References
- Bruff, D. (2009). Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating active learning environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6, 9-20.
- Castillo-Manzano, J. I., Castro-Nuno, M., Lopez-Valpuesta, L., Sanz-Diaz, M. T., & Yniguez, R. (2016). Measuring the effect of ARS on academic performance: A global meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 96, 109-121.
- Chien, Y-T., Chang, Y-H., & Chang, C-Y. (2016). Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review, 17, 1-18.
- Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2013). Impact of cold-calling on student voluntary participation. Journal of ManagementEducation, 37, 305-341.
- Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862-864.
- Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P (2014). Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE— Life Science Education, 13, 478-492.
- Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
- Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., … Wenderoth, M. P (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6, 132-139.
- Goacher, R. E., Moore, D., Sanchez, L., Schupp, P R., & Tong, Y (2015). Using clickers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In D. S. Goldstein & P D. Wallis (Eds.), Clickers in the classroom: Using classroom response systems to increase student learning (pp. 53-69). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
- Hodges, L. C., Anderson, E. C., Carpenter, T. S., Cui, L., Gierasch, T. M., Leupen, S., … Wagner, C. R. (2015). Using reading quizzes in science classes—the what, why, and how. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(1), 49-55.
- Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayley, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102-119.
- Jones, S. J., Crandall, J., Vogler, J. S., & Robinson, D. H. (2013). Classroom response systems facilitate student accountability, readiness, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49, 155-171.
- Koenig, K. (2010). Building acceptance for pedagogical reform through wide-scale implementation of clickers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(3), 46-50.
- Kolikant, Y. B.-D., Drane, D., & Calkins, S. (2010). “Clickers” as catalysts for transformation of teachers. College Teaching, 58, 127-135.
- Liu, C., Chen, S., Chi, C., Chien, K.-P., Liu, Y, & Chou, T.-L. (2016). The effects of clickers with different teaching strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55, 603-628.
- MacArthur, J. (2013). How will classroom response systems “cross the chasm”? Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 273-275.
- Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Meehan, K. C., & Salmun, H. (2016). Integrating technology in today’s undergraduate classrooms: A look at students’ perspectives. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(1), 39-47.
- Richardson, A. M., Dunn, P. K., McDonald, C., & Oprescu, F. (2015). CRiSP: An instrument for assessing student perceptions of classroom response systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 432-447.
- Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
- Vicens, Q., & Caspersen, M. E. (2014). Getting more scientists to revamp teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(5), 22-27.
- Wieman, C., & Gilbert, S. (2015). Taking a scientific approach to science education, Part I-research. Microbe, 10, 152-156.