Generations in Design Methodology

REFERENCES

• Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Akin, O. (1979). ‘Exploration of the Design Process'. Design Methods and Theories, 13 (3/4), 115–119.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. (1971). ‘The State of the Art in Design Methods'. DMG Newsletter, 5 (3), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L. B. (1965). ‘Systematic Method for Designers'. Republished in N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L. B. (1979). ‘Whatever Became of Design Methodology?’ Design Studies, 1 (1), 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Banathy, B. H. (1987). ‘The Design of Evolutionary Guidance Systems'. Presentation to the 1987 Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary, 1st-5th June.
   Google Scholar
• Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Banathy, B. H. (2000). Guided Evolution of Society: A Systems View. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, G. (1979). ‘The Development of Design Methods'. Design Methods and Theories, 13 (1), 41–5.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). ‘Wicked Problems in Design Thinking’. Design Issues, 8 (2), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1998). ‘Branzi's Dilemma: Design in Contemporary Culture'. Design Issues, 14 (1), 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. (1978). ‘The Origins and Nature of “Hard” Systems Thinking'. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 5 (2), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. chester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. (1983). ‘O.R. and the Systems Movement: Mappings and conflicts'. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34 (8), 661–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. (1985). ‘From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s'. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36 (9), 757–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology: A 30-Year Retrospective. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. W. (1967). ‘Wicked Problems'. Management Science, 14 (4), B141–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1972). ‘The Day the Music Died’. DMG-DRS Journal: Design Research and Methods, 6 (4), 185.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1984a). ‘Introduction’. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1984b). ‘Part Two: The Structure of Design Problems. Introduction'. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in Design Methodology. chester: Wile y.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1986). ‘Understanding Design: The Lessons of Design Methodology'. Design Methods and Theories: Journal of the DMG, 20 (2), 409–438.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2001). ‘Design/Science/Research: Developing a Discipline'. Keynote paper to the 5th Asian Design Conference (pp.16-24), Seoul, South Korea, 11 th- 13th October.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, J. (1982). ‘Design Creativity and the Understanding of Objects'. Design Studies, 3 (3), 133–7.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, H. & Deacon, J. (1999). Human Beginnings in South Africa. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
   Google Scholar
• Esherick, J. (1963). ‘Problems of the Design of a Design System'. In J. C. Jones & D. G. Thornley (eds.), Conference on Design Methods. London: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Fowles, R. A. (1977). ‘What Happened to Design Methods in Architectural Education? Part One - A Survey of the Literature'. Design Methods and Theories, 11 (1), 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, T. (1984). Method in Architecture. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., Musgrove, J. & O'Sullivan, P. (1972). ‘Knowledge and Design’. In W. J. Mitchell (Ed.), Environmental Design: Research and Practice (Vol. 2). Los Angeles: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, J. (1964). Essays of a Humanist. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (1982). ‘The Nature of “Soft” Systems Thinking: The Work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland'. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 9, 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. & Keys, P. (1984). ‘Towards a System of Systems Methodologies'. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35 (6), 473–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantsch, E. (1975). Design for Evolution. New York: Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. C. (1963). ‘A Method of Systematic Design’. In J. C.
   Google Scholar
• Jones & D. G. Thornley (eds.), Conference on Design Methods. London: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. C. (1970). Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures. chester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, P. (1995a). ‘Preface’. In P. Keys (Ed.), Understanding the Process of Operational Research: Collected Readings. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, P. (1995b). ‘Part 3: Critique and Revision, 1975-85 - Overview’. In P. Keys (Ed.), Understanding the Process of Operational Research: Collected Readings. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, P. (1995c). ‘Conclusion: Towards the Future'. In P. Keys (Ed.), Understanding the Process of Operational Research: Collected Readings. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Khisty, C. J. (2000). ‘Can Wicked Problems be Tackled Through Abductive Inferencing?’ Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 126 (3), 104–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, W. & Rittel, H. (1970). Issues as Elements of Information Systems. Berkeley, CA: Center for planning and Development Research, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (2001). The Law of Accelerating Returns. http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable= 1 (2002 April 23rd 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo, E. (1996). Evolution: The General Theory. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. R. (1979). ‘Cognitive Strategies in Architectural Design’. Ergonomics, 22 (1), 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebl, F. (2002). ‘The Anatomy of Complex Societal Problems and its Implications for OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53 (2), 161–184.
   Google Scholar
• Luckman, J. (1967). ‘An Approach to the Management of Design'. Operational Research Quarterly, 18 (4), 345–358.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. & Taylor, S. (1992). ‘The Use of Soft Systems Methodology in Practice'. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43 (4), 321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. T. (1973). ‘Emerging Methods of Environmental Design and Planning: A Comment on the Occasion of the Publication of the Paperback Edition'. DMG-DRS Journal: Design Research and Methods, 7 (3), 246–250.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, D. (1997a). ‘Structuring and Navigating Design Information: Towards a Preliminary Theory of Generic Issue-Based Information Systems'. Design Methods: Theories, Research, Education and Practice, 31 (2), 2497–2507.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, D. (1997b). ‘Wayfinding in Issue-based Information Systems for Design: Pitfalls of Graphical Navigational Aids'. Design Methods: Theories, Research, Education and Practice, 31 (2), 2484–2496.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Gomez, A. & Pelletier, L. (1997). Architectural Representation and the Perspective Hinge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, A. & Warwick, S. (1995). ‘Review of Soft Systems Methodology’. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 95 (4), 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Presley, A., Sarkis, J. & Liles, D. H. (2000). ‘A Soft-Systems Methodology Approach for Product and Process Innovation'. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47 (3), 379–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, R. R. & Evans, D. A. (1967). ‘Rational Design: More Than Analysis?’. DMG Newsletter, 1 (8/9), 2.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. (1972). ‘State of the Art. The DMG 5th Anniversary Report'. DMG Occasional Paper No.1, pp.5-10. Republished in N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in Design Methodology (pp.317–327). Chichester: Wiley. Rittel, H. (1986). ‘Some Principles for the Design of an Educational System for Design - Part II (Conclusion)’. Design Methods and Theories: Journal of the DMG, 20 (1), 366–375.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H W. J. & Webber, M. M. (1973). ‘Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning'. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, R. & Nims, J. (1996). ‘Anthronomics: Insight into What Really Matters'. Innovation, 15 (2), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J. E. (1998). ‘Towards a Methodology for the Design of Multimedia Public Access Interfaces'. Journal of Information Science, 24 (3), 155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1973). ‘The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems'. Artificial Intelligence, 4 (3), 181–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slann, P. A. (1963). ‘Foreword’. In J.C. Jones & D.G. Thornley (Eds.), Conference on Design Methods. London: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Sless, D. (2002). Philosophy as Design: A Project for our Times. 3rd International Conference of the Design Education Association, Cardiff, 14th March 2002. http://www.communication.org.au/html/paper_33.html (April 23rd 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Sturt, G. (1923). The Wheelwright's Shop. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, K. J., Burns, C. M. & Pawlak, W. S. (1997). ‘Muddling Through Wicked Design Problems'. Ergonomics in Design, 5 (1), 25–30.
   Google Scholar