Orchestrating Concepts: Kitchen Dynamics and Regime Change in Good Housekeeping and Ideal Home, 1922–2002

REFERENCES

• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-scription of Technical Objects.” In W. Bijker and J. Law (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beecher, C. E. and H. B. Stowe. 1969 [1869]. The American Woman's Home, on Principles of Domestic Science being a Guide to the Formation and Maintenance of Economic, Healthful, Beautiful and Christian Homes. Ann Arbor, MI: University microfilms.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. 2004. “Beauty on a Budget.” Kitchen and Bathroom Designer April 2004: 19.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of Judgement and Taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, T. and J. Hockey (eds). 1999. Ideal Homes? Social Change and Domestic Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cieraad, I. 2002. “Out of my Kitchen! Architecture, Gender and Domestic Efficiency.” The Journal of Architecture 7: 263–79.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. and R. Fuerst-Dilic. 1994. Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in Changing Europe. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conran, T. 1977. The Kitchen Book. London: Mitchell Beazley.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. S. 1983. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. S. 1995. “How the Refrigerator Got its Hum.” In D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman (eds). The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. S. 1998. “The ‘Industrial Revolution’ in the Home: Household Technology and Social Change in the Twentieth Century.” In P. Hopkins (ed.) Sex/Machine: Readings in Culture, Gender and Technology. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Wit, O., J. V. den Ende, J. Schot and E. van Oost. 2002. “Innovation Junctions: Office Technologies in the Netherlands 1880–1980.” Technology and Culture 43(1): 50–72.
   Google Scholar
• Doorly, M. 1999. “A Woman's Place: Dolores Hayden on the Grand Domestic Revolution.” In D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman (eds). The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn, pp. 314–17. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B. and D. English. 1979. For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts' Advice to Women. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forty, A. 1986. Objects of Desire: Design and Society since 1750. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. 2004. The Making of the Modern Kitchen: Gender, Design and Culture in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1969. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1993. Force Fields: Between Intellectual History and Cultural Critique. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, M. and K. Sorensen. 1996. Making Technology our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, E. and J. A. Miller. 1992. The Bathroom, The Kitchen and the Aesthetics of Waste: A Process of Elimination. New York: Kiosk.
   Google Scholar
• Meikle, J. 1979. Twentieth Century Limited: Industrial Design in America 1925–1939. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1997. “Consumption and its Consequences.” In H. Mackay (ed.) Consumption and Everyday Life. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nickles, S. 2002. “Preserving Women: Refrigerator Design as Social Process in the 1930's.” Technology and Culture 43: 693–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2003. English House Condition Survey 2001: Building the Picture. London: ODPM.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. 1999. Domestic Goods: The Material, the Moral, and the Economic in the Postwar Years. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pantzar, M. and R. Sundell-Nieminen. 2003. “Towards an Ecology of Goods: Symbiosis and Competition between Household Goods.” In I. Koskinen (ed.) Empathic Design: User Experience in Product Design. Helsinki: IT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. and R. Kemp. 1998. “Technological Change.” In S. Rayner and E. Malone (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change: Resources and Technology, Vol. 2. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. 2001. “New Technology in Everyday Life—Social Processes and Environmental Impact.” Ecological Economics 38(3): 403–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. and D. Southerton. 2000. “Defrosting the Freezer: From Novelty to Convenience—A Narrative of Normalization.” In Journal of Material Culture 5(3): 301–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E. B. 2000. “The Cook, the Cooker and the Gendering of the Kitchen.” The Sociological Review 2000: 612–28.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R., E. Hirsch and D. Morley. 1992. “Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Economy of the Household.” In R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch (eds) Consuming Technologies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, P. 1995. As Long as it's Pink: The Sexual Politics of Taste. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Worden, S. 1989. “Powerful Women: Electricity in the Home 1919–1940.” In J. Attfield and P. Kirkham (eds) The View from the Interior, pp. 128–47. London: The Women's Press.
   Google Scholar