7
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Technological Change and the Concentration of the U.S. General Cargo Port System: 1970–88

&
Pages 272-289 | Published online: 09 Jun 2016

References

  • Auerbach, S. 1988. Fighting for shipping superiority: Upstart Norfolk and mighty Baltimore square off in battle of the ports. The Washington Post, Washington Business, 24 October.
  • Bonney, J. 1992a. ‘Advanced maturity’ for liner trades. American Shipper, January, 69–73.
  • Bonney, J. 1992b. Singapore's strategy. American Shipper, May, 7–8.
  • Brennan, J. 1991. The future of world trade and its implications for West Coast ports. Paper presented at the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Western Regional Conference, San Francisco, October.
  • Burke, J. 1992. Throughports called key to capture short-haul freight by double-stacks. Traffic World, 27 April, 27–28.
  • Collison, F. 1990. Liner shipping and the U.S. international trades. Journal of Transportation Management 1:1–30.
  • C&NW, NS likely haulers of Chicago trash. 1992. Traffic World, 27 April, 61.
  • Draine, E. H. 1963. Import traffic of Chicago and its hinterland. Department of Geography Research Papers no. 81. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Graham, M. G., and Hughes, D. O. 1985. Containerisation in the eighties. London: Lloyd's of London Press.
  • Griffith, D. A., and Amrhein, C. 1991. Statistical analysis for geographers. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hanelt, R., and Smith, D. 1987. The dynamics of West Coast container port competition. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum 28:82–91.
  • Hayuth, Y. 1988. Rationalization and deconcentration of the U.S. container port system. The Professional Geographer 40:279–88.
  • Hicks, P., ed. 1989. Jane's containerisation directory, 1988–89. Surrey: Jane's Information Group.
  • Hoare, A. G. 1986. British ports and their export hinterlands: A rapidly changing geography. Geografiska Annuler 68B:29–40.
  • Janelle, D. 1991. Global interdependence and its consequences. In Collapsing space and time: Geographic aspects of communications and information, ed. S. Brunn and T. Leinbach, 49–81. London: Harper Collins Academic.
  • Kenyon, J. 1970. Elements in interport competition in the United States. Economic Geography 46:1–24.
  • Kim, C. K. 1987. An innovation in liner shipping: The round-the-world service as a global strategy. Bremen: Institute for Shipping Economics and Logistics.
  • King, E. 1991. EDI slowly steps into the limelight. Global Trade, November, 19–21.
  • Knee, R. 1989. Far East sea-air crunch. American Shipper, October, 82.
  • Lambert, M. R., ed. 1988. Baltimore opens an intermodal gateway. In Containerisation international yearbook, 69–73. London: National Magazine Co.
  • Lambert, M. R. 1989. Containerisation international yearbook. London: National Magazine Co.
  • McKenzie, D.; North, M.; and Smith, D. 1990. Intermodal transportation: The whole story. Omaha: Simmons-Boardman Books.
  • Mayer, H. M. 1957. The Port of Chicago and the St. Lawrence Seaway. Department of Geography Research Papers no. 49. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Mayer, H. M. 1978. Current trends in Great Lakes shipping. GeoJournal 2:117–22.
  • Olson, H. E., and Grier, D. V. 1990. Impact of technological change on foreign trade: comparative analysis of the St. Lawrence Seaway and the Panama Canal. Transportation Research Record 1263:83–100.
  • Port of Oakland Research Department. 1988. Trade analysis—Pacific Basin, calendar year 1987.
  • Rimmer, P. J. 1967. The changing status of New Zealand seaports, 1853–1960. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 57:88–100.
  • Ross, J. R. 1991. Developments cut costs, speed shipments. Global Trade, November, 14–18.
  • Saporta, M. 1988. Two ‘Atlanta’ ports battle it out for no. 1. Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 10 April.
  • Simmons, R. 1989. EDI: The competitive advantage for the future. Global Trade, November, 12–14.
  • Slack, B. 1990. Intermodal transportation in North America and the development of inland load centers. Professional Geographer 42:72–83.
  • Starr, J. T. 1991. The Port of Baltimore: Off the beaten track. Maritime Policy and Management 18:171–81.
  • Taaffe, E.; Morrill, R.; and Gould, P. 1963. Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries. Geographical Review 53:503–29.
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1972. Domestic and international transportation of U.S. foreign trade: 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1979. Domestic and international transportation of U.S. foreign trade: 1976, part A(B) exports (imports). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1988. U.S. foreign trade, classification of customs districts and ports, schedule D. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1970a, 1988b. U.S. waterborne exports and general imports. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1970b, 1975, 1985, 1988c. U.S. waterborne general imports (exports) and inbound (outbound) intransit shipments. SA 305 (705) IT Annual. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • Vandeveer, D. 1991. Planning facilities to accommodate advanced technologies in handling systems. Paper presented at the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Western Regional Conference, San Francisco, October.
  • Vickerman, M. 1991. The effects of future vessel design on port infrastructure. Paper presented at the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Western Regional Conference, San Francisco, October.
  • Warren, W., and Beargie, T. 1992. The ghost of ‘Svenska’ returns. American Shipper, January, 40/16.
  • Weigend, G. 1958. Some elements in the study of port geography. Geographical Review 48: 185–200.
  • Winslow, T. 1991. Future vessel technology. Paper presented at the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Western Regional Conference, San Francisco, October.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.