History Is Repeating Itself: Get Ready for a Long Dry Spell

References

• Ben-Abdallah, R., H. Ben-Ameur, and M. Breton. 2009. “An Analysis of the True Notional Bond System Applied to the CBOT T-Bond Futures.” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 33, no. 3 (March): 534–545.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Abdallah, R., H. Ben-Ameur, and M. Breton. 2012. “Pricing the CBOT T-Bond Futures.” Quantitative Finance, vol. 12, no. 11: 1663–1678.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Abdallah, R., and M. Breton. 2015. “The Rise and Fall of the Squeeze Propensity in the U.S. T-Bond Futures Market: An Ex-Post Analysis of the CME’s Solution to the 5-Year-Gap Issue.” Les Cahiers du GERAD Working Paper G-2015-120 (November).
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Abdallah, R., and M. Breton. 2016. “To Squeeze or Not to Squeeze? That Is No Longer the Question.” Journal of Futures Markets, vol. 36, no. 7 (July): 647–670.
   Google Scholar
• Benninga, S., and Z. Wiener. 1999. “An Investigation of the Cheapest-to-Deliver on Treasury Bond Futures Contracts.” Journal of Computational Finance, vol. 2, no. 3 (Spring): 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, T., and B.J. Christensen. 1999. “Interest Rate Dynamics and Consistent Forward Rate Curves.” Mathematical Finance, vol. 9, no. 4 (October): 323–348.
   Google Scholar
• Burghardt, G., T. Belton, M. Lane, and J. Papa. 2005. The Treasury Bond Basis: An In-Depth Analysis for Hedgers, Speculators, and Arbitrageurs. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R.R., H.S. Ju, and S.K. Yeh. 2009. “Embedded Options in Treasury Bond Futures Prices: New Evidence.” Journal of Fixed Income, vol. 19, no. 1 (Summer): 82–95.
   Google Scholar
• CME Group. 2013a. “CME Group Announces Solution to Delivery Gap in US Treasury Bond Futures.” Press release (13 December) http://www.cmegroup.com/media-room/press-releases/2013/12/13/cme_group_announcessolutiontodeliverygapinustreasurybondfutures.html.
   Google Scholar
• CME Group. 2013b. “Decision on T-Bond Basket Gap.” (13 December) http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/us-tbond-futures-delivery-basket.html.
   Google Scholar
• CME Group. 2013c. “U.S. Treasury ‘Classic’ Bond Futures: Describing the Gap in the Delivery Basket & Presenting Potential Options to Address.” Webinar (released on 18 July 2013): https://cmegroup.adobeconnect.com/_a777821181/p1n8o40xkp2/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal. .
   Google Scholar
• CME Group. 2013d. “US Treasury ‘Classic’ Bond Futures: Describing the Gap in the Delivery Basket & Presenting Potential Options to Address.” (November): https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/files/us-t-bond-futures-delivery-basket-presentation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CME Group. 2014. “Modification of CBOT U.S. Treasury Bond Futures Contract Grade for Three (3) Delivery Months.” Special Executive Report S-7191 (17 September): http://www.cmegroup.com/tools-information/lookups/advisories/ser/files/SER-7191.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.J., and R.G. Donaldson. 1998. “A Strategic Analysis of Corners and Squeezes.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 33, no. 1 (March): 117–137.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, B., and A. Shapiro. 1989. “The Mispricing of U.S. Treasury Bonds: A Case Study.” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 2, no. 3: 297–310.
   Google Scholar
• El-Erian, M.. 2015. “Market Instability Won’t Deter a Fed Rate Hike.” Bloomberg View (14 December).
   Google Scholar
• FOMC. 2015a. “Summary of Economic Projections.” Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee Meeting of 16-17 September 2015 (released 8 October): https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20150917ep.htm.
   Google Scholar
• FOMC. 2015b. “Summary of Economic Projections.” Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee Meeting of 27-28 October (released 18 November): https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20151028.htm.
   Google Scholar
• FOMC. 2015c. “Summary of Economic Projections.” Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee Meeting of 15-16 December: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20151216ep.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Grieves, R., and S.V. Mann. 2004. “An Overlooked Coupon Effect in Treasury Futures Contracts.” Journal of Derivatives, vol. 12, no. 2 (Winter): 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrow, R.A.. 1992. “Market Manipulation, Bubbles, Corners, and Short Squeezes.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 27, no. 3 (September): 311–336.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, S., and J. Käppi. 2004. “Manipulation of the Bund Futures Market.” Applied Financial Economics, vol. 14, no. 11: 799–808.
   Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh, N.. 1993. “Treasury Auction Bids and the Salomon Squeeze.” Journal of Finance, vol. 48, no. 4 (September): 1403–1419.
   Google Scholar
• Karunakar, R.. 2015. “Sovereign Bonds to Remain in Demand, Say Strategists: Poll.” Reuters (10 December): http://www.reuters.com/article/us-markets-bonds-poll-idUSKBN0TT1ZF20151210.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, D.R.. 2008. “Does Deliverability Enhance the Value of U.S. Treasury Bonds?” Journal of Futures Markets, vol. 28, no. 3 (March): 264–274.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., and D.J. Seppi. 1992. “Futures Manipulation with ‘Cash Settlement.” Journal of Finance, vol. 47, no. 4 (September): 1485–1502.
   Google Scholar
• Major, S.. 2015. “Tighter Policy Will Mean Lower Bond Yields.” Financial Times (9 December).
   Google Scholar
• Merrick, J.J., N.Y. Naik, and P.K. Yadav. 2005. “Strategic Trading Behavior and Price Distortion in a Manipulated Market: Anatomy of a Squeeze.” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 77, no. 1 (July): 171–218.
   Google Scholar
• Oviedo, R.A.. 2006. “Improving the Design of Treasury Bond Futures Contracts.” Journal of Business, vol. 79, no. 3 (May): 1293–1315.
   Google Scholar
• Pirrong, C.. 2011. “Squeeze Play: The Dynamics of the Manipulation End Game.” Journal of Alternative Investments, vol. 14, no. 1 (June): 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, B.P.. 2000. “Using Treasury STRIPS to Measure the Yield Curve.” FEDS Working Paper 2000-42.
   Google Scholar
• Sihvonen, J.. 2013. “The Cheapest-to-Deliver Premium: Theory and Evidence.” Working paper, University of Vaasa, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L.E.O.. 1994. “Estimating and Interpreting Forward Interest Rates: Sweden 1992-1994.” NBER Working Paper 4871 (September).
   Google Scholar
• Yonan, Jr., A., and J. Connor. 1996. “New Government-Bond Rules Aim at Market-Manipulation.” Wall Street Journal (11 September 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, G.. 1998. “Can the New Top the Old for Stellar U.S. Bonds?” Asian Wall Street Journal (2 January).
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, G., and J. Montgomery. 1999. “Treasurys Rally after Speech by Fed Chief Eases Rate Fears.” Wall Street Journal (3 November).
   Google Scholar