Two-Year Community: Modeling Tiktaalik: Using a Model-Based Inquiry Approach to Engage Community College Students in the Practices of Science During an Evolution Unit

References

• Ambitious Science Teaching. (2015). A discourse primer for science teachers. Retrieved from http://ambitiousscienceteaching.org/
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://visionandchange.org/finalreport
   Google Scholar
• Askew, J. & Gray, R. (2017). The science of Little Boy: Investigating the chemistry behind the first use of a nuclear weapon in warfare. The Science Teacher, 84(8), 45-51.
   Google Scholar
• Baze, C. L. (2017). Examining the effects of model-based inquiry on conceptual understanding and engagement in science (Master’s thesis, Northern Arizona Universty). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 10280243)
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., Zhang, D., & Neilson, D. (2011). Model based inquiry in the high school physics classroom: An exploratory study of implementation and outcomes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 258-269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Brown, D. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109-138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2; pp. 515-542). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. E., Rogan-Klyve, A. M., & Clark-Huyck, B. (2016). Investigating Axial Seamount: Using student generated models to understand plate tectonics. Science Scope, 40(1), 26-34.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, J. (1996). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula. Education, 117, 133-140.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2; pp. 579-599). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, C., Stewart, J., & Cartier, J. (2009). Model-based inquiry and school science: Creating connections. School Science and Mathematics, 109, 394-402.
   Google Scholar
• Public Broadcasting Company. (2014). Your inner fish [website]. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/your-inner-fish/home/
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, G. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 839-858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. (2009). Argument-driven inquiry: A way to promote learning during laboratory activities. The Science Teacher, 76(8), 42-47. Retrieved from http://static.nsta.org/files/tst0911_42.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632-654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuster, M., Vigna, J., Tontonoz, M., & Sinha, G. (2014). Biology for a changing world (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J., Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Anderson, B., & Zimmerman, C. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry in undergraduate chemistry labs: The impact on students’ conceptual understanding, argument skills, and attitudes toward science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 74-81. Retrieved from static.nsta.org/files/jcst1204_74.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92, 941-967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar