Integrating Engineering Design in Undergraduate Biology Using a Life Science Design Task

References

• Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bethke Wendell, K., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering designbased science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 513–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, W. J., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilizing multiple-choice tests. Science Education, 90, 253269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten, M., & Sheth, M. (2017). Tensions teaching science for equity: Lessons learned from the case of Ms. Dawson. Science Education, 101, 134–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B. M. (2011). Exploring a science teacher’s uncertainty with integrating engineering design: An action research study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 645–660.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of high-leverage practices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education, 102, 342–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. (2005). Standardizing test items. Science Scope, 28(4), 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 550–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, H., & Lachenbruch, P (2008). Paired T test. In R. B. D’Agostino, L. Sullivan, & J. Massaro, J. (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of clinical trials (pp. 1–3). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M. C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teachers’ views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), Article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, M. M. (2012). Middle-school teachers’ understanding and teaching of the engineering design process: A look at subject matter and pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 345360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. (2015). Three-dimensional instruction. The Science Teacher, 82(8), 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington DC: National Academies Press. Available at www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standard
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2013). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London, England: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Roseler, K., Paul, C. A., Felton, M., & Theisen, C. H. (2018). Observable features of active science education practices. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(6), 83–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, K. L., Jr., & Hoffman, A. R. (2018). Integration, authenticity, and relevancy in college science through engineering design. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(3), 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, K. B., & Lee, H. S. (2010). Elementary students’ learning of materials science practices through instruction based on engineering design tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 580–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. A., & Stroupe, D. (2017). The three-story challenge: Implications of the next generation science standards for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 68, 251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 697–726). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar