Reducing Sequence Risk Using Trend Following and the CAPE Ratio

References

• ap Gwilym, O., A. Clare, J. Seaton, and S.H. Thomas. 2010. “Price and Momentum as Robust Tactical Approaches to Global Equity Investing.” Journal of Investing, vol. 19, no. 3 (Fall): 80–91 https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2010.19.3.080.
   Google Scholar
• Asness, C., A. Ilmanen, and T. Maloney. 2015. “Market Timing Is Back in the Hunt for Investors.” Institutional Investor Magazine (November): www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/3505321/asset-management-hedge-funds-and-alternatives/market-timing-is-back-in-the-hunt-for-investors.html#.WUlPduvyu70.
   Google Scholar
• Bengen, W.P.. 1994. “Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data.” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 7, no. 1 (October): 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, G.. 2011. “Systematic Withdrawal Programs: Unsafe at Any Speed.” Journal of Financial Service Professionals, vol. 65 (January): 44–61.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchett, D., M. Finke, and W.D. Pfau. 2015. “Optimal Portfolios for the Long Run.” Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchett, D.M., and L.R. Frank. 2009. “A Dynamic and Adaptive Approach to Distribution Planning and Monitoring.” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 22: 52–66.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchett, D., M. Kowara, and P. Chen. 2012. “Optimal Withdrawal Strategy for Retirement Income Portfolios.” Retirement Management Journal, vol. 2, no. 3 (Fall): 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., L. Palmer, and J. Goetz. 2011. “Sustainable Withdrawal Rates of Retirees: Is the Recent Economic Crisis a Cause for Concern?” International Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 3, no. 1 (February): 17–22 https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v3n1p17.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, A., J. Seaton, P.N. Smith, and S.H. Thomas. 2013. “Breaking into the Blackbox: Trend Following, Stop Losses, and the Frequency of Trading—The Case of the S&P 500.” Journal of Asset Management, vol. 14, no. 3 (June): 182–194 https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2013.11.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, A., J. Seaton, P.N. Smith, and S. Thomas. 2016. “The Trend Is Our Friend: Risk Parity, Momentum and Trend Following in Global Asset Allocation.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, vol. 9 (March): 63–80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, P.L., C.M. Hubbard, and D.T. Walz. 1998. “Retirement Savings: Choosing a Withdrawal Rate That Is Sustainable.” Journal of the American Association of Individual Investors, vol. 20, no. 2 (February): 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, P.L., C.M. Hubbard, and D.T. Walz. 1999. “Sustainable Withdrawal Rates from Your Retirement Portfolio.” Financial Counseling and Planning, vol. 10, no. 1: 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, P.L., C.M. Hubbard, and D. Walz. 2003. “A Comparative Analysis of Retirement Portfolio Success Rates: Simulation versus Overlapping Periods.” Financial Services Review, vol. 12, no. 3 (Summer): 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, P.L., C.M. Hubbard, and D.T. Walz. 2011. “Portfolio Success Rates: Where to Draw the Line.” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 24, no. 4 (April): 48–60.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M.T.. 2007. “A Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation.” Journal of Wealth Management, vol. 9, no. 4 (Spring): 69–79 https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2007.674809.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L.R., and D.M. Blanchett. 2010. “The Dynamic Implications of Sequence Risk on a Distribution Portfolio.” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 23, no. 6 (June): 52–61.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L.R., J.B. Mitchell, and D.M. Blanchett. 2011. “Probability-of-Failure-Based Decision Rules to Manage Sequence Risk in Retirement.” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 24, no. 11 (November): 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Guyton, J.T.. 2004. “Decision Rules and Portfolio Management for Retirees: Is the ‘Safe’ Initial Withdrawal Rate Too Safe?” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 17, no. 10: 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Guyton, J.T., and W.J. Klinger. 2006. “Decision Rules and Maximum Initial Withdrawal Rates.” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 19, no. 3: 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, B., Y.H. Ooi, and L.H. Pedersen. 2014. “A Century of Evidence on Trend-Following Investing.” Working paper, AQR Capital Management.
   Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman. 1993. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, vol. 48, no. 1 (March): 65–91 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C.M.. 2002. “A Century of Stock Market Liquidity and Trading Costs.” Working paper, Columbia Business School (May).
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C.. 2014. “The Crisis in Retirement Planning.” Harvard Business Review, vol. 92, no. 7–8 (July–August): 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milevsky, M.A., and H. Huang. 2011. “Spending Retirement on Planet Vulcan: The Impact of Longevity Risk Aversion on Optimal Withdrawal Rates.” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 67, no. 2 (March/April): 45–58 https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v67.n2.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milevsky, M.A., and S.E. Posner. 2014. “Can Collars Reduce Retirement Sequencing Risk? Analysis of Portfolio Longevity Extension Overlays (LEO).” Journal of Retirement, vol. 1, no. 4 (Spring): 46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.B.. 2009. “A Mean–Variance Approach to Withdrawal Rate Management: Theory and Simulation.” Paper presented at the Academy of Finance, Chicago (19 March): http://ssrn.com/abstract=1371695.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.B.. 2011. “Retirement Withdrawals: Preventive Reductions and Risk Management.” Financial Services Review, vol. 20, no. 1 (Spring): 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, T.J., Y.H. Ooi, and L.H. Pedersen. 2012. “Time Series Momentum.” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 104, no. 2 (May): 228–250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okusanya, A.. 2015. “Pound Cost Ravaging.” Paper, Aviva for Advisers.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, W.D.. 2014. “New Research on How to Choose Portfolio Return Assumptions.” Advisor Perspectives Vol. 8 (July): 1-7 (www.advisorperspectives.com/articles/2014/07/01/new-research-on-how-to-choose-portfolio-return-assumptions).
   Google Scholar
• Pye, G.B.. 2000. “Sustainable Investment Withdrawals.” Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 26, no. 4 (Summer): 73–83 https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2000.319765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C.D.. 2007. “A Phased-Income Approach to Retirement Withdrawals: A New Paradigm for a More Affluent Retirement.” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 20, no. 3 (March): 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sexauer, S., M.W. Peskin, and D. Cassidy. 2012. “Making Retirement Income Last a Lifetime.” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 68, no. 1 (January/February): 74–84 https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v68.n1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiller, R.J.. 2001. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, R.G.. 2008. “Stochastic Optimization of Retirement Portfolio Asset Allocations and Withdrawals.” Financial Services Review, vol. 17, no. 1 (Spring): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, R.G., and J.B. Mitchell. 2006. “Dynamic Retirement Withdrawal Planning.” Financial Services Review, vol. 15: 117–131.
   Google Scholar
• Strub, I.S.. 2013. “Tail Hedging Strategies: The Cambridge Strategy.” Mimeo, Asset Management Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, E.D., A. Suarez, and D.T. Walz. 2015. “The Perfect Withdrawal Amount: A Methodology for Creating Retirement Account Distribution Strategies.” Financial Services Review Vol. 24 No. 4 (Winter).
   Google Scholar
• Waring, M.B., and L.B. Siegel. 2015. “The Only Spending Rule Article You Will Ever Need.” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 71, no. 1 (January/February): 91–107 https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v71.n1.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D., and M.S. Finke. 2011. “Determining Optimal Withdrawal Rates: An Economic Approach.” Retirement Management Journal, vol. 1, no. 2: 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Zolt, D.M.. 2013. “Achieving a Higher Safe Withdrawal Rate with Target Percentage Adjustment.” Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 26: 51–59.
   Google Scholar