application site of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness . Spine J.15 ( 6 ), 1332 – 1338 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerapong P , HumePA , KoltGS . The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention . Sports Med.35 ( 3 ), 235 – 256 ( 2005 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattyn E , RajendranD . Anatomical landmark position – can we trust what we see? Results from an online reliability and validity study of osteopaths . Man. Ther.19 ( 2 ), 158 – 164 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tullberg T , BlombergS , BranthB , JohnssonR . Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis . Spine (Phila. Pa 1976)23 ( 10 ), 1124 – 1128 ( 1998 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JK , BereznickDE , McgillSM . Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?Spine (Phila Pa 1976)29 ( 13 ), 1452 – 1457 ( 2004 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulig K , LandelR , PowersCM . Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic mri: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization . J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.34 ( 2 ), 57 – 64 ( 2004 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgos KS , WasylykNT , Van LunenBL , HochMC . Inter-clinician and intra-clinician reliability of force application during joint mobilization: a systematic review . Man. Ther.19 ( 2 ), 90 – 96 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanlayanaphotporn R , ChiradejnantA , VachalathitiR . The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: a randomized controlled trial . Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.90 ( 2 ), 187 – 192 ( 2009 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A , LatimerJ , MaherCG . Forces applied during manual therapy to patients with low back pain . J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.25 ( 6 ), 362 – 369 ( 2002 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronado RA , GayCW , BialoskyJEet al. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis . J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.22 ( 5 ), 752 – 767 ( 2012 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nougarou F , DugasC , DeslauriersC , PageI , DescarreauxM . Physiological responses to spinal manipulation therapy: Investigation of the relationship between electromyographic responses and peak force . J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.36 ( 9 ), 557 – 563 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA , InjeyanHS , RueggR . Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance p production in normal subjects . J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.29 ( 1 ), 14 – 21 ( 2006 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon HT , DhamiMS , HowleyTP , AnnettR . Spinal manipulation and beta-endorphin: A controlled study of the effect of a spinal manipulation on plasma beta-endorphin levels in normal males . J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.9 ( 2 ), 115 – 123 ( 1986 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcpartland JM , GiuffridaA , KingJet al. Cannabimimetic effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment . J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc.105 ( 6 ), 283 – 291 ( 2005 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Courtney CA , WittePO , ChmellSJ , HornbyTG . Heightened flexor withdrawal response in individuals with knee osteoarthritis is modulated by joint compression and joint mobilization . J. Pain11 ( 2 ), 179 – 185 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop MD , BeneciukJM , GeorgeSZ . Immediate reduction in temporal sensory summation after thoracic spinal manipulation . Spine J.11 ( 5 ), 440 – 446 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay CW , AlappattuMJ , CoronadoRA , HornME , BishopMD . Effect of a single session of muscle-biased therapy on pain sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials . J. Pain Res.6 , 7 – 22 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulian R , BurkeJ , DishmanJD . Spinal reflex excitability changes after lumbar spine passive flexion mobilization . J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.25 ( 8 ), 526 – 532 ( 2002 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dishman JD , BurkeJ . Spinal reflex excitability changes after cervical and lumbar spinal manipulation: a comparative study . Spine J.3 ( 3 ), 204 – 212 ( 2003 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devocht JW , PickarJG , WilderDG . Spinal manipulation alters electromyographic activity of paraspinal muscles: a descriptive study . J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.28 ( 7 ), 465 – 471 ( 2005 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppieters MW , StappaertsKH , WoutersLL , JanssensK . The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment technique in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain . J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.33 ( 7 ), 369 – 378 ( 2003 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malisza KL , GregorashL , TurnerAet al. Functional mri involving painful stimulation of the ankle and the effect of physiotherapy joint mobilization . Magn. Reson. Imaging21 ( 5 ), 489 – 496 ( 2003 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks C , ClelandJA , ElliottJM , ZagardoM , LiuWC . Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine if cerebral hemodynamic responses to pain change following thoracic spine thrust manipulation in healthy individuals . J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.43 ( 5 ), 340 – 348 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay CW , RobinsonME , GeorgeSZ , PerlsteinWM , BishopMD . Immediate changes after manual therapy in resting-state functional connectivity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging in participants with induced low back pain . J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther.37 ( 9 ), 614 – 627 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston L , ClaydonL , TumiltyS . The effects of spinal mobilizations on the sympathetic nervous system: a systematic review . Man. Ther.19 ( 4 ), 281 – 287 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegarra-Parodi R , ParkPY , HeathDMet al. Assessment of skin blood flow following spinal manual therapy: a systematic review . Man. Ther.20 ( 2 ), 228 – 249 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindgren L , RundgrenS , WinsoOet al. Physiological responses to touch massage in healthy volunteers . Auton. Neurosci.158 ( 1–2 ), 105 – 110 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogura T , TashiroM , MasudMet al. Cerebral metabolic changes in men after chiropractic spinal manipulation for neck pain . Altern. Ther. Health Med.17 ( 6 ), 12 – 17 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegedus EJ , GoodeA , ButlerRJ , SlavenE . The neurophysiological effects of a single session of spinal joint mobilization: does the effect last?J. Man. Manip. Ther.19 ( 3 ), 143 – 151 ( 2011 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zusman M . Mechanisms of musculoskeletal physiotherapy . Phys. Ther. Rev.9 , 39 – 49 ( 2004 ).
   Google Scholar
• Nijs J , Lluch GirbesE , LundbergM , MalflietA , SterlingM . Exercise therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: innovation by altering pain memories . Man. Ther.20 ( 1 ), 216 – 220 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill JC , FritzJM . Psychosocial influences on low back pain, disability, and response to treatment . Phys. Ther.91 ( 5 ), 712 – 721 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop MD , BialoskyJE , ClelandJA . Patient expectations of benefit from common interventions for low back pain and effects on outcome: secondary analysis of a clinical trial of manual therapy interventions . J. Man. Manip. Ther.19 ( 1 ), 20 – 25 ( 2011 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bishop MD , MintkenPE , BialoskyJE , ClelandJA . Patient expectations of benefit from interventions for neck pain and resulting influence on outcomes . J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.43 ( 7 ), 457 – 465 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C , LearmanK , ShowalterC , KabbazV , O’HalloranB . Early use of thrust manipulation versus non-thrust manipulation: a randomized clinical trial . Man. Ther.18 ( 3 ), 191 – 198 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C , SheetsC . Clinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trials . J. Man. Manip. Ther.19 ( 1 ), 55 – 57 ( 2011 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bialosky JE , BishopMD , GeorgeSZ , RobinsonME . Placebo response to manual therapy: Something out of nothing?J. Man. Manip. Ther.19 ( 1 ), 11 – 19 ( 2011 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuentes J , Armijo-OlivoS , FunabashiMet al. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study . Phys. Ther.94 ( 4 ), 477 – 489 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn T , FritzJ , WhitmanJet al. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation . Spine (Phila. Pa 1976)27 ( 24 ), 2835 – 2843 ( 2002 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA , ChildsJD , FritzJM , WhitmanJM , EberhartSL . Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise, and patient education . Phys. Ther.87 ( 1 ), 9 – 23 ( 2007 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintken PE , ClelandJA , CarpenterKJet al. Some factors predict successful short-term outcomes in individuals with shoulder pain receiving cervicothoracic manipulation: a single-arm trial . Phys. Ther.90 ( 1 ), 26 – 42 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood MR , MortonV , FarrinA , TeamUBT . Do baseline characteristics predict response to treatment for low back pain? Secondary analysis of the UK Beam Dataset [ISRCTN32683578] . Rheumatology (Oxford)46 ( 8 ), 1297 – 1302 ( 2007 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams NH , HendryM , LewisRet al. Psychological response in spinal manipulation (PRISM): a systematic review of psychological outcomes in randomised controlled trials . Complement. Ther. Med.15 ( 4 ), 271 – 283 ( 2007 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar