754
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparative Debates in Post-Socialist Urban Studies

Pages 829-849 | Published online: 16 May 2013

References

  • Abu-Lughod, J. L., 1999, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's Global Cities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Andrusz, G., 2001, Further thoughts on the post-socialist city, July 31, 2001. Retrieved June 29, 2012 from http://www.anthropolis.de/andrusz_2.htm
  • Barth, F., 1999, Comparative methodologies in the analysis of anthropological data. In J. Bowen and R. Petersen, editors, Critical Comparisons in Politics and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univerisyt Press, 78-90.
  • Beauregard, R., 2003, City of Superlatives, City & Community , Vol. 2, 183-199.
  • Beaverstock, J., Smith, R., and Taylor, P., 1999, A roster of World Cities. Cities , Vol. 16, 445-458.
  • Bodnár, J., 2001, Fin de Millénaire Budapest: Metamorphoses of Urban Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Brade, I., Herfert, G., and Wiest, K., 2009, Recent trends and future prospects of sociospatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and East Europe: A lull before the storm? Cities , Vol. 26, 233-244.
  • Brenner, N., 2001, World City. Theory, globalization, and the comparative-historical method: Reflections on Janet Abu-Lughod's interpretation of contemporary urban restructuring. Urban Affairs Review , Vol. 37, 124-147.
  • Brenner, N., 2003, Stereotypes, archetypes, and prototypes: Three uses of superlatives in contemporary urban studies. City & Community , Vol. 2, 205-216.
  • Burawoy, M., 1994, The end of Sovietology and the renaissance of modernization theory. Contemporary Sociology , Vol. 21, 774-784.
  • Czepczyńki, M., 2008, Cultural Landscape of Post-socialist Cities. Representation of Powers and Needs. Adlershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Dear, M., 2005, Comparative urbanism. Urban Geography , Vol. 26, 247-251.
  • Dingsdale, A., 1999, Budapest's built environment in transition, GeoJournal , Vol. 49, 63-78.
  • Eckardt, F., 2005, Paths of Urban Transformation. Frankfurt, Germany: Verlag Peter Lang.
  • Eisenstadt, S. N., 2000, Die Vielfalt der Moderne [ The Diversity of the Modern ]. Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück Verlag.
  • Földi, Z., 2006, Neighbourhood Dynamics in Inner-Budapest: A Realist Approach. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University, Netherlands Geographical Studies, No. 350.
  • Enyedi, G. and Kovács, Z., 2006, Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres. The Case of Central Europe. Pécs, Hungary: Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  • French, R. A., and Hamilton, F. E. I., 1979, The Socialist City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy. New York, NY: John Willey and Sons.
  • Geèienë, I., 2005, Discourse on the middle class in post-communist context. Sociologija. Mintis ir Veiksmas , No. 2, 75-85.
  • Gdaniec, C., 2005, Kommunalka und Penthouse. Stadt und Stadtgesellschaft im postsowjetischen Moskau [ Commune and Penthouse. State and Urban Society in Post-Soviet Moscow ]. Berlin, Germany: Lit Verlag.
  • Glick Schiller, N. and Caglar, A., 2009, Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: Migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies , Vol. 35, 177-202.
  • Glatter, J. and Wiest, K., 2007, Zwischen universellen Mustern und individuellen Pfaden—Aspekte der vergleichenden Gentrification-Forschung am Beispiel der Dresdner Äußeren Neustadt [Patterns between universal and individual paths—aspects of comparative research on the gentrification of Dresden Neustadt]. Geographische Zeitschrift , Vol. 95, 155- 172.
  • Hamilton, F. E. I., Dimitrowska-Andrews, K., and Pichler-Milanovich, N., 2005, Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.
  • Hantrais, L., 1999, Contextualization in cross-national comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology , Vol. 2, 93-108.
  • Harris, A., 2008, From London to Mumbai and back again: Gentrification and public policy in comparative perspective. Urban Studies , Vol. 45, 2407-2428.
  • Haworth, A., Kemeny, J., and Manzi, T., 2004, Social constructionism and international comparative housing research. In K. Jabobs, J. Kemeny, and T. Manzi, editors, Social Constructionism in Housing Research. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 159-177.
  • Häussermann, H., 1996, From the socialist to the capitalist city: Experiences from Germany. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, and I. Szelenyi, editors, Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 214-231.
  • Hirt, S., 2006, Post-socialist urban forms: Notes from Sofia. Urban Geography , Vol. 27, 464-488.
  • Hirt, S. and Stanilov, K., 2007, The perils of post-socialist transformation: Residential development in Sofia. In K. Stanilov, editor, The Post-socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 215-244.
  • Hörschelmann, K. and Stenning, A., 2008, Ethnographies of postsocialist change. Progress in Human Geography , Vol. 32, 339-361.
  • Humphrey, C., 2002, Does the category "postsocialist" still make sense? In C. M. Hann, editor, Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 12-14.
  • Kaelble, H., 2003, Die interdisziplinären debatten über vergleich und transfer [The interdisciplinary debates on comparison and transfer]. In H. Kaelble and J. Schriewer, editors, Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in Sozial-, Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften [ Comparison and Transfer: Comparative Analyses in Social, Cultural, and Cultural Studies ]. Frankfurt, Germany and New York, NY: Campus, 469-493.
  • Kaelble, H., 2005, Die debatte über vergleich und transfer und was jetzt? [The debate on comparison and transfer and now what?]. H-Soz-u-Kult , February 8. Retrieved July 31, 2009 from http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berin.de/forum/id=574&type=artikel
  • Kemeny, J. and Lowe, S., 1998, Schools of comparative housing research: from convergence to divergence. Housing Studies , Vol. 13, 161-176.
  • Kovács, Z., 1998, Ghettoization or gentrification? Post-socialist scenarios for Budapest. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment , Vol. 13, 63-81.
  • Koch, F., 2010, Die Europäische stadt in transformation: Stadtplanung und stadtentwicklungspolitik im postsozialistischen Warschau [The European city in transition: Urban planning and urban development policy in post-socialist Warsaw]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Marcinczak, S., 2007, The socio-spatial structure of post-socialist Lódź, Poland. Results of the National Census 2002. Bulletin of Geography , Vol. 8, 66-82.
  • McFarlane, C., 2010, The comparative city: Knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , Vol. 34, 725-742.
  • McMichael, P., 1990, Incorporating comparison within a world-historical perspective: An alternative comparative method. American Sociological Review , Vol. 55, 385-397.
  • Mollenkopf, J. H. and Castells, M., 1991, Dual City: Restructuring New York. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Nader, L., 1993, Comparative consciousness. In R. Borofsky, editor, Assessing Cultural Anthropology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 84-96.
  • Nagy, E. and Timár, J., 2012, Urban restructuring in the grip of capital and politics: Gentrification in East Central Europe. In T. Check and A. Balogh, editors, Development of the Settlement Network in the Central European Countries: Past, Present, and Future. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag, 121-135. (forthcoming).
  • Nijman, J., 2007, Place-particularitiy and "deep analogies": A comparative essay on Miami's rise as a World City. Urban Geography , Vol. 28, 92-107.
  • Ourednícek, M., 2005, New suburban development in the post-socialist city: The case of Prague. In F. Eckardt, editor, Paths of Urban Transformation. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang, 143-156.
  • Ourednícek, M. and Temelová, J., 2009, Twenty years after socialism: The transformation of Prague's inner structure. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Sociologia , Vol. 54, 9-30.
  • Park, R. and Burgess, E., 1925, The City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Petrović, M., 2004, Cities after Socialism as a Research Issue. London, UK: London School of Economics.
  • Pickles, J. and Smith, A., 2007, Post-socialist economic geographies and the politics of knowledge production. In A. Tickell, E. Sheppard, and J. Peck, editors, Politics and Practice in Economic Geography. London, UK: Sage, 151-162.
  • REAS, 2008, Residential markets in Central European capitals. Retrieved June 29, 2012 from http://www.reas.pl/
  • Robinson, J., 2003, Postcolonialising geography: Tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography , Vol. 24, 273-289.
  • Robinson, J., 2004, In the tracks of comparative urbanism: Difference, urban modernity, and the primitive. Urban Geography , Vol. 25, 707-723.
  • Robinson, J., 2006, Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Robinson, J., 2010, Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , Vol. 35, 1-23.
  • Robinson, J., 2011, The travels of urban neoliberalism: Taking stock of the internationalization of urban theory. Urban Geography , Vol. 32, 1087-1109.
  • Sassen, S., 2001, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schmid, C., 2005, Stadt, Raum und Gesellschaft. Henri Lefebvre und die Theorie der Produktion des Raumes [City, Space, and Society. Henri Lefebvre and the Theory of the Production of Space ]. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.
  • Schlögel, K., 2004, Bürgergesellschaft, neue urbanität und die zukunft der stadt in Osteuropa [Civil society, new urbanism, and the future of the city in Eastern Europe]. Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften , Vol. 2, 394-410.
  • Slater, T., 2002, What is gentrification. Retrieved September 2004 from http://members.lycos.co.uk/gentrification
  • Smith, A. and Timár, J., 2010, Uneven transformations: Space, economy and society 20 years after the collapse of state socialism. European Urban and Regional Studies , Vol. 17, 115-120.
  • Smith, N., 1995, Remaking scale: Competition and cooperation in prenational and post-national Europe. In H. Eskelinen and F. Snickars, editors, Competitive European Peripheries. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 59-74.
  • Soja, E. W. and Scott, A. J., 1986, Los Angeles: Capital of the late twentieth century. Environment and Planning D , Vol. 4, 249-254.
  • Spohn, W., 2006, Globale, multiple und verwobene Modernen: Perspektiven der historisch-vergleichenden Soziologie [Global, multiple, and interwoven modernity: Perspectives on comparative sociology]. In T. Schwinn, editor, Die Vielfalt und Einheit der Moderne. Kultur- und strukturvergleichende Analysen [The Diversity and Unity of Modernity: Cultural and Structural Comparative Analyses]. Mainz, Germany: VS Verlag Sozialwissenschaften, 101-130.
  • Stenning, A. and Hörschelmann, K., 2008, History, geography and difference in the post-socialist world: Or, do we still need post-socialism? Antipode , Vol. 40, 313-335.
  • Sýkora, L., 1994, Local urban restructuring as a mirror of globalization processes: Prague in the 1990s. Urban Studies , Vol. 31, 1149-1166.
  • Sýkora, L., 1999, Processes of Socio-spatial Differentiation in Post-communist Prague, Housing Studies , Vol. 14, No. 5, 679-701.
  • Sýkora, L., 2005, Gentrification in post-communist cities. In R. Atkinson and G. Bridge, editors, Gentrification in a Global Context. London, New York: Routledge, 90-105.
  • Therborn, G., 2003, Entangled modernities. European Journal of Social Theory , Vol. 6, 293-305.
  • Tilly, C., 1984, Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons , New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Timár, J., 2004, More than "Anglo-American", it is "Western": Hegemony in geography from a Hungarian perspective. Geoforum , Vol. 35, 533-538.
  • Tosics, I., 2005, City development in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990: The impacts of internal and external factors. In F. E. I. Hamilton, K. Dimitrovska-Andrews, and N. Pichler-Milanovich, editors, Globalization and Transformation in Eastern and Central European Cities. Tokyo, Japan: The United Nations University Press, 44-78.
  • Verdery, K., 1996, What Was Socialism and What Comes Next. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Wacquant, L., 1995, The comparative structure and experience of urban exclusion: Race, class, and space in Chicago and Paris. In R. Lawson, K. MacFate, and W. J. Wilson, editors, Poverty, Inequality, and the Future of Social Policy: Western States in the New World Order. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 543-570.
  • Wasserstrom, J., 2007, Is global Shanghai "good to think"? Thoughts on comparative history and post-socialist cities. Journal of World History , Vol. 18, 199-234.
  • Werner, M. and Zimmermann, B., 2002, Vergleich, transfer, verflechtung. Der ansatz der histoire croisée und die herausforderung des transnationalen [Comparison, transfer, integration. The approach of the entangled history and the challenge of transnationalism]. Geschichte und Gesellschaft , Vol. 28, 607-636.
  • Wiest, K., 2006, Soziale grenzen in städten—repräsentationen von wohngebieten in den neuen ländern [Social boundaries in cities—representations of residential areas in Eastern Germany]. Europa Regional , Vol. 14, 33-40.
  • Young, C. and Kaczmarek, S., 2008, The socialist past und postsocialist urban identity in Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies , Vol. 15, 53-70.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.