Using POGILs and Blended Learning to Challenge Preconceptions of Student Ability in Introductory Chemistry

References

• Baepler, P, Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, C. P, Minderhout, V, & Loertscher, J. (2012). Learning transferable skills in large lecture halls: Implementing a POGIL approach in biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40, 1-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, E. J. (2013). Augmenting guided-inquiry learning with a blended classroom approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6), 27-33.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A metaanalysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 87-122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. J. (2010). Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning in an introductory anatomy and physiology course with a diverse student population. Advances in Physiology Education, 34, 150-155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, A., Pakhira, D., & Stains, M. (2013). Implementing process-oriented, guided-inquiry learning for the first time: Adaptations and short-term impacts on students’ attitude and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 409-416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2013). STEM attrition: College students ‘paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340, 305-308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakayode, S. O., Yakubu, M., Adeyeye, O. M., Pollard, D. A., & Mohammed, A. K. (2014). Promoting undergraduate STEM education at a historically black college and university through research experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 662-665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 8410-8415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
   Google Scholar
• Gellene, G. I., & Bentley, A. B. (2005). A six-year study of the effects of a remedial course in the chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 125-130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332, 1213-1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20-34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks, T. L. (2015). Assessing the quantified impact of a hybrid POGIL methodology on student averages in a forensic science survey course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (2008). Design and analysis of experiments. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moog, R. S., & Farrell, J. J. (2014). Chemistry: A guided inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (2008). POGIL: An overview. In R. S. Moog & J. N. Spencer (Eds.), Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) ( ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 994; pp. 1-13). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Gosling, S. D., & Ferrell, J. D. (2013). Daily online testing in large classes: Boosting college performance while reducing achievement gaps. PloS One, 8, e79774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2, 21-33.
   Google Scholar
• Royce, B. R. (2012). Evaluation of student thinking on the ABCC. Unpublished master’s thesis, Fresno Pacific University, Fresno, California. Retrieved from http://modeling.asu.edu/thesis/RoyceBrenda-ABCCthesis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162, 933-936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (2002). Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional model combining web-based and classroom components. Computers & Education, 39, 261-269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W., & Kennedy, G. J. (2011). Teaching learning strategies to increase success of first-term college students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79, 478504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from: https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 1081-1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., deGravelles, K., Sylvain, M. R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., … Warner, I. M. (2012). Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 148-156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar