References
- ABET. (2016). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2016-2017. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/
- Allchin, W. H. (1903). The Harveian Oration on the study of structure in relation to function. The British Medical Journal, 2(2234), 1029-1034.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education. A call to action. Washington, DC: American Association of the Advancement for Science.
- American Association of Physics Teachers. (2015). American Association of Physics Teachers 2015 annual report. College Park, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.aapt.org/Publications/uploadZ2015_Annual_Report.pdf
- American Chemical Society. (2015a). Undergraduate professional education in chemistry: ACS guidelines and evaluation procedures for bachelor’s degree programs. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/about/governance/committees/training/2015-acs-guidelines-for-bachelors-degree-programs.pdf
- American Chemical Society. (2015b). Biochemistry supplement. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/about/governance/committees/training/acsapproved/degreeprogram/biochemistry-supplement.pdf
- American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (2006). Beyond crossroads: Implementing mathematics standards in the first two years of college (Executive summary). Memphis, TN: Author. Retrieved from http://beyondcrossroads.matyc.org/doc/ES.html
- American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. (2017). Accreditation program for bachelor’s degrees in biochemistry & molecular biology. Accreditation application guide. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.asbmb.org/uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Application/App%20Guide_032817.pdf
- American Society for Microbiology. (2012). Recommended curriculum guidelines for undergraduate microbiology education. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.asm.org/images/Education/FINAL_Curriculum_Guidelines_w_title_page.pdf
- American Society of Plant Biologists. (2017a). ASPB-BSA core concepts and learning objectives in plant biology for undergraduates. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://aspb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ASPB-BSA-CoreConcepts.pdf
- American Society of Plant Biologists. (2017b). Higher education: Scholarly teaching, active learning, communicating science. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from https://aspb.org/education-outreach/higher-education
- American Statistical Association. (2016). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) college report 2016. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise
- Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P, & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 375-386.
- Association of American Medical Colleges. (2009). Scientific foundations for future physicians: Report of the AAMC-HHMI Committee. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/Programs/aamc-hhmi-2009-report.pdf
- Barwell, R. (2005). Ambiguity in the mathematics classroom. Language and Education, 19, 117-125.
- Bell, E. (2001). The future of education in the molecular life sciences. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2, 221-225.
- Botanical Society of America. (2012). July 2012 BSA business report. St. Louis, MO: Author. Retrieved from http://www.botany.org/bsa/membership/council2012/a_summary.pdf
- Cheetham, M. E., & Caplan, A. J. (1998). Structure, function and evolution of DnaJ: Conservation and adaptation of chaperone function. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 3(1), 28-36.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2017). Standards for mathematical practice: Look for and make use of structure. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/MP7/
- Cooper, M. M., Underwood, S. M., & Hilley, C. Z. (2012). Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): Do students connect structures with properties? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 195-200.
- Cooper, M. M., Underwood, S. M., Hilley, C. Z., & Klymkowsky, M. W. (2012). Development and assessment of a molecular structure and properties learning progression. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1351-1357.
- Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London, England: John Murray.
- Davidson, A. L., Dassa, E., Orelle, C, & Chen, J. (2008). Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 72, 317-364.
- Dill, K. A., & MacCallum, J. L. (2012). The protein-folding problem, 50 years on. Science, 338, 1042-1046.
- Doherty, J., Ebert-May, D., & Pohlad, B. R. (2017). Ecology learning framework. CourseSource and Ecological Society of America. Retrieved from http://www.coursesource.org/courses/ecology
- Doschak, M. R., & Zernicke, R. F. (2005). Structure, function, and adaptation of bone-tendon and bone-ligament complexes. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions, 5, 35-40.
- Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103-121.
- Ellis, J., Dodds, P., & Pryor, T. (2000). Structure, function and evolution of plant disease resistance genes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 3, 278-284.
- Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Tolpadi, A., & Stangl, D. (2016, February 1). Gender balance in ASA activities update. AMSTATNEWS. Retrieved from http://magazine.amstat.org/blog/2016/02/01/genderupdate16/
- Heron, P., & McNeil, L. (2016). Phys21: Preparing physics students for 21st-century careers. College Park, MD: American Physical Society.
- Hilborn, R. C., Howes, R. H., & Krane, K. S. (Eds.). (2003). Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physics: Project report (SPIN-UP). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.
- Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247-298.
- International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. (2011). Standards for doctoral degrees in the molecular biosciences. Retrieved from http://iubmb.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2790/2016/08/Standards_for_the_Doctoral_Degrees.pdf
- International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. (2017). IUBMB educational activities. Retrieved from http://iubmb.org/activities/educational-activities/
- Jarmul, D., & Olson, S. (1996). Beyond Bio 101: The transformation of undergraduate biology education. Chevy Chase, MD: Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
- Kageyama, T. (2002). Pepsinogens, progastricsins, and prochymosins: Structure, function, evolution, and development. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 59, 288-306.
- Kaplan, J. J., Fisher, D. G., & Rogness, N. T. (2009). Lexical ambiguity in statistics: What do students know about the words association, average, confidence, random, and spread? Journal of Statistics Education, 17(3), 1-19.
- Ketten, D. R., Odell, D. K., & Domning, D. P (1992). Structure, function, and adaptation of the manatee ear. In J. A. Thomas, R. A. Kastelein, and A. Y. Supin (Eds.), Marine Mammal Sensory Systems (pp. 77-95). Boston, MA: Springer.
- Klemow, K. M. (1991). Basic ecological literacy: A first cut. Ecological Society of America Education Section Newsletter, 2(1), 4-5. Retrieved from http://klemow.wilkes.edu/basic-lit.html
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Li, Y.-C., Korol, A. B., Fahima, T., & Nevo, E. (2004). Microsatellites within genes: Structure, function, and evolution. Molecular biology and evolution, 21, 991-1007.
- Lira, M. E., & Gardner, S. M. (2017). Structure-function relations in physiology education: Where’s the mechanism? Advances in Physiology Education, 41, 270-278.
- Mathematics Association of America. (2015). A common vision for the undergraduate mathematics program in 2025. Retrieved from http://maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/common-vision/cv_white_paper.pdf
- Meijer, M. R., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2009). Structure-property relations between macro and micro representations: Relevant mesolevels in authentic tasks. In J. K. Gilbert & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 195-213). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
- Meredith, P., Powell, B. J., Riesz, J., Nighswander-Rempel, S., Pederson, M. R., & Moore, E. (2006). Towards structure-property-function relationships for eumelanin. Soft Matter, 2, 37-44.
- Merkel, S., Reynolds, J., Hung, J. K., Smith, H., Siegesmund, A., Smith, A. (2012). Recommended curriculum guidelines for undergraduate microbiology education. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology. Retrieved from https://www.asm.org/images/Education/FINAL_Curriculum_Guidelines_w_title_page.pdf
- Michael, J. (2007). Conceptual assessment in the biological sciences: A National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop. Advances in Physiology Education, 31, 389-391.
- Michael, J., Cliff, W., McFarland, J., Modell, H., & Wright, A. (2017). The core concepts of physiology: A new paradigm for teaching physiology. New York, NY: Springer.
- Michael, J., & McFarland, J. (2011). The core principles (“big ideas”) of physiology: Results of faculty surveys. Advances in Physiology Education, 35, 336-341.
- National Research Council. (2003). Bio2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2013). The mathematical sciences in 2025. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
- O’Connor, T. (1994). Emergent properties. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31, 91-104.
- Ophuls, W. (1907). The relation of anatomic structure to function. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 4, 138-139.
- Polacek, N., & Mankin, A. S. (2005). The ribosomal peptidyl transferase center: Structure, function, evolution, inhibition. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 40, 285-311.
- Saxe, K., & Braddy, L. (2015). A common vision for undergraduate mathematical science programs in 2025. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. Retrieved from http://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/CommonVisionFinal.pdf
- Sheehan, D., Meade, G., & Foley, V M. (2001). Structure, function, and evolution of glutathione transferases: Implications for classification of non-mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily. Biochemical Journal, 360(1), 1-16.
- Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. (2012). Modeling across the curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.siam.org/reports/modeling_12.pdf
- Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. (2014, May). SIAM education committee report on undergraduate degree programs in applied mathematics. Philadelphia, PA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.siam.org/reports/undergraduate_14.pdf
- Tansey, J. T., Baird, T., Jr., Cox, M. N., Fox, K. M., Knight, J., Sears, D., & Bell, E. (2013). Foundational concepts and underlying theories for majors in “biochemistry and molecular biology” [Special section]. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 41, 289-296.
- Voet, J. G., Bell, E., Boyer, R., Boyle, J., O’Leary, M., & Zimmerman, J. K. (2003). Recommended curriculum for a program in biochemistry and molecular biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31, 161-162.