Exploring Power Distribution and Its Influence on the Process of Argumentation in a POGIL Biochemistry Classroom

References

• Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1997). Small group discussions in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1099-1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral, K., Bauer, C., Hanson, D., Hunnicutt, S., Schneider, J., & Yezierski, E. (2005, June). A white paper for facilitating POGIL activities in large classes. Paper presented at the POGIL national meeting, Connecticut College, New London, CT.
   Google Scholar
• American Chemical Society. (2008). Undergraduate professional education in chemistry: ACS guidelines and evaluation procedures for bachelor’s degree programs. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, N., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., Wawro, M., Towns, M., & Cole, R. (2013). Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 81-94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., Carter Power, S., Christian Morton, B., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2004). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Case, R. (2005). Moving critical thinking to the main stage. Education Canada, 45(2), 45-49.
   Google Scholar
• Cherif, A., & Wideen, M. (1992). The problems of transition from high school to university science. Catalyst, 36, 10-18.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1985a). Society, mind and development. In F. Kessel & A. W. Siegel (Eds.), Houston Symposium IV (pp. 89-114). New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1985b). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146-161). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comford, L. (2016). Team-based learning reduces attrition in a first-semester general chemistry course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(2), 42-46.
   Google Scholar
• Daubenmire, P. L., Bunce, D. M., Draus, C., Frazier, M., Gessell, A., & van Opstal, M. T. (2015). During POGIL implementation the professor still makes a difference. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(5), 72-81.
   Google Scholar
• Deek, F. P., Kimmel, H., & McHugh, J. A. (1998). Pedagogical changes in the delivery of the first-course in computer science: Problem solving, then programming. Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 313-320.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etkina, E., & Mestre, J. P. (2004). Implications of learning research for teaching science to non-science majors (SENCER Backgrounder presented at SSI 2004). Washington, DC: SENCER.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, J. J., Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (1999). A guided inquiry general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 570-574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, C. R., Gallagher, V. J., Weldon, T. L., & Felder, R. M. (2000). Dynamics of peer education in cooperative learning workgroups. Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 285-293.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, D., & Wolfskill, T. (2000). Process workshops—a new model for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 120-130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, T. C., Burks, G. A., Giron, J. J., Wong, W., Chung, G. K. W. K., & Baker, E. L. (2002). An interactive database supporting virtual fieldwork in an environmental engineering design project. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 167-176.
   Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D. (2010). Modeling theory for math and science education. In R. Lesh, C. R. Haines, P. L. Galbraith, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 13-41). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, S., Rodgers, S., Biggers, M., Binkley, D., Kolin Frantz Gundermann, D., … Sweat, M. (2009). Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science. In SIGCSE’09 Proceedings of the 40th ACMtechnical symposium on computer science education (pp. 163-167). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Jerald, C. D. (2009). Defining a 21st century education. Alexandria, VA: Center for Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Learn-About/21st-Century/Defining-a-21st-Century-Education-Full-Report-PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Munhoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1171-1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krussel, L., Edwards, B., & Springer, G. T (2004). The teacher’s discourse moves: A working (thinking) draft framework for analyzing discourse in mathematics classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 104, 307-312.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Shaw, V, & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287-315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulatunga, U., Moog, R. S., & Lewis, J. E. (2014). Use of Toulmin’s argumentation scheme for student discourse to gain insight about guided inquiry activities in college chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(5), 78-86.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, O. N., Rasmussen, C., & Allen, K. (2005). Students’ retention of knowledge and skills in differential equations. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 227-239.
   Google Scholar
• Lacoboni, M. (2008). Mirroring people: The new science of how we connect with others. New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: APA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lips, H. (1991). Women, men and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, D. (1999). Student-based assessment in a multi-disciplinary problem-based learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 237-241.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, A. B., & Darbeau, R. W. (2013). Revision of the ACS guidelines for bachelor’s degree programs. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 398-400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., Hall, M. W., & Resnick, L. B. (2002). Accountable talk: Classroom conversation that works (3 CD-ROM set). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, S. (1985). Sweetness and power. London, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, A., Stanford, C., Cole, R., & Towns, M. (2016). The nature of students’ chemical reasoning employed in scientific argumentation in physical chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 353-364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2010). Exploring the intersection of science education and 21st century skills: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2014). Undergraduate chemistry education: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004a). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004b). Ideas, evidence and argument in science (In-service Training Pack, Resource Pack and Video). London, England: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., Henderson, B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S.-Y (2016). The development of validation of learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Education, 53, 821-846.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The White House.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., Kwon, O. N., Allen, K., Marrongelle, K., & Burtch, M. (2006). Capitalizing on advances in mathematics and K-12 mathematics education in undergraduate mathematics: An inquiry-oriented approach to differential equations. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7, 85-93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., Kwon, O. N., & Marrongelle, K. (2009, April). A framework for interpreting inquiry-oriented teaching: Opportunities for student and teacher learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., Hall, M. W., & Fellows of the Institute for Learning. (2001). Principles of learning: Study tools for education [CD-ROM]. Pittsburgh, PA: Institute for Learning, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1122-1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., Wiese, D., Hunter, A., & Daffinrud, S. M. (2000, March). Creating a better mousetrap: On-line student assessment of their learning gains. Paper presented at the national meeting of the American Chemical Society, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://www.salgsite.org/docs/SALGPaperPresentation-AtACS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, P B. A., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., & De Buisonje, C. D. (2002). Problem based learning in continuing medical education: A review of controlled evaluation studies. British Medical Journal, 321, 153-156.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, J. N., Moog, R. S., & Farrell, J. J. (2004). Physical chemistry: A guided inquiry: Thermodynamics. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Suppe, F. (1998). The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65, 381-405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talley, L., & Temple, S. (2015). How leaders influence followers through the use of nonverbal communication. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36, 69-80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1969). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• University of Wisconsin-Madison. (2013). Education innovation. Retrieved from http://edinnovation.wisc.edu/content/uploads/2013/02/5_step3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1989). Structures of discourse and structures of power. Communication Yearbook, 12, 18-59.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P S. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizons Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitacre, I. M., & Nickerson, S. D. (2009). Measuring inquiry-oriented teaching in the context of TA professional development. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/crume2009/proceedings.html
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 31, 8-19.
   Google Scholar
• Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P, & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109-120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions, and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar