Preparing Preservice K-8 Teachers for the Public School: Improving Evolution Attitudes, Misconceptions, and Legal Confusion

References

• Allmon, W D. (2011). Why don’t people think evolution is true? Implications for teaching, in and out of the classroom. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 648-665.
   Google Scholar
• Carifo, L., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42, 1150-1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobern, B. (2004). Apples and oranges: A rejoinder to Smith and Siegel. Science & Education, 13, 583-589.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, F. (2006). The language of God: A scientist presents evidence for belief. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. C. F., & Dodou, D. (2010). Five-point Likert items: t Test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(11), 1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards v. Aguillard, (19 482 U.S. 578 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 37 U.S. Law Week 4017, 89 S. Ct. 266, 21 L. Ed 228 (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A. N., Gram, W, Frazier, B. N., Tare, M., Thompson, S., & Diamond, J. (2010). A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 326-353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147-179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 95-121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddy, B. C., & Nadelson, L. S. (2013). The variables related to public acceptance of evolution in the United States. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(1), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzmiller, et al. v Dover Area School District, et al., Case No. 04cv2688 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011). The influence of education major: How diverse preservice teachers view pseudoscience topics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 579-591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manwaring, K. F., Jensen, J. L., Gill, R. A., & Bybee, S. M. (2015). Influencing highly religious undergraduate perceptions of evolution: Mormons as a case study. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 8(1), 23.
   Google Scholar
• McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F Supp. 1255, 50 U.S. Law Week 2412 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. C. (2002). Teach the controversy. Retrieved from http://www.discovery.org/a/1134
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. (1999). Finding Darwin’s God: A scientist’s search for common ground between God and evolution. New York, NY: Cliff Street Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, E. (2012). The teach-the-controversy approach. Retrieved from https://answersingenesis.org/public-school/science-standards/teach-the-controversy/
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. (2001). Teaching evolution: Do state standards matter? Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 21(1/2), 19-21.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. (2004). How well do biology teachers understand the legal issues associated with the teaching of evolution? BioScience, 54, 860-865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. (2008). Creationism in the biology classroom: What do teachers teach and how do they teach it? The American Biology Teacher, 70(2), 79-84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., & Nadelson, S. (2010). K-8 educators perceptions and preparedness for teaching evolution topics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 843-858.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., & Southerland, S. (2012). A more fine-grained measure of students’ acceptance of evolution: Development of the inventory of student evolution acceptance—I-SEA. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1637-1666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., & Southerland, S. A. (2010). Examining the interaction of acceptance and understanding: How does the relationship change with a focus on macroevolution? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 82-88.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Teachers Association. (2013). The teaching of evolution (NSTA Position Statement). Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/evolution.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Newport, F (2014). In U.S., 42% believe creationist view of human origins. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norby, R. (2003, March). It is a gender issue! Changes in attitude towards science in a technology based K-8 pre-service preparation science classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 625-632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohio Department of Education. (2003). Ohio science standards. Columbus, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Peloza v Capistrano Unified School District, 37 F 3rd 517 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change. In W Schnotz, S. Vaosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 33-50). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamom.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Future direction for theory and research on intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 429-441). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, J. R., & Roy, P. (2007). The natural selection: Identifying and correcting non-science student preconceptions through an inquirybased, critical aprroach to evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 69, 460-466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge, M. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance and teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64, 21-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge, M., & Warden, M. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 13-18.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The “warming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 107-115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V (2015). Warm change about hot topics: The role of motivation and emotion in attitude and conceptual change about controversial science topics. In L. Corno & E. Anderman (Eds.), APA handbook of educational psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A., & Pendarvis, M. P (1997). Evolution vs. conservative religious beliefs. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27(3), 167-170.
   Google Scholar
• Southerland, S. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (2005). In S. Alsop (Ed.), The shifting roles of acceptance and dispositions in understanding biological evolution Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Trevors, G., Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G., & Winne, P H. (2016). Identity and epistemic emotions during knowledge revision: A potential account for the backfire effect. Discourse Processes, 53(5/6), 339-370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagler, A., & Wagler, R. (2013). Addressing the lack of measurement invariance for the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 2278-2298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, M. (1998). Assessing student attitudes towards science in an urban elementary classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier University. (2017). Ignation pedagogy. Retrieved from http://www.xavier.edu/jesuitresource/news-events/Ignatian-Pedagogy.cfm
   Google Scholar